# data[].attributes.body
A new correlation that i discovered was with Jack, and his narcistic ego that could be compared for the rest of society. In chapter 4 closer to theend of the chapter, jakv and the rest of the choir boys had left the fire unattended while they went to go hutn for pigs. Thus angering ralph and bring he confrontation of calling jack out saying it was his fault for the fire and how they were close tro being discovered and saved. Jack had a hard time accepting this, not wating to find fult in his character, je goes one to argue with ralph trying to justifiy his doing. This could draw back to very narcistic behavior/psychological matter with ego and not wanting to be wrong, having that feeling of knowing to be right. Because it is dificult for a person to admit to their wrongs and suddenly doubt themselves, dpubting tjehir own knowledge and their who sate being. these can be more explaine through this rsources below: 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for some people, saying they're wrong feels impossible.

Be it your partner, your boss or, God forbid, your in-laws, dealing with somebody who, even when faced with overwhelming evidence of a bungle, just can't cop blame can be frustrating.

But why do they do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to explain:
They think being wrong means they're unworthy
For some, conceding that they're fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences associated with loss or failure," says Sharp.

"I think the reason some can't apologize isn't actually because they don't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as an inherent character fault," he explains.

Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their screw-ups are unforgivable.

"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the time,'" he says.
They think never admitting fault makes you look stronger
For some, appearing apologetic is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good leader admits their mistakes.

"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being fallible tend to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.

According to him, a boss' deep sense of accountability can inspire people to think of them as "highly trusted" and conjure "higher levels of engagement and productivity."

"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's pretty hard to believe," says the psychologist. "I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect. Whereas someone who says, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm sorry but I'll try to fix it,' to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."
They don't value the truth
For some people, the fact is they "don't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.

"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a reality, is that not everyone does value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.

Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says some people who eat up "fake news" propaganda might not value facts. When it comes to the truth, the expert warns that some people "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"

"They don't care about it because they value other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.

Citing the upsurge of alt-right political movements around the world, Sharp says how someone approaches a situation will often reveal whether facts or feelings will influence them more.

"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains. "Other people make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an emotional person because it just won't wear, you're talking different languages ... This is why two sides might increasingly [find] it hard to communicate or to find common ground. It's very difficult."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
This is why some people can't admit they're wrong

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for some people, saying they're wrong feels impossible. Be it your partner, your boss or, God forbid, your in-laws, dealing with somebody who, even when faced with overwhelming evidence of a bungle, just can't cop blame can be frustrating.

# data[].attributes.body
The correlation between the first part of the  story and my own personal experience is how the boys try and bring their personal experiences into the new  situation that they have found themselves in. The conch shell is a perfect example of this Ralph took his personal experiences and used the conch shell to his advantage

"S'right. It's a shell! I seen one like that before. On someone's back wall. A conch he called it. He used to blow it and then his mom would come." (Golding 15)

# data[].attributes.body
Kids can't function without human authority. Each character representing a problem within society and their own complex. Kids; while their brain is still maturing, complexly lack common sense and cooperation.

# data[].attributes.body
A correlation I have with one of the characters, and well in general with other women as well, that is that piggy, always quoting his aunt, yielding representation of only female voice represented in the whole book. Also representing the rational world with another voice of a party. Piggy had great and actual smart ideas, but they were always pushed away due to appearance. which I can relate to this and other women as well how our voices are always shun down or never heard due to out appearance and/or just because of our sex.

# data[].attributes.body
When the boys miss the ship due to the lack of smoke from the fire, they check their priorities. Ralph argues with them that nothing they start or attempt to start every gets finished. He complains how they can never devote their time and finish a task. The boys being so tired of Ralph's authority they argue, disregarding the conch shell and the rules they have set; Jack seems to not care about the rules. The boys seem to need a parent guidance to function and lack cooperation and common sense.

# data[].attributes.body
Diagnosis: Ralph; is selfish, thinks highly of himself, ruler complex, wants to save himself more than anything. Piggy; Insecure, timid, doesn’t stand up for himself. Jack; doesn’t prioritize the important things, thinks hunting is the most important thing, acts like he could take anyone, also thinks he’s better than everyone else, stubborn. Prognosis: Ralph; He’ll loose a close friend and then realize his mistakes. Piggy; will most likely die from his lack of athleticness and won’t stand up for himself. Jack; will realize that he’s in the wrong and can’t be saved unless he prioritizes something other than hunting.