# data[].attributes.body
Hannah E. People that are in favor of the test believe that the test can identify emotions and past trauma. In the text they believed that the the test worked very well and that it can help diagnose illnesses. The people that went against the test believe that the test is useless and that the test is not scientific. In the text the people believed that the test did not list any facts and that it shows no reason for the results. They want it to have a reason and scientific background.

# data[].attributes.body
Some Doctors like Dr. Weiner felt like the tests were taken out of context and are actually useful for personality. On the other hand, other Doctors thought it was useless and weren't scientific

# data[].attributes.headline
Part 2 people who don't want to keep the test. According to the text it says,"Small number of open-minded people, and in particular students, who have yet to make up their minds on this issue. This shows that they are against it. Jornea

# data[].attributes.subject
Part 2 people who don't want to keep the test. According to the text it says,"Small number of open-minded people, and in particular students, who have yet to make up their minds on this issue. This shows that they are against it. Jornea

# data[].attributes.body
The author believes ink blots are not scientifically helpful because they are "cultish" and "Scientifically useless." However the other side says the ink blot "has been used fir a long time effectively with very good results and a great deal of scientific results."

# data[].attributes.headline
part 1 continued. "With very good results and good results. 

# data[].attributes.subject
part 1 continued. "With very good results and good results. 

# data[].attributes.body
This shows that they wanna keep the test. -Jornea

# data[].attributes.headline
Tarver - During the debate there was two sides one showes 

# data[].attributes.subject
Tarver - During the debate there was two sides one showes 

# data[].attributes.headline
One side of the debate thinks that the inkblot test is not a good way to do the test because it wont show good results. The other side thinks that it would give good results.

# data[].attributes.subject
One side of the debate thinks that the inkblot test is not a good way to do the test because it wont show good results. The other side thinks that it would give good results.

# data[].attributes.headline
The practitioners from the administers  say that a very small number of indexes derived from these techniques. BY dylan. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The practitioners from the administers  say that a very small number of indexes derived from these techniques. BY dylan. 

# data[].attributes.body
 People that like the test believe that the test can identify emotions and past trauma

# data[].attributes.body
Protective tests are controversial because of the lack of evidence that the test actually proves your intelligence. Many doctors are against the test due to theses reasons. there are very few doctors in favor of the continuation of the test.

# data[].attributes.headline
Part one to the debate is that they want to keep the test. According to the text it says,"Have been used for a long time very effectively

# data[].attributes.subject
Part one to the debate is that they want to keep the test. According to the text it says,"Have been used for a long time very effectively

# data[].attributes.body
Jornea

# data[].attributes.body
One side of the debate thinks That the Inkblot test is unscientific and "cultish "

The other side thinks that it is a great

# data[].attributes.body
On one side of the debate for the Rorscharch is that the pyshcologists, like Dr. Lienfield opposes the tests because there are not factual, According to the text the tests are only based on emotions and test to attain personalities.

# data[].attributes.headline
One side of the debate thinks That the Inkblot test is unscientific and "cultish "                         

# data[].attributes.subject
One side of the debate thinks That the Inkblot test is unscientific and "cultish "                         

# data[].attributes.body
The other side thinks that it is a great and has been used for along time and had good results. The Evidence to support the  side that thinks the test is useless   "There has been a substantial gap between the clinical use of these tests and what the research suggests about their validity," said Dr. Scott O. Lilienfeld "

# data[].attributes.body
Assignment 1- One side of the debate are in favor for it being able to tell what people are feeling through personality. The article says, "They "have been used for a long time very effectively, with very good results and a great deal of scientific support," he said." Dr. Irving B. Weiner is saying he is with the favor for it being sake of being able to tell stuff through different tests.

# data[].attributes.body
One part of the debate it that they think the test is effective and shows good results. The other side of the debate is that they think the test isn't effective. The side that is for the assignment says that the test is effective because it shows great results of presonality, and how they feel about the pictures they are given. The people that aren't in favor of the test say that it gives limited data and shouldn't be used for intelligence and it doesn't give good feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
the scientist that are  against the inkblot test they are against it because the test can only give results about there personality and cant test their inlect but the scientist that are for the inkblot test think it can test personality intlect and if they have done crimes

# data[].attributes.body
Half the scientist think that the test is very positive to accumulate peoples emotion. Half scientist talks about how they are inkblot think that the test is negative. It shows no information and is not effortless.

# data[].attributes.body
Some scientist who think the test is helpful support it because they think it tells you more about what the person knows. The other scientist think it is limited on what it can tell you about the person.

# data[].attributes.body
one side of the debate is talking about the Rorschach test and how effective the test is they give

# data[].attributes.body
First part of the debate- Dr.Lilienfeld stated he wanted to raise awarness for the problems of the test because he belives the test and the test results are invilad.
The second part of the debate- Dr.Weiner stated that you can't have a person who hasn't study the test comment and criticizes it.

# data[].attributes.body
Projective tests are controversial because….
Projective tests are controversial but….
Projective tests are controversial so….

# data[].attributes.body
Identify each side of the debate over the Rorschach and other projective tests.

Locate evidence that supports each side of the debate.