# data[].attributes.body
Name : Willa Marvela

NIM : 2430202010049

Subject : Intermediate English Reading

Here are some point that i want to highlight based on evaluating the text.

1. Peatlands in Indonesia Are in Trouble

Many peatlands (wetland areas with a lot of dead plants) in Indonesia are being damaged by farming and fires. These areas are important for the environment but are being changed into farms, especially for oil palm and rubber trees.

2. Why Local People Use Peatlands This Way

Local people, like in the village of Kayu Labu (Sumatra), grow oil palm and rubber because it gives them more money. These crops are easier to sell and are supported by companies and government programs. Other crops like vegetables or fruits don’t make as much money and are harder to grow or sell.

3. Restoring Peatland is Hard

The government wants to fix the damaged peatlands by rewetting them and helping people find better ways to use the land. But most people don’t want to change because they don’t know other good ways to earn money from peatlands. Previous programs to teach new skills (like raising buffalo) didn’t work well because there was not enough support.

4. The Real Problem: Poverty

Many people are poor, so they care more about surviving today than protecting the land for the future. They don’t have the money or time to try new things that might not work. Even if they know it's bad for the environment, they still have to feed their families.

5. What Can Be Done

To protect peatlands, we need to work with the local people and understand their lives and needs. Solutions must include new jobs that are good for both the environment and the people (like eco-tourism or farming that doesn’t hurt peatlands). Local people should help make the rules about how land is used, not just follow orders from the government.

# data[].attributes.body
Nama : meisya putri alifa sisma

Nim : 2430202010012

Here are the important ideas I inferred from the scientific paper:

1. Peatland Degradation is Driven by Socioeconomic Needs

Local communities in Indonesia continue to convert peatlands for agriculture (especially oil palm and rubber) because it provides them with better income, even though it harms the environment.

2. Restoration Programs Lack Long-Term Support

Government initiatives to restore peatlands often fail because of weak communication, low participation, and no follow-up support for alternative livelihoods like livestock farming.

3. There is a Conflict Between Short-Term Survival and Long-Term Conservation

Villagers act based on immediate needs (like feeding their families), which leads to actions that damage peatlands. Without proper incentives, education, and infrastructure, they are unlikely to adopt sustainable practices.

4. Effective Conservation Needs Local Involvement

The paper emphasizes that peatland restoration will only succeed if local people are involved in rule-making and benefit directly from conservation efforts.

# data[].attributes.body
Abdurrahman Setioko Arfandi

2430202010050

IEW

This article explains why saving tropical peatlands is difficult, especially in Kayu Labu village, South Sumatra. People there often clear peatlands to grow oil palm and rubber. These activities are bad for the environment, but they give better income compared to more sustainable options.

The main problems are:

People need money now, so they choose jobs that give fast income.

They don’t know enough about eco-friendly farming.

Government programs often stop too early and don’t give long-term help.

National policies don’t always match local needs.

The article suggests:

Involve local people in land-use decisions.

Give financial support for sustainable farming.

Provide more training and long-term help.

Use a community-based approach.

In short, peatland conservation will only work if it also helps improve people’s lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Mety Cheysa Lova

2431402010001

Intermediate English Reading

I can highlight some important points from this article, namely:

1. Peatland Degradation Causes.

The spread of degradation in Indonesia is influenced by natural events and human activities. Local communities turn peatlands into land for their agriculture.

2. Socio-Economic Drivers.

Farmers in Kayu Labu utilize short-term economic benefits rather than long-term ones. The benefits of palm oil cultivation and rubber are higher than alternatives, so they cause degradation.

3. The importance of the role of the local community.

Understanding from the local community is needed to restore the peatland, which is the community's hope. Land management must involve decisions from local communities so that conservation results increase.

4. Challenges faced in Restoration Efforts.

The existence of inequality among people who are interested in different needs and goals. Lack of public awareness about the impact of restoration and knowledge about the rewetting process.

5. Various choices of Livelihoods for the community.

Palm oil and rubber as the main source of income for the community. The challenge of price fluctuations and also market access in the cultivation of vegetables and fruits. Environmental degradation causes a decline in fishing and traditional craft-making activities.

6. Policy Implications.

Policies are needed to balance community welfare with peatland restoration. Alternative livelihoods are promoted through the improvement of infrastructure, communication, and others. Also include the local community in decision making.

7. Ecosystem Service.

The article emphasizes that ecosystem services are important to be recognized. This service is needed to inform management strategies and overcome market or sales failures.

In my view, after I read and analysed this article, the relationship between the livelihood of local residents and peatland conservation efforts in Indonesia is very complex. To achieve maximum results, consideration and understanding from the local community are required; efforts to maintain socio-economic and wetland restoration are the responsibility of all parties.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Muhammad Fikri Assiraj

NIM: 2430302010004

Subject: Intermediate English Reading

Here are my some main ideas that I would like to share.

1. The Effort of Indonesia's Government

As usual, Indonesia always has lack of knowledge about how to maintain their agricultural things. The government especially when it has to do something within its ability to restore the Peatland commonly not too success. The results merely often need more consideration about how to manage them in an effective way, and that's because why Peatland conservation is so challenging.

2. Livelihood As The Current Situation

Giving the knowledge to local people is also good movement, because they can understand about maintaining their plants in their own lands. They can recognize the ecosystem by approaching it together with other local community. They absolutely depend on the Peatland in whatever they do with their Peatland it supposed to be supported by Indonesia's government.

3. Peatland As The Classical Problem of Market Failure in Indonesia

The benefits of ecosystem can be useful which help many local communities and protect it's value of natural ecosystem itself. Although it is so challenging to face, the failure will be the opponent of this problem that Indonesia has. Often, the local people use the ecosystem for their own importance as the priority for short-term life. They didn't absolutely understand how to share and manage the ecosystem for long living together. Because of this problem, the market failure in public goods and ecosystem will be the main problem and will be on going as long as the local people really get into it.

In summary, I think that why this is so challenging is because the Indonesia's government and its local people didn't understand how to manage it properly. However, despite of 'it is so challenging' or not, it depends on 'how can we face it with our own knowledge.'

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Annisa Naomi Bonarai

Student Id: 2430202010053

Intermediate English Reading (c)

"Why is Tropical Peatland Conversation so Challenging?"

Main Idea:

Conserving peatlands in Indonesia is hard because local people depend on farming oil palm and rubber, which damages the peatlands but gives them better income than sustainable options.

Points:

1. Oil palm and rubber bring in more money, so farmers prefer them over eco-friendly crops.

2. Many don’t know about or trust sustainable farming alternatives.

3. Government programs to restore peatlands haven’t worked well due to poor communication and lack of support.

4. The damage to peatlands affects everyone, but locals don’t see the benefits of protecting them.

5. To succeed, conservation must help improve people’s lives, involve them in decisions, and offer real economic alternatives.

Summary:

The paper explores why conserving tropical peatlands in Indonesia is difficult. It finds that local communities rely on oil palm and rubber farming for income, even though these practices damage the environment. Sustainable alternatives are less profitable or poorly supported. The study concludes that peatland conservation must address local economic needs and involve communities in decision-making to be effective.

# data[].attributes.body
Nama: Irene Alia Setiawati

ID: 2430202010047

INTERMEDIATE ENGLISH READING (C)

The Important Ideas/Points

The article "Why is tropical peatland conservation so challenging?" discusses the real challenges of conserving peatlands in Kayu Labu village, South Sumatra. Despite various government and international programs, the local community continues unsustainable practices like converting peatlands for oil palm and rubber plantations—mainly due to economic reasons.

Main Insights:

1. Conflict of Interests

Conservation brings long-term benefits, but local people prioritize short-term income for daily survival.

2. Lack of Support for Alternatives

Programs introducing alternatives like cattle and buffalo farming weren’t successful due to poor communication, limited training, and lack of follow-up.

3. Need for Community-Based Approaches

Successful solutions must involve the community directly—setting rules, monitoring land use, and ensuring fair distribution of benefits.

4. Policies Must Fit Local Conditions

Every village is different. Conservation strategies must consider the unique social, economic, and ecological context of each area.

My Reflection/ Opinion:

In my opinion, I learned that conservation won’t work if people aren’t involved or don’t have other ways to earn a living. This article reminded me that protecting nature also means understanding and supporting the

people who live in it.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Riska Shifa Fajia

Nim : 2430202010046

Intermediate English Reading (C)

This scientific paper, titled "Why is Tropical Peatland Conservation so Challenging? Findings from a Livelihood Assessment in Sumatra, Indonesia," presents several important ideas and points regarding the complexities of tropical peatland conservation, particularly in the context of local livelihoods in the Kayu Labu village of Sumatra, Indonesia. Here's a breakdown of the key inferences:

1. The Intricate Link Between Conservation and Livelihoods:

This paper emphasizes that the successful conservation of tropical peatlands cannot be achieved in isolation from the needs and realities of local communities. Conservation efforts must consider and integrate the livelihood strategies of people living in and around these areas.

The study highlights the dependence of the Kayu Labu Village community on peatland resources for their livelihoods, including agriculture (oil palm, rubber, vegetables, rice), fisheries, and non-timber forest products.

Conservation initiatives that fail to provide viable alternative livelihoods or address the economic needs of local communities are likely to face resistance and be unsustainable.

2. Challenges Arising from Current Land Use and Economic Drivers:

The conversion of peatlands to agriculture, particularly oil palm plantations, is a major driver of peatland degradation. This method generates rapid financial returns, making it difficult to halt.

The paper details the costs and benefits associated with various livelihood options in the region. Often, economic advantages lead people to prefer environmentally damaging practices, such as planting oil palm.

Smallholder farmers here face difficulties in marketing their harvests, unstable prices, susceptibility to pests and diseases, and high initial capital requirements. These factors influence their land-use decisions.

3. Complexity of Governance and Stakeholder Engagement:

The paper underscores the importance of clear land tenure and the recognition of community rights in peatland management. A lack of clarity can lead to conflicts and hinder conservation efforts.

Effective collaboration among the government, local communities, and other relevant stakeholders is crucial for the success of peatland conservation initiatives.

It is essential to involve local communities in the planning and implementation of conservation activities. This includes understanding their knowledge, values, and perspectives.

4. The Importance of Sustainable Alternative Livelihoods:

The research suggests exploring and promoting sustainable alternative livelihood options that can provide economic benefits to local communities while reducing their reliance on peatland-degrading activities. Mentioned examples include improved management of existing farming systems, crop diversification, agroforestry, and sustainable harvesting of non-timber forest products.

The paper points out the challenges in transitioning to these alternative methods, such as the need for training, market access, and financial support.

5. The Need for Landscape-Level and Ecosystem-Based Approaches:

The paper implies that conservation efforts need to consider the broader landscape context and the interconnectedness of ecological and social systems.

The ecosystem services framework is presented as a valuable tool for understanding and valuing the multiple benefits provided by peatlands, including carbon storage, water regulation, and biodiversity conservation, in addition to supporting livelihoods.

6. Specific Findings from Kayu Labu Village:

The study provides detailed information about the socio-economic conditions, livelihood strategies, and community perceptions regarding peatlands and their conservation in Kayu Labu.

It highlights the importance of oil palm and rubber as primary sources of income for many households, while also noting the challenges and vulnerabilities associated with these crops.

The research identifies specific difficulties and opportunities in this area that need to be considered when developing successful conservation plans.

In conclusion, this paper argues that tropical peatland conservation is a complex challenge requiring a holistic approach. This approach must integrate ecological considerations with a deep understanding of local livelihoods, governance structures, and socio-economic drivers. Sustainable solutions necessitate the active participation of local communities, the provision of viable economic alternatives, and effective multi-stakeholder collaboration.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Aisyha Wulandari

SRN. : 2430302010009

Intermediate English Reading (C)

The scientific paper titled "Why is tropical peatland conservation so challenging? Findings from a livelihood assessment in Sumatra, Indonesia" presents a detailed socioeconomic and ecological investigation into the challenges of conserving tropical peatlands in the Kayu Labu village in South Sumatra. Here are the key points and important ideas inferred from the study:

1. Conflict Between Economic Needs and Environmental Sustainability

Oil palm and rubber farming are the main livelihood sources for locals. These practices are economically rational for farmers but are ecologically unsustainable, leading to peatland degradation, fires, subsidence, and carbon emissions.

The "tragedy of the commons" is a central theme: individuals act in self-interest (short-term gain) that ultimately leads to the degradation of shared resources (peatlands).

2. Market Failure and Ecosystem Services

The paper emphasizes that peatlands provide valuable ecosystem services (carbon sequestration, biodiversity, water regulation), which are public goods not valued in market transactions.

There's a market failure where external benefits are unrecognized by economic systems, thus failing to incentivize conservation.

3. Inadequate Incentives and Knowledge for Alternative Livelihoods

Government-sponsored alternative livelihoods like cattle and buffalo farming have seen low uptake due to poor communication, lack of support, and limited profitability.

Locals lack information, skills, and support to cultivate "peat-friendly" crops or engage in sustainable practices.

4. Importance of Community Engagement and Local Governance

Effective peatland conservation must involve local community participation in rule-making and enforcement.

The paper suggests applying Ostrom’s principles for managing common-pool resources, including:

Clear boundaries and rights

Local monitoring and sanctions

Conflict resolution mechanisms

Nested institutional structures

5. Policy Implications and Suggested Solutions

Restoration initiatives should link ecological restoration with local welfare.

Integrated approaches are required—improving infrastructure, market access, and supporting sustainable agriculture or ecotourism.

A shift in valuation frameworks is needed to account for non-market ecosystem benefits.

In conclusion, Peatland conservation in Indonesia is difficult not because of lack of awareness, but due to structural socioeconomic constraints. Successful conservation depends on aligning economic incentives with ecological objectives, requiring policy reform, community-driven institutions, and long-term support.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Selfi Rahmadanti

Nim: 2430202010039

Intermendiate English Reading - C

The important Point from Scientific Articles:

1. Dependence on Palm Oil and Rubber

The majority of Kayu Labu Village residents depend on oil palm and rubber cultivation for their livelihoods. These commodities were chosen because they are considered to provide stable and high incomes, and already have a good marketing system. Oil palm, for example, has a profitable selling price and is supported by village cooperatives and large companies (plasma system).

2. Lack of Knowledge about Peat Friendly Commodities

Interviews with residents showed that most of them were unaware of other agricultural commodities that could be planted sustainably on peatlands. They felt they had never received information, training, or support from the government or NGOs regarding farming techniques that did not damage peatlands. This made them reluctant to try new things for fear of failure and loss of income.

3. Conflict of Interest between Personal Interests and Public Interests

Peatland conservation often conflicts with the short-term economic needs of the community. Many residents feel they must first fulfill their daily needs, such as food, children's education, and other basic needs. In this context, they act rationally—looking for the fastest and most effective way to earn income, even if it means clearing peatlands or destroying forests. This is a clear example of the “tragedy of the commons ,” where natural resources are overused for personal gain, which ultimately harms all parties.

4. Failure of Top-Down Conservation Programs

Government programs such as peat restoration by BRG (Peatland Restoration Agency) which includes canal blocking, rewetting, and community economic empowerment activities have been less successful because they were designed from above without direct involvement of local communities. In addition to low participation, the main problems are:

Less effective socialization

No post-training support

Not relevant to the real conditions of the community
As a result, even though there are conservation initiatives, communities return to old practices because they do not see direct benefits from the programs.

5. Solution: Participatory Approach and Local Institutions

The solution proposed in this article emphasizes the importance of establishing a local, community-based institutional system. This approach draws on Elinor Ostrom’s common-pool resource theory , which emphasizes that resources such as peat will be more effectively protected if:

The community helps set the rules

There is clear supervision and sanctions

There is a conflict resolution mechanism

Community rights and obligations are formally recognized.
In other words, local communities must be part of the solution, not just objects of central policies.

Personal Opinions:

In my opinion, the main challenge of peatland conservation is not only about the environment, but also about the lives of local communities . They choose to plant oil palm or rubber because it is the only clear source of income, not because they do not care about the environment.
Conservation will only succeed if communities are actively involved and provided with viable and profitable livelihood alternatives . We cannot protect nature without first protecting the welfare of the people who live in it .

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Alda Yanti Julieta Marbun

NIM : 2430202010048

Intermediate English Reading (C)

Analyze the key ideas or points of the Article: “Why is Tropical Peatland Conservation So Challenging?”

Economic Dependence on Peatland Farming

Many rural communities in Indonesia, such as Kayu Labu Village, rely on peatlands to grow oil palm and rubber. These crops are chosen because they provide high incomes, have established infrastructure, and are easy to market.

Unsustainable Practices Lead to Peatland Degradation

Oil palm and rubber cultivation often requires the drainage of peatlands, which leads to soil subsidence, carbon emissions, and higher risks of fire and flooding. This creates long-term environmental damage that threatens local and global ecosystems.

Lack of Access to Sustainable Alternatives

Local communities are not familiar with profitable and sustainable crops or livestock that are suitable for peatlands. Government programs to introduce alternatives (such as cattle or buffalo farming) have failed due to poor communication, short duration, and lack of follow-up support.

Conflict between Public and Private Interests

What is good for the environment (public interest) often conflicts with what is good for farmers’ incomes (private interest). Without the right incentives or support, farmers will continue to choose what benefits them in the short term even if it destroys the land.

The Need for Local Participation and Policy Reform

Successful peatland restoration must involve local communities in decision-making. Policies must be tailored to the local context and supported by education, infrastructure, and long-term access to finance.

Personal Opinion :

I believe this article provides a very realistic view of the complex relationship between livelihoods and environmental protection. We cannot expect people to protect peatlands if they are struggling to meet daily needs. If the government wants peatland restoration to succeed, it must focus on real solutions: educating communities, providing financial incentives, and building trust. Conservation should not feel like a sacrifice it should be a shared benefit.

# data[].attributes.body
Nama: Antung Yuliana Vanesa

Nim : 2430302010018

Intermediate English Reading - C

Important points of the scientific work

This scientific paper discusses the conservation of tropical peatlands in Indonesia, using a case study from Kayu Labu village, South Sumatra. The main objective of this paper is to identify strategies that reconcile the economic needs of the local community with efforts to preserve peatlands, so that restoration can be sustainable and supported by the local population.

The main focuses of this paper are:

1. Peatland degradation due to land conversion into agricultural areas, particularly for oil palm and rubber plantations.

2. Conflict between local economic interests and environmental concerns.

3. Evaluation of the various livelihoods available to the people of Kayu Labu, along with their advantages and disadvantages.

4. The low level of local community awareness regarding the importance of peatland conservation, and the lack of information or training provided by the government.

5. Community-based and policy-based solutions.

Key points from this paper:

1. The Urgency of Peatland Protection and Management

Peatlands play a crucial ecological role, especially in carbon storage and global climate regulation. However, they are under serious threat from land conversion, drainage, and burning—activities that have major environmental and public health impacts.

2. The Role of Science in Peatland Rehabilitation

Scientific knowledge and a multidisciplinary approach are essential in designing and implementing peatland restoration programs. This study emphasizes the need for involvement from academics, policymakers, and local communities in the restoration process.

3. Socio-Cultural Approach to Restoration

This research highlights the importance of considering the social and cultural aspects of local communities when designing policy interventions. Successful restoration must integrate local values, land-use history, and traditional knowledge.

4. Challenges in Restoration

Key challenges in peatland restoration include lack of coordination between institutions, limited data, and conflicting interests between conservation and economic development. This study underlines that successful restoration depends heavily on the active and continuous involvement of all stakeholders.

5. Recommendations

This paper recommends the need for:

•Strengthening policies based on scientific data.

•Developing holistic and contextual restoration models.

•Involving local communities in every stage of the restoration process.

Personal Opinion:

In my opinion, this scientific paper is highly relevant and important, especially considering the critical condition of tropical peatlands in Indonesia, which continue to be under pressure from economic expansion, particularly in the plantation sector. The case of Kayu Labu village presents a real-world picture of how the conflict between the economic needs of local communities and environmental conservation efforts becomes a complex dilemma.

What interests me most is the approach that emphasizes the integration of science, policy, and local wisdom. Conservation policies often fail because they overlook the socio-cultural dimensions of the communities living directly alongside peatland ecosystems. I agree that sustainable restoration can only be achieved if the community is actively involved—not just as objects, but as the main subjects of change.

# data[].attributes.body
Nama : Bintang C Sirait

Nim : 2430202010040

Why is Tropical Peatland Conservation So Challenging? – A Summary and Reflection

The article titled “Why is Tropical Peatland Conservation So Challenging?” explores the complexities of conserving tropical peatlands in Indonesia, focusing on a case study in Kayu Labu village, South Sumatra. Despite national and international efforts to restore degraded peatlands, local communities continue to rely on unsustainable land use practices. This is largely driven by the economic necessity to support their livelihoods. The article investigates how local socioeconomic factors influence land management choices and offers strategies to encourage more sustainable practices.

The important points from the scientific articles

Peatland degradation is caused by extensive conversion of forests to agriculture, particularly for oil palm and rubber plantations. These activities require drainage systems that dry out the peat and make it highly flammable, releasing large amounts of carbon emissions.

Kayu Labu villagers prefer oil palm and rubber because they are economically rewarding, supported by cooperatives and market infrastructure, and considered reliable sources of income.

Alternative livelihoods introduced by the government, such as cattle or buffalo farming, have not been widely adopted due to:

Lack of training and technical support

Poor communication between program implementers and the community

Unclear long-term economic benefits

There is a gap between conservation policies and the daily realities of local people. While conserving peatland is important for environmental reasons, for villagers, feeding their families and securing stable income is the priority.

The article emphasizes the importance of:

Engaging communities in rule-making for land management

Providing economic incentives and infrastructure for sustainable alternatives

Using the Ecosystem Services approach and community-based governance (as proposed by Elinor Ostrom) to manage peatlands more fairly and effectively

Personal opinion

In my opinion, the article presents a balanced and realistic view of the peatland conservation issue. It shows that environmental solutions cannot be separated from social and economic realities. I strongly agree that involving local communities in conservation planning is essential. Without their active participation and support, even well-funded restoration programs will fail. Additionally, government and NGOs must improve education, offer consistent follow-up support, and create real economic alternatives that are both sustainable and profitable. Only then will conservation efforts be truly successful and accepted by the people most affected by them.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Lamiang Pio Nain Tisi

Class: Intermediate English Reading

SRN: 2430302010001

Tropical peatlands in Indonesia are among the most carbon-rich ecosystems on Earth, providing critical ecological services such as carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and flood regulation. However, these landscapes are under increasing threat due to both natural factors and intensive human activities, particularly their conversion into agricultural lands. Despite ongoing restoration initiatives supported by the government and international stakeholders, unsustainable land use practices persist—especially at the local level. This study investigates the underlying reasons behind these challenges by examining how local livelihoods shape peatland use in Kayu Labu Village, South Sumatra.

1. Methods

To understand the interactions between livelihoods and peatland conservation, data were collected through a combination of in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, direct observation, and literature review. Respondents included village residents, local government officials, and business stakeholders. The data were analyzed using qualitative and descriptive techniques.

2. Results

1. Livelihood Patterns:

Oil Palm: The most preferred income source due to its high economic value, market support, and suitability for marginal lands. However, it requires high start-up costs and drainage canal construction, which damages peat ecosystems.

Rubber: Easier to manage with a stable market, but subject to price volatility.

Vegetables and Fruits: Quick to harvest and meet daily needs but vulnerable to pests and market fluctuations.

Rice: Symbolically important for food security, yet difficult to cultivate on peat soil.

Traditional Practices: Activities such as gelam wood collection, purun weaving, and fishing are becoming increasingly difficult due to land degradation and ecosystem changes.

2. Challenges to Sustainable Practices:

Local communities are hesitant to adopt environmentally friendly practices due to limited knowledge, lack of market access, and uncertainty in income.

Restoration efforts like peat rewetting are poorly received because they do not offer direct economic benefits.

3. Discussion and Policy Implications

Conflicting Interests:

There is a fundamental tension between the short-term economic interests of local communities and the long-term ecological goals of peatland conservation.

Theoretical Framework:

Ecosystem Services (ES): While peatlands offer vital services like carbon storage and flood control, these benefits are not reflected in market values or daily livelihood incentives.

Tragedy of the Commons: Overuse and degradation of peatlands result from the absence of clear regulations and ownership structures.

Proposed Solutions:

Participatory Approach: Engage communities in decision-making to foster ownership and compliance.

Cooperative Institutions: Establish local governance structures to promote sustainable resource management.

Economic Incentives: Develop peat-friendly livelihood alternatives such as agroforestry, eco-tourism, and sustainable crafts that align economic benefits with conservation goals.

4. Conclusion

Effective peatland restoration requires a deep understanding of local socioeconomic realities. Conservation policies must strike a balance between environmental goals and the livelihood needs of communities. The active and meaningful involvement of local stakeholders is essential to achieving long-term sustainability in tropical peatland management.

# data[].attributes.body
Della Mutiananda Ritonga

[2430202010051]

The Important Points from Scientific Articles

Indonesia has a significant area of tropical peatlands that play an important role in the environment. However, in recent decades, peatlands have been degraded due to conversion to agricultural land, especially for oil palm and rubber plantations. Therefore, the article “Why is tropical peatland conservation so challenging? Findings from a livelihood assessment in Sumatra, Indonesia” discusses the challenges of peatland conservation by taking a case study in Kayu Labu Village, South Sumatra. The article emphasizes that one of the main challenges in peat conservation is the conflict between the economic needs of local communities and environmental conservation efforts. Here are some important points that I can infer from the article.

1. Economic Considerations of Communities

The people of Kayu Labu village carry out unsustainable agricultural practices (especially palm oil and rubber) because they are more economically profitable in the short term. People prefer activities that can make money quickly, even though they are detrimental to the environment. This happens because they have to fulfill their daily needs. In addition, they also think that the benefits of protecting the environment will only be experienced in the long term.

2. Lack of Information and Support for Environmentally Friendly Methods

Alternatives such as vegetable, purun, citrus, rice, galam cultivation, and even husbandry (cattle, water buffalo) have been introduced to local communities. However, these have been less successful because of a lack of information, assistance, and economic viability. The alternative programs offered by the government have not been effective because the communities did not receive sufficient training and support. As a result, they are not confident to try new methods that have not been proven to be economically successful.

3. Economic Conditions Affect Life Choices

The majority of people in Kayu Labu are small farmers or day laborers who live in limited economic conditions and income. Therefore, people have to choose the quickest way to make money. This makes it difficult for them to switch to a more environmentally friendly system if there is no economic guarantee.

4. The Importance of Cooperation in Managing Land

There is a suggestion of peat management based on cooperative institutions as developed by Elinor Ostrom to avoid the “tragedy of the commons”. Land management will be more effective if done jointly by the community. They need to be given the right to formulate their own rules so that they feel more ownership and responsibility for the preservation of peatlands.

5. Peat Conservation Needs to Consider Many Aspects

Peatland restoration is not only about the technicalities of rewetting and replanting, but also about livelihoods, education, policy, infrastructure and markets. Peatland conservation efforts will fail if they only focus on the environmental side. A comprehensive approach is needed by considering the social and economic aspects of local communities.

Personal Opinion:

I found this article very helpful in understanding how complex peatland conservation is in Indonesia. I agree that we cannot force local communities to leave palm oil or rubber if there is no alternative that can truly guarantee their livelihood. Conservation programs should be tailored to the economic and social conditions of the community. In my opinion, the government and organizations involved must be more active on the ground. It is not enough for them to provide short-term training, but they must also assist local communities until they can run more environmentally friendly businesses independently. In the end, environmental conservation and community welfare must go hand in hand. If only one is prioritized, the outcome will not be sustainable.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Cika Dini Riffia

Nim : 2430302010014

The main idea from this topic

In recent years, widespread peatland degradation has occurred in Indonesia as a result of both natural events and human activities. Although there is a strong push for restoration from national and international stakeholders, at the local level, farmers and communities are still widely managing peatlands with unsustainable practices including their conversion into agricultural land. To understand the causes of such a challenging situation, we carried out a survey to investigate the drivers of local livelihoods in the typical peatland village community of Kayu Labu in South Sumatra Province. Our findings showed that while the unsustainable practices adopted do not align with either the long-term interests of this community or the wider public interest, they do align with the best socioeconomic interests of the farmers. A preliminary examination of the livelihood options chosen illustrates the strong contrast between public and private interests. In particular, in local communities like Kayu Labu, the profit margins for oil palm and rubber are higher than those for sustainable alternatives. We conclude that, to address the problem of peatland degradation and to design successful and sustainable peatland restoration initiatives, decision-makers need to understand the local socioeconomic situation, people's livelihoods, and their expectations. A key option is to increase the roles and responsibilities of local communities in determining the rules that relate to land management. Only then are regulatory and policy interventions likely to improve peatland conservation and restoration outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Uriel Zelevaya Selco

(2430302010003)

Class C

Intermediate English Reading

This is scientific paper about why is tropical peatland conversation is challenging and also talk about the people who live in Kayu Labu village, south Sumatra Indonesia.

Analysis of keys idea

Livelihood Dependence:

Local communities have long been reliant on peatlands for various aspects of their livelihoods, including agriculture, fishing, and forest product collection. Conservation initiatives can have a direct impact on such traditional activities and income sources, leading to resistance or non-compliance.

Economic Drivers of Degradation:

Land conversion of peatlands, particularly for extensive agriculture like oil palm and rubber plantations, has been one key economic driver. These industries are sources of jobs and income, creating influential vested interests that prioritize economic gains over environmental protection.

Sophisticated Hydrology and Ecology:

Peatlands are delicate and specialized ecosystems with complicated hydrological regimes. Agricultural and other land-use drainage disrupts this fragile balance, initiating peat subsidence, fire risk, greenhouse gas emission, and biodiversity loss. Restoration of this hydrology is technically challenging and often expensive.

Governance and Land Tenure Issues:

Weak governance, unclear land tenure, and overlapping jurisdictions can compromise effective conservation efforts. This can lead to illegal actions, enforcement issues, and absence of accountability.

Competing Stakeholder Interests :

Conservation activities often involve a number of stakeholders with differing and sometimes conflicting interests, including local communities, government agencies (at multiple levels), private businesses, and international organizations. It may be difficult to balance these interests and achieve agreement on conservation goals.

Limited Awareness and Capacity:

There may be a lack of awareness among both local people and even government officials of the ecological importance of peatlands and the long-term expense of their degradation. There could also be a technical and financial lack of capacity to set up and monitor effective conservation and restoration measures.

Costly Restoration and Time-Consuming:

Restoration of degraded peatlands is generally a costly and time-consuming endeavor. It requires enormous amounts of funds and continuous effort over many years to re-establish the natural hydrological regime and vegetation.

Social and Cultural Factors:

Conservation of peatland has to consider social and cultural values of peatlands to the local communities. Neglect of this can lead to a lack of local support and weaken the success of conservation efforts.

External Pressures and International Markets:

Global demand for certain products like palm oil can put immense pressure on peatland ecosystems, and national and local conservation efforts may struggle to hold sway in the face of such powerful economic pressures.

In short, the challenge of tropical peatland conservation is one of balancing environmental protection and the socio-economic needs and ambitions of local populations in the context of complex ecological systems and often challenging governance and economic circumstances. Your term paper likely explains these at length with specific examples and insights from the Kayu Labu region of Sumatra.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Julianno

NIM: 2430302010013

Subject: Intermediate English Reading

Ideas/Points from the Article:

1. Complex Socio-Ecological Systems

Tropical peatlands are not only ecological areas but also involve complex interactions between the environment, society, and economy. Conservation efforts must balance biodiversity, carbon storage, agriculture, and local livelihoods.

2. Conflicting Stakeholder Interests

Different stakeholders (government, companies, indigenous/local communities) often have different goals. For example, commercial interests in palm oil or other industrial crops often conflict with carbon conservation and local community needs.

3. Policy and Governance Challenges

Weak law enforcement, overlapping regulations, and a short-term economic focus hinder effective peatland management. Although policies exist, their implementation is often inconsistent and lacks local participation.

4. Hydrological Complexity

Peatland conservation requires careful water level management, which is technically difficult. Draining peatlands for farming damages them, increasing the risk of fire and carbon emissions.

5. Fire and Haze Crisis

Annual peatland fires, especially in Indonesia, contribute significantly to global carbon emissions and regional haze. These fires are often caused by land-use change and poor drainage practices.

6. Need for Multi-Scale Solutions

Conservation needs action from local to global levels. Integrated approaches involving rewetting, community participation, sustainable land use, and international climate finance are essential.

Conclusion

Tropical peatland conservation faces many challenges due to the conflict between short-term economic interests and long-term environmental benefits. To make peatland restoration successful, we need approaches that involve local communities as part of the solution. Collaboration, strong policy support, education, and economic incentives are key to ensuring that environmental protection also improves community well-being.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Fitriani

NIM : 2430202010042

Analysis points / ideas of "why is tropical peatland conservation so

challenging"

1. Unsustainable Practices vs. Socioeconomic Interests: The study

highlights that local communities in Kayu Labu are engaged in

unsustainable peatland management practices, such as converting

peatlands into agricultural land for oil palm and rubber cultivation.

While these practices do not align with long-term community or

public interests, they are economically beneficial for the farmers,

illustrating a conflict between public and private interests.

2. Drivers of Livelihoods: The research identifies that the primary

livelihood options for the community are oil palm and rubber, which

are more profitable than sustainable alternatives. This economic

reliance on high-margin crops drives the continued degradation of

peatlands, as farmers prioritize immediate financial returns over

environmental sustainability.

3. Challenges in Peatland Restoration: The Peatland Restoration

Agency (BRG) aims to restore degraded peatlands and improve local

livelihoods, but faces challenges such as a lack of knowledge about

rewetting processes, insufficient alternative livelihood options, and

poor communication with local communities regarding restoration

efforts.

4. Need for Local Involvement and Knowledge: To effectively address

peatland degradation, it is crucial for decision-makers to understand

the local socioeconomic context and involve communities in land

management decisions. Increasing local roles and responsibilities in

determining land use rules is essential for successful restoration

initiative.

5. Framework for Sustainable Management: The text suggests that a

participatory approach, incorporating the principles of cooperative

management and ecosystem services valuation, is necessary for

sustainable peatland management. This includes establishing clear

boundaries, monitoring compliance, and creating conflict resolution

mechanisms to balance the interests of various stakeholders while

promoting both community well-being and environmental

conservation.

# data[].attributes.body
Name:Flourentino Nagato Essyatianus Bajau

NIM:2430302010015

Rombel:C

Intermediate English Reading

The Ideas and Key Points in Scientific Articles

why is tropical peatland conservation, especially in Indonesia, so challenging. Based on a case study in Kayu Labu village, South Sumatra, there are several important points that I can conclude from this paper.

1. Conflict Between Conservation and Economic Needs

The main problem is the conflict between environmental conservation goals and the economic needs of the local community. Many villagers depend on oil palm and rubber plantations for their livelihoods, even though these practices damage the peatland ecosystem. Although they understand the importance of conservation, they choose more profitable agricultural methods to survive.

2. Market Failure in Ecosystem Services

Local communities do not directly benefit from the ecosystem services provided by peatlands, such as carbon storage or flood prevention. These services are public goods, and because they have no direct market value to villagers, there is no strong incentive to protect them. This is a classic example of market failure.

3. Lack of Profitable and Sustainable Alternatives

The lack of effective alternative livelihoods is another major problem. Government programs introducing cattle or buffalo farming were poorly communicated and lacked follow-up support. As a result, communities returned to oil palm and rubber farming because they proved profitable.

4. The Importance of Community Engagement

The Solution is This emphasizes that involving local communities in land management decisions is key. When communities feel ownership and responsibility, they are more likely to support sustainable practices.

5. The Need for Integrated Policies

Conservation efforts must be aligned with improving community well-being. Policies must support environmental sustainability and economic development. For example, promoting “peat-friendly” farming techniques, developing agroforestry, and improving infrastructure and market access are important steps.

Conclusion

In conclusion, peatland conservation is not just an environmental issue—it is also a social and economic issue. Long-term success depends on understanding local realities, engaging communities, and providing realistic and sustainable alternatives. Conservation will only be successful if it is linked to people’s daily lives and livelihoods.

# data[].attributes.body
Name:Embun triandini pratiwi

Nim: 2430302010016

English Reading

The Ideas and Key Points in Scientific Articles

why is tropical peatland conservation, especially in Indonesia, so challenging. Based on a case study in Kayu Labu village, South Sumatra, there are several important points that I can conclude from this paper.

1. Conflict Between Conservation and Economic Needs

The main problem is the conflict between environmental conservation goals and the economic needs of the local community. Many villagers depend on oil palm and rubber plantations for their livelihoods, even though these practices damage the peatland ecosystem. Although they understand the importance of conservation, they choose more profitable agricultural methods to survive.

2. Market Failure in Ecosystem Services

Local communities do not directly benefit from the ecosystem services provided by peatlands, such as carbon storage or flood prevention. These services are public goods, and because they have no direct market value to villagers, there is no strong incentive to protect them. This is a classic example of market failure.

3. Lack of Profitable and Sustainable Alternatives

The lack of effective alternative livelihoods is another major problem. Government programs introducing cattle or buffalo farming were poorly communicated and lacked follow-up support. As a result, communities returned to oil palm and rubber farming because they proved profitable.

4. The Importance of Community Engagement

The Solution is This emphasizes that involving local communities in land management decisions is key. When communities feel ownership and responsibility, they are more likely to support sustainable practices.

5. The Need for Integrated Policies

Conservation efforts must be aligned with improving community well-being. Policies must support environmental sustainability and economic development. For example, promoting “peat-friendly” farming techniques, developing agroforestry, and improving infrastructure and market access are important steps.

Conclusion

In conclusion, peatland conservation is not just an environmental issue—it is also a social and economic issue. Long-term success depends on understanding local realities, engaging communities, and providing realistic and sustainable alternatives. Conservation will only be successful if it is linked to people’s daily lives and livelihoods.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Keyzia Putri Siagara

NIM: 2430302010005

Subject: Intermediate English Reading

Analysis of Key Ideas from

"Why Is Tropical Peatland Conservation So Challenging?"

The scientific paper titled "Why Is Tropical Peatland Conservation So Challenging?" presents a critical examination of the complex issues surrounding peatland degradation and conservation efforts in tropical regions, with a focus on South Sumatra, Indonesia. Several key points can be inferred from the authors’ findings.

Firstly, it is evident that economic pressures are a major driver of peatland degradation. Local communities, such as those in Kayu Labu village, rely heavily on peatland areas for their livelihoods—primarily through the cultivation of oil palm and rubber. These agricultural activities are not only more profitable but also better supported by local infrastructure and market access compared to sustainable alternatives. This creates a significant obstacle to conservation, as efforts to protect peatlands often conflict with the immediate economic interests of local populations.

Secondly, there is a noticeable disconnect between national and international conservation policies and the realities faced by local communities. While broader policies emphasize the ecological value of peatlands, local people prioritize income generation and food security. This results in competing interests between environmental protection and the socio-economic needs of the community, which hinders the implementation of effective conservation strategies.

Another key point inferred from the paper is the limited impact of current livelihood alternatives promoted by peatland restoration programs. Many of these alternatives fail due to a lack of technical support, relevant training, and follow-up mechanisms. Without clear incentives, capacity building, or evidence of economic viability, communities remain reluctant to adopt new, environmentally friendly practices.

Furthermore, weaknesses in governance and institutional coordination present significant challenges. Although Indonesia has made substantial policy efforts through agencies such as BRG (Peatland Restoration Agency), inconsistencies in communication, legal frameworks, and enforcement reduce the effectiveness of such initiatives. Local communities often feel excluded from decision-making processes and encounter difficulties in securing land rights and access to state programs.

The paper suggests that a more participatory and collaborative approach is essential for sustainable peatland conservation. Involving local communities in the formulation of rules, responsibilities, and benefits can foster a stronger sense of ownership and accountability. This inclusive model aligns more closely with the daily realities of peatland-dependent populations and is more likely to succeed in the long term.

Lastly, the authors highlight the need for a shift in how ecosystem services are valued. Current economic systems often fail to account for the long-term benefits of peatland ecosystems, such as carbon storage, water regulation, and biodiversity preservation. Effective conservation, therefore, requires policies that connect environmental benefits with tangible improvements in community well-being.

Conclusion

In summary, this paper reveals that tropical peatland conservation is not solely an environmental issue, but also a deeply social and economic one. Efforts to restore and protect peatlands must be integrated with local development goals, livelihood support, and inclusive governance structures. Only by addressing these interconnected factors can conservation initiatives achieve meaningful and lasting impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Fasya Syahri Ramadhan (2430202010052)

Intermediate English Reading (C)

This study examines the challenges of tropical peat conservation in Kayu Labu Village, South Sumatra, Indonesia, focussing on the relationship between local community livelihoods and peatland degradation. Here are the important points from the research results:

Conflict between Personal Interest and Public Interest

Non-sustainable practises such as the conversion of peat forests into oil palm and rubber plantations are economically beneficial for the local community.

However, this practice is harmful to the long-term environment and is contrary to public/global interests (conservation, carbon emission reduction, and so on).

Main Liveliening Choice

Palm Oil: The main choice because of its high economic value, well-known cultivation system, company support, and easy marketing.

Rubber: The second most important commodity, the price fluctuates, but the local market is available and has long been known to the public.

Vegetables & Fruits (oranges): Fast source of income but high risk, limited market, and requires high capital.

Rice: Used for food security, but not suitable for deep peatlands.

Local plants (purun, gelam) and fisheries are only complementary because they are less profitable or the population decreases.

Peat Conservation Barriers

Lack of knowledge & skills to manage peat sustainably.

Limitations of technical support and program continuity from the government (for example, the BRG farming program is not sustainable).

Economic incentives for sustainable practises do not exist or are not yet competitive compared to palm oil and rubber.

Land ownership and legality issues add to the complexity of peat governance.

Tragedy of the Commons

People act rationally individually to fulfil economic needs, but have a bad impact collectively.

Without common rules or management organisations, peat resources will continue to be degraded.

Policy and Solution Recommendations

Increasing the role of local communities in the formulation of rules and land management (based on Ostrom’s principle):

Clear demarkation of territorial boundaries

Agreed collective rules

Monitoring & sanctions for violations

Conflict resolution mechanism

Multi-level institutions (nested institutions)

Diversify livelihoods with mixed agricultural systems and local species that are more suitable for peatlands.

Community capacity improvement through training, communication, and long-term technical support.

The restoration approach is based on public welfare, not solely on environmental conservation.

Main Conclusion

Peat conservation in Indonesia is very challenging because of the community’s economic dependence on unsustainable practises. Conservation efforts must be in harmony with the improvement of public welfare so that it can be widely accepted and implemented. Solutions must be collaborative, adaptive, and locally based.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Zephaniah Russel Kristiono

NIM : 2430202010056

Subject : Intermediate English Reading

This scientific paper about how people live in Kayu Labu, Sumatra, Indonesia, tells us some important things about why it's hard to protect tropical peatlands:

1. Money vs. Saving Peatlands:

What they found: The ways people are using the land now (like growing palm oil and rubber) make them the most money right now, even though it hurts the environment and might cause problems for everyone later.

What it means: It's hard to save peatlands because what's good for the environment often goes against what people think is best for their wallets right now. Making more money from palm oil and rubber makes people want to use the land in ways that aren't good for the peatlands.

2. Not Enough Good Choices for Making a Living:

What they found: The people there don't know enough about other ways to grow things or make money from the peatlands that won't damage them. They mostly know how to farm regular soil and aren't familiar with taking care of peatlands in a sustainable way.

What it means: Just telling people not to do bad things isn't enough. To save peatlands, we need to find and help people use other ways to earn a good living that don't hurt the land. When the government tried to introduce cows and buffaloes, not many people did it, showing that we need to communicate better, give long-term help, and make sure the new ways fit what people need.

3. Everyone Thinking of Themselves:

What it means: Even though the paper doesn't say this directly, the situation is like when everyone uses a shared thing for their own benefit without thinking about the future. In the end, the shared thing (the peatland) gets ruined, which hurts everyone.

What it means: To save peatlands, we need to set clear rules, give people responsibilities, and create reasons for them to take care of the land in a sustainable way together.

4. Listening to Local People Matters:

What they found: People who make decisions need to really understand how the local people live, how they make money, and what they expect. This will help in planning good ways to bring the peatlands back to health.

What it means: If the people in charge don't think about what the local communities need, their plans to save the peatlands probably won't work. Giving local communities more power to decide how the land is managed is very important for better results.

5. What Should Happen Next:

What they suggest: We need to find other ways for people to make a living that also take into account their lives and the land itself.

What it means: Future research should focus on finding and promoting good ways for people to earn money from peatlands that also fit their culture. The government should focus on working with the communities, teaching them new things, sharing knowledge, and building good partnerships to help them use the peatlands in a way that doesn't harm them.

Basically, saving tropical peatlands in Indonesia is difficult because we need to find a way for people to earn a good living while also taking care of the environment. This means understanding the lives of the local people, giving them good choices for making money, and letting them be part of the solution.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Anita

SRN: 2430302010002

Subject: Intermediate English Reading

The scientific article “Why is tropical peatland conservation so challenging? Findings from a livelihood assessment in Sumatra, Indonesia”, discusses in depth why tropical peatland conservation is difficult, even though everyone knows that tropical peatlands are ecologically and climatically important. This research was conducted by surveying Kayu Labu Peatland Village, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Here are some important ideas/points that I can infer from the article:

1.      Peatland is considered a food solution in Indonesia

According to data, Indonesia is the 4th most populous country in the world, therefore, Indonesia needs to have national food security. To address the problem, the government finally decided to use peatlands to cover the food security, however, the properties contained in peatland soil are clearly different from other mineral soils, so not all peatlands can be used as agricultural land.

2.      The impact of converting peatland into agricultural land

Although the utilization of peatland as agricultural land is very helpful for improving the livelihoods and welfare of some rural communities, such as rice farming, oil palm, and rubber plantations. However, in remote areas with high forest cover, oil palm plantations are detrimental to the subsistence livelihoods of rural communities, as they can lead to the loss of their livelihoods or loss of community access to traditional natural resources.

In addition, the conversion of peatlands to agricultural land also brings adverse impacts on the environment, such as declining biodiversity, the threat of extinction of some species due to loss of their habitat, carbon emissions, subsidence, and increased risk of flooding and fire. Therefore, peatland conservation is essential to prevent adverse impacts on humans, animals, and the environment.

3.      Conservation challenges: Economic Dependence of the Population on Peat Unfriendly Commodities

From the survey results, the people of Kayu Labu Village are highly dependent on oil palm and rubber crops because these two commodities are considered the most economically beneficial. Besides generating a stable income, the cultivation system is well-known, and the sales market is easily accessible. Therefore, even though peatlands are very important for the environment, the community still chooses to plant these commodities because there are no other economically comparable options.

4.      Conservation challenges: Ineffective Restoration Programs and Community Rejection

Despite restoration programs such as livestock rearing and canal blocking, community participation remains low due to a lack of ongoing assistance, lack of direct economic benefits, and insufficient socialization. Communities often reject restoration programs for fear of disrupting their livelihoods.

5.      Conservation challenges: Poverty and Limited Access to Capital and Land

Many young families do not have capital or land and can only work as laborers on other people's palm oil or rubber plantations. Without access to capital and training, it is difficult for them to switch to more sustainable, environmentally friendly farming.

6.      Conservation challenges: Economic and Political Pressure for Plantation Expansion

Peatlands are often seen as an economic resource for agriculture and plantations, particularly the highly profitable oil palm. Both governments and communities tend to favor economic expansion over protecting the environment.

7.      Conservation Challenges: Science and Research Limitations

Research on tropical peat ecosystems, especially in relation to climate change and appropriate restoration techniques, is still not strong enough. This lack of knowledge hinders the development of truly effective and sustainable solutions.

8.      Solutions for peatlands in Indonesia

There are three main ways to manage peatlands, which are a shared resource. First, the government regulates with strict laws and oversight. Second, land can be privatized through paid permits to control its use. Third, local communities can form joint institutions to manage the land collectively for sustainability and socio-environmental balance.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Gabriela Evifania Hendroyono Putri
NIM: 2430202010044
Subject: Intermediate English Reading (C)

1. People Need to Survive First

The biggest issue is that people need to use the peatlands to make a living. Crops like oil palm and rubber are the only options that give them more income. Even if they know it harms the environment, they choose what’s best for their families right now.

2. Top Down Programs Don’t Work Well

The government has tried programs like canal blocking and giving cattle, but people didn’t really follow through. They didn’t fully understand the programs, and there was no follow-up. So the help didn’t feel useful or effective to them.

3. No Clear Alternative Jobs or Income

Other crops like vegetables, rice, or purun are harder to grow, bring in less money, and are harder to sell. Because of that, people prefer to keep farming oil palm and rubber it's what works best for them.

4. Everyone Uses, No One Protects

This is a classic example of the “tragedy of the commons.” Everyone uses the peatland for their own needs, but no one takes care of it. Over time, the land becomes damaged and everyone ends up losing.

5. Solutions Must Fit Real Life

Telling people to protect the peatland isn’t enough. The new ways of farming must help them earn a good income too. They need simple training, support, and options that really work in daily life. If it helps their economy, they’re more likely to support conservation.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Junadie

Rombel C

Intermediate English Reading

NIM : 2430302010007

1.Unsustainable Practices

Farmers and communities are still widely managing peatlands with unsustainable practices including their conversion into agricultural land.Our findings showed that while the unsustainable practices adopted do not align with either the long-term interests of this community

2. Livehood

Oil palm and rubber plantations has been shown to improve the livelihoods and welfare of some rural communities. The Indonesian Government in 2016, was to revitalise the livelihoods of people living in communities that are dependent on peatland. Supporters in their efforts to restore peatlands is the provision of sustainable alternative livelihood options for local people. Consider the main livelihood options that are currently available to the residents of Kayu Labu in terms of their advantages and disadvantages for local people.

3. Kayu labu

Kayu Labu is one of seven villages located in the Pedamaran Timur sub-district of the Ogan Komering Ilir Regency in South Sumatra. The aforementioned issues and conflicts are centered in this specific location, where a longstanding dispute over land ownership between the government and local communities persists.

4. Livehood Options

To create a profile of the residents of Kayu Labu, and to understand their livelihood options and how they utilise peatlands. Who are familiar with the local situation and whose livelihoods depend on the peatland. Key informants were chose purposively based on initial advice from the Village Head followed by snowball sampling using information received from village elders and previous respondents. Oil palm (OP) is the most popular agricultural commodity and the main source of livelihood for most villagers who own their own land. Rubber is the second most important livelihood option. Daily tapping of the plants is carried out by landowners or by hired labour through a production sharing system, and then Vegetables, Oranges, Rice, and others.

5.Discussion and Policy Implications

This study has shown that people living in KayuLabu are reliant on oil palm and rubber agriculture, which requires the conversion and development of natural forested peatland. The ES framework can be used to identify and quantify the full range of benefits derived by different stakeholders including local communities, indigenous peoples and other groups that depend on ecosystem services for their livelihoods.Three solutions to the problem have been suggested, namely: centralised governmental laws or regulations; privatisation (fees/permits); and cooperative institutions formed and managed by the resource users themselves. Ignoring long-term cost for the sake of short-term profit maximisation results in further peatland degradation along with more fires and GHG

emissions.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Verenita Sonya M

NIM :2431302010001

Intermediate English Reading

1. Livelihood Dependence on Peatlands

Local communities in Sumatra rely heavily on peatlands for their livelihoods—through agriculture, fishing, and small-scale plantations (like oil palm and rubber).

This dependence creates tension between conservation goals and local economic needs.

2. Limited Alternatives

There are few viable livelihood alternatives that are both environmentally sustainable and economically attractive.

This lack of options makes it difficult to shift communities away from practices that degrade peatlands, such as draining for farming or burning land for clearing

3. Low Awareness and Knowledge

Some communities have limited understanding of peatland ecosystems, their ecological value, and the long-term impact of degradation (like fires and carbon emissions).

Without adequate environmental education, behavior change is hard to achieve.

4. Policy and Governance Challenges

There are gaps in policy enforcement, land tenure issues, and coordination between different levels of government.

Unclear or conflicting land rights lead to unregulated land use and hinder conservation efforts.

5. Economic Pressures and Market Forces

The demand for commodities (especially oil palm) influences land use decisions, encouraging expansion into peatland areas.

Short-term economic gains often outweigh the perceived long-term benefits of conservation.

6. Fire Risk and Land Degradation

Drained peatlands are extremely fire-prone, and fires are often used to clear land.

This results in serious environmental consequences, such as haze pollution and massive carbon emissions.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Rionaldo.

NIM: 2430302010010.

Intermediate English Reading.

1. Conflict between short term and long term benefits.

In Kayu Labu, farmers often choose to grow oil palm and rubber because these crops provide immediate income. However, these choices lead to environmental damage, affecting the peatlands and the community's long-term well-being. It's important for people to balance their immediate needs with the need to protect the environment for future generations.

2. Importance of community involvement.

Local communities need to be more involved in deciding how to manage and use peatlands. They should have a say in rules related to land use, as this can lead to better solutions that are acceptable to everyone. When communities are empowered, they are more likely to support sustainable practices.

3. Consequences of Unsustainable Practices.

Unsustainable farming practices, like draining peatlands, can cause floods, fires, and loss of carbon storage, leading to climate change. Over time, these actions degrade the land, making it less productive and harming the community. This is known as the “tragedy of the commons,” where individual actions harm the shared resource.

4. Need for alternative livelihoods.

There is a need to find alternative ways for people to earn their living without harming the peatlands. Suggestions include sustainable agriculture, eco-tourism, or using peat-friendly plants. Supporting local people in exploring these options can help them achieve economic stability while protecting the environment.

5. Environmental education and support.

Many residents lack knowledge about sustainable practices and their benefits. Providing education and training can help change behaviors and encourage communities to restore and protect their peatlands.

6. Collaboration among atakeholders.

Restoration efforts will require collaboration between local communities, government, and NGOs. Effective communication and shared goals are essential to create successful restoration programs that address both environmental and socio-economic needs.

# data[].attributes.body
Name : Talitha Amelia

Nim : 2430302010019

Subject : Intermediate English Reading

1. People need money to live

Many villagers in Sumatra grow oil palm and rubber because they earn more money that way, even though it harms the peatland.

2. Peatlands are being damaged

Turning forests into farms causes floods, fires, and pollution. It's bad for the environment and hard to fix.

3. No good options (yet)

Other ways to make money (like vegetables, livestock, crafts) don’t bring as much profit, and people don’t have enough support or information to try them.

4. Shared land problem

Everyone uses the peatland, but no one takes care of it. This leads to damage a problem called the “tragedy of the commons.”

5. How to fix it

Support sustainable land use by empowering communities to create their own rules, providing resources like funding, training, and markets, and ensuring that land protection improves people's lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: sandi candra dinata

Nim :2430202010041

Intermediate English reading

1. Conflict of interests:

There is a conflict between public interests (peatland conservation) and private interests (economic benefits from crops like oil palm and rubber).

2. Unsustainable management practices:

Local communities tend to choose unsustainable peatland management practices due to higher profit margins from crops like oil palm and rubber.

3. Importance of understanding local socio-economic situation:

It is crucial to understand the local socio-economic situation to achieve effective peatland restoration and conservation.

4. Role of local communities:

Local communities must be involved in decision-making related to peatland management to achieve effective restoration and conservation.

5. Sustainable management alternatives:

Sustainable and profitable peatland management alternatives are needed for local communities to reduce conflicts of interest and achieve effective conservation.

conclusion:

the conservation of tropical peatlands is a complex challenge that requires a deep understanding of the local socio-economic context and the involvement of local communities in decision-making processes. To achieve effective restoration and conservation, it is essential to balance public and private interests, promote sustainable livelihoods, and provide alternative management options that benefit both local communities and the environment. By working together, we can protect these critical ecosystems and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: Cindy Anastasya Hutapea

NIM:243030201008

Intermediate English Reading

1. Conflict Between Environmental and Socioeconomic Interests

The core challenge in conserving tropical peatlands lies in the conflict between public environmental goals (e.g., restoration, climate mitigation) and private economic interests of local communities. Farmers in Kayu Labu rely on unsustainable land-use practices, like converting peatland into oil palm and rubber plantations, because these options provide higher and more reliable income compared to sustainable alternatives.

2. Unsustainable Practices Are Rational Choices

Local residents make rational decisions based on their immediate economic needs. Oil palm and rubber offer economic security and have strong market systems, making them attractive even if they degrade peatlands in the long term.

3. Ineffectiveness of Top-Down Conservation Efforts

National-level peatland restoration initiatives, such as canal blocking and livestock training programs, suffer from poor implementation, lack of follow-up, and minimal community engagement. As a result, participation and impact have been limited.

4. Need for Locally Tailored, Participatory Solutions

The paper advocates for community-led governance and institutional arrangements (based on Ostrom’s common-pool resource management principles). Local communities should help define land-use rules, monitor compliance, and enforce sanctions. Empowering them with ownership and responsibility could lead to more effective conservation outcomes.

5. Importance of Socioeconomic Context

Successful restoration efforts must address poverty, land tenure, and market access. Alternative livelihoods like vegetable farming, paludiculture (wetland crops), or ecotourism are viable only if they are supported by infrastructure, training, and long-term economic incentives.

6. Call for a New Valuation Framework

A shift is needed toward an ecosystem services framework, where the value of peatland’s environmental functions (e.g., carbon storage, water regulation) is recognized and possibly monetized. This could help align private incentives with public conservation goals.

7. Tragedy of the Commons

The paper underscores that peatlands in Indonesia exemplify the “tragedy of the commons”: individual users deplete a shared resource for personal gain, leading to collective loss. Without effective governance, overuse and degradation are likely to continue.

Conclusion:

Conserving tropical peatlands requires integrated, community-sensitive policies that align ecological sustainability with the real socioeconomic needs of rural populations. Top-down mandates alone are insufficient; participatory governance and incentive structures must be central to any long-term solution.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why is Tropical Peatland Conservation so Challenging