# data[].attributes.headline
I think the combination of both approaches is the best, because that way students can learn and engage at the same time. I don't think that one approach would work without another.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the combination of both approaches is the best, because that way students can learn and engage at the same time. I don't think that one approach would work without another.

# data[].attributes.body
M: teacher interacts with students, asking Qs, repeating, correcting (more suitable for younger studenst)
D: i believe more suitable for older students already withh bigger experiences in the field of study, however depending on the personality of the student this proces can be hindering

# data[].attributes.headline
D approach seems hard to apply with a class of 40+ students.

# data[].attributes.subject
D approach seems hard to apply with a class of 40+ students.

# data[].attributes.headline
Combination of both could have the best results from students. It's important to explain something and then let students have discussion.

# data[].attributes.subject
Combination of both could have the best results from students. It's important to explain something and then let students have discussion.

# data[].attributes.headline
In czech high schools D approach is lacking when it omes to learning languages.

# data[].attributes.subject
In czech high schools D approach is lacking when it omes to learning languages.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like M is more suitable for high schools, as the teacher have syllabuses they need to go through and it is hard to control teenagers if they really speak about the theme. D is more useful in universities as the students have more knowledge. And the perfect would be combination of the both.

# data[].attributes.headline
The M approach is more about passive learning and would be good for teaching new information. The D approach on the other hand focuses on team work, dialogue, collaborative projects as such. I feel like this would be useful way to put the previously learned skills into practice. I believe both approaches should be combined depending on the situation and level of proficiency.

# data[].attributes.subject
The M approach is more about passive learning and would be good for teaching new information. The D approach on the other hand focuses on team work, dialogue, collaborative projects as such. I feel like this would be useful way to put the previously learned skills into practice. I believe both approaches should be combined depending on the situation and level of proficiency.

# data[].attributes.headline
The M approach is a better method for beginners to learn about basics of the language or science. The D method is good if most of the students are interested in the topic and already are ready to speak in the language or speak together about centain topic. I believe both should be combined to some extend

# data[].attributes.subject
The M approach is a better method for beginners to learn about basics of the language or science. The D method is good if most of the students are interested in the topic and already are ready to speak in the language or speak together about centain topic. I believe both should be combined to some extend

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that both approaches have pros and cons. In my opinion M approach is best when explaining new things and at the beginner level. D is best to practise and it is a good way to use who you've learned from M approach. Best is combination of both.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that both approaches have pros and cons. In my opinion M approach is best when explaining new things and at the beginner level. D is best to practise and it is a good way to use who you've learned from M approach. Best is combination of both.

# data[].attributes.headline
In my opinion, the dialogical way of teaching is better for the engagement of the student with the material, however I think that it is better suited for students, who already are familiar with the material. For best results I believe that both of these approaches should be combined.

# data[].attributes.subject
In my opinion, the dialogical way of teaching is better for the engagement of the student with the material, however I think that it is better suited for students, who already are familiar with the material. For best results I believe that both of these approaches should be combined.

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe D is more useful for advanced language or science students, that are really interested in the topic (probably university students). In high school, I think that the students are not interested enough to be working individually. Also teachers in middle or high school tend to be stressed by the amount of topics they are expected to go through and they are not given enough lecture time to make students engage.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe D is more useful for advanced language or science students, that are really interested in the topic (probably university students). In high school, I think that the students are not interested enough to be working individually. Also teachers in middle or high school tend to be stressed by the amount of topics they are expected to go through and they are not given enough lecture time to make students engage.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe good approach would be to combine both approaches and alter the lecture according to the students' level.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that a combination of M and D approches is ideal - start with an M, where the teacher gives necessary information, then continue with D, when students can discuss and use what they learnt.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that a combination of M and D approches is ideal - start with an M, where the teacher gives necessary information, then continue with D, when students can discuss and use what they learnt.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the M approach and D approach should be combined during the classes. The M approach used to explain new stuff, while the D approach used to practice the knowledge that the students' possess. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the M approach and D approach should be combined during the classes. The M approach used to explain new stuff, while the D approach used to practice the knowledge that the students' possess. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe both approaches should be combined. M focuses more on explaining "rules" of the studied matter whereas D is more inclined to "practice". Therefore I believe one cannot be 100% effective without the other.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe both approaches should be combined. M focuses more on explaining "rules" of the studied matter whereas D is more inclined to "practice". Therefore I believe one cannot be 100% effective without the other.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hello! You can write your ideas here! :) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Hello! You can write your ideas here! :) 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think D is way more resourceful, and it does help to foster students' understanding in a more accurate way!

# data[].attributes.subject
I think D is way more resourceful, and it does help to foster students' understanding in a more accurate way!