# data[].attributes.headline
Limited funding to cover all the priorities

# data[].attributes.subject
Limited funding to cover all the priorities

# data[].attributes.body
3B - important to ensure longevity of services that people rely on

3C - always important

3A (though similar to 3E?)

3D

3E (similar to 3A?) - some doubt as to feasibility of federating everything

# data[].attributes.headline
Need actual objectives mapped to these priorities

# data[].attributes.subject
Need actual objectives mapped to these priorities

# data[].attributes.body
The priorities are so generic that it's hard to find anything missing, for example.

# data[].attributes.body
e.g. sustainability

# data[].attributes.headline
Priorities mean diff things to diff communities/groups

# data[].attributes.subject
Priorities mean diff things to diff communities/groups

# data[].attributes.body
project management, federated environment

# data[].attributes.body
3C - Security is always a top priority

3D - better meeting community needs through service evolution

3E - resilience and flexibility

3B - Long term running is key

3A - Creating accessible infra is critical to uptake

# data[].attributes.body
3B: the IRIS service needs to be available in the longer term (at least 5 yr planning horizons).

3C: IRIS needs to offer a secure infrastructure

3E: IRIS needs to be able to accommodate a wide range of end user science projects/ communities.

3D:

3A: it depends on the 'services'

# data[].attributes.body
Are we talking about people here ? Because for excellent operations we need experienced people in place.

# data[].attributes.body
If IRIS becomes an operational infrastructure then there needs to be a focus on operational support. So a ticketing system, helpdesk, monitoring usage of the resources. This also involves connecting with the support services available at the resource providers

# data[].attributes.body
I don't quite understand 3B (the English doesn't work) because it conflates two things: longer term planning... thus making the services more sustainable (in the funding sense); but then it also talks about improving service efficiency, which is a separate issue surely? What services are inefficient and why is that?

# data[].attributes.headline
Hosting and web presence facilities for projects

# data[].attributes.subject
Hosting and web presence facilities for projects

# data[].attributes.body
e.g. it took a long time for ExCALIBUR, for H&ES, for ExCALIBUR software projects to develop their own web presence (and some still haven't). Having a central facility that becomes known for allowing this would be great - publish webpages, publish internal confluence-type pages, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
B is essential - so that communities can plan and understand they will have access to reliable and predictable services. Security is second as securing the services is very important, if they're compromised they are unusable.

Federated infra services created a lot of discussion about this was - useful for some, but not for all. It may be it can be implemented but the netork performance required has so far been unattainable.

D - sounds like it limits the scope, providers shouldn't tell the users what it is they want.

# data[].attributes.body
In managing big project use of IRIS, in terms of DC and AC processing - the ability to schedule across IRIS will become increasingly important. Many projects know when they will need significant access to processing resources, and when they will have less need. The ability to schedule, especially with a year ahead horizon, would be very useful.

# data[].attributes.headline
Provision of reliable long-term funding plan

# data[].attributes.subject
Provision of reliable long-term funding plan