# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Update

Revenue from tourism has helped protect parks on the islands, tour operators say, but they are worried that popular land-based trips could harm beaches and wildlife.

Image

Puerto Ayora en las Galápagos Credit Credit Federico Rios Escobar para The New York Times

Is the growth of land-based tourism in the Galápagos, the Ecuadorean islands in the Pacific Ocean, a good thing for its wildlife and ecosystems or is it harmful?

According to the International Galápagos Tour Operators Association,a group of 35 tour operators, it is both.

In February, the group sent a letter to Ecuador's tourism minister, Enrique Ponce de León, to express its concern that the growth of land-based tourism in the Galápagos Islands has the potential to harm its much-photographed landscapes and beaches as well as its famous wildlife such as giant tortoises, sea lions and iguanas. The letter asked Mr. Ponce de León to limit and more carefully regulate land tourism; as of late May, the tourism minister had not responded to the letter, according to the association's executive director, Matt Kareus.

Cruises traditionally have been the most popular way to explore the Galápagos. Mr. Kareus said that from the early 1970s to the early 2000s, most tourists to the islands were on cruises. However, ship-based tourism is a tightly controlled industry because Ecuador's government has placed a cap on the number of berths (beds) allowed on the Galápagos cruise ship fleet.

"Unlike cruises, land-based tourism is loosely regulated, and because of that, this segment of the tourism industry is growing dangerously fast," Mr. Kareus said.

According to statistics from Galápagos National Park, the number of visitors to the islands increased by 39 percent between 2007 and 2016 to 225,000 from 161,000. During that same period, the number of visitors on land-based tours jumped 92 percent to 152,000 from 79,000. At the same time, ship-based tourism decreased by 11 percent from around 82,000 visitors to around 73,000.

Galápagos travel experts and locals say that land tourism is rising so rapidly because hotel development has exploded on the islands in the past decade. A 2007 study from the Charles Darwin Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes wildlife research, reported that there were 65 hotels on the islands in 2006. In 2017, that number increased to 317, according to the Galápagos Tourism Observatory.

Andrew Balfour, a Galápagos native and the general manager of Pikaia Lodge, an upscale 14-room hotel on Santa Cruz Island, in the heart of the Galápagos archipelago, said that many of the new properties are budget-friendly and attract a large number of tourists. "You see hotels here that are extremely inexpensive, and that never used to exist," he said. (Historically, the Galápagos have been an expensive vacation destination.)

Dr. Andrea Smith, an environmental scientist who has worked in the Galápagos, said that new hotels require new roads, infrastructure and sewage systems and involve shipments from the mainland. "The more shipments you have, the higher the risk of invasive species, and these are a major threat to the fragile ecosystem," she said.

More people have moved to the Galápagos to work in land-based tourism, and this increase in population is also a threat to its wildlife, Dr. Smith said, because a larger population requires more infrastructure. According to the Ecuadorean National Census of 2010, 25,100 people live in the Galápagos, and the population on the islands grew by 60 percent from 1999 to 2005.

The tour operators' association emphasized that it does not want to ban land-based tourism in the Galápagos. "We are not saying 'don't come here,'" said Jim Lutz, the president of the tour group's board and the founder and president of Vaya Adventures, a Berkeley, Calif., company that sells Galápagos trips. "We are saying let's control how many people can come."

Mr. Lutz said that tourism has helped the Galápagos thrive: in past decades and centuries, pirates and whaling ships exploited the islands, especially by stealing its wildlife.

"There are stories of how whaling ships would come and fill their ship holds with the giant tortoises who live on the islands," he said. Tourism protects the islands, according to Mr. Lutz, because the money generated from visitors allows for the monitoring and protection of Galápagos National Park and the Galápagos Marine Reserve, which he said is expensive and complicated.

He encourages travelers who are seeking a beach getaway or want to go fishing to consider destinations other than the Galápagos. "These activities exist in many places, and you don't need to go to the Galápagos to get them," he said. "The islands are a place for those who are interested in ecotourism."

Marc Patry, a member of the association's board and the owner of the Ottawa travel company CNH Tours, which sells Galápagos trips, also said he welcomes land-based tourism to the islands but added that it should be high-quality tourism. "We want a small number of travelers, and they should care about sustainability," he said.

Overtourism isn't an issue limited to the Galápagos: Venice, Italy, is among the cities that have been affected by overcrowding from tourism. In December, the World Travel & Tourism Council and the consulting firm McKinsey & Company released a co-authored report, "Coping With Success: Managing Overcrowding in Tourism Destinations," which looked at the impact overtourism can have.

"Overtourism is becoming more of a problem because the number of travelers globally is increasing," said Rochelle Turner, the tourism council's research director. "Tourism can grow, but it needs to do so in a way that's safe."

As with any popular destination, the Galápagos should have a long-term plan in place to manage land-based tourism, Ms. Turner said. That plan should involve economists, scientists and nongovernmental organizations. "In an ideal world, these groups would work together and come up with a strategy to protect the environment and the local people and grow the tourism industry at the same time," she said.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page TR2 of the New York edition with the headline: Land-Based Tourism in the Galápagos Prompts a Warning. Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Is Land Tourism Threatening the Galápagos?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Update Revenue from tourism has helped protect parks on the islands, tour operators say, but they are worried that popular land-based trips could harm beaches and wildlife. Is the growth of land-based tourism in the Galápagos, the Ecuadorean islands in the Pacific Ocean, a good thing for its wildlife and ecosystems or is it harmful?

# data[].attributes.body
What is the importance of taking a vacation on today's business minded society?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
thrive

Importance of taking vacation

Taking vacation is good for your health-really!
Feeling overwhelmed by work or like your work-life balance is out of whack? Have you skipped out on vacation plans this year? If so, you are not alone...but you may want to keep reading.

Research shows Americans work more than anyone in the industrialized world. They also take less vacation, work longer days and retire later.

Productivity and stress management trainer and coach, Joe Robinson, author of, "Work to Live" and "Don't Miss Your Life," says the issue is driven by a number of factors. Namely, work force cutbacks and lean staffing make it difficult for people doing the jobs to get away. People are also afraid to take vacations in the "layoff era" for fear that they will appear less committed than coworkers.

A number of studies have shown that taking time away from the job can have physical and psychological health benefits. People who take vacations have lower stress, less risk of heart disease, a better outlook on life, and more motivation to achieve goals.
Mental and physical benefits
If you still need a little convincing, here is a list of some of the additional benefits of taking time away from work:

Improved physical health: Stress can contribute to heart disease and high blood pressure. For both men and women, the New York Times reported, taking a vacation every two years compared to every six will lessen the risk of coronary heart disease or heart attacks.

Improved mental health: Neuroscientists have found that brain structure is altered by chronic exposure to the stress hormone cortisol, which can be a major contributing factor to anxiety and depression. Feelings of calm arise from time away from work and relieve stress, which allows the body and mind to heal in ways that it couldn't if it were still under pressure.

Greater well-being: According to a Gallup study, people who "always make time for regular trips" had a 68.4 score on the Gallup-Heathway's Well-Being Index, in comparison to a 51.4 Well-Being score for less frequent travelers. One study found that three days after vacation, subjects' physical complaints, quality of sleep, and mood had improved as compared to before vacation. These gains were still present five weeks later, especially in those who had more personal time and overall satisfaction during their vacation.

Increased mental power: Upon returning from vacation, workers are often more focused and productive. Studies have found that chronic stress can actually modulate a part of the brain that inhibits goal-directed activity and can cause problems with memory. Time off can tune up a well-functioning brain.

Improved familial relationships: Spending time enjoying life with loved ones can keep relationships strong. A study by the Arizona Department of Health and Human Services found that women who took vacations were more satisfied with their marriages.

Decreased burnout: Workers who take regular time to relax are less likely to experience burnout, making them more creative and productive than their overworked, under-rested counterparts.

Planning alone boosts happiness: Research shows the biggest boost in happiness comes from planning the vacation. A person can feel the effects up to eight weeks before the trip!

The bottom line is, taking time away from the stresses of work and daily life can improve our health, motivation, relationships, job performance, and perspective and give us the break we need to return to our lives and jobs refreshed and better equipped to handle whatever comes.

More Like This:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Taking vacation is good for your health-really! Feeling overwhelmed by work or like your work-life balance is out of whack? Research shows Americans work more than anyone in the industrialized world. They also take less vacation, work longer days and retire later.

# data[].attributes.body
Traveller.com.au
- People refusing to fly due to environmental damage caused by airplanes
-Plans in Thailand to close Maya Bay (the site of filming "The Beach") due to too much environmental damage
By: Matt McClellan

# data[].attributes.body
looking for the gulf motel

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for

# data[].attributes.body
"I want to blame the condos, their shadows for ruining the beach."

# data[].attributes.body
Cruise ships create 70,000 tons of waste each year.

# data[].attributes.headline
Small Business- Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.subject
Small Business- Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.body
Small business accounts for 50% of United States' GDP.

# data[].attributes.headline
How does making an experience out of a business effect the profit

# data[].attributes.subject
How does making an experience out of a business effect the profit

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.headline
Big business' effect on the environment 

# data[].attributes.subject
Big business' effect on the environment 

# data[].attributes.body
Should minimum wage raise be raised to $15 in the United States?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Since 1938, when the minimum wage was first introduced (at a rate of $0.25 an hour), the federal minimum wage has increased 22 times. The minimum wage is the salary floor or the lowest possible rate that employers can pay employees.

The most recent update to the federal minimum wage was in 2009, when it was raised to $7.25 an hour. Currently, 29 states and the District of Columbia have a higher minimum wage than the federal rate. As of July 2019, 44 cities had also passed laws raising the minimum wage.

When the state and federal minimum wage are different amounts, employees are entitled to the higher rate of the two. The question is whether the federal minimum wage should be raised again - and if so, to what hourly rate?

Should the Minimum Wage Be Raised?

Opponents believe that increases to the minimum wage will place a burden on employers, especially small companies, resulting in slower growth and decreased levels of employment. Proponents of an increase in the rate say that the minimum wage has not kept up with inflation and that many minimum wage workers are impoverished.

People on both sides of the issue point to economic studies and data to back up their viewpoint. Many Americans, however, have already made up their minds on the issue: A 2019 CNBC survey showed that 60% of respondents favored raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour.

Here is a summary of the pros and cons of raising the minimum wage.

Why the Minimum Wage Should Be Raised

An increase in the minimum wage raises the standard of living for impoverished workers.

The minimum wage hasn't kept up with inflation. As a result, the pay of many workers, particularly those with families of three or more people, are now well below the poverty level.

Studies show graduated increases in the minimum wage have a low impact on unemployment.

Consumers would spend more money if they earned more money, meaning that an increase to the minimum wage would have positive effects on the economy.

Increasing the minimum wage could help reduce gender- and race-based income inequality.

Government expenses for social programs aimed at the poor would potentially be reduced. This might result in slightly lower taxes for other Americans.

Slightly more revenue for the government would be generated from payroll taxes for social security.

Why the Minimum Wage Should Not Be Raised

In companies with a fixed compensation budget, an increase to the minimum wage could result in layoffs or slower hiring.

Employers might hire fewer workers in entry-level jobs, which might make it harder for workers to begin their careers.

An increase to the minimum wage would provide an incentive for employers to invest in automated processes, technology, and machinery to increase productivity rather than human resources.

Raises the incentive for companies to outsource labor to countries where minimum wage rates are lower.

A higher minimum wage could result in an increase of the high school dropout rate.

Prices might be increased to offset higher labor costs.

For small companies, already stressed owner/operators might take on more responsibility.

Wages for higher paid workers might be suppressed, and salary increases might be lower for those not impacted by a higher minimum wage.

State and Local Initiatives to Raise Minimum Wage

Even though the federal minimum wage hasn't increased since 2009, the majority of states have a higher minimum wage than required by the federal government. In addition, some local municipalities have initiated minimum wage increases for their location. For instance, San Francisco's minimum wage is higher than the state of California's minimum wage. (And, in turn, California's minimum wage is higher than the federal minimum wage).

Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia increased their minimum wage during 2017, mostly due to previously passed legislation.

In 2018, the highest state minimum wage was $11.50/hour, in Washington state, followed by Massachusetts and California at $11/hour. Many cities also increased the minimum wage rate as well - as of Jan. 1, 2018, it was $14/hour in Seattle, Washington (or $11.50/hour, plus at least $2.50/hour in tips and benefits) and $15/hour in Sunnyvale, California, for instance.

The Bottom Line

The Federal Minimum Wage is $7.25 per Hour: It was last raised in 2009.

Many States and Localities Set a Higher Minimum Than the Federal Mandate: As of 2019, 29 states and 44 cities have a higher minimum wage.

A Recent Survey Showed That Many Americans Favor an Increase: 60% want a $15 per hour minimum wage, according to a CNBC poll.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Since 1938, when the minimum wage was first introduced (at a rate of $0.25 an hour), the federal minimum wage has increased 22 times. The minimum wage is the salary floor or the lowest possible rate that employers can pay employees.

# data[].attributes.body
"I want to find the gulf motel exactly as is was and pretend for a moment nothing lost is lost."

# data[].attributes.headline
Importance of a role model for the youth

# data[].attributes.subject
Importance of a role model for the youth

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.aacap.org/aacap/families_and_youth/facts_for_families/fff-guide/children-and-role-models-099.aspx

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Social class is correlated to environmental hazards that increase one's risk of contracting a disease or sustaining an injury; low access to fresh produce, exercise facilities, and preventative health programs are all environmental hazards that negatively impact health outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"Please check your email for instructions on resetting your password. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account.

# data[].attributes.body
How is our mental health affected when we shift blame onto something/someone

# data[].attributes.body
looking for the gulf motel

# data[].attributes.body
should decor be used to improve peoples moods, productivity, and or efficiency.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Mr. Calzon has cultivated Democrats as well as Republicans in Congress, where there is considerable anti-Castro sentiment, while exchanging barbs with some liberals who would prefer negotiation with Mr. Castro to continuation of the economic embargo and verbal hostilities.

The foundation's chairman, Jorge Mas Canosa, president of a Miami construction and engineering concern, and other board members have also set up a well-heeled political action committee to contribute to candidates sensitive to Cuban-Americans.

Among the recipients have been Mr. Reagan, Florida politicians including Senator Paula Hawkins, a Republican, and Representative Dante B. Fascell, the Democratic chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and other Republicans and Democrats around the country.

The foundation has won an audience among policy makers on issues ranging from the Castro Government's alleged involvement in drug trafficking and financial dependence on Western banks to the need for Radio Marti, the radio station Congress set up last year to broadcast news about Cuba to Cuba from the Florida Keys. Growing Self-Assertion

According to Jose S. Sorzano, deputy chief of the United States Mission to the United Nations, the foundation's emergence reflects the growing self-assertion of exiles who ''have made it in the American system and have learned how to maneuver and have now decided it is time to have their presence felt in Washington.''

Mr. Sorzano, 43 years old, came to the United States from Cuba in 1961, as Mr. Castro was tightening his dictatorship. ''All of us arrived here more or less destitute, without speaking the language, much less understanding the culture or the political system,'' he recalled. He said his first job was as a ''deep-fry man in a Marriott Hot Shop.'' He is now on leave from a teaching job at Georgetown's government department.

The foundation's announced goals are to promote ''an independent and democratic Cuba'' free of Communist rule, to protect human rights and to ''enlighten and clarify public opinion on problems of Cuban concern.''

''We lend our voices to those who cannot speak in Cuba,'' Mr. Calzon said, through publishing papers and sponsoring speeches by experts on Cuban issues and mailing copies to professors and libraries around the country, as well as through direct contact with the Administration, Congress and the press.

In Congress, the foundation has helped spur such activities as a House task force hearing last month on Cuba's alleged drug trafficking. Praise on Effectiveness

Barbara Burris, an aide to Mr. Fascell, termed the foundation ''the most effective and the most active'' Cuban- American group here. ''They were the primary force behind Radio Marti,'' she said.

A smaller group here called Of Human Rights, also directed by Mr. Calzon, documents and publicizes the plight of political prisoners in Cuba. It was described as ''a very reliable source'' by Elliott Abrams, Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs. ''They get information out of Cuba that nobody else gets,'' he said.

Mr. Calzon said he shunned the kind of ''wild claims'' that sometimes prevent exile groups from being taken seriously in this pragmatic capital. He takes pains to dispel what he calls ''the stereotype of the Cuban-American community'' as a collection of fringe groups and ''bomb throwers'' wallowing in anti-Castro extremism.

Although he said his hope was for Cuba to break the yoke of Castroism and Soviet domination and become an independent democracy, he retreated into vagueness when asked whether he would like to see a Grenada-style invasion to liberate Cuba. Low-Key Approach

A positive answer to such a question might reinforce the stereotype Mr. Calzon abhors. A negative answer might antagonize some of his Cuban-American constituency. Mr. Calzon chose to dismiss the question as farfetched.

He also takes a low-key approach in criticizing United States policies with which he disagrees, such as the Government's refusal to process visas for former Cuban political prisoners in Havana. While some critics have called this policy hypocritical for an Administration that professes concern for the former prisoners' lot, Mr. Calzon's word for the policy is ''unfortunate.''

''Basically my strategy in town is not to antagonize,'' he said. ''In order to be heard, we have to stop yelling and lower our voices a little bit.''

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Mr. Calzon has cultivated Democrats as well as Republicans in Congress, where there is considerable anti-Castro sentiment, while exchanging barbs with some liberals who would prefer negotiation with Mr. Castro to continuation of the economic embargo and verbal hostilities.

# data[].attributes.headline
Immigration - "Looking for the Gulf Motel"

# data[].attributes.subject
Immigration - "Looking for the Gulf Motel"

# data[].attributes.body
Investopedia.com
-Immigration maintains supply and demand
-Immigrant families increase productivity

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the Gulf Motel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Searching for answers, Professor Grusky and Kim Weeden, an assistant professor of sociology at Cornell, turned to 30 years of data collected by the federal government and the National Opinion Research Center, affiliated with the University of Chicago. Together, the two surveys contained information on a representative group of about 760,000 Americans, from their political attitudes to their reading and television habits.

The professors concluded that lumping people into big groups like the ''working'' or ''middle'' class on the basis of their incomes ultimately had little to do with what they bought, what they watched or whom they voted for. Rather, cultural and political similarities are more likely to be found among people who are in the same profession or do the same type of work, reinforced first by educational training and then by work experiences.

Sociologists, for instance, are mostly politically liberal while economists are mostly conservative, they said.

Even big occupation groupings can hide differences, Professor Grusky said. Consider an issue like abortion. Among service workers, bartenders tended to support legalized abortion while cooks and cleaners tended to oppose it.

''Classes are as weak as they ever were,'' Professor Grusky said. ''There is nothing shared in the big classes. Social scientists were always off the mark in talking about these big classes.''

Paul W. Kingston, a professor of sociology at the University of Virginia and the author of ''The Classless Society: Studies in Social Inequality'' (Stanford University Press, 2000), agrees. He says that people who share a common economic position ''do not significantly share distinct, life-defining experiences.'' And he further argues that economic inequality alone does not imply the existence of classes.

''The empirical issue is how would you recognize a class when you saw one,'' Professor Kingston said in an interview. ''Does a blue-collar worker have a certain outlook, background, cultural disposition? The general impression is, there was a greater class structure 50 years ago. There is a lot of generational class mobility.''

Professor Kingston says his research shows that habits in voting and tastes in music, television and recreation fail to correlate significantly with income. Class in the old-fashioned sense is arbitrary, he declares.

''Lots of people play golf, lots of people play tennis,'' he said, referring to two sports once seen as the province of the affluent. ''Very few people go to the opera, and very few people discuss modern art. There are few of these things that speak to class.''

The public's readiness to swallow Ms. Lopez's glamorous ascent from maid to mogul is just a small indicator of how deeply ingrained the idea of social mobility is in America. Charges of class warfare often fail to resonate because many people believe they have the chance to occupy the rich end of the income scale -- despite the ever-widening income gap.

Robert Perrucci, a sociologist at Purdue University, explains this attitude by saying, ''People accept inequality if they think there is opportunity.'' But he, like a number of other sociologists, maintains that class counts for more now than ever.

''Paul Kingston views class in cultural terms,'' Professor Perrucci said. ''I look at it in economic terms. As a sociologist, I am concerned about the volatility of a society where 80 percent of the people are frozen out of possibilities. No one is saying we all have to be equal.''

The average annual salary in America, expressed in 1998 dollars, went from $32,522 in 1970 to $35,864 in 1999. In the same period, according to Fortune magazine, the average real annual compensation of the top 100 C.E.O.'s went from $1.3 million -- 40 times the pay of an average worker -- to $37.5 million, or over 1,000 times the average worker's pay.

Professor Perrucci, along with Earl Wysong, at Indiana University of Kokomo and David W. Wright at Wichita State University, compared the incomes and occupations of 2,749 fathers and sons from the 1970's to the late 1990's. Their conclusion? That class mobility has decreased.

From the upper to the lower levels, the researchers found that sons retained the same levels of income and occupational prestige as their fathers. At the upper level, affluent sons gained prestigious positions -- like doctors and lawyers -- even more frequently than their fathers did 30 years ago.

''What has happened in the last 25 years is that a large segment of American society has become more vulnerable,'' said Professor Perrucci, who is co-author of ''The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream?'' (Rowman & Littlefield, 2002) with Professor Wysong. ''Twenty years ago, going to college was enough. Now, it has to be an elite school. The American dream is being sorely tested.''

The new reality, he said, is a society in which one-fifth of Americans are privileged, with job security, high wages and strong skills. The other 80 percent belong to a ''new working class,'' he said, that despite great variability within the group lacks the same security and high wages.

Professor Perrucci and his colleagues proposed four measures to determine where one lands on the class scale. They are: social capital (whom you know); credential capital (like where you received your degree); income or consumption capital; and investment capital (stocks and bonds). The last category is the one most affected by Mr. Bush's new economic program and tax laws.

Minorities, Professor Perrucci added, are far more likely than whites, especially white males, to lack elite educational credentials and social capital.

Although the black middle class roughly doubled in the last 20 years, about 30 percent of blacks (compared with 8 percent of whites) are poor by government standards. Numerous studies also show that continued discrimination in housing and jobs stymies black economic mobility, as does the perception that minorities have different values and behavior from whites.

Erik Olin Wright, a sociology professor at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, argues that race is one of the factors that mute the expression of class conflict.

''To say there's no class is to imply that the workers at Enron and the owners at Enron have no built-in conflict, no different outcomes,'' said Professor Wright, who is also the author of ''Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis'' (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

But it is ''simple-minded,'' he said, to argue, as some sociologists have done, that the absence of open hostilities means there are no real social classes with similar interests.

Race divisions, for example, could discourage people from similar classes to come together and push for better health care or schools, Professor Wright said. Or people may be too ''demoralized and resigned,'' he added, to organize movements that pit working people against rich people.

''It may be the triumph of one class,'' he said, ''one class that is so hegemonic that people feel defeated.''

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Does Class Count in Today's Land of Opportunity?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Studies conducted by Center for Study of Inequality at Cornell University and National Opinion Research Center at Chicago University suggest that class mobility has significantly increased over passing generations, and that economic inquality alone no longer means that definitive classes exist; photos (M)

# data[].attributes.body
What is the impact of cheap thrills on mental and physical health?
https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/six_ways_happiness_is_good_for_your_health

# data[].attributes.body
Looking for the gulf motel

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_196710_meltzer.pdf

How does social class effect people?