# data[].attributes.body
My muddiest point would be properly connecting my evidence with my commentary and it flowing well.

# data[].attributes.body
I think commentary is hardest for me mainly because I’m not sure what to write after I give my evidence. I thought commentary was there to summarize the evidence I gave but in the essay they had explained it and stated why the speaker had stated it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think my muddiest point is commentary and rhetorical analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
Putting enough commentary and the “how” in my thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
My muddiest point was probably being specific with my context.

# data[].attributes.body
The muddiest point for me is the why, and how of the commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
my muddiest point is sophistication, i don't understand it fully

# data[].attributes.body
Commentary, why the author chose that rhetorical device and how it relates to the purpose

# data[].attributes.body
I would say my muddiest point is the ability to include a perfect amount of extra evidence into my commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
Finding the "how" and "why" in commentary

# data[].attributes.body
Explaining why an author/speaker uses a specific rhetorical choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Commentary, the why this choice and the how does this work.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between sophistication (besides fancy language) and commentary

# data[].attributes.body
The muddiest point for me is creating commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
My muddiest point is trying to find what I should write about, like the topic sentences and such