# data[].attributes.headline
Rhesus monkey clings to surrogate Harry Harlow performed a series of experiments in the 1960s designed to explore the powerful effects that love and attachment have on normal development. In these experiments, Harlow isolated young rhesus monkeys, depriving them of their mothers and keeping them from interacting with other monkeys. The experiments were often shockingly cruel, and the results were just as devastating. ﻿

# data[].attributes.subject
Rhesus monkey clings to surrogate Harry Harlow performed a series of experiments in the 1960s designed to explore the powerful effects that love and attachment have on normal development. In these experiments, Harlow isolated young rhesus monkeys, depriving them of their mothers and keeping them from interacting with other monkeys. The experiments were often shockingly cruel, and the results were just as devastating. ﻿

# data[].attributes.headline
Behaviorist John Watson and his assistant Rosalie Rayner conditioned a boy to fear a white rat, and this fear even generalized to other white objects including stuffed toys and Watson's own beard.

# data[].attributes.subject
Behaviorist John Watson and his assistant Rosalie Rayner conditioned a boy to fear a white rat, and this fear even generalized to other white objects including stuffed toys and Watson's own beard.

# data[].attributes.headline
During the late 1960s, psychologists Martin Seligman and Steven F. Maier were conducting experiments that involved conditioning dogs to expect an electrical shock after hearing a tone. Seligman and Maier observed some unexpected results.7﻿When initially placed in a shuttle box in which one side was electrified, the dogs would quickly jump over a low barrier to escape the shocks. Next, the dogs were strapped into a harness where the shocks were unavoidable.After being conditioned to expect a shock that they could not escape, the dogs were once again placed in the shuttlebox. Instead of jumping over the low barrier to escape, the dogs made no efforts to escape the box. Instead, they simply lay down, whined and whimpered. Since they had previously learned that no escape was possible, they made no effort to change their circumstances.

# data[].attributes.subject
During the late 1960s, psychologists Martin Seligman and Steven F. Maier were conducting experiments that involved conditioning dogs to expect an electrical shock after hearing a tone. Seligman and Maier observed some unexpected results.7﻿When initially placed in a shuttle box in which one side was electrified, the dogs would quickly jump over a low barrier to escape the shocks. Next, the dogs were strapped into a harness where the shocks were unavoidable.After being conditioned to expect a shock that they could not escape, the dogs were once again placed in the shuttlebox. Instead of jumping over the low barrier to escape, the dogs made no efforts to escape the box. Instead, they simply lay down, whined and whimpered. Since they had previously learned that no escape was possible, they made no effort to change their circumstances.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What is learned helplessness? Martin Seligman 1965 Experiment

# data[].attributes.body
i think this is very unethical because even though they got a little bit of research it was more cruel and abusive towards the monkeys so it wasn't really worth it and the monkeys suffered from emotional harm i also thought the pit of despair was very unethical because he locked the monkeys up in a cage when they have never had any other animal contact so this would have really stressed the monkeys out

# data[].attributes.body
- No empathy for the dog
- Has long lasting effects
- Made no effort to change there situation.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Children can't give consent.
2) The experiment could cause a permanent fear of the colour white (The experimenters may not have known how or been able to reverse the effects).
3) They were traumatising a small child.
4) Mishandling of animals.
5) Child was most likely seperated from their family.

# data[].attributes.body
I find this experiment to be unethical based on the abuse that the monkeys suffered. They had no choice to opt out, etc, they were forced into an experiment that had no benefit to them. The experiment only had negative based outcomes for the monkeys and resulted in intense trauma and stress related behaviours. The cruel nature of this experiment created my perspective of it being unethical.
- stevie

# data[].attributes.body
The experiment was unethical as the monkeys were being abused and it was very cruel towards the monkeys. He did this to see if they could live without their mother and he replaced them with a soft cloth figure and a tin one,The monkeys suffered from negative outcomes from this experiment  while they were locked in cages.
-Annaleise & Mia

# data[].attributes.body
This is unethical because the conductors of the experimenter weren't thinking of the dogs well being. Instead they shocked the poor dog multiple times without his consent for there own personal gain.

chelsea

# data[].attributes.body
i think because they are monkeys and cant talk people think it might be alright to test their thoughts they have on them were if it was a human people would consider it wrong. the monkeys would have gotten a lot of emotional harm and they could potentially not know how to populate in the future

# data[].attributes.headline
Respect for the dignity of persons and peoples

# data[].attributes.subject
Respect for the dignity of persons and peoples