# data[].attributes.body
In the target setting and relationship to the decade report, is the "goal" statement well stated and established?

# data[].attributes.body
Tricky if this happens before the nomination endorsement by the NSO. Challenging to access this training if you need an NSO permission, while the NSO can decide to allow only one potential candidate, who is most likely to get endorsement.

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting idea, perhaps a bit clunky to implement in reality, and it seems like the number of candidates is small yet it could just become a kind of shadow election when teams are proposed, and then political party/bloc party possibilities

# data[].attributes.body
Could be a simple backstop to have in constitutional writing form, easy to comprehend

# data[].attributes.body
The members of the same team tend to have similar ideas and not bringing the necessary diversity

# data[].attributes.body
You need to have really a lot of candidates if people are not allowed to be in more than one team. So you end up having only 2 teams for example for election and not much choice

# data[].attributes.body
I think this is the strongest idea. And could be generalised later for other measures of focus that the committee has

# data[].attributes.body
The formation of the teams is very tricky. This is because friends or like-minded people can group together hence affecting the diversity on perspectives and management.

The individual election are still better
The random teams still make the best teams from unknown to known

# data[].attributes.body
Something that would be valuable as is, or something along those lines

# data[].attributes.body
Likely redundant if the appointment approach occurs along with the nomination 2 round

# data[].attributes.body
Would not pursue at this time

# data[].attributes.body
If they are nominated right there from the floor, then they don't have the candidates training from measure 1.

# data[].attributes.body
A general statement that is easily supportable and aligned to the goal. Interesting idea too for the reward elements, not sure how to think of those for now.

# data[].attributes.body
Would connect well in practice with the "appointment young members..." one, with this idea as the standing mechanism to achieve that appointment on behalf of whomever is empowered to make the appointment

# data[].attributes.body
Conceptually good. I'm conflicted on the mandatory training bit: on the one hand the standard setting is clear, on the other it may itself either be a shadow election or unnecessary limit someone that already has higher skills/training/etc. Something like this training is set "as the norm"/"as the base expectation".

# data[].attributes.body
In theory, could this be off the back of a conference, which can capture the energy and encourage the second time "repeat visitor" as an eligible candidate

# data[].attributes.body
Clearly a package that is a subset of these ideas either be those to put forward. Keeping in mind a desire for simplicity, which assists with transparency, it would be worth while making sure the process to-be can be explained in less than a paragraph.