# data[].attributes.body
Type: line

Subject: The average time required to manufacture cars in the US

Category: 4 different brands of vehicles

Unit: hours

Year: 8 years (1998-2005)

# data[].attributes.body
1: line chart

2: the average time to produce cars in the US

3: 4 car manufactures

4: hours

5: a period of 8 years from 1998 to 2005

# data[].attributes.body
The line chart demonstrates the average time required to manufacture cars of 4 different brands of vehicles in the US, measured in hours, over a period of 8 years from 1998 to 2005.

# data[].attributes.body
Generally, Honda and Toyota had never required more than one day to produce vehicles while General Motor was the only one witness its trend go down over the period of 8 years

# data[].attributes.body
In general, it is clear that Honda had always been the most time-efficient car manufacturer while General Motor was the only to witness its trend decrease constantly.

# data[].attributes.body
The line diagram shows the average of time to produce cars in US of 4 difference brand, meansured of hours, over the period of 3 years

# data[].attributes.body
The line graph illustrate the average time it took for four different car manufacturers in producing vehicles at their factory which were located in the US from 1998 to 2005.

# data[].attributes.body
In general, it can be seen that Honda and Toyota had always been the most time-efficient while an exclusive downward trend was seen in the figure of General Motor.

# data[].attributes.body
Overall, it is clear that Honda had consistently been the most time-efficient car manufacturer, whereas General Motors was the only one to have witnessed a continuous decline in its trend.

# data[].attributes.body
In general, it is evident that Honda had always been the most time- efficient car producer in the chart while General Motor was the only one which invested most of the time in manufacturing vehicles but it gradually improved over the period.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1998, General Motors spent approximately 32 hours to produce a vehicle, which was 10 hours greater compared to Honda's production time that year. Over the next 6 years, Ford showed a similar downward trend, fluctuating between 28 and 31 hours before sharply declining to 24 hours. Moreover, GM gradually reduced its production time, reaching approximately 24 hours by 2005.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1998, General Motor took 32 hours on average for its vehicle production, which was significantly higher compared to what was required for Honda by 10 hours in the same year. From 1999 to 2005, it was clear that the amount of time spent on General Motor production tended to decrease considerably by 8 hours. Additionally, there was an downward trend in the average time spent on Honda production in the first year by 2 hours. From 1999 to 2002, it increased considerably from 20 hours to 24 hours. In the next year, the amount of time spent on Honda to produce vehicles decreased moderately by 4 hours.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1998, General Motor reached a peak at 32 hours which was around twice as much as Toyota. In the next 7 years, there was a significant decline in the amount of time from 32 to approximately 22 hours in General Motor. The year 2001 witnessed a remarkable growth with Ford which rose to nearly 32 hours. Afterwards, a dramatic decrease in it was recorded.The amount of time spent on producing Toyota vehicles reached a fluctuation from 1998 to 2002 around 23 hours. Until 2005, it fell to a low of 20 hours. After the decline from 1998 to 1999 in Honda, the amount increased markedly, before falling moderately to 20 hours in 2005.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1998, GM spent approximately 32 hours for its vehicle production, which was significantly greater compared to Honda by 10 hours in the same year.Over the next 6 years, Ford showed a similar downward trend which fluctuated from 28 to 31 hours before dropping sharply to the 24 hours. In addition, the amount of GM's production time had been falling to around 24 hours by 2005. Toyota and Honda initially had the same production time of 22 hours, which varied over the years before aligning again at 20 hours in 2005. Between 2001 and 2002, both companies recorded identical production times and experienced a 2% rise from 22 to 24 hours. This pattern indicates that similar industry factors may have affected their manufacturing efficiency.

# data[].attributes.body
In 2005, Honda spend approximately 20 hours to produce vehicles, which was the same what was took for toyota. from 2002 to 2005, all 4 difference brand had a similar trend that was reduced the amount of time its required to manufactured vehicles. In 2001, Ford reach its peak, took more or less than 31 hours to produced vehicles which was just less than that for general motor in 1998, while Toyota and Honda shared the same amount of time its need to produced vehicles. In 1998, general motor took 32 hours, which was the most unit required in the period of 8 years, significantly higher than itself in 2005 by 10 hours. In the same year, Toyota and Ford had the same start at 22 hours required, in the next few years, Honda decreased the amount of time while Toyota had the opposite trend.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1998, 32 hours on average was required to manufacture vehicles by General Motor, which was significantly higher compared to that of Honda by 10 hours in the same year. There was a considerable decline to approximately 22 hours in the average time to produce cars in 2005, yet Ford occupied the most time on average to assemble cars at roughly 31 hours in 2001. A moderative decrease by 2 hours was recorded in the amount of time required for Toyota and Honda, while theirs upward trend were exactly equal from 22 hours in 2001 to 24 hours in 2002.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking closely, in 1998, General Motor spent 32 hours on average in producing vehicles, which was significantly higher than what was repuired for Honda by 10 hours. There was a slight decrease of under 28 hours in General Motor’s car manufacturing in 4 years later. After that, it continued to decline steadily until its avarage of time hit the lowest point at 22 hours in 2005. Meanwhile, that of Toyota invested less than 24 hours to produce vehicles over the times but only in 2002 its figure reached enough one day for car production.

# data[].attributes.body
The illustrations outline the changes taking place at a floor of the Central Library based on the proposed plan over a period of 20 years.

# data[].attributes.body
The maps give information about the floor plan for a public library in a 2 different timeline and how it looks now.

# data[].attributes.body
This diagram depicts the key changes that occurred in the floor plan of the public library, comparing how it looked 20 years ago and how it looks now.

# data[].attributes.body
The line chart compares data on the production volume of main fuels, measured in tonnes, in the EU over a 5-year period from 1980 to 2000. (Line)

The diagram below illustrates the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and its current layout. (Mập)

# data[].attributes.body
The provided diagrams illustrate the changes in the floor plan of a public library between 20 years ago and the present day.

# data[].attributes.body
The CDs, videos, computer games have been replaced by the complex of storytelling events, sofas and children’s fiction books in the top left corner of the floor of Central Library. There has been a removal of adult fiction books, while it has transformed into all reference books in the Western site of the Central Library floor. In Southwest of the map, the Central Library floor has seen the deconstruction of the reading room, which include periodicals such as newspapers and magazines. Meanwhile, the establishment of a computure room has been executed at the same location. To be specific the idea of technological-assited format, the enquiry desk and the children’s books have been converted into cafe and lecture room in the Estern zone of the Central Library floor. The center area of the children’s books and the enquiry desk, the disappearance of aldult non-fiction books has had a room for the complex area of aldult fiction books, information desk and self-service machines, in which the adult fiction books has been narrowed than before. The tables and chairs has been erased in the center of the map, while the entrance has been a the only area remained unchanged.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at the layout from 20 years ago, the library was primarily organized around traditional functions. There were distinct sections for 'Adult fiction books,' 'Adult non-fiction books,' and 'Children's books.' A 'Reading room' provided space for newspapers and magazines, while 'Tables & chairs' were centrally located. The 'Enquiry desk' handled various tasks, including ticket issuing and book returns. This setup reflects a conventional library focused on providing reading materials and basic services

# data[].attributes.body
The given map illustrates the development of a public library through 20 years.

In general, it is clear that the library has cut down the availability of its book genres to offer a wider range of services for visitors as well as adopt a more modern and technological assisted format.

To begin with table chairs in the middle of the library which was removed. To the left side of the entrance, the old entertaining area including CDs, videos, computer games was developed by adding some facilities like sofas, storytelling events and children’s fiction books. Mover, the adult fiction books was added typical of books. There is a new computer room which replaces the original reading room.

In the right side of the entrance, the children’s book and the enquiry desk are converted into a lecture room and a coffee shop respectively. Additionally, there is a multifunctional device seen clearly in adult non-fiction books area by adding information desk and self-service machines.