# data[].attributes.headline
Is this information clearly biased in one way or another? Why did the author or creator decide to share this information? Does this source present multiple points of view on the topic?Is the language used meant to evoke a strong, emotional response? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Is this information clearly biased in one way or another? Why did the author or creator decide to share this information? Does this source present multiple points of view on the topic?Is the language used meant to evoke a strong, emotional response? 

# data[].attributes.headline
Does the source contain any false information or errors? Does the source use reputable sources to support the claims made? Has the source gone through peer review? Are any research methods used well-designed and are conclusions from the research supported by the evidence? Does this source align with other sources that discuss this topic? Does the information seem complete, or are facts missing?

# data[].attributes.subject
Does the source contain any false information or errors? Does the source use reputable sources to support the claims made? Has the source gone through peer review? Are any research methods used well-designed and are conclusions from the research supported by the evidence? Does this source align with other sources that discuss this topic? Does the information seem complete, or are facts missing?

# data[].attributes.headline
What credentials related to the topic at hand does the author have? Does the author have any relevant affiliations with a respected university or organization? What can you find about the author online? Has the author published on this subject before? Is the publication reputable? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What credentials related to the topic at hand does the author have? Does the author have any relevant affiliations with a respected university or organization? What can you find about the author online? Has the author published on this subject before? Is the publication reputable? 

# data[].attributes.headline
What aspect of your research question(s) does this source answer? Is the intended audience appropriate for academic research? Does this source provide a new perspective or piece of information? Is this source too technical or too general? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What aspect of your research question(s) does this source answer? Is the intended audience appropriate for academic research? Does this source provide a new perspective or piece of information? Is this source too technical or too general? 

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the date of publication? Does the source use recent information? Are the references and/or links current? Does currency matter for this topic? Why or why not? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the date of publication? Does the source use recent information? Are the references and/or links current? Does currency matter for this topic? Why or why not? 

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is good because they have updated it this year.

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is good because most of the information could be up to date.

# data[].attributes.body
currency is good because it can help you to find the most recent information

# data[].attributes.body
Currency is good in the Global Peace Index because the writers keep uploading new information frequently.

# data[].attributes.body
Currency is good because the date is close to today (April 16 was last updated) . Also included pictures that are high quality

# data[].attributes.body
Currency is good because the information is updated. There are informations from 2008-2019. Its like a timeline.

# data[].attributes.body
The one of the currencies is good as it is up-to-date but the other one shows information from 2019 and so much has changed from then. With the one from 2019, we don't know exactly where they got their information from.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Conflict Tracker was updated very recently while the Global Peace Index was last updated in 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
Currency is good because the information was updated not too long ago.

# data[].attributes.body
relevance is good beca
use you can chose the best information fr the topic that you are talking about

# data[].attributes.body
authority is good because it is better to get information from a web site that is respected

# data[].attributes.body
Global conflict tracker includes multiple sides (religion section) which counts as "new perpective".
It has not too much or too less information that are not too hard nor too easy to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index provides information of what they would be rated according to certain aspects such as violent crime and terrorism. Global Conflict Tracker provides information about the different situations happening worldwide and choosing the type of conflict you want to know about. Therefore, multiple perspectives are available.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance can help you find a topic similar to your research.

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is generally good because it has recent information (updates).  But some information is old (2019) and it probably
has changes since.

# data[].attributes.headline
joao more handsome than bruno the ugly one  

# data[].attributes.subject
joao more handsome than bruno the ugly one  

# data[].attributes.body
accuracy is good because it is important to know if the information is fake or real

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Conflict Tracker provides information by categories and all the information is relevant.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index is meant to offer an accurate picture of a nation's relative peacefulness. There are of course some observations to be made. For example: The study rewards countries who restrict their citizens' access to firearms. It has a clear bias against the incarceration of criminals as well, rewarding countries for having lower prisoners per capita. It also penalizes countries that maintain standing armies, ranking nations on a criterion called "Number of armed-services personnel per 100,000."

# data[].attributes.body
Unlike other websitea finding the author in the article took a little seconds, however you can clearly identify who the author is, there are a lot of author making the website full with different perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
Authority can be useful when you are deciding wether the information/site should be trusted.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance is good in the Global Peace Index because there is a lot of information in the site, and it's easy to find what you're looking for.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Tracker has relevant information and there are categories on the top that makes easier to find different info.

# data[].attributes.headline
joao the cute man while bruno is just ugly  

# data[].attributes.subject
joao the cute man while bruno is just ugly  

# data[].attributes.body
purpose is good because it shows why that information is there and if it is relevant to your topic

# data[].attributes.body
Authority is pretty good in The Global Peace Index because if you research who is the author of the site in google, you can see that is Jason Shohara.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index uses accurate information aligned with information from other sources.

# data[].attributes.body
There is good relevant information and it is very easy to distinguish the different categories because of the way things are set up.

# data[].attributes.body
With Vision of Humanity, it's somewhat generalised as it only shows statistics but nothing to add on top of it while Council on Foreign Relations doesn't show THAT much statistics but provides information about the conflicts.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the information on the website is not fake, this is because it has sources from different countries, it supports eachother which is mostly a reliable source.
For example, Global peace index uses many graphs with dates on them

# data[].attributes.body
Authority is pretty good because you can find who the author is and see if this person is trustable or not.

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is pretty good (2019). Sure, things have happened in 2020, but not too much; we aren't even a third of the way done with 2020!

# data[].attributes.body
Authority is good because the contributors are well-known and can be trusted.

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is not bad most of the information is updated.

# data[].attributes.body
It is fairly relevant, because the Global Peace index takes many things into account, but it sometimes presents the information as if militarization is a bad thing, which it isn't.

# data[].attributes.body
Authority is good because it helps you see if the information is trustable or not.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index shows what the information is for any wether or not this is the type of site you are looking for.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance is good because you can easily find the information that you want.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index does a good job in accuracy, because the source contains reliable information.

# data[].attributes.body
There are a lot of people who contribute to making the Global Peace Index, and many of these people have respectable amounts of education.

# data[].attributes.body
The information provided are true. But some information is missing. For example, Global Conflict Tracker may not show all of the conflicts worldwide. Some of those conflicts are smaller than others but they can still be important to many people.

# data[].attributes.body
The authority is good because You can easily tell who the author is and if you search him on the internet you can easily know if he can be trusted or not.

# data[].attributes.body
All of the information comes from real statistics, but sometimes, the way it is presented can make certain good things seem bad, like high military spending, which actually contributes to peace.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index gives you a good idea of how peaceful countries are, though there are some things you have to keep in mind. For example, the Global Peace Index said that Israel was more violent than Palestine (which isn't a country), yet Israel provides equality for all its citizens, Jewish, Muslim, or Christian, whereas Palestine is extremely hostile to Israeli citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
The people Council on Foreign Relations have faces on their website and gives loads of information about them, meaning that for that website, authority is good. Though with Visions of Humanity, there aren't any faces behind them giving a feeling of doubt.

# data[].attributes.body
It is important to have good accuracy because real information is really important and knowing that the website take their information from proven statistics is good.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index is very objective, and does a good job on just presenting the facts. Therefore it's good on purpose

# data[].attributes.body
The aim is to tell the audience what has been going on and sources from the past. The peace is the theme, it both talks about peace and some places that are not peaceful. Global peace index uses many numbers and countries name. On the other hand Global conflict tracker has more about countries

# data[].attributes.body
Global Peace Index shows what countries could be considered 'violent' in some aspects. The purpose of it could be to inform people about their country. The Global Conflict Tracker's purpose is to inform people about some of the situations happening around the world that may matter to them.

# data[].attributes.body
Global Peace Tracker includes accurate information but Global Conflict Tracker doesnt show all the countries.

# data[].attributes.body
The most recent dates updated is 2019 which is very good considering were not even half way through 2020.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index is to inform people about what is going on etc... and the Global Conflict Tracker's is to tell people what might affect them.

# data[].attributes.body
The accuracy of both websites seems to be accurate though for one of them, I would like to see more of exactly how they gathered their information...

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index should be read critically and with scepticism. While it seems to be measuring the right things, it gives poor weighting to each component. Simply weighting for the rule of law seems to be insufficient. The call made on the peacefulness of a certain country as a whole, then comparing a different country with a different system should not be made if the judgement made is only shown through something such as a violent demonstration.

# data[].attributes.body
The global peace tracker includes relevant information. The information is easy to find and there is lots of it.

# data[].attributes.body
Global Conflict Tracker has sort of smaller perspective then Global peace Index, but Global Conflict Tracker tells what is happening that might affect on them. But on the other hand Global Peace Index tells the situation happening world wide
with stats and images.

# data[].attributes.body
For Visions of Humanity, their purpose is to show people that the world was once a peaceful place but now it is all crap (haha, see what I did there?). For Council on Foreign Relations, their purpose is to help people (most specifically Americans) better understand the world and foreign policies regarding the United Sates and a few other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
It is good because you can get the authors name and see with they are trust able.

# data[].attributes.body
The informations are true, however there are some information missing and also sometimes the way this information is presented can be really opinion based and seem either bad or good.

# data[].attributes.body
The information seems accurate and reliable. It uses other sources but it can also be missing data.

# data[].attributes.body
The Authority is good because you can find the author outside of the website and with a little research can figure out if they are reliable and trust worthy.

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is good because it has all the most recent information

# data[].attributes.body
the information listed is trustworthy data however there are missing bits of data for example the global conflict tracker doesn't list all the countries.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index has a great level of authority, as it is in fact the world's leading measure of global peacefulness and the Institute for Economics and Peace is reputable.

# data[].attributes.body
Its shows you how peaceful countries are and lists them from most peaceful to least which is nice.

# data[].attributes.body
The Global Peace Index helps us understand the trends in well-being and development of the nations worldwide, as well as their strengths and limitations.

# data[].attributes.body
The results from the Global Peace Index are shown annually. I believe that this is done correctly because measuring things such as the trends in peacefulness and the economic impact of violence should be done having analysed every factor possible.

# data[].attributes.body
The currency is good because all the newest data is from 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
The Peace Index gives us not only data as for simple subjects such as homicides or incarceration, but it goes deeper by exploring other aspects of the country.

# data[].attributes.body
The Peace Index appears to be a rather reliable index when it comes to scientific validation. They claim to have many experts and specialists within their staff.

# data[].attributes.body
They seem to be fairly trustworthy for what I can see because it has information about most countries, the only countries they cannot assess are those that are rather isolated from the rest of the world like Greenland or North Korea.

# data[].attributes.body
Because the Peace Index is a fairly known index and because they claim to be unbiased. I believe that the purpose of this organisation is to provide people with knowledge and try to convince them to cooperate towards global peace.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance is good to find a lot of good information about the topic you are researching

# data[].attributes.body
Authority is good because you can see if the author is reliable

# data[].attributes.body
Accuracy is important so you can tell if the information you are getting is true or not

# data[].attributes.body
Purpose is good because you know why the information is presented to you