# data[].attributes.body
Yes I would change my mind because, robots don't have a lot of experiance flying. Human pilots have been doing their job for years. If the robot messed up they can't really figure out the solution. Human pilots can figure out the best way to be safe if something happened.

# data[].attributes.body
I would not want robots being pilots because your putting humans in danger. If the robot doesn't have experiance who knows what bad things could happen. I am ok with robots working fast food, but if robots are now trying to fly that is a big step from food. That type of thinking probably needs to be considered for a long time before being published to the world.

# data[].attributes.body
That people need to figure out a way that humans and robots share the work load. I agree with that statement, but if robots are doing the work they should be helping with stuff that won't risk humans life. For example, if robots are bringing food to people as a waiter, that won't risk human life. But if they are being a pilot that is a danger people shouldn't risk if the robots are not experienced.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I would definitely change my min. Robots are not as used to flying as some humans. What happens if a robot messes up or forgets how to fly a plane. A human has a brain and remembers these things.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I would change my mind because I don´t trust a machine with my life. I trust autopilot that has been used since forever, but not a robot. If I knew that a machine was flying my plane i would buckle up and ask to be dropped off at the next airport. Also what if it malfunctions in the middle of it. What if the robot explodes and blows up the pilot, then were going down.

# data[].attributes.body
I would change my mind because i trust human that can think and have a mind. Human can adjust to situations but robots don't have a mind to know what it going on. I think that robots shouldn't fly because they can break and stuff can go very wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I would not change my mind.I would definitely rather have a human flying the plane.I say this because I do not trust the robots to do that because what happens if the robot starts to function and then there is only on pilot.So I would feel more safe with humans flying the plane.

# data[].attributes.body
I would change my mind about flying if the pilot was a machine because I would be worried that an error in the robot could occur and the plane would crash. The robot wouldn't get tired though which might make me less worried about flying with a robot pilot. I believe that if a robot was flying the plane then it wouldn't lose its distraction and it would be able to fly more efficiently. This would really change the way I feel because humans think for themselves and they would be able to make a decision while a robot might not be able to and the plane would crash.

# data[].attributes.body
Humans create robots and control them but what happens if the Ipad that is controlling the robot dies. You could possibly die too. I would not trust a robot even if it is run by a human.
Humans are not the smartest sometimes.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that I would change my mind if I knew that the plane wasn't being controlled by a human. I think that not much would be different since pilots use auto pilot anyways. Also, the robots would be mostly controlled by humans. I don't think that any accidents would be likely to happen that wouldn't happen with a human pilot.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I would, I do not want a robot flying a plane without people because they are programmed to do certain things and cannot just improvise. They also do not have the level of experience that a human pilot would have. A human pilot can improvise what to do when something goes wrong, a robot can't. A human has experience with flying and certain things a robot would not have. A robot could also malfunction and cause a crash.

# data[].attributes.body
I would definitely change my mind about getting on a plane with a robot pilot. I believe that the robots lack the experience to make decisions about certain situations. I think robots can also have malfunctions during flight that can be dangerous even with a human co-pilot. Human co-pilots are going to be very helpful during flight in case of a malfunction with the robot.

# data[].attributes.body
yes I would change my mind about the flight only because robots haven't went through all the experience that humans have. What happens if a robot dies or something messes up. I just don't trust a machine in general. though robots react faster than humans so many more things can go wrong with robots.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he means that there is a lot to learn and a rot can't do all the work so hes saying that it is better for robots and human should work better together.

# data[].attributes.body
If just a robot was flying a plane that I was going to board soon, I would change my flight. If a pilot was on the plane sitting next to the robot, and not just a co-pilot, I would not be as determined to change my flight. Robots can have a malfunction and if the robot is sitting in the passenger seat, it can be hard to move such a complicated and heavy object. Also if there was no pilot on the plane, other passengers would be panicking when they found out.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I would not get on a plane with a robot controlling and here's why. I can agree and disagree because I wouldn't want to get on the plane because of the robot but if I knew everything going on I maybe wouldn't be as scared. If the robot were to stop working and doesn't react to the situation if there's a situation and were in the air we would all be terrified. Most people would get on and I see why but I would choose not to just for my safety. Its up to you of how you choose to travel but this is just my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I wouldn´t change my mind it a robot was my pilot. I believe robots are the way of the future and as technology advances, so do robots. Robots have a faster reaction time, and have been programmed with all the past flights of their planes flights. Even if people disagree with robots flying, we have to understand we can´t look down on robots as we as humans have made them. Robots never get tired, bored, or distracted so they are always 100% focused on the plane.

# data[].attributes.body
The meaning of spectrum is worldwide.
So he is saying Its really worldwide of increasing autonomy and how humans and robots work together.So that each can be doing the thing that its best.The robots are increasing worldwide.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because robots know only a certain about of knowledge while experienced pilots know everything about flying and common sense. I don't agree with robots being pilots because that is replacing a humans job. So, because of that robot replacing a humans job that means that they might not be able to find a job and not be able to buy there basic human needs. Robots are also made my humans meaning that robots know the same or less information making humans better. So, I think that humans are better and more experience than humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with that statement because what if the Ipad that is controlling the robot dies. You could die and so could everyone on the plane. Also what if the robot malfunctions. If a human controls the robot still no because like I said what if the ipad dies.

# data[].attributes.body
I would not want a robot to run a plane if a human runs it. If a human runs it they would have to control it on something. What if the thing they are controlling it on runs out of battery? You could possibly die and that would be really bad.

# data[].attributes.body
What if the jets break and the plane is on fire a robot wouldn't know what do do in that situation. The plane could break or the robot and if there is no pilot no one will know how to do. YOU COULD DIE AS WELL AS EVERYONE ON THE PLANE.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it means that the important thing is increasing the efficiency of robots. Robots that don't have the ability to do certain things can put other people in danger when it comes to flying. The human co-pilot can help with any flaws that the robot can have. Robots have the capability to be better at flying in the future and not put people at risk.

# data[].attributes.body
John Langford means that there is a wide spread of how we humans and robots work together in the world to achieve different tasks. I believe that we need to watch how we choose to use robots. If one day, robots take over we can loose a lot of things even us daily life. The robots are helping us everyday so we know how to work better at something but us humans have to get there first meaning we need experience.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion about robots flying is very bad.I still believe that if the robot functions something bad could happen.What if the I pad dies that controls the robot.I also would not feel comfortable that a robot is flying a machine that is really big because that takes a lot of responsibility and robots dint have brains.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he means that there is still a lot of work to do /learn about robots. Robots can't do everything by themselves and we need to learn how to do things together. I still don't agree with the statement tho. I don't trust robots at all even if they are ran by humans. So many malfunctions could happen with the robot.

# data[].attributes.body
A situation that I wouldn't want a robot to take over would be teaching. I feel like there would be no personal connections no matter how human-like it would be. I also believe that they would have no sense of humor. I hope robots never replace schoolteachers in the future because school would be much more boring.

# data[].attributes.body
Humans and robots should work together so if a robot makes a mistake the human can fix it. I disagree however, I think that a robot should not be controlling something like a plane even if the pilot is watching it because the robot could die, or malfunction. Anything could happen with a robot and it could cause many bad things. I would not trust a robot with flying a plane.

# data[].attributes.body
I would not want a robot running my plane because if the ipad dies so does the robot. If the robot dies on the control it will be stuck there because it is metal. There could also be a malfunction. What if someone spills water on it, then it would malfunction.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the statement that robots and humans should work together, and this is the reason I would not a trust a robot alone. Increasing autonomy to make sure robots function properly is a great step in the right direction. I am okay with a robot helping with food, but with many passengers lives, i"m not so sure.

# data[].attributes.body
This statement means that John Lang ford thinks that robots should do what there good at while humans should do what there good at. This means that humans should do the things like flying and taking care of the passengers. While the robots should be on the ground doing other things that there good at. So, I think that John wants robots to do what they normally do and humans to keep there jobs and continue there normal life.

# data[].attributes.body
That as more robots get more advanced in automation, we get closer to this goal of robots flying planes. I agree with this statement as if something like automation, or better more advanced cameras are invented the robots get better. He is right saying these things as I also believe that when automation reaches a certain point, we won´t have to do things like fly or cook or other things. I do believe though, that there should be atleast one pilot on board just incase things do go back.

# data[].attributes.body
I think a situations would be if the plane was getting hijacked, there would not be anything that the robot would be able to do. I think another situation would be if the plane has a malfunction, the robot would not be able to do anything. If the robot exploded that could be a hazard to the co-pilot. Robots are not the safest flying a plane, and should not be flying.

# data[].attributes.body
I wouldn't trust a robot flying a plane because it's dangerous and there could be malfunctions. Honestly I don't trust robots at all, there is no specific job that I don't trust them with. Just think of all the malfunctions and things that could go wrong with robots. The robot could forget how to fly the plane or it could die in the middle of flying. I just don't trust robots.

# data[].attributes.body
When I think about robots running a plane, I can only think of all the mistakes that can happen. A situation I would definitely not want a robot would definitely be flying in a plane. The reason for this is that many lives are risked just to test a robot. What if they run out of battery? What if it malfunctions? I do not think this should happen.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that John Langford meant that robots and humans working together need to be something that happens more often. Robots would be able to pilot a plane and do the thing it is meant to do while the human does what they are supposed to do. Automatic things need to be something that is a thing all around the world, people and robots could work together instead of robots ruling the world or humans ruling the world. Autonomy could help society by driving, driving would be safer if vehicle could drive themselves Autonomy could help with a lot of other things in society.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, there are some very certain conditions were I wouldn´t want robbots flying. I believe that if humans couldn´t perfectly fly and humans made robots, that robots probably aren´t absolutely perfect either. Some scenario´s would be if flying through extreme weather, or if in the military flying through war or flying to wars. Through all of this I realize that nothing is truly perfect, not humans, or robots made by humans, but all that has to happen is that robots preform better than a human.

# data[].attributes.body
If there was a situation where I would not want to fly in a plane when a robot was piloting it would be if there was lightning. I believe that the plane might crash or explode if lightning hit it. I don't know if the robot would know what to do. Robots are also electrical so being hit by lightning could cause the robot to go offline. In the end there would be no one to pilot the plane and everyone would die or get injured. If a human piloted the plane then they would probably know what to do and they wouldn't get hit by lightning because they are not metal. In the end everyone might make it out alive or atleast most.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because there can be a variety of situations that can cause issues with plane and everyone on the plane. If were going through a storm and the robot has not been programmed to go through one successfully. Robots need to be programmed to work through any situations and with anything that gets in its way. In my opinion I chose not to get on a plane with robots for my safety but to others it may be that best way of traveling and living everyday life.

# data[].attributes.body
I wouldn't want a robot to be flying a plane when the plane is on fire. I don't want the robot to blow up and cause a bigger problem. The robot would cause the whole plane to blow up making possibly no survivors. So, I don't agree with robots being pilots because of this situation.