# data[].attributes.body
If you want better salaries for low-level employees, we'll have to significantly increase prices, which will hurt consumers.

# data[].attributes.body
The government should not prohibit drugs. Otherwise, the government would also have to ban alcohol and cigarettes. And then sugar and junk food would have to be regulated, too. Next thing you know, the government is forcing us to exercise every day! In the end, the government would control every aspect of oru lives!

# data[].attributes.body
After I dropped off donatiaons for the food bank, I picked up a lottery ticket at the corner store, and it was a winner. That must've been my reward for doing a good deed.

# data[].attributes.body
My father smoked four packs of cigarettes a day from age 14 and lived until the age of 95. So smoking really can't be that bad for you.

# data[].attributes.body
#5 (덕인, 알리, 소율, 다인)

Hasty generalization

We cannot generalize something just by knowing or having one case.

# data[].attributes.body
It’s saying that the prohibition of drugs (small step) will lead to control of every aspect of our lives (drastic change) , which is a slippery slope.

# data[].attributes.body
The cause, donation to food bank, the result, picking up the lottery and winning it, don't have the correlation to each other.

ㄴFALSE CAUSE

# data[].attributes.body
Hasty generalization

It is not logical because its conclusion is only based on minor and exceptional case.

# data[].attributes.body
The speaker is assuming that his good deed and winning the lottery are casually connected when they aren’t. So it’s a false cause

# data[].attributes.body
Hasty Generalization

There are over billion of people in the world that smokes, and only one sample that writer has can be exceptional case. We can’t generalize large number of data by just one or small sample.

# data[].attributes.body
The author is generalizing his or her own experience into smoking itself wouldn't be too unhealthy for people.

# data[].attributes.body
Logical Fallacy : Either-Or

Why : There are only two options to choose and ignores other solutions. The speaker makes the listener not to choose better salaries for low-level employees by telling a bad option/result.

# data[].attributes.body
There is no causal relationship between donation and the lottery win.

-False cause

# data[].attributes.body
The author is assuming that government's restriction on drugs would cause numerous effects which are bit exaggerated to happen just like the chain reaction.

# data[].attributes.body
Hasty Generalization / It is concluded with insufficient example.

# data[].attributes.body
Either-or / In this sentence, the person spoke like there is only one way to solve the problem about salaries for low-level employees, but there can be many ways to solve the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
Slippery Slope / Prohibiting alcohol, cigarettes, sugar, and junk food are the chain of events that results in drastic change or undesirale outcome that the government would control every aspect of our lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Slippery slope

Incorrectly assumes that prohibiting drugs by government will lead to drastic changes.

# data[].attributes.body
This sentence shows a slippery sentence.

It is saying that prohibiting drugs, which is initial action , will lead to controlling every aspects of our lives, which is drastic change.

Also there is no evidence to prove this chain reaction in sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
The author is limiting the choice by mentioning that the only method to increase salaries for employees is to increase prices which could hurt their customers.

# data[].attributes.body
False Cause / He won the lottery ticket because it was just a coincidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Slippery slope

There is little evidence but only assertion.

# data[].attributes.body
There's no correlation between donating for the food bank and winning the lottery ticket.

# data[].attributes.body
Either-Or / It suggests only two options, so the author is leading us not to choose other multiple choices that can resolve the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
Either-or

There can be another ways to give better salaries for low-level employees. However, this sentence just suggests two options. One is increasing salaries resulting in hurting consumers, and the other is giving low salaries to workers.

# data[].attributes.body
Hasty Generalization

The father lived until the age of 95, even though he smoked a lot. The reason why the father lived long maybe he had a healthy lung. We cannot exactly know the effects of smoking on health from one’s anecdote.