# data[].attributes.headline
Arizona Law That Banned Mexican-American Studies May Be Discriminatory, Court Rules

# data[].attributes.subject
Arizona Law That Banned Mexican-American Studies May Be Discriminatory, Court Rules

# data[].attributes.body
Chris B, Wendy Gutierrez, Gloria Herrera, Rafael Pineda

Basic Identification:
1. Online News Article
2. July 07 2015, Updated on July 08 2015
3. The Huffington Post
4. Roque Planas Latino Voices

Author's Intent:
1. Male journalist
2. It identifies the author as a person
3. The author created this source to inform others of the progress of the banned program. It isn't very detailed on what occurred at court and had many of the representatives give intake on how they feel toward the situation.
4. The author's argument was that the banning of the Tucson ethnic studies was a form of discrimination against Mexican-Americans.
5. The article was mainly intended for the students, teachers and parents of the Tucson ethnic studies program.
6. Some might agree with the argument of the author that banning the program is an attack against ethnic groups, some might disagree and think that schools must not forget about learning the US Government.

# data[].attributes.headline
Arizona Law that banned Mexican American studies may be discriminatory Court Rules

# data[].attributes.subject
Arizona Law that banned Mexican American studies may be discriminatory Court Rules

# data[].attributes.body
Members: Owens, Yaneli, Edgar, Jaime
Basic ID
1) News Article Secondary Source
2) Feb 20, 2015
3) New York Times
4) Wiliam D. Carrigan  and Clive Webb

Authors Intent
1) They are both professors
2) They are both aware of their students not knowing about some information on the lynching
3) Author created the source to spread awareness
4)Mexicans were going through the same hardships as African Americans
5) Latinos and Chicano
6)Sadden and worries about Americans Past

# data[].attributes.body
by: Sergio, Andrew, Sandra ,Christopher

Basic Identification
1. primary Source
2. April 3, 2008
3. Mexico City
4.Deborah Bonello and Reed Johnson

Authors Intent
1. A female reporter
2. The fact that she was mexican she was being biased towards providing support towards her culture.
3. to educate the people in the USA in who are mad about the commercial.
4. The authors main argument was that to not forget the history of both countries.
5. the intended audience for this source are the americans who dont know the real history of the usa.
6. they are going to take the article negatively because they refuse to know the history

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyzing Sources: Arizona Law That Banned Mexican-American Studies May Be Discriminatory, Court Rules

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyzing Sources: Arizona Law That Banned Mexican-American Studies May Be Discriminatory, Court Rules

# data[].attributes.body
Group Members: Lorena Nunez, Tiffany Nunez, Blanca Amador

Basic Identification
1.  Article/ primary source
2.  07/07/2015
3.  Tucson’s, AZ
4.  Roque Planas

Author’s Intent
1.  Editor for Latino Voices.
2. He can be bias towards the needs of the Latino community as a latino editor. As a latino editor he knows the community's problem at first hand.
3.  His profession is based on the Latino community, and this is a problem that concerns the community; so that can be a reason why he wrote this article.
4.  His argument is that this Arizona law to ban Mexican-American ethnic studies curriculum is intentionally discriminating against Hispanics.
5.  Latinos are the intended audience because they can see what is going on so they will be on board to fight against the elimination of ethnic studies.
6.  The intended audience can come up with a way not to eliminate the Mexican-American studies.

# data[].attributes.headline
Arizona Law that banned Mexican-American Studies May Be Discriminatory,Court Rules 

# data[].attributes.subject
Arizona Law that banned Mexican-American Studies May Be Discriminatory,Court Rules 

# data[].attributes.body
by: Jeannette Rivera, Liza Serrano, Jeremy Sanchez
Basic Identification
1. Newspaper Article
2.July 7, 2015; published July 8th, 2015
3.Huffington Post
4. Roque Planas
Author's Intent:
1.Male editor
2. Him being a latino editor he now how hard problems  can get for the latino community
3.Well since the editor does work for Latino Voices it is a problem that concern a lot of latin, especially himself being latino. It is a problem because a lot of people might have gotten offended Mexican-American studies being banned and probably why he wrote this article to address the problem to the world.
4.Roque argument is based on Arizona banning Mexican-American studies and discriminating Hispanics and is sending out a message with this article.
5. The intended audience for the article are Latinos because the are facing the problem and are very offended by it, so with citizen power, they're going to doing anything possible to fight the banning of Mexican-American Studies.
6.The intended audience can gather up as a community and figure a plan out to help save "Mexican-American Studies"

# data[].attributes.body
Group members: Amaralys,  Ranchel, Franchesca, Nancy, Maribel

Basic Identification:
1. News Paper article Secondary Source
2. February 20, 2015
3. New York
4. William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb

Author's Intent
1. William D. Carrigan is a professor of history and Clive is a professor of modern American history.
2. They are both educated and are both historians.
3. We think they created this source to uncover and reveal more truths about what happened in the past.
4.The author's main arguments were that that Mexican's were the most people of color lynched and they were lynched for accusitions that were not shown proven.
5. The intended audience of this source is for the general public, mostly for people living in America.
6. Their perspective can feel disturbed about what has happened in the past that hasn't had a big recognition at all in the history classes in America.

# data[].attributes.body
by: Eli Berengut, Yazmin Alalli, Natasha Dholakia, Janella De Anda

Basic Identification:
1) Secondary source(newspaper)
2) February 20, 2015
3)New York
4) William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb

Authors intent:
1) Professor of history at Rowan University. Clive Webb is Professor of modern American History
2) Since they are both historians, we could see their perspectives may or may not be biased based on gender, color, profession, and class.
3)To inform people that go to the hanging tree about what actually happened there
4) The authors argument is that Blacks are not the only victims of white mobs and that Mexican's were also lynches, specifically at this location
5) Anybody who reads the New York times and possibly anyone who is planning on visiting this location
6) The intended audience could shape this perspective by making them aware of exactly what happened at this hanging tree and that Mexican's were lynched here.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyzing Sources: When Americans Lynched Mexicans

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyzing Sources: When Americans Lynched Mexicans

# data[].attributes.body
Members: Georgeanna, Heriberto, Alberto, Mayra

Basic ID:
1) A secondary source, news paper article
2) February 20, 2015
3) New York
4) William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb

Author's Intent:
1) Carrigan was a professor of history at Rowan University. Webb was a professor of modern history at University of Sussex. They're both caucasian males. Probably both upper middle class.
2) They both are fully capable of writing this article since they're historians with enough of an education to not be biased.
3) Since Clive Webb studied for political violence and race, he created this source to bring awareness that other minorities were targeted throughout history.
4) Webb and Carrigan are arguing that when you go back in American history, you can see that the act of lynching was never punished.
5) Mexican-Americans
6) The authors provide us with enough information to understand the historical context of the lynching without bashing white people.

# data[].attributes.body
Members: Natalie, Anni, Esmeralda, Melody

When Americans Lynched Mexicans

Basic Information:
1. Online Newspaper Article
2. Feb. 20, 2015
3. The New York Times, The Opinion Pages, Op-Ed Contributors

Author's Intent:
1. Carrigan: A professor of History at Rowan University, white middle aged man.
Webb: A professor of modern American history at the University of Sussex, white middle aged man.
2. The way one person grows up and the opportunities given to them often influence their perspectives because privilege can tame and blind. The authors, although it was meant to be a scholarly article, used language that was calm and like previously mentioned, tame. They did question a lot of the credibility of history as it has been told but overall it was a calm tone.
3. Carrigan specializes on lynchings and Webb on political violence in America so due to their expertise, the New York Times most likely saw them the most fit to write this article. They were most likely willing to do so because writing on such a big paper brings light to topics that might not be so popular.
4. The authors talk argue that Mexicans, aside from African Americans, were in large numbers lynched, even though common knowledge says otherwise. The authors give examples about different lynchings throughout the 19th and 20th century and how they not only weren't documented but that authorities had a large part.
5. The intended audience is most likely those who have had the basic "high school" education where they teach the very basic of history, in this case lynchings.
6.The audience might discredit the claims made in the article since it is not popular history or what has been taught.
Historical Context:
Content of the Source:
Relevance of the Source:

# data[].attributes.body
Group Members: Jesus Roman, Adrian Salazar, Jose Velazquez, Alondra Ruiz
1) Secondary Source, News Article
2)February 20, 2015
3)New York
4)William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb
1]Professor with a PHD in American History
2] It gives the author credibility
3] Addressing an issue that is overlooked to the audience
4] He was trying to argue that not only African Americans were lynched but Mexicans too.
5] Everyone who is unaware of the history of Lynching.
6] It bring the Perspective of disbelief.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyzing Sources "Arizona Law That Banned Mexican- American Studies May Be Discriminatory, Court Rules"

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyzing Sources "Arizona Law That Banned Mexican- American Studies May Be Discriminatory, Court Rules"

# data[].attributes.body
Group Members: Melyssa Montoya, Daniela Barajas, Kiana Fines, Fredy Garcia

1) This source is a online Newspaper Article.
2) This article was written on July 7, 2015 and updated on July 8, 2015.
3) This article was created at the HuffPost.
4) Roque Planas created this article.
Authors Intent:
1) Roque Planas is and Editor for Latino Voices. He is a male.
2) The author is heavily invested in having latino voices represented.
3) We believe the author created this source to shed some light on the Arizona Law that banned Mexican-American Studies.
4) The author argues that this decision to ban Mexican-American Studies is a blow. As we can see in paragraph 5.
5) The latino community.
6) The intended audience might agree that this law is discriminatory towards the Mexican- American community.

# data[].attributes.headline
SAMPLE:  "When Americans Lynched Mexicans"

# data[].attributes.subject
SAMPLE:  "When Americans Lynched Mexicans"

# data[].attributes.body
Group Members: Melisa, Jose, Maria

Basic IDs
1) This is a periodical article (secondary source).