# data[].attributes.body
Assessments should go beyond worksheets and 5-paragraph essays and become activities that not only assess set standards, but also encourage further thought and reflection

# data[].attributes.body
Having multiple methods of assessments allows for equitable learning for success, at first glance this seems to put teachers in a position to create multiple versions of an assessment, but it can also mean that more than one assessment can be used to show mastery of a standard

# data[].attributes.body
Because technology is ubiquitous, teachers must support students in learning appropriate use, thus teachers must vet any digital resources before allowing student access to ensure the resource is appropriate and encourages further learning

# data[].attributes.body
Instruction is planned to support student engagement and rigorous learning by aligning with students’ interests and character

# data[].attributes.body
When a teacher is aware of students’ cultural/socio-economic identities, the subject can be tailored to be inclusive; however this might be intrusive for some students and families.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to teach a subject, one must be knowledgeable of that subject, otherwise you may misinform their learning, or create gaps in learning that they would otherwise need to succeed in this subject.

# data[].attributes.body
When multiple retakes are necessary for student success, something may have gone wrong in teacher's planning process. Considering a variety of interventions should always be part of the planning process.

# data[].attributes.body
Assessments are meant to reveal misunderstandings, so that the teacher can clear those up. If data is not collected from formative assessments, teachers may not be addressing these misunderstandings and students may be paying the price in their summative assessment scores. Is that fair? Make ups may be offered but when do students get those misunderstandings cleared up? While working with peers? In tutorial? During reflection after they failed their 3rd attempt? Are students paying the price when misunderstandings are not addressed. Yes, they are.

# data[].attributes.body
"Plans for learning have a flow that allows for student learning and reflection." - I love that "reflection" is valued in the new framework. Modelling reflective thoughts with sentence stems, if needed, will help build this as a regular and valued practice paramount to sustained learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Making teachers aware of resources should be ongoing, especially given the growth rate of AI resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I appreciate the addition of "clarity of purpose" when setting instructional outcomes. Students want to know the why -- the desired outcome before they engage in critical thinking, as they should, but it can get overlooked when planning. Making our thinking visible is key to building trust and engagement.

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps certain content area disciplines (the humanities) lend themselves to incorporate knowledge of students' race, culture and identity into planning and preparation easier than other content areas but can be done in each classroom. This may take some modelling in PD.

# data[].attributes.body
Plans and preparation assume exploration of real world application to ensure relevance for our students. This practice is key to necessary engagement.

# data[].attributes.body
Lessons and unit plans require a variety of strategies and a range of pedagogical approaches.

# data[].attributes.body
This seems to be what teachers have always been doing.

# data[].attributes.body
This all will benefit students.

# data[].attributes.body
It's important to continue to revise assessments to ensure you are assessing equitably.

# data[].attributes.body
Teaching is a craft. Planning is critical.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like most teachers strive to do this.

# data[].attributes.body
Important for students to know what they will be learning/experiencing.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like most teachers would say that this is a strong point for them.

# data[].attributes.body
Should always be part of teaching.