# data[].attributes.body
Too many diagrams that aren't explained and too many solutions, no sense of the market features or characteristics
No concept used

Three solutions is a lot, maybe they could just have one but explain it fully. Also there are a lot of diagrams (ex. 3) and only one is explained

# data[].attributes.body
F) could do with better explanation of graph and more links to article

# data[].attributes.body
Good explanations, I didn't really know what the concept was.

# data[].attributes.body
Own graphs required and you need to explicitly state what your concept is. I could not tell whether it was intervention or sustainability so this is a problem.
You have not claspped' your solutions in a rigorous way. You expression is sometimes emotive which you should avoid in Economics writing and a tendency for unnecessarily long sentences - precision and conciseness!

Good use of economic terminology

# data[].attributes.body
Some issues of precision in the explanation, not sure that there is asymmetric information since does the vape industry know any more about the harm than consumers? Not sure that point is relevant...

I like the thorough explanations, I would probably find a way to integrate the definitions more naturally with the sentences than parentheses.

# data[].attributes.body
Precise, sound diagrams well explained. Solutions well Claspped

# data[].attributes.body
Not clear what concept you were using. Look carefully at the amount of tax consumers will pay. Your explanation was inaccurate. Generally your explanation of diagrams was satisfactory though could be much better if you tighten up on the theory. Your solution was affected by your failure to explain the elasticities you have chosen, since these will affect the outcomes of those solutions. Claspp required

1st of all, I like the beginning :)
It gets attention from the reader immediately. Maybe explain demerit good and inefficiency. Diagrams are also very good and very clear. I'd probably write Price 1 instead of P1 and optimal Quantity instead of Q* in the explanation so that it makes more sense to the reader. Overall it's rlly good tho

# data[].attributes.body
Problem was fine
You need to look at labelling qm q opt, pm, popt would be preferable
Solution needs 'claspping' explicitly
Concept not clear at all