# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the Leandro v. State decision. No child should be left behind on education because the state didn't want to dish out the funds to do so. This ruling allows all children the right to a sound basic education. The ruling also stated no excuses or exceptions - this means that ALL children (disabled, ELL, low-income) get that right to an education.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the decision of the Court in Leandro v. State. Every child has the right to receive a sound basic education. The ruling was comprehensive and made sure no exceptions or excuses could be made and that the right applied to all children. Being from Vance County I found this case very interesting and applicable to lower wealth counties.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Leandro v State. I believe that every child has the opportunity to receive sound basic education. Reading that this ruling mentioned no excuses meaning that all children will get to have a right to education.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the decision from Leandro V. State. The big takeaway was that every student needed to have access to a sound basic education and that is so important. No matter what a families financial background is the children deserve to get the same education as everyone else. No exceptions and no excuses can be made with it comes to every student getting a sound education and I agree with that a hundred percent.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I support the Leandro v. State decision because I agree that all students no matter what background or financial status they may come from should have access to the same education in order to be prepared and successful in life.

# data[].attributes.body
I fully support the Leandro v. State decision because no child should ever be denied opportunity or access to a basic education based on what type of family they were born into or where they live. I find it interesting that the state of North Carolina is still working to give every child their Leandro Right (sound basic education) 20+ years after the decision.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the Leandro v. State decision. All children regardless of wealth should receive equal access and equal opportunity to education, the same as any other child. I think the Leandro v. State decision does a great job at highlighting the importance that education should be freely available in ALL states as there are many low income regions that would benefit greatly. I in particularly liked the ruling of "no exceptions or excuses" as this pertains to all children despite any sort of disability.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the decision on Leandro v. state. All children should have a right to education no matter their background. There should be no excuses as to why children don't receive the same education just like the ruling declares

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the decisions that the Leandro v. State case made because it allowed all children that reside in North Carolina to receive a sound basic education and obligated the state of North Carolina to deliver every child’s Leandro right. This means that all students deserve the right to education just as anyone else. It also eliminates any possibility of discrimination towards any child of any background with no exceptions.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because I believe that the amount of money or area that someone happened to be born into should have no effect on their access to basic education. Every single child deserves the same opportunities to learn. If a child is disadvantaged and requires more to learn the same things as others, then they should be provided with what they need to have sufficient abilities to be a successful adult in society.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the Leandro v. State decision. Every child should have access to sound basic education at the least. Denying Leandro V. State meant that students who were English learners, students of color, disables students, and more were responsible for succeeding in school whole other students have an upper hand. No child should be excluded from getting sound education because of the lack of funding.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the Leandro v. State decision. I believe that each child, no excuses or exceptions deserves the right to a sound base education. A sound basic education is essential to prepare students for success in a rapidly changing society, enabling them to be informed citizens and active participants in their communities.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I support the Leandro v. State decision. I agree with the court's finding that all children in North Carolina have a fundamental right to an adequate basic education - therefore it is the state's responsibility to provide all children with an education sufficient to prepare them for college, career and life in general.

I believe that funding plays a large part in determining the quality of education a student receives. Students attending schools with more resources tend to excel academically as these resources allow for the hiring of more qualified teachers, providing additional learning materials, and offering extracurricular activities.

I think the Leandro v. State decision is significant as it affirms the belief that education should not depend on where a child lives - regardless of his or her background, all children deserve access to a quality education experience.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree with the ruling that every child has a right to a sound education no matter where they are from or financial status that they live in. I believe that every child should have a fair playing field when it comes to education. This ruling made sure that all students will have the same education as those to others in different financial statues.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree bc every student should get access to an appropriate or adequate education, even if the student come from a low income family. With that sound basic education comes sufficient resources, principles, and teachers so those students can have an ample learning environment. Low income counties weren’t able to fund a sound basic education, but in the ruling the districts got their funding.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with the Leandro v. State decision. I feel that every child should have the opportunity to have access to a sound basic education. It does not matter what is their race, gender, what kind of background they come from or their financial status, no child should be denied the right that they have to learn.