# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Information that indicates Adnan’s innocence
Response:
1. Claim of being at library during murder
2. Witness seing Adnan at the library
3. Many people claiming that Adnan as that murder is out of character and unlikely

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Sarah Koenig (podcaster) shows bias / neutrality
Response:
1. Flat out says that the motive of being heartbroken doesn't make sense
2. Says most witnesses also believe that the motive is unlikely
3. But also talks about Adnan asking Hae min lee for a ride to get into her car and kill her

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Information that indicates another suspect
Response:
1. The entire episode discussed Mr. S discovering the body under suspicious circumstances
2. There is evidence proving that it is essentially impossible for Mr. S to randomly stumble upon the body and even with the intention of finding the body it's hard to locate
3. Mr. S had a criminal record of streaking and was involved in suspicious activity with a police officer

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Inconsistencies in evidence
Response:
1. Jen’s statement was vague, contradicted itself, and overall didn’t make sense
2. Jay’s numerous interviews all varied from one another in crucial details for example where they went and if he was involved
3. The reason why Adnan would confide in Jay as a criminal partner isn’t plausible or believable

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Information that indicates Adnan’s guilty
Response:
1. The timeline that Jay gives to the police is possible, however extremely unlikely
2. Adnan's phone record matches with the cell towers, call log, Jay's story, Adnan's story, and Cathy's story. Also, all locations that were  supported by the cell towers.
3. Even though the details in Jay's story is inconsistent. However his overall story though, mainly the key points seem to be accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
Theme:
Response:

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Information that indicates Adnan's guilty
Response:
1. Adnan's left palm print was found on the Hae's map page of Leakin Park
2. A letter from Hae written to Adnan where she stated that she was frustrated with Adnan. Adnan and Hae’s friend Aisha wrote notes back and forth joking about it. At the top of the page Adnan wrote “I’m going to kill.” Aisha stated that, the words weren’t there at the time, and must’ve been added later by Adnan.
3. A father called Dave told the police that his daughter Laura heard something about a dead body. Laura said that a boy from the neighborhood told her that a guy had showed him a dead body. She stated that the boy appeared to want to get it off of his chest. Police also asked her if he mentioned who the friend was that showed him the dead body and she stated that she thought he said his name was Adnan.

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Information that indicates Adnan’s innocence
Response:
1. Found an alternative explanation for the so-called “Nisha call”, a phone call made from Adnan’s phone to his friend Nisha that seemed not to fit with his timeline of events. A new theory suggests that the call could be nothing more sinister than an accidental "butt dial".
2. Issued a motion to test the DNA evidence from the case in a bid to link the crime not with Adnan but with a man named Ronald Lee Moore (now dead), who was convicted around the same time as Adnan for a similar crime.
3. Don, Hae’s boyfriend at the time of her death. It emerges that he – like Adnan – never tried to call Hae after she went missing.

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Ineffective Council

Response:
1. Several people at the second trial, including Adnan, suggested Gutierrez had a confusing way of presenting evidence. Her career ended a year after Adnan's trial ended, when she got in trouble with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, with clients complaining she had taken their money and not carried out the work she had promised.
2. Gutierrez saw this as the "magic information" at the time. She argued that it was "patently improper" as it could look like Jay was being influenced by the state and she said that the defence should have been informed. But this was not upheld by the judge.
3. Gutierrez was accused by the judge of lying after she claimed she had not seen a piece of mobile phone evidence about to be presented by the prosecution. Gutierrez requested the mistrial herself, fearing that the jury would not trust her after overhearing the accusation from the judge.

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Information that indicates another suspect
Response:
1. Jay admitted to “somewhat” lying on the stand
2. Inconsistencies in Jay’s entire story.
3. His high school classmates and friends paint a picture of a guy that's charming but slightly dangerous-seeming guy whom you couldn’t quite get a finger on

# data[].attributes.body
Theme:
Response:

# data[].attributes.body
Theme: Human Behavior/Nature
Response:
1. Any behavior can be used as evidence of good character or questionable character — it’s all subjective. For instance,Adnan’s ability to smooth over rough situations as proof that he’s a good guy, while another points to that same quality as a sign that he’s sneaky.
2. We would rather believe that murderers are a different breed than the rest of us, however Ewing said that most of the time, murderers are pretty ordinary.
3. The audience get a sense of what the podcast has done to Adnan’s life, dredging up old feelings of hurt and even more painfully, perhaps, giving him a glimmer of hope. Koenig acknowledged that “my story had messed with his equilibrium.”