# data[].attributes.headline
은제,준영,동현 ,다은

# data[].attributes.subject
은제,준영,동현 ,다은

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 임금

맥락: Roe v. Wade found that young women who got an abortion to delay an unplanned pregnancy for just one year had an 11 percent increase in hourly wages compared to the mean.
Roe v. Wade는 계획되지 않은 임신을 단지 1년 연기하기 위해 낙태를 한 젊은 여성들이 평균에 비해 시간당 임금이 11% 증가했다는 것을 발견했다.

# data[].attributes.headline
도원,예담,하원,시현,희원

# data[].attributes.subject
도원,예담,하원,시현,희원

# data[].attributes.headline
채령,혜주,단렬,가희,나은

# data[].attributes.subject
채령,혜주,단렬,가희,나은

# data[].attributes.headline
주원,소은,주영,예원,소현

# data[].attributes.subject
주원,소은,주영,예원,소현

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 떨어지다, 줄어들다
맥락: Women's labor force participation could go down
낙태 금지가 실시될 경우 여성들이 임신으로 인해 노동에 참여하기 어려워짐 -> 노동 참여수가 줄어들 것이다

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: [값 따위]를 끌어올리다

해석: Abortion access is a major force that has driven up women’s labor force participation.
-낙태허용은 여성의 노동력 참여를 끌어올린 주요의 원동력(힘)이다.-

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 직업 전망

맥락: Education rates are foundational for career prospects and pay.
교육율은 직업 전망과 급여의 기초이다

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 여성 정책 연구소
(= Institute for Women's Policy Research)

The IWPR estimates that if existing abortion restrictions went away, women across the US would make $1600 more a year on average.
여성 정책 연구소는 만약 기존의 낙태 규제가 없어진다면, 미국 여성들은 평균적으로 1600달러를 더 벌수 있을 것이라고 추정한다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: Roe 대 Wade 사건
(헌법에 기초한 사생활의 권리가 낙태를 포함하는 지에 관한 미국 대법원의 중요한 판례)

맥락: A 1996 study by Joshua Angrist and William Evans looked at states that liberalized abortion laws before Roe v. Wade and found abortion access leads to higher education rates and labor-market outcomes.
Joshua Angrist와 William Evans 의 1996년 연구에서 Roe v. Wade 사건 이전에 낙태법을 자유화한 주들을 통해 낙태에 대한 접근이 높은 교육률과 노동 시장 결과로 이어진다는 사실을 발견했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 로 대 웨이드 재판(임신 중절권을 인정한 미국 최고재판소 판례)
맥락: Roe vs. Wade(의 결과)가 현재 뒤집히고 있어 곧 사실상 미국의 주 중 약  절반 정도가 낙태를 불법으로  만들 것이다.
Roe vs. Wade is now overturned, which will soon effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:  뒤집히다, 뒤집다
맥락: Roe vs Wade 법이 이제 뒤집혀서 미국의 주 중 약 절반 정도의 주가 사실상 낙태를 불법으로 할 것이다.
(미국의 연방 대법원이 판결에 부합하지 않는 모든 제도와 법 등은 폐지 또는 수정의 대상이 되고 미국의 모든 개별 주는 미국 대법원의 판결에 따라야 하므로 절반 정도의 주가 미국 대법원의 낙태 불법 판결에 따를 것이다.)
Roe vs. Wade is now overturned, which will soon effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 빈곤율
(가난하여 살기가 어려운 가구나 사람의 비율. )

맥락 : Income, in turn, affects poverty rates of not only the women who have to go through unwanted pregnancy, but also their existing children.
소득은 차례로 원치 않는 임신을 겪어야 하는 여성뿐만 아니라 기존자녀의 빈곤율에도 영향을 미칩니다 .

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 훼방놓다, 좌절시키다, 방해하다
맥락: Nationally, women’s labor force participation rates went from around 40 percent before Roe v. Wade was passed in 1973 to nearly 60 percent before the pandemic. Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.
낙태를 허용하는 법이 통과되자 대략 40%였던 여성의 노동력 참여율이 60%로 올랐다. 그러므로 낙태를 금지한다면 이러한 증가(혹은 이런 증가로 인한 이득)을 방해하거나 심지어 되돌릴 수도 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
로 대 웨이드 재판 /임신 중절 권리를 인정한 미국 최고 재판소의 판례

맥락 : Nationally, women' labor force participation rates went from around 40 percent before Roe.v.Wade was passed in 1973 to nearly 60 percent before the pendemic (men's participation was nearly 70 percent at the time)
전국적으로, 여성 노동력 참여율은 1973년 로 대 웨이드 재판이 통과되기 전 약 40%에서 팬데믹 이전 약 60%로 증가했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 오랜 시간 동안
맥락: ... research that compares outcomes over time for women across the country who received or were denied abortions, ...
전국적으로 낙태를 받았거나 거부받은 여성들의 결과를 오랜시간 비교한 연구...

# data[].attributes.body
해석: a person's potential ability to apply for a get a particular job (=job prospect) 특정 직업의 구직에 지원할 수 있는 한 사람 잠재적 능력
맥락: a gap that could affect their employment prospects even further into the future.
심지어 더 나아간 미래에도 그들의 구직 지원의 잠재적 능력에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 차이

# data[].attributes.body
In a widespread or large manner

문장: The evidence is largely driven by the impacts on young Black women.

증거는 젊은 흑인 여성의 영향력으로 널리 퍼져갔다.

# data[].attributes.body
피임약
맥락: We know a lot from previous research on the initial expansion of birth control pills and abortion care in the ’70s that, when women have a little more certainty over their family planning, they just make choices differently,

우리는 최초의 낙태에 대한 관심과 피임약의 증가가 발발했던 여성이 그들의 가족 계획에 대한 확실성이 조금 증가하고 그들이 다양하게 선택했던 70년대의 이전 연구에서 우리는 많은 것을 안다

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : ~을 불법으로 만들다 / ~을 불법화하다
맥락 : Roe vs. Wade법이 이제 뒤집혔고, 이는 곧 미국 주 중 약 절반이 낙태를 사실상 불법으로 만들 것이다.
Roevs. Wade is now overturned, which will soon effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 유출되다, 누출되다
맥락: 지난 5월 정치꾼에게 초안이 유출돼 금요일 최종 형태로 공개된 이 결정은, …
That decision, a draft of which was leaked to Politico in May and was released in its final form Friday, …

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 낙태 제공자(산부인과 등)를 제한하기 위해 특별히 고안된 법률 유형
(Targeted regulation of abortion providers)

맥락: While broader abortion bans are now possible in any state that wishes to enact one, plenty of individual states have alread enacted TRAP laws that make getting an abortion more difficult.
법안을 제정하고자 하는 모든 주에서 광범위한 낙태 금지가 가능한 상황에, 많은 개별 주에서 이미 낙태를 더 어렵게 만드는 TRAP 법률을 제정했습니다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 뒤집다
맥락: 낙태의 불법화는 여성 인권의 지금까지의 진보를 뒤집어서 여성 인권의 퇴보에 일조한다
And taking away the ability to make that decision stands to upend decades of progress women have made in the workforce, ~

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 노동력 인구비율, 생산연령 인구에 대한 노동력 인구
맥락: 낙태 금지로 인해 아이를 낳고 기르느라 일하지 못하게 된 여성들의 수 때문에 전체 생산연령 인구에 비해 노동을 하는 인구가 줄어들었다.
The Institute~ estimated that state-level restriction have cost those economies $105 billion a year in reduced labor force participation, ~.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 시기를 맞추다
맥락: 낙태를 금지하면 많은 돈이 드는 자녀 양육의 시기를 맞추기 힘들어 진다
So of course restrictions that make it harder to time when they have kids or ~ is going to have serious impacts~

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 법정 조언자 의견서
맥락: 연방 대법원이 미국 수정 헌법 제14조가 낙태권에 대한 보장을 포함하지 않는다고 판결한 사건인 Dobbs v. Jackson ~ 사건에서 낙태권 박탈이 여성에게 얼마나 안좋은 영향을 주는지 경제학자들의 의견을 담은 의견서
- research that Myers, along with more than 150 other economists, outlined in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ~

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: 악화시키다
맥락: As the US faces an ongoing labor shortage — one led in part by women who have left the workforce to care for children and elders during the pandemic — the Supreme Court’s expected decision will exacerbate the situation and potentially change women’s experience in the workforce for years to come.
해석: 미국이 지속적인 노동력 부족에 직면함에 따라(대유행 기간 동안 어린이와 노인을 돌보기 위해 노동력을 떠난 여성들에 의해 부분적으로 주도된다.) 대법원의 예상 결정은 상황을 악화시키고 향후 수년간 여성의 노동력 경험을 변화시킬 수 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: 직종분리
맥락: this could lead to more occupational segregation- women's overrepresentation in certain fields like health care and teaching, for example- which reduces wages in those fields, even when accounting for education, experience, and location.
이것은 더 많은 직업적 분리로 이어질 수 있다 - 예를 들어, 건강 관리나 교육 같은 특정 분야에서 여성의 과잉 대표 - 그것은 교육, 경험, 그리고 위치를 설명할 때 조차도 그 분야에서 임금을 감소시킨다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 미묘하지만 해롭게
맥락 : Perhaps most insidiously, lack of abortion access seriously restricts women's hopes for their own careers.
가장 미묘하지만 해롭게도, 낙태의 부족한 접근성은 자기자신의 장래에 대한 여성들의 희망을 심각하게 제한한다.

# data[].attributes.headline
다음 시간 전까지 할일

# data[].attributes.subject
다음 시간 전까지 할일

# data[].attributes.body
- ClassCard: Food Crisis, Abortion 단어 학습하고 시험 치기
- Abortion 기사 전체 복습해두기
- 말하기 수행평가 주제 올리기
- Padlet 노락딱지 붙은 사람 수정해두기

# data[].attributes.body
해석:The deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy.
인간 임신의 고의적 종료로 ,대부분 임신 첫 28주 동안 수행된다.

맥락:Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.낙태 금지는 이러한 이득의 일부를 방해하거나 심지어 역전시킬 수 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.vox.com/recode/23074696/abortion-illegal-supereme-court-women-work

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This story is part of a group of stories called

Uncovering and explaining how our digital world is changing - and changing us.

Roe vs. Wade is all but certain to be overturned, which could effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states. If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

That decision, a draft of which was leaked to Politico earlier this month, affects a woman's likelihood to work at all, what type of job she takes, how much education she receives, how much money she makes, and even the hopes and dreams she has for herself. In turn, her career affects nearly all other aspects of her life, from her likelihood to live in poverty to her view of herself.

And taking away the ability to make that decision stands to upend decades of progress women have made in the workforce, which has cascading effects on women's place in society.

As Caitlin Myers, a professor of economics at Middlebury College, put it, "Childbearing is the single most economically important decision most women make."

We know all this because of decades of research on how abortion bans hurt women - research that Myers, along with more than 150 other economists, outlined in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Mississippi case that's likely to upend Roe v. Wade. In addition to long-term studies specifically looking at outcomes of women who were unable to get an abortion versus those who did, there's even more robust data around the negative causal effects of having children on women in general. It's also just common sense, according to Jason Lindo, a professor of economics at Texas A&M University.

"Anyone who has had kids or seriously thought about having kids knows it's super costly in terms of time and money," Lindo said. "So of course restrictions that make it harder for people to time when they have kids or which increase the number of children that they have is going to have serious impacts on their careers and their economic circumstances."

Even in the absence of a national ban, state anti-abortion measures have been a huge burden on women and society at large. The Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) estimated that state-level restrictions have cost those economies $105 billion a year in reduced labor force participation, reduced earnings, increased turnover, and time off among prime working-age women.

An abortion ban won't affect all women equally, either. Myers says that in regions of the country where abortion is banned and where travel distances will increase for women to be able to get an abortion, about three-quarters of women seeking abortions will still do so. That means roughly a quarter of women there - in Myers's words, "the poorest, the most vulnerable, the most financially fragile women in a wide swath of the Deep South and the Midwest" - will not receive their health care services.

As the US faces an ongoing labor shortage - one led in part by women who have left the workforce to care for children and elders during the pandemic - the Supreme Court's expected decision will exacerbate the situation and potentially change women's experience in the workforce for years to come.

1) Women's labor force participation could go down

Abortion access is a major force that has driven up women's labor force participation. Nationally, women's labor force participation rates went from around 40 percent before Roe v. Wade was passed in 1973 to nearly 60 percent before the pandemic (men's participation was nearly 70 percent at that time). Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.

Using data from the Turnaway Study, landmark research that compares outcomes over time for women across the country who received or were denied abortions, University of California San Francisco professor Diana Greene Foster and fellow researchers found that six months after they were denied an abortion, women were less likely to be employed full-time than those who received an abortion. That difference remained significant for four years after these women were denied abortions, a gap that could affect their employment prospects even further into the future.

2) Lower educational attainment

Education rates are foundational for career prospects and pay. A 1996 study by Joshua Angrist and William Evans looked at states that liberalized abortion laws before Roe v. Wade andfound abortion access leads to higher education rates and labor-market outcomes. American University economics professor Kelly Jones used state abortion regulation data to determine that legal abortion access for young women who became pregnant increased their educational attainment by nearly a year and their likelihood of finishing college by about 20 percentage points. The evidence is largely driven by the impacts on young Black women.

Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers' likelihood of attending or completing college. In turn, lower education affects which jobs women are qualified for.

3) The types of jobs women get will be more restricted

Having children significantly affects the types of jobs women get, often steering them to part-time work or lower-paying occupations. While a broader abortion ban is on the horizon, plenty of individual states have already enacted TRAP laws that make getting an abortion more difficult. This legislation has also provided a natural experiment for researchers like Kate Bahn, chief economist at research nonprofit Washington Center for Equitable Growth, who found women in these states were less likely to move into higher-paid occupations.

"We know a lot from previous research on the initial expansion of birth control pills and abortion care in the '70s that, when women have a little more certainty over their family planning, they just make choices differently," Bahn told Recode.

This could lead to more occupational segregation - women's overrepresentation in certain fields like health care and teaching, for example - which reduces wages in those fields, even when accounting for education, experience, and location.

4) All of the above negatively affect income

Curtailing which jobs women get, taking time out of the workforce, receiving less education - all of these hurt women's pay, which is already lower on average than men's.

One paper by economist Ali Abboud that looked at states where abortion was legal before Roe v. Wade found that young women who got an abortion to delay an unplanned pregnancy for just one year had an 11 percent increase in hourly wages compared to the mean. Jones's research found that legal abortion access for pregnant young women increased their likelihood of entering a professional occupation by 35 percentage points.

The IWPR estimates that if existing abortion restrictions went away, women across the US would make $1,600 more a year on average. Lost income doesn't just affect women who have unwanted pregnancies, but also their families and their existing children. Income, in turn, affects poverty rates of not only the women who have to go through unwanted pregnancy, but also their existing children.

5) Lack of abortion access limits women's career aspirations

Perhaps most insidiously, lack of abortion access seriously restricts women's hopes for their own careers. Building on her team's research in the Turnaway Study, Foster found that women who were unable to get a desired abortion were significantly less likely to have one-year goals related to employment than those who did, likely because those goals would be much harder to achieve while taking care of a newborn. They were also less likely to have one-year or five-year aspirational goals in general.

Limiting women's autonomy over their reproductive rights reinforces the unequal status of women in ways that are both concrete and ephemeral, C. Nicole Mason, president and CEO of IWPR, told Recode.

"That's a very psychic, emotional, psychological feeling - to feel and understand that my equality, my rights, are less than my male counterparts," she said. "The law is making it so. The Supreme Court is making it so."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
5 ways abortion bans could hurt women in the workforce

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Uncovering and explaining how our digital world is changing - and changing us. Roe vs. Wade is all but certain to be overturned, which could effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states. If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

# data[].attributes.body
직업적 분리

남성과 여성의 직업적 분리

# data[].attributes.body
over: 과도 represenation: 드러나다
women's overrepresentation in certain fileds like healther care  and teaching.

건강 관리나 교사 같은 특정 직업군에 여성의 비율이 두드러지게 많다.