# data[].attributes.body
Candidates: Dave Brat (R) and Abigail Spanberger (D)

# data[].attributes.body
During the 2016 election the state of Virginia did vote for Clinton, but Virginia's 7th precinct voted for Tump.

# data[].attributes.body
Dave Brat is up for reelection
Abigail Spanberger is the first woman candidate sine 1961.

# data[].attributes.body
Abigail Spanberger is married to Adam Spanberger, they live with their children in Glen Allen Virginia. Spanberger believes in Education for all, health care for all, finding jobs for people, and a lot more.

# data[].attributes.body
Dave Brat is married to Laura Brat, they have two children Jonathan and Sophia. Brat believes in the Judeo-Christian tradition, the rule of law and the free market system.

# data[].attributes.body
Virginia 7th is a rural republican area with some suburbs becoming more democratic in recent years. Many people living in Virginia are ages 25-59.

# data[].attributes.body
in 2014 the last non-presidential general election the voter turnout was 2,194,346. In Virginia 7th 8,531 voters cast ballots

# data[].attributes.body
Abigail Spanberger beat retired Marine Col. Dan Ward. Spanberger won with 72.7% of the votes. For Brat no one ran against him in the primary so it was an easy win for him.

# data[].attributes.body
Brat and Spanberger have different views on taxes, health care, and immigration. Brat believes on less tax, where Spanberger views taxes as helping the country and state. She says that more tax could benefit health care for all. On the immigration issue Brat agrees with President Trump on tariffs and immigration laws. Spanberger believes that there should be stricter laws on immigration and border patrol.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
CULPEPER - In what might be the only election debate in Virginia's 7th U.S. House District, Democrat Abigail Spanberger sought to run to the political center while GOP Rep. Dave Brat kept pulling her back by trying to tie her to unpopular House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and liberal immigration policy.

Acknowledging that he had tried to link Spanberger to Pelosi "a million times," the former economics professor, seeking a third term in Congress, highlighted his conservative positions on immigration and taxes in Monday's debate at Germanna Community College, hosted by the Culpeper Chamber of Commerce and televised by WTVR CBS6.

Spanberger, a former CIA officer, has outraised Brat four quarters in a row and hopes Trump-fueled Democratic energy in the Richmond suburbs can help her pull an upset in a district Republicans have held since 1971. Spanberger attacked Brat over his vote for permanent corporate tax cuts in last year's tax bill, and what the Congressional Budget Office has forecast will be an additional $1.9 trillion in debt.

Brat several times said Spanberger supported a Medicare-for-all plan that she has said - and said repeatedly in the debate - she does not support.

Brat said he ran four years ago as an outsider, reminding the audience of over 400, and viewers watching at home, that he challenged his own party's leadership on immigration when he landed a surprising upset of House Majority Leader Eric I. Cantor in a 2014 primary.

"That huge win opened the door for now millions of millions of dollars" that "are now flooding from the left and Nancy Pelosi and outside special interest groups into this district to buy this election back," Brat said. "This election is huge money and a vote for my opponent will be a vote for the Nancy Pelosi liberal agenda."

Brat heralded the tax cut that Congress passed and President Donald Trump signed last year.

"The tax cuts passed and this economy is just booming," Brat said. For an average family, he said: "That is a new refrigerator. That is a family vacation. That is a car repair."

Spanberger, who has said she will not support Pelosi for Democratic leader if she is elected, criticized Brat for supporting corporate tax cuts of $42 billion for the pharmaceutical industry as the two argued throughout the debate over addressing health care costs.

"I question again whether Congressman Brat knows which Democrat, in fact, he's running against. Because I am not the Democrat who supported single payer in the primary, I am not Nancy Pelosi and I am not President Barack Obama," Spanberger said.

"I am a woman who grew up in Henrico County, grew up in this community. Who was taught service, hard work and a commitment to the belief that the American people can be anything and we will lead the way in this world."

Brat claimed in the debate that a Washington Post fact checker had given four Pinnochios to Spanberger - but the fact check related to an ad in Pennsylvania.

Brat tried to tie Spanberger to so-called "sanctuary cities." Virginia doesn't have sanctuary cities, which are loosely defined.

Spanberger said she worked with Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a federal officer. Without giving specifics, she said she supports bipartisan immigration reform and strong border security.

Brat this year backed a compromise immigration bill from Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-6th, which would have allowed people under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to remain in the United States, but the bill failed in the House. He cited his support for that compromise during the debate.

"It's very clear that my opponent falls to the very far left on the issue of immigration," Brat said.

Spanberger responded: "Congressman Brat, I appreciate you explaining to me the role of federal law enforcement agents because indeed I used to be one. ... I am well aware of the role of federal agents. I do not support safe havens for criminals or gangs."

On trade, Brat described himself as a free trader but defended Trump administration tariffs as a temporary necessity, blaming China. Spanberger opposes the tariffs.

And while Brat mentioned former President Barack Obama several times in his critique of Spanberger's positions, the current president - who helped drive a Democratic wave election in Virginia last year - didn't come up much in the debate.

Libertarian candidate Joe Walton, who has described himself as a sensible centrist in the race, was not allowed to participate and watched from the audience.

Spanberger's campaign said in a news release on Sunday that her filing for the third quarter of the year will show she raised nearly $3.6 million for the quarter and has not taken money from corporate PACs. Brat's third quarter filing with the Federal Election Commission showed he raised just more than $1 million in the quarter.

Spending by outside groups between Oct. 1 and Friday favored Brat, according to the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project. Outside spending to help Brat totaled 1,268,020 while outside spending to help Spanberger was $958,495.

With just 22 days left before election day, Monday's debate could be the only debate of the general election between Brat and Spanberger, who beat Dan Ward in a Democratic primary in June after numerous debates and forums with him and other candidates.

The Spanberger campaign said Brat mentioned Pelosi at least 25 times on Monday.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Brat, Spanberger argue taxes, health care

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Immigration also discussed at what might be only 7th District debate

# data[].attributes.body
according to this article in Virginia's newspaper, Brat and Spanberger are now tied, Spanberger was in the lead a month ago, but the votes have evened out.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Rep. Dave Brat, R-7th, and Democratic challenger Abigail Spanberger are in a statistical tie among likely voters, according to a poll released Monday by the Wason Center for Public Policy at Christopher Newport University.

The poll showed 46 percent of likely voters favored Spanberger and 45 percent favored Brat, according to a news release. Libertarian candidate Joe Walton had 4 percent.

The poll surveyed 871 registered voters on landlines and cellphones Oct. 18-27. The margin of error was plus or minus 4.2 percentage points.

The poll found a 16-point "enthusiasm gap" benefiting Spanberger, with 78 percent of Democrats "very enthusiastic" about voting, versus 62 percent of Republicans, according to the news release.

Brat, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, maintained an edge among voters who identified as independents; 46 percent of likely voters identifying as independent said they support Brat compared with 38 percent for Spanberger, whose strategy is to court votes from Republicans and independents as well as her own base in the Democratic Party.

When the Wason Center restricted the voting model to only voters who said they were definitely going to vote and were very enthusiastic about the election, Spanberger received 48 percent to Brat's 45 percent, with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 points.

The 10-county district includes parts of Chesterfield and Henrico counties in the Richmond suburbs and is among races being watched closely nationally in the Nov. 6 congressional midterm elections.

The close race is a significant shift from two years ago, when Brat received 57.5 percent of the vote and beat Democrat Eileen Bedell by 15 points.

That Brat could be in jeopardy "is totally conditioned on the fact that Hillary Clinton lost the presidency in 2016 and Donald Trump is now the president," said Rachel Bitecofer, assistant director of the Wason Center.

If Clinton was the president, Republicans would be fired up and the 7th District would not be competitive, she said.

On a question about Trump, 47 percent of likely voters in the 7th said they approve of his job performance, compared to 51 percent disapproval.

The poll found a gender gap in the 7th, comparable to other districts across the country. Men favored Brat by 52 percent to 37 percent, and women favored Spanberger by 53 percent to 39 percent.
pwilson@timesdispatch.com
(804) 649-6061

Twitter: @patrickmwilson

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Poll shows Brat and Spanberger in statistical tie in 7th U.S. House District race

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Rep. Dave Brat, R-7th, and Democratic challenger Abigail Spanberger are in a statistical tie among likely voters, according to a poll released Monday by the Wason Center for Public Policy at Christopher Newport University. The poll showed 46 percent of likely voters favored Spanberger and 45 percent favored Brat, according to a news release.

# data[].attributes.body
Virginia offers online voter registration, registration by mail, and register to vote in person but not on the day of the election. Photo ID is required to vote in Virginia. The deadline is Monday, October 15, 2018.

# data[].attributes.body
Running against Spanberger and Brat is Libertarian Joe Walton, he only has 0.1% of the votes, so it seems unlikely that he would play spoiler and take away votes.

# data[].attributes.body
This poll shows who the Universities think will win.

# data[].attributes.body
Virginia is a democratic state, however Virginia 7th is republican. This graph shows the money distributed to each party. Money to the Republicans is significantly higher than the money to the Democrats.

# data[].attributes.body
This poll also shows the Universities opinion, but it shows more in detail who they think will win.

# data[].attributes.body
This ad shows Brat talking to citizens and what he has done and what he will do.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/dave-brat-delivering-for-virginia-families--campaign-2018/2018/09/18/5e71b012-bb72-11e8-adb8-01125416c102_video.html?utm_term=.8dbab4816eec

# data[].attributes.body
This ad shows Spanbergers CIA involvement before she decided to run and how  she is committed to the country.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/abigail-spanberger-for-congress-vetted--campaign-2018/2018/09/11/d0b5c288-b5d9-11e8-ae4f-2c1439c96d79_video.html?utm_term=.561db9d04c07

# data[].attributes.body
Dave Brat has a very conservative view on many issues and traditionally is far right, Abigail Spanberger is liberal on many issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Dave Brat used to be an economics professor and Abigail Spanberger is a former CIA operative

# data[].attributes.body
This article says that depending on who wins this election it could change what is happening in Washington. If Brat wins the GOP could say in power. If Spanberger wins the Democratic Party can challenge the Trump administration and take over Washington in the next election.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
WASHINGTON-Next week's elections will not only determine the balance of power on Capitol Hill but also will seal the fate of the Trump administration's legislative agenda for the next two years and set the landscape of the 2020 presidential campaigns.

The direction of the nation's most contentious and consequential issues - health care, immigration, taxes, climate change, trade, gun control, ethics and campaign finance overhauls and oversight of the administration - hinges on what voters decide Nov. 6.

The stakes are enormous.

If Democrats capture control of just one chamber of Congress, most likely the House, they can deny President Donald Trump and their GOP colleagues their legislative wish list, slamming shut the window for a new round of tax cuts or divisive changes to entitlement programs. With the subpoena power that comes with a committee gavel, House Democrats will kick-start Congress' largely dormant oversight role, probing everything from the president's hidden personal tax returns to the administration's handling of health care and financial regulations, as well as its response to hurricanes, the Russian election interference investigation and other international crises.

With control of the House, Democrats could push along legislation on pivotal matters, such as rescuing or expanding parts of the 2010 health care law, raising the federal minimum wage and addressing gun control, ethics in government and political money issues. Those bills wouldn't likely make their way into law even if the party wins control of the Senate - the president has veto power after all. But it would allow Democrats to lay out an alternative policy vision, incubating proposals that the party's 2020 White House hopefuls could embrace, or reject.

"In many ways, the House Democrats are going to determine in those first 100 days what the common platform of the 2020 presidential candidates will be," said Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat and member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "What we pass on the House side, even if it doesn't become law, will become the mantra of the presidential candidates."

It won't be all harmony within the Democratic caucus. The party will need to resolve its leadership lineup and will contend with an emboldened progressive wing at the same time it needs to show voters proof that it can once again govern.

Although less likely than taking the House, Democrats taking the Senate in the 116th Congress could intensify pressure on the executive branch through oversight investigations and efforts to block administration goals - think border wall, for example - through the appropriations process.

Most importantly, they could hold up or even block Trump's judicial and executive branch nominees.

On the flip side, if Republicans maintain control of Congress, the election results would serve as an endorsement of the Trump-GOP agenda and embolden the party to carry on with more tax cuts and conservative appointees, changes to welfare programs and a hard-line approach to immigration and border enforcement.

In a Democrat-controlled House or Senate, the biggest concern for Republicans on the Hill and their conservative allies outside Congress isn't that the other party will wield the power over the next two years to enact progressive or any other kind of major legislation. Instead it's about the potential for dashed hopes, lost opportunities and the end of what many conservatives felt should have been the midpoint, not the end, of a stretch of policy victories, including more tax cuts and regulatory overhauls.

"We didn't accomplish as much as we wanted to in these first two years," said Tim Chapman, executive director of the conservative Heritage Action for America, the lobbying arm of The Heritage Foundation. "We didn't get where we wanted to on fixing the health care system or welfare reform. ... You don't know that you're going to get that window again in 2020."

With either chamber of Congress in Democratic hands, Republicans will face other fears: that Trump could morph into more of a liberal on signature issues such as funding infrastructure projects, possibly flipping on their policy priorities to start cobbling together deals with Democratic leaders. Congressional Republicans could also lose the already flighty focus of their president who, when it comes to trade policy, often sounds more like the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party than any faction of the GOP.

Still, one of the biggest questions, if Democrats hold the power in either chamber, remains: Can they work with a president whom their voters despise, especially when it's the left's angry and motivated base that will have helped catapult the party back into power?

"The president is tacking towards the center in everything but his rhetoric," said John Feehery, a former congressional Republican leadership aide, who is now a partner at the lobbying shop EFB Advocacy. "Democrats are tacking further to the left because they don't like his rhetoric."

The new free-trade deal with Mexico and Canada, a renegotiation of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement, includes tougher protections for workers, something Democrats have called for. "There's a lot in there that Democrats should like," Feehery said. "But do they want to give the president a victory?"

Celeste Drake, trade policy specialist with the AFL-CIO, said congressional Democrats are "still coalescing" when it comes to the new deal, which would require Congress' approval. Trade, of course, is an issue that splits the party's few free-traders with the majority of the caucus, which is largely skeptical of the impact of big trade deals on jobs and workers' pay. Drake said the new deal's stronger labor provisions sound appealing but isn't sure how they'd be enforced.

The president's language about the new agreement also leaves Democrats uncomfortable. "His rhetoric on NAFTA has been very xenophobic," she said. "How does that square with the Democrats who have long been calling for a NAFTA reform? ... Democrats will be looking to put a stamp on this and to address those issues."

Democrats, in power in either the House or the Senate, will also look to put their stamp on health care and prescription drug matters. If voters often accuse politicians of flip-flopping on a policy, lawmakers have seen much of the electorate do an about-face on the 2010 health care law, which cost Democrats their House majority in that year's elections. Now quite the opposite has popped up on the campaign trail. Instead of vilifying lawmakers for the law, a majority of voters in some of the country's tightest electoral contests want to preserve at least its protections for patients with pre-existing conditions.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is up for re-election this year, said keeping in place those protections as well as measures to bring down pharmaceutical prices have become huge rallying points on the campaign trail, in Democrats' favor.

On the pharmaceutical prices, she said, "I'm excited about that because I'm the lead on a bunch of those bills" and the discussion of those matters on the campaign trail "will really help to finally propel that issue into next year." Trump has also signaled his interest in reining in drug prices.

Immigration, however, offers a stark contrast between the two parties and between congressional Democrats and the president. "I'm hoping we win all these seats, and that will be a big pushback on some of the rhetoric there, and maybe we can then move on comprehensive reform," Klobuchar adds.

(EDITORS: BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM)

Republicans have also worked to differentiate themselves from Democrats on style and rhetoric, not just policy. The GOP is stoking fears about unruly mobs of leftists taking over Washington.

"We got a little preview of what life would be like here in the United States Capitol with Democrats in charge, if they're successful in capturing one or both houses of the Congress after the midterm elections: angry mobs, intimidation, showing up at people's homes, mailing them coat hangers, and trying to intimidate members," Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn of Texas told reporters in the Capitol after the debate over Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.

"That's not exactly my ideal of how the United States Congress should operate."

(EDITORS: BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM)

The debate over civility has taken a scary turn in recent days with suspected explosive devices turning up in the mail to several prominent Democrats including some sitting lawmakers.

Top of the agenda In the House, if Democrats control the chamber, a vocal group of incumbents, including House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, along with some of the likely stars of the incoming freshman class, have called for the new majority's top priority and first order of legislative business to be a far-reaching overhaul of the nation's campaign finance, voting rights, lobbying and ethics laws.

"All of these items should be packaged, in my opinion, into one reform bill and addressed in the opening days of the next Congress," Hoyer said recently. "Democrats, if entrusted with the leadership will do exactly that. ... If Democrats can fix government we can earn the trust of voters to lead on addressing health care, infrastructure, jobs, the environment and so many other critical issues."

Hoyer's endorsement of such a measure is significant. It's the kind of talking point one would expect from Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, not Hoyer, who enjoys a friendly rapport with the nation's business community and has a long list of former aides in the K Street lobbying corridor.

A major campaign finance, lobbying, ethics and anti-corruption package would not pass the Senate, but the proposal would allow Democrats to deliver, in the House, a platform for the party, including those running for president in 2020.

"We'll be creating a new baseline of what Democrats stand for," said Rep. John Sarbanes of Maryland, who chairs the House Democrats' Democracy Reform Task Force. He said his party has big ideas on immigration, health care, gun control and a number of other issues. But first, he said, "You have to establish this idea that you're unrigging the system."

Democrats can't fight pharmaceutical companies on drug prices if the party is beholden to the industry's donations, he said. More than 100 Democratic challengers have called on the party's House leaders to embrace the idea.

One of them is Abigail Spanberger, a former CIA operative who is running to unseat Republican Dave Brat in Virginia's 7th Congressional District.

"When we look at issues that are as great as education and health care and the cost of prescription drug prices and criminal justice reform, every piece of those issues does link back to what is the driving force behind legislation that's coming out of Washington, what's the driving force behind the purpose of those efforts whatever they may be," Spanberger said during a recent phone call with reporters. "And I think that it's up to us to take every action necessary to ensure that voters believe that it's about them."

Democrats share common policy priorities, of course, but if such an overhaul is the first order of business, it will quickly expose some of the rifts within the caucus.

Khanna said he expects the Progressive Caucus' membership to serve as the party's "fountain and engine for ideas" should Democrats reclaim the House. Early priorities could include, he said, a Medicare-for-all style of health care, a vote on an increase in the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, and a $1 trillion infrastructure package to spur new jobs and improve the country's roads, airports and rails.

Will Marshall, president of the Progressive Policy Institute, said the tack Congress takes doesn't just depend on whether Democrats win control of the House or Senate, but by how much.

If the party comes in on a wave, then it will feel the pressure to take up big issues such as Medicare-for-all, rolling back the Republican tax breaks and addressing climate change and immigration. If they barely take control, the ambition could be lessened.

Regardless, Marshall said such issues as data privacy legislation could gain momentum in the next Congress: "There's a growing feeling in the country that we need rules for privacy, to protect people's personal information."

Rep. Scott Peters of California, who heads the moderate New Democrat Coalition PAC, said there are issues on which Democrats of all persuasions agree, including protecting the so-called Dreamers, who came to the United States as undocumented minors; new campaign finance disclosures; and measures to ensure that all gun buyers are subject to background checks.

"I think it's pretty obvious to all of us where we agree and that we agree a lot more than we disagree," Peters said. When it comes to possibly working with the president, he isn't sure what to expect.

"In two years, I haven't seen a lot of interest on their side in doing that," Peters said of the White House. He noted that the president has been "insulting to Democrats," adding, "I don't take any of that personally" and saying he'd work with the administration if it's interested in tackling policies of interest in his district.

For his part, Trump said during an October appearance on Fox News that he believes Republicans will remain in charge of Congress. "And if we're not, if we lose the majority in the House, which is always a possibility, we will probably just have to fight it out," he said, adding that there are "a lot of haters" in the Democratic Party. "Now, can we get along? Maybe. And there's a possibility. They want infrastructure, I want infrastructure; there's something that can bring us together. We have a lot of things where there is commonality and it's possible that we'll even get along."

Bipartisan collaboration between congressional Democrats and the president offers an intriguing possibility: Democrats could well be attacking the president with their investigative power - and certainly some will call for his impeachment - at the same time they try to strike legislative bargains with Trump.

"We would finally see what we've been promised the last year and a half: Infrastructure Week," said Democratic lobbyist Anne Urban, who is with the K Street firm Urban Swirski & Associates.

At the same time, "Democrats have been really smart about keeping their powder dry on impeachment. But there's going to be a whole lot of time spent doing investigations, and probably rightfully so. There hasn't been anything close to exhaustive investigations done."

(EDITORS: STORY CAN END HERE)

Even some on the conservative, libertarian side say they welcome more oversight from Capitol Hill as a way to balance out executive power, which has been on the rise in recent administrations by presidents of both political parties.

"I welcome oversight of government programs, regardless of what letter goes behind the name of the chairman," said Kent Lassman, who runs the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank.

Matt Mackowiak, president of the Potomac Strategy Group, sees a political upside, eventually, to a House Democratic majority.

"I do believe they move to impeach the president in the first 90 days," he predicted. That, along with a full slate of investigations, he said, "will help Trump get re-elected."

---

©2018 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved

Visit CQ Roll Call at www.rollcall.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

-----

PHOTO (for help with images, contact 312-222-4194):MIDTERMS-PAPERBALLOTS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
2016 united states presidential election

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
America is at a midterm crossroads. Let us count the ways

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
WASHINGTON-Next week's elections will not only determine the balance of power on Capitol Hill but also will seal the fate of the Trump administration's legislative agenda for the next two

# data[].attributes.body
Spanberger's campaign apologizes to Dave Brat of offensive note. Four high school door knockers left an offensive note of the doorstep of Brat.

# data[].attributes.body
Brat is endorsed by the Tea Party Patriots Fund, Freedom Workers, National Rifle association, and more. Brat is endorsed by very conservative organizations, this shows his placement on the spectrum.
Spanberger is endorsed by the  United Auto Workers, Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Feminist Majority Political Action Committee, and more. Spanberger is is endorsed by the opposites of Brat, this shows her democratic views on the different issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Dave Brat: raised $2,707,910, spent $1,897,920, and has $978,004. PAC's have contributed $397,954 to his campaign. Large Individual Contributors have given $$1,739,650. Brat also has $500 self funded. Brat has also gotten money from Koch industries which is based in Kansas, House Freedom Fund, and other groups.
Abigail Spanberger: raised $5,894,232, spent $5,303,695, and has $590,537. PAC's have contributed $331,891 to her campaign. Large Individual Contributors have given $$3,940,814. Spanberger has $0 self funded. Spanberger has gotten money from Virginia Commonwealth University, Stanford University which is based in California, and other groups.

# data[].attributes.body
This senate race is extremely close, being .3% away from each other in the polls, however Brat did manage to pull even with Spanberger,  but according to recent polls Spanbeger is more popular among voters. So we predict that Spanberger will win the election by a small percent.

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_Kr0Oqb799EKN4R9Y2Tn3SPcJ__zJ8uhMShVbIuE-pM/edit