# data[].attributes.body
1 도원 채령 주원 은제
2 예담 혜주 소은 준영
3 하원 단렬 주영 동현
4 시현 가희 예원 다은
5 희원 나은 소현

# data[].attributes.body
- 3 Reasons Businesses Are Tapping Into The Gig Economy 복습

- 맡은Part의 단어/표현 세 개 이상 게시하기

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"Have you ever been on a trapeze?" That's how Martha, an independent consultant, responded when we asked her to describe her work in the five years since she'd left a global consulting firm to set out on her own. She had recently tried the art, which she saw as a good metaphor for her life: the void she felt when between assignments; the exhilaration of landing the next engagement; the discipline, concentration, and grace that mastering her profession required. Trapeze artists seem to take huge risks, she explained, but a safety system - including nets, equipment, and fellow performers - supports them: "They appear to be on their own, but they're not."

Martha (whose name, like others in this article, has been changed) is part of a burgeoning segment of the workforce loosely known as the gig economy. Approximately 150 million workers in North America and Western Europe have left the relatively stable confines of organizational life - sometimes by choice, sometimes not - to work as independent contractors. Some of this growth reflects the emergence of ride-hailing and task-oriented service platforms, but a recent report by McKinsey found that knowledge-intensive industries and creative occupations are the largest and fastest-growing segments of the freelance economy.

To learn what it takes to be successful in independent work, we recently completed an in-depth study of 65 gig workers. We found remarkably similar sentiments across generations and occupations: All those we studied acknowledged that they felt a host of personal, social, and economic anxieties without the cover and support of a traditional employer - but they also claimed that their independence was a choice and that they would not give up the benefits that came with it. Although they worried about unpredictable schedules and finances, they also felt they had mustered more courage and were leading richer lives than their corporate counterparts.

We discovered that the most effective independent workers navigate this tension with common strategies. They cultivate four types of connections - to place, routines, purpose, and people - that help them endure the emotional ups and downs of their work and gain energy and inspiration from their freedom. As the gig economy grows worldwide, these strategies are increasingly relevant. Indeed, we believe they may also be helpful to any corporate employees who are working more autonomously, from home or a remote office, or who feel they might one day want - or need - to jump into a freelance career.

Produce or Perish

The first thing we realized when we began interviewing independent consultants and artists was that the stakes of independent work are enormously high - not just financially but also existentially. Unshackled from managers and corporate norms, people can choose assignments that make the most of their talents and reflect their true interests. They feel ownership over what they produce and over their entire professional lives. One study participant told us, "I can be the most I've ever been myself in any job."

However, the price of such freedom is a precariousness that seems not to subside over time. Even the most successful, well-established people we interviewed still worry about money and reputation and sometimes feel that their identity is at stake. You can't keep calling yourself a consultant, for example, if clients stop asking for your services. A well-published writer told us, "You become your work. If you write a good book...it's really great, and when you don't achieve it, you have to accept...that failure might define who you are to yourself." An artist agreed: "There's no arriving. That's a myth."

For this reason, productivity is an intense preoccupation for everyone we interviewed. It provides self-expression and an antidote to precariousness. Interestingly, however, the people we talked with aren't just focusing on getting things done and sold. They care about both being at work - having the discipline to regularly generate products or services that find a market - and being into their work: having the courage to stay fully invested in the process and output of that labor.

Sustaining productivity is a constant struggle. Distress and distractions can erode it, and both impediments abound in people's working lives. One executive coach gave a poignant description of an unproductive day: "It's when there is so much to do that I'm disorganized and can't get my act together. [In the evening,] the same e-mails I opened in the morning are still open. The documents I wanted to get done are not done. I got distracted and feel like I wasted time." A day like that, he said, leaves him full of self-doubt.

When we asked interviewees the secret to getting through such days and ultimately sustaining productivity as they defined it, we discovered a paradox at the heart of their answers. They all want to preserve their independence and, in many cases, even their unsettledness (which one consultant described as the key to continued learning and "keeping my edge"), but they also spend a great deal of time developing a "holding environment" - a physical, social, and psychological space for their work.

This concept - first used by the British psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott to describe how attentive caregivers facilitate children's development by buffering them against distress and creating room for experimentation - has since been employed in the field of adult development to refer to conditions in which people can be their best and grow. Corporate employees, of course, can find them with a good boss in a solid organization. But for independent workers, a holding environment is less a gift than an accomplishment; it must be cultivated, and it can be lost.

So they create these environments for themselves by establishing and maintaining what we call "liberating connections" - because they both free people up to be individually creative and bind them to work so that their output doesn't wane.

The Four Connections

Place.

Disconnected from a corporate office, the people we interviewed find places to work that protect them from outside distractions and pressures and help them avoid feeling rootless. Though many claimed their work was portable, they all still seemed to have somewhere to retreat. One writer told us, "People fail because they don't create a space and time to do whatever it is they need to do."

We visited many of these spaces in person and noticed several similarities among them. They feel confined - almost uncomfortably so in the case of some artists. They are used consistently for all substantive work. They allow easy access to the tools of the owner's trade and to little else. And they're dedicated to work; people usually leave them once their daily tasks are done. One software engineer, whose home office has all these features, described it as a "fighter pilot cockpit," where everything he needs is within arm's reach. "Sometimes it's claustrophobic," he explained, but "when I'm there, the open space is in my mind."

Despite these commonalities, each workspace is also unique, with a location, furniture, supplies, and decorations that reflect the idiosyncrasy of its owner's work. These places are not just protective cocoons for the working self - they evoke it, too. Karla, an independent consultant who initially told us she could do work "wherever I show up and am doing something that has positive impact in the world," eventually admitted that her home office is where she goes to avoid distraction and find inspiration, literally surrounded by her current and potential projects, arranged in visible and accessible piles. "When I walk through that door, I step into a space that embraces all the different aspects of myself," she told us. "I feel at home in there." Without that place and the space it gives her, Karla explained, she would probably be too sensitive to external demands and thus less focused and free.

Routines.

In organizations, routines are often associated with safety or boring bureaucracy. However, a growing body of research has shown that elite athletes, scientific geniuses, popular artists, and even everyday workers use routines to enhance focus and performance. The professionals we spoke with tend to rely on them in the same way.

Some routines improve people's workflow: keeping a schedule; following a to-do list; beginning the day with the most challenging work or with a client call; leaving a sentence incomplete in an unfinished manuscript to make an easy start the next day; sweeping the studio floor while reflecting on a new piece. Other routines, usually involving sleep, meditation, nutrition, or exercise, incorporate personal care into people's working lives. Both kinds often have a ritual element that enhances people's sense of order and control in uncertain circumstances.

One consultant we interviewed takes a bath every morning and visualizes what she wants to accomplish while she soaks. Another consultant, Matthew, who specializes in helping boards focus on innovation, keeps a strict daily schedule: "I'm up at 6:00 and there's exercise. I pack my wife's lunch. We pray. She's out the door around 8:00. I'm in my office by 8:30, and I do work where there's deeper thought required - design or writing - in the morning. That's when I'm at my best. Then in the afternoon I schedule phone calls, more of the business or financial things that need to be done." This discipline even extends to his wardrobe: "I always get dressed for the office. Most days in summer I wear shorts when I'm not on the road, but still I shower and shave as if I were going to a workplace separate from home."

That may sound rigid, but it helps Matthew pour himself into his work. He and other successful independent workers seem to follow the advice of the French novelist Gustave Flaubert: "Be regular and orderly in your life...so that you may be violent and original in your work."

Purpose.

For most people in our study, striking out on their own initially involved doing whatever work would allow them to find a footing in the market. But they were adamant that succeeding means taking only work that clearly connects to a broader purpose. All could articulate why their work, or at least their best work - be it to empower women through film, expose harmful marketing practices, sustain the American folk music tradition, or help corporate leaders succeed with integrity - is more than a means of earning a living. Purpose creates a bridge between their personal interests and motivations and a need in the world. Matthew, for example, said that although at first he felt "a certain desperation around having clients and making an income," over time his view of success shifted "to one that is a lot about living a life of service to others and making the planet a better place."

An executive coach we interviewed told us that purpose keeps her steady, inspired, and inspiring. "A big distinction between successful independents and the ones who aren't or go back [to corporate jobs] is getting to that place of knowing what you're meant to do. That gives me resilience for the ups and downs. It gives me the strength to decline work that isn't in alignment. It gives me a quality of authenticity and confidence that clients are drawn to. It's helpful to building or maintaining the business and serving the people I am here to serve."

We found that purpose, like the other connections, both binds and frees people by orienting and elevating their work.

People.

Humans are social creatures. Studies in corporate settings have long demonstrated how important other people are to our careers - as role models who show us who we might become, and as peers who help us progress by sharing our path. Researchers have also warned about a "loneliness epidemic" hitting the workplace, for which independent workers can certainly be at even greater risk.

But those we interviewed are keenly aware of the dangers of social isolation and strive to avoid it. Though many are ambivalent about formal peer groups, which they often see as insipid substitutes for collegiality, all reported having people they turn to for reassurance and encouragement. Sometimes these are direct role models or supportive collaborators; in other cases they're family members, friends, or contacts in similar fields, who can't always offer specific work advice but nevertheless help our study participants push through challenging times and embolden them to take the risks their work entails.

Matthew, for example, noted that reaching out to people in his inner circle helps calm his anxiety: "If I were just left on my own, I could sit here in the office and go down a rat hole. You're left to your own inner voice, and it spirals down into ruminating." Karla told us that she, too, regularly turns to a handful of peers with whom she's close. "All the work I do in the independent economy comes through these connections," she said. But their help goes well beyond referrals. "My ability to process, develop, and grow as a human being and understand who I am in the work I'm doing comes from the conversations that I have with these folks," she explained. "These people are how I know what I'm supposed to be doing."

Redefining Success

In popular management tales, career success usually comes with security and equanimity. For independent workers, however, both are ultimately elusive. And yet most of those we studied told us they feel successful.

Our conclusion is that people in the gig economy must pursue a different kind of success - one that comes from finding a balance between predictability and possibility, between viability (the promise of continued work) and vitality (feeling present, authentic, and alive in one's work). Those we interviewed do so by building holding environments around place, routines, purpose, and people, which help them sustain productivity, endure their anxieties, and even turn those feelings into sources of creativity and growth. "There's a sense of confidence that comes from a career as a self-employed person," one consultant told us. "You can feel that no matter how bad it gets, I can overcome this. I can change it. I can operate more from a place of choice as opposed to a place of need."

Many we spoke to believe they wouldn't be able to find the same mental space or strength in a traditional workplace. Martha, the consultant who compared herself to a trapeze artist, recalled that she became "much more successful professionally" and "much more comfortable in my identity personally" when a trusted counselor helped her reframe - and own - her struggle, rather than seek ways to evade it. "She helped me understand that I could think of myself, which I now do, as a pioneer. I don't fit in any categories that exist in organizations, and it's more effective for me to be independent." Seen this way, discomfort and uncertainty were not just tolerable but affirming - signs that she was just where she needed to be.

When we spoke, she portrayed employment as no longer an anchor she missed but a shackle she'd been fortunate enough to break. "I don't know that I would frame [my new life] as precariousness anymore," she concluded. "I would frame it as really living."

A version of this article appeared in the March-April 2018 issue (pp.140-143) of Harvard Business Review.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The 4 Things You Need to Thrive in the Gig Economy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"Have you ever been on a trapeze?" That's how Martha, an independent consultant, responded when we asked her to describe her work in the five years since she'd left a global consulting firm to set out on her own.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 뿌리가 없는-> 안정이 없는, 불안정한
맥락: 우리가 인터뷰한 사람들은 외부의 산만함과 압박으로부터 그들을 보호하고 그들이 불안정하다고 느끼는 것을 피하도록 돕는 일을 할 장소를 찾는다.
the people we interviewed find places to work that protect them from outside distractions and pressures and help them avoid feeling rootless.

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: 걸린 돈

맥락: The first thing we realized when we began interviewing independent consultants and artists was that the stakes of independent work are enormously high not just financially but also existentially.

--> 독립적인 컨설턴트(상담가)와 예술가들을 인터뷰하기 시작했을 때, 우리가 처음으로 깨달은것은 독립작업에 걸린 돈이 재정적으로뿐만아니라 실존 적으로도 높다는 것을 깨달았다.

# data[].attributes.body
equanimity 평정, 침착
elusive 파악하기 어려운, 눈에 띄지 않는
In popular management tales, career success usually comes with security and equanimity. For independent workers, however, both are ultimately elusive.
유명한 성공 신화에서는, 성공은 보통 안심과 침착과 함께 온다. 하지만 독립 계약자에게는 둘 모두 파악하기 어렵다(불가능하다).

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 유명한 경영 이야기
맥락: 경영자들 사이에서 자명한 이야기, 경영에 대한 유명한 이야기
In popular management tales, career success usually comes with security and equanimity.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 해방된

Unshackled from managers and corporate norms, people can choose assignments that make the most of their talents and reflect their true interests.

관리자와 기업의 규범에서 해방되어, 사람들은 자신의 재능을 최대한 활용하고 진정한 관심을 반영하는 업무를 선택할 수 있습니다.

# data[].attributes.body
공중 곡예(사)

Have you ever been on a trapeze?
넌 공중 곡예를 체험해본 적 있니?

Trapeze artists seem to take huge risks, she explained, but a safety system — including nets, equipment, and fellow performers — supports them: “They appear to be on their own, but they’re not.”

공중 곡예사들은 큰 위험을 감수하는 것 같지만 그녀가 설명하길 안전 시스템이 설비되어있다고 말한다- 네트, 장비 그리고 조수- 그들은 그들 직접 공연하는 것 같지만, 실은 그렇지 않다. "

맥락: 공중 곡예(사)를 그녀의 인생에 비유함(gig work global market 사이트 창립자)

# data[].attributes.body
independent worker: a person, business, or corporation that provides goods or services under a written contract or a verbal agreement. = 계약을 통해 일하는 사람
맥락: In popular management tales, career success usually comes with security and equanimity. For independent workers, however, both are ultimately elusive.
유명한 성공 신화에서는, 성공은 보통 안심과 침착과 함께 온다. 하지만 독립 계약자에게는 둘 모두 파악하기 어렵다(불가능하다).

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 관청의 번거로운 절차

맥락 : In organizations, routines are often associated with safety or boring bureaucracy.
⇒ 단체 안에서의 '루틴'은 안전 혹은 관청의 지루한 절차와 연류된다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 지식 집약 사업
맥락: 거의 150만의 북아메리카와 서부 유럽의 사람들은 프리랜서로 일한다. 그들 중 대부분은 지식 집약 산업과 창의적인 직업에서 일한다.
Approximately 150 million people in North America and Western Europe now work as independent contractors, most of them in knowledge- intenstive industries and creative occupations

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~에 기반을 마련하다

맥락: 우리가 연구하는 대부분의 사람들은, 자기 자신을 스스로 비판하는 것은 시장의 기반을 마련할 수 있는 모든 일을 하는 것이다.

For most people in our studying, striking out on their own initially involved doing whatever sork would allow them to find a footing in the market.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 불안정성, 위태로움
맥락: 그러나, 그런 자유의 대가는 시간이 지나도 가라앉지 않아 보이는 위태로운 것이다.
However, the price of such freedom is a precariousness that seems not to subside over time.

# data[].attributes.body
(급)성장하다.

Martha is part of a burgeoning segment of the workforce loosely known as the gig economy.

Martha는 대충 gig economy라 알려져있는 급증하고 있는 노동 분야의 일부분이다.( 이 부분에 발을 담고 있다)

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 가라앉다, 진정되다, 침하하다
맥락: 그러나, 그런 자유의 대가는 시간이 지나도 가라앉지 않아 보이는 위태로운 것이다.
However, the price of such freedom is a precariousness that seems not to subside over time.

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: (성공 등을 통해) 자리를 확실히 잡은

맥락: Even the most successful, well-established people we interviewed still worry about money and reputation and sometimes feel that their identity is at stake.

--> 가장 성공적이고 자리를 확실히 잡은 사람들 조차도 여전히 돈 과 평판에 대해 걱정하며, 때때로 그들의 신분이 위태롭다고 느낀다~~

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: 위태로운

맥락: sometimes feel that their identity is at stake

--> 때때로 그들의 신분이 위태롭다고 느낀다

# data[].attributes.body
뜻: 초점을 맞추다.

매락: Interestingly, however, the people we talked with aren’t just focusing on getting things done and sold

--> 흥미롭게도, 우리가 인터뷰한 사람들은 그저 일을 끝내거나, 판매하는데에만 초점을 맞추고 있지 않는다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 안아주는 환경, 보듬어주는 환경
맥락:  근로자 중 다수는 4개의 커넥션(연관성, 연결)을 만들어서 그들 스스로 "보듬어 주는 환경"를 만들었다
Many of these workers have created a "holding environment" for themselves by establishing four connections.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 실질적인
English Definition : having a firm basis in reality and being therefore important.

맥락 : They are used consistently for all substantive work.
⇒ 그 공간들은 모든 실질적인 업무를 위해 지속적으로 사용된다.

*In this sentece, 'They' means "places to work that protect people from outside distractions and pressure and help them avoid feeling rootless"
(They = 방해와 압박을 받지 않고 불안정함을 배제시키는 공간)

# data[].attributes.body
해석: the state of being dangerously likely to fall or collapse.

맥락: "I don't know that I would frame [my new life] as precariousness anymore," she concluded.
-> "저는 이제 제 새로운 삶을 위태롭다고 구성(정의)할지 모르겠습니다.(않습니다)" 그녀가 결론지었다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 산업현장에서 필요에 따라 사람을 구해 계약직 혹은 임시직 형태로 고용하는 경제 방식을 말한다
맥락: Martha(기사의 다른 사람들과 마찬가지로 이름이 변경된)는 긱 경제로 느슨하게 알려진 인력의 급성장하는 부분의 일부이다.

Martha (whose name, like others in this article, has been changed) is part of a burgeoning segment of the workforce loosely known as the gig economy.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 조종실

맥락 : One software engineer, whose home office has all these features, descirbed it as a "fighter pilot cockfit." where everything he needs is within arm's reach.

한 이러한 특성이 있는 사무실을 가진 소프트웨어 엔지니어는, 그가 필요한 모든 것이 팔이 닿는 위치에 있는 비행기 조종실 같다고 묘사했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:
고유성/특질
맥락:
"Despite these commonalities, each workspace is also unique, with a location, furniture, supplies, and decorations that reflect the idiosyncrasy of its owner's work."
"이러한 공통점에도 불구하고 각 작업 공간은 고유한 위치, 가구, 소모품 및 장식이 소유자의 작업 고유성 을 반영합니다.

# data[].attributes.body
뜻 : 밀실공포증을 앓는

맥락 : "sometimes it's claustrophobic," he explaind, but "when I'm there, the open space is in my mind."

"그 좁은 공간은 때때로 밀실공포증을 느끼게 해요." 그는 설명했다, "하지만 내가 거기에 있을때, 열린 공간이 머릿속에 있어요."

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 전통적 직장
맥락: 개인을 단기채용하는 gig work가 아닌 전통적인 방식으로 오래 일할 직원을 여러명 채용해 일을 하는 직장
Many we spoke to believe they wouldn't be able to find the same mental space or strength in a traditional workplace.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 좁고 사방이 막힌(제한된)

맥락: They feel confined — almost uncomfortably so in the case of some artists.
그들은 제한감을 느낍니다. 몇몇 예술가들의 경우에는 거의 불편하게 느껴집니다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 요지부동의, 단호한
맥락: But they were adamant that succeeding means taking only work that clearly connects to a broader purpose.
그러나 그들은 성공한다는 것은 더 넓은 목적과 분명히 연결되는 일만을 취하는 것을 의미한다고 단호했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 사업현장에서 필요에 따라 전문가나 근로자를 구해 임시로 계약을 맺고 일을 맡기는 형태의 경제 방식
맥락:~ 지식 집약적 산업과 창조적인 직업은 플리랜서 경제에서 가장 크고 빠르게 성장하는 부문이다.

~knowledge-intensive industries and creative occupations are the largest and fastest-growing segments of the freelance economy.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 선택한 곳, 필요한 곳
맥락: gig worker로 일하면서 내가 필요한 직장보다는 내가 원하는 직장을 골라서 일을 더 할 수 있다는 생각
I can operate more from a place of choice as opposed to a place of need.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 해방된, 속박을 받지 않는

맥락: Unshackled from managers and corporate norms, people can choose assignments that make the most of their talents and reflect their true interests.

관리자와 기업의 규범에서 벗어나 사람들은 자신의 재능을 최대한 활용하고 진정한 관심을 반영하는 업무를 선택할 수 있습니다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 폐쇄공포증, 밀실 공포증을 앓는[느끼게 하는]

맥락: “Sometimes it’s claustrophobic,” he explained, but “when I’m there, the open space is in my mind.”

그는 "때로는 밀실 공포증이 있다"며 "내가 거기 있을 때 열린 공간이 내 마음 속에 있다"고 설명했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 가지런함

맥락: 그것은 나에게 가지런하지 않은 일을 거절할 힘을 준다.

It gives me the strength to decline work that isn't in alignment.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: (생각감정을) 분명히 표현하다
맥락: All could articulate why their work, or at least their best work — be it to empower women through film, expose harmful marketing practices, sustain the American folk music tradition, or help corporate leaders succeed with integrity — is more than a means of earning a living.
영화를 통해 여성들에게 힘을 실어주고, 해로운 마케팅 관행을 폭로하고, 미국 포크 음악 전통을 유지하거나, 기업 지도자들이 청렴하게 성공하도록 돕는 것이 그들의 일, 혹은 적어도 그들의 최고의 일이 왜 생계를 위한 수단 그 이상인지를 모두 분명히 표현할 수 있었다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 떠받치는, 지탱하는; 유지하는

맥락 : When we asked interviewees the secret to getting through such days and ultimately sustaining productivity as they defined it, we discovered a paradox at the heart of their answers.

인터뷰 대상자들에게 그러한 날들을 견디고 궁극적으로 그들이 정의한 대로 생산성을 유지하는 비결을 물었을 때 우리는 그들의 대답의 핵심에서 역설을 발견했습니다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 생산성 유지

맥락 : Sustaining productivity is a constant struggle.

생산성을 유지하는 것은 끊임없는 투쟁입니다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: -으로 바뀌다/되었다

맥락: These connections help independent workers sustain productivity, endure their anxieties, and even turn those feelings into sources of creativity and growth
이러한 연결들은 독랍적인 근무자들이 생산성을 유지하고 그들의 걱정을 견디고 심지어는 그런 감정들을 창의성과 성장의 원천으로 변화시키게 도와준다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 외로움 증후군
맥락: Researchers have also warned about a “loneliness epidemic” hitting the workplace, for which independent workers can certainly be at even greater risk.
연구원들은 또한 독립 근로자들이 훨씬 더 큰 위험에 처할 수 있는 "고독 전염병"이 직장에 닥칠 수 있다고 경고했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:
지루한 관료주의
맥락:
"In organizations, routines are often associated with safety or boring bureaucracy."
"조직에서 일상은 종종 안전 또는 지루한 관료제 와 관련이 있다."

# data[].attributes.body
해석:
사적인/개인의 방/공간
맥락:
"These places are not just protective cocoons for the working self - they evoke it, too"
"이 장소들은 일하는 자아의 사적인 공간 일 뿐만 아니라 그것을 불러일으키기도 합니다."

# data[].attributes.body
~에 전념하다

맥락: And they’re dedicated to work; people usually leave them once their daily tasks are done.

그리고 그들은 일에 전념한다; 사람들은 보통 그들의 일상적인 일이 끝나면 그 자리를 떠난다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 전투기 조종석
홈 오피스가 이러한 모든 기능을 가지고 있는 한 소프트웨어 엔지니어는 그가 필요로 하는 모든 것이 손이 닿는 곳에 있는 "전투기 조종석"이라고 설명했다.
One software engineer, whose home office has all these features, described it as a “fighter pilot cockpit,” where everything he needs is within arm’s reach.

# data[].attributes.body
맥락 : They allow easy access to the tools of the owner’s trade and to little else.
그 공간들에서 주인의 직업에 필요한 장비는 쉽게 닿을 수 있지만 그 외에 다른 것들은 접근성이 낮다.
⇒ '작업의 효율성을 높여주는 공간(They)' 을 설명한다.

# data[].attributes.body
뜻 : 특이한 성격, 별스러운 점, 특이체질

맥락 : despite these commonalities, each workspace is also unique, with a location, furniture, supplies, and decorations that reflect the idiosyncrasy of it's owner's work.

이러한 공통점에도 불구하고 각 작업공간은 위치, 가구, 장식품 등으로 본인의 성격을 보여준다

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 반대 감정이 병존하는, 애증이 엇갈리는
맥락: Though many are ambivalent about formal peer groups, which they often see as insipid substitutes for collegiality, all reported having people they turn to for reassurance and encouragement.
비록 많은 사람들이 종종 그들이 동료애의 무미건조한 대체물로 보는 공식적인 또래 집단에 대해 양면성을 가지고 있지만, 모두 그들이 안심과 격려를 위해 의지하는 사람들을 가지고 있다고 보고되었다.

# data[].attributes.body
후퇴하다

Though many claimed their work was portable, they all still seemed to have somewhere to retreat.

비록 많은 사람들이 그들의 직업을 그들이 조종 할 수 있다고 주장했지만, 그들은 여전히 후퇴할 곳이 있는 것처럼 보였다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: (책·악보 등의) 원고

맥락: leaving a sentence incomplete in an unfinished manuscript to make an easy start the next day; sweeping the studio floor while reflecting on a new piece.

다음 날 쉽게 시작하기 위해 미완성 원고에 불완전한 문장을 남겨 두고. 스튜디오 바닥을 휩쓸며 새로운 작품을 되새긴다.

# data[].attributes.body
모으다

맥락: gig worker들은 상사의 지원이나 도움 없이는 개인적, 사회적 경제적 불안을 느낌

Although they worried about unpredictable schedules and finances, they also felt they had mustered more courage and were leading richer lives than their corporate counterparts.

그들(worker)들은 예상치 못한 스케쥴이나 제정을 걱정함에도 불구하고 그들은 그들이 용기를 가지고 그들을 그들의 다른 회사 직원보다 더 풍요로운 삶으로 이끈다고 느낀다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:승차호출 서비스,전화나 스마트폰 어플 등을 이용해서 택시를 직접 불러서 이용할 수 있는 새로운 형태의 교통수단 ex) uber

맥락: Some of this growth reflects the emergence of ride-hailing and task-oriented service platforms,
이 성장의 일부는 승차호출 서비스와 작업 지향적인 서비스 플랫폼의 출현을 반영한다

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 선입견, 집착
맥락: 이러한 이유로, 생산성은 인터뷰한 모두에게 강한 집착(관심대상)이였다.
For this reason, productivity is an intense preoccupation for everyone we interviewed.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 자유로운 연결

맥락 So they create these environments for themselves by establishing and maintaining what we call “liberating connections”— because they both free people up to be individually creative and bind them to work so that their output doesn’t wane.

그래서 그들은 우리가 "자유로운 연결"이라고 부르는 것을 설정하고 유지함으로써 스스로 이러한 환경을 만듭니다. 왜냐하면 둘 다 사람들이 개별적으로 창의적이 되도록 자유롭게 하고 결과물이 줄어들지 않도록 일에 묶이기 때문입니다.