# data[].attributes.body
I think on the indicators mentioned we mostly view this experience very favorably.

# data[].attributes.body
Is it possible to give more incentive to giving detailed survey responses in order to quickly refine and improve meetings.

# data[].attributes.body
I think a overall roadmap for some of the larger items. Such as an endorsement roadmap for the year, big mile markers that you can tell us are on the way. A time clock for sections of the meeting if we are worried about going over in areas.

# data[].attributes.body
We noticed that the relevance of the information and resources provided had the largest section of excellent responses. However, the usefulness of the information provided had the lowest amount of excellent responses. We talked about how the information is related to teaching but might not feel useful in the moment. It might circle around things that are relevant, but in the moment feel overwhelming or like knowledge we already have.

# data[].attributes.body
The fact that there is nearly universal good or better in every category is pretty amazing and worthy of celebration.

# data[].attributes.body
Put things in writing so that breakout sessions are more defined with instructions so that breakout sections are more clear.

# data[].attributes.body
We feel like there were more than 24 people there. So there are some people that are not responding. The videos were not easy to follow and the audio was a little rough, for those who were not able to attend. Were all of the votes by people that were there? What was the reasons that they did not respond.

# data[].attributes.body
Continue to take feedback and refine the meeting design to benefit everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
I now know pacing and expectations and opportunities for the next few years a lot better and loved that about the meeting. We love that you guys give grace as we are figuring things out. We also are so impressed that you have this up and running so well for this being the first time through this cohort.

# data[].attributes.body
We noticed there was one section that was some marked as "poor" in the design portion of the data. We wondered if that was because it was in person and that might have made it difficult for some to be there.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that the canvas page and the overall structure has improved! We think that we have been heard. We feel like there has been improved communication and clear expectations.

# data[].attributes.body
That 42% of the usefulness of the information they believed it to be very good. A solid core of the participants. The relevance of the information and the resources were rated excellent by the majority. Overall, the ratings are positive.

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of teachers still see this program as relevant. There is strength in the group. The teachers are willing to do hard things. There is good group culture.

# data[].attributes.body
This data seems to mean a lot to leaders of this Group, but not sure if this data means as much to me as a participant.

We understand the desire for us to be engaged and involved, and I think looking at the data sends it home that every voice counts. We appreciate that our feedback is taken seriously

# data[].attributes.body
It would be very interesting to see specific questions response compared to the individual's average score (for example my overall impression for SEI is usually "Excellent" so if I ranked it as just "good" that is meaningful).

# data[].attributes.body
We noticed that more people felt the information was relevant but not as many felt it was as useful. For example, the fishbowl activity was relevant, but maybe not as useful to some.

# data[].attributes.body
Overall, the majority of participants feel that this is a positive experience. There seems to be very few that voted fair. Everything else is good, very good or excellent.

# data[].attributes.body
We noticed that 4 of the 5 options leaned towards the positive. This could be perceived as a bias.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that is a positive number. As classroom teachers we dont have time for anything that is not going to support us. This really shows that what we are learning here are things that are making us better educators. This group is pushing us but not without support.

# data[].attributes.body
e.g., quality of meeting, usefulness, and design had 20% or more of participants marking "good" or lower on their feedback ratings signal opportunities for improvement and refinement.

# data[].attributes.body
e.g., The design and resources question had 50%+ of respondents indicating that those were "excellent"

# data[].attributes.body
e.g., 54% percent of respondents stated the relevance of information and resources were "excellent" with 100% marking "good" or better. This signals positive perceptions of that the resources were useful to support teaching practices and/or leadership skills.