# data[].attributes.headline
1. Again technical problems. Good planning of PPT content (with introduction and warm-up Q&A part), design is appropriate to the topic. The theoretical part of each member's part is too long.  	                                                  2.  5 principles are covered in PPT. While analyzing principles in the text no visual example is not provided.                                               3. they introduce their modification and explain it, Malika's done a good job. 	                                                  4. Q&As are not included, any audio or video materials are used.            5. Not each member of that group feels responsible for time management. Some sentences in PPT do not begin with capital letters.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Again technical problems. Good planning of PPT content (with introduction and warm-up Q&A part), design is appropriate to the topic. The theoretical part of each member's part is too long.  	                                                  2.  5 principles are covered in PPT. While analyzing principles in the text no visual example is not provided.                                               3. they introduce their modification and explain it, Malika's done a good job. 	                                                  4. Q&As are not included, any audio or video materials are used.            5. Not each member of that group feels responsible for time management. Some sentences in PPT do not begin with capital letters.

# data[].attributes.body
- good use of technology: canva, padlet
-it was very interesting to participate for me
- interacted with audience
-Sarvinoz clearly explained the assessing reading with examples.
-observed the currculum according to 5 principles
-speech was easy to follow
-perfectly modificated version

# data[].attributes.body
I loved the way they introduced their research and structured their talk. They described the background really clearly. The demonstration was nice. The explanation of the presenters was clear and in detail. Sitora’s slides were well-designed. I liked Mavluda’s speech as it was more natural. They put a lot of work on their slides. Although there were some technical problems, they managed to make it smoothly. Furthermore, their movement engaged the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Starting with questions in order to wake up students and check their background knowledge about the topic is helpful to draw the attention. I think this method was used well by the presenters. Furthermore, the design of the ppt is also captivating. Mavluda's explanation about the chosen reading text according to the validity, authenticity and washback principles is clear as she analyzed every criterion of those principles. I liked modified version of this task as they added more modern tech tools instead of ordinary techniques. I learned some information which was new for me about syntactic, morphological and genre knowledge which was defined by Sarvinoz.

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback:
Good start with citation, layout of the presentation is very well organized. Theoratical part is also included. Curriculum o the chosen test is also provided. Clear explanation of the task practicality was given.
The critique part of the reading part was provided step by step, in a logical order. Speakers were confident while delivering the  information. Thorough explanation of modification part.

# data[].attributes.body
Starting with warm up questions;

Interaction with audience;

Curriculum objectives are given;

Test criteria are analyzed;

Good organization and PPT is well-designed;

Brilliant group member;

Technical problems influenced their speech;

# data[].attributes.body
Ziyada

# data[].attributes.headline
Feedback for group presentation on Assessing reading, Group 2, MA TESL 5311, 3T, SPRING 1, 2022

# data[].attributes.subject
Feedback for group presentation on Assessing reading, Group 2, MA TESL 5311, 3T, SPRING 1, 2022

# data[].attributes.body
Feel free to share your opinion