# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson evokes empathy through her diction and impactful facts in order to convince the reader of the detriments of carelessly interfering with natural processes. As such, Carson demonstrates that humans are inherently exploitative and ignorant, and should be deprived of their capitalistic reign over nature. (there should be oversight of ...)

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs nefarious diction and devious war imagery in order to connect the effects of capitalism to the real world (specify). In doing so, reveals that humans are often overcome by their own greed, making them ignorant to the world around them, thus causing overall death and destruction in the long run.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs argumentative diction and illustrative similes to criticize the several atrocities that human intervention in nature can lead to. By outlining the devastating effects of indiscriminate pesticide use, Carson suggests that the impacts humans bring are much greater than what one would imagine.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs negativly charged language, informative details, and rhetorical questions to demonstrate how killing the birds will cause ireversable distruction, in doing so she reveals that people are unaware of the consequences of their actions.
(neglect to change their practices in order to gain profit) - negligent?

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt “Silent Spring” Rachel Carson employs word choice and imagery to establish that, the mass killing from use of pesticides are not the fault of farmers, but a direct cause of capitalism.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs strong diction, factual information and rhetorical questions to convince the reader that humans are neglecting (to account for) the demolition they are inflicting on the environment by industrializing agriculture. In doing so, she reveals that human greed is destructive and irreversible and urgent change is needed.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs strong diction, pathos, and rhetorical questions to convince the reader that the hubris of humans often leads to detrimental impacts on the natural environment. In doing so, she reveals that in order for the world to flourish, humans and natural beings must coexist with one another in a respectful manner.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs diction, informative details, and rhetorical appeal to convince readers that humans are negligent of the disastrous impact of parathion usage. Rather than focusing on agricultural profit, she calls for urgency to preserve natural resources and give emphasis on human-nature co-existence.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs strong diction and verbal irony to convince the reader that the prioritization of monetary ambitions in the farming economy will result in the eventual destruction of the environment. In doing so, Carson reveals that once a procrastinated issue grows beyond control, its demolition will be unselective and relentless against all species.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs _pathos_ to convince the reader that __by neglecting the destruction of the environment, it furthers our destruction of all living beings__ . In doing so, she reveals that __urbanization is leading us to an irreversible future__.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs imagery and diction to convince the reader that humans are unaware of the long-lasting impact of their actions on the environment and all species. In doing so, she reveals that our actions are devastating and irreversible.

# data[].attributes.body
In the excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson employs strong diction, specific details and rhetorical questions to convince the reader that maximizing crop production through the expedient use of pesticides to control pests has  a severely detrimental impact on the environment and the consequences of such methods cannot be quantified. In doing so, she proposes that humans would benefit from a more wholistic approach  (preeminent value of nature; humans are intricately connected to the environment) ....