# data[].attributes.body
Stewart Resnick, owner of Wonderful Pistachios, addresses attendees at the Ninth Annual Wonderful Pistachio Conference about recent recalls and market challenges. He discusses the company's success and plans to expand into Mexico. Lynda, a key figure in their community development efforts, presents a documentary highlighting their work in Lost Hills. The Resnicks are praised for their investments in education, including an $80 million charter school complex in Delano. Lynda emphasizes health initiatives for their employees, prompting some discomfort among the growers. Despite past legal battles, Stewart maintains a guarded demeanor.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:

-Stewart Resnick's acknowledgment of recent challenges and proactive approach to address them, such as dealing with FDA recalls and exploring new markets in Mexico.

-Lynda's dedication to community development and philanthropy, exemplified by initiatives like the documentary and investment in education.

-The Resnicks' commitment to improving education through the construction of a modern charter school complex in Delano, providing opportunities for underprivileged students.

-Lynda's emphasis on employee health and wellness, demonstrated by initiatives like building gyms and promoting healthy lifestyles among workers.

Cons:

-The discomfort among growers, possibly due to feeling criticized or pressured by Lynda's health-focused remarks, which could strain relationships within the industry.

-Stewart's guarded demeanor and past legal battles with business partners may reflect negatively on the company's reputation and stakeholder relations.

-The Resnicks' dominance in the market and control over pricing, potentially leading to concerns about monopolistic practices and limited competition.

-The lack of acknowledgment or credit given to external sources, such as journalist John Gibler, for their contributions to identifying community issues and prompting philanthropic action.

# data[].attributes.body
Two men convicted in a 2021 shooting death in Kern County were sentenced to life in prison. David Earlvon Gray received life without parole for first-degree murder, while Demitiris Devon King got 20 years to life for second-degree murder. The incident occurred on Nov. 3, 2021, resulting in the death of Justin Griffin Jr. Gray, King, and another individual were arrested by the Bakersfield Police Department. Christian Francios Gaines faced trial but had a hung jury, leading to a mistrial. Despite King's request for a new trial due to a potential conflict of interest with a juror, Judge Charles Brehmer denied it. Defense attorney Tim Hennessy requested contact information for jurors, but the request was denied by the prosecution.

# data[].attributes.body
The Kern Water Bank is a vital recharge facility aimed at replenishing an underground aquifer during wet years to tackle drought conditions. Located west of Highway 43 near Panama Lane, it spans 32 square miles with over 80 recharge basins. The water bank supports diverse wildlife, including 240 bird species, with 35,000 water birds during high-water years. Managed under a habitat conservation plan, it hosts endangered plants and species. The nonprofit Kern Water Bank Authority operates it on behalf of member districts, covering 20,600 acres and featuring 91 recovery wells. While closed to the public, the bank offers tours. This year, it may break the record for water storage, potentially exceeding 2017's 560,000 acre-feet. Additionally, California is investing billions to capture and conserve stormwater, expand groundwater recharge, fund stormwater capture projects, and increase reservoir capacity.

# data[].attributes.body
California is facing an unprecedented drought, declared a statewide emergency by Governor Gavin Newsom. This crisis is exacerbated by record-high temperatures caused by human-induced climate change. Warm winters lead to reduced snowpack, which melts earlier, leaving California reliant on dwindling water sources by late summer. Additionally, warmer air absorbs moisture from lakes, plants, and soil, intensifying the drought's impact. Despite recent rain, experts predict continued dry conditions due to the La Niña weather phenomenon.

# data[].attributes.body
Water storage and water wars are issues of federalism because they involve the complex interplay between federal, state, and local governments in managing and regulating water resources.

1. Federal Role: The federal government plays a significant role in water storage through agencies like the Bureau of Reclamation, which constructs and manages large-scale water storage projects such as dams and reservoirs. These projects often involve interstate rivers and basins, which fall under federal jurisdiction. Additionally, federal laws like the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act have implications for water storage and allocation, as they regulate water quality and protect ecosystems that depend on water resources.

2. State Authority: States have primary authority over water rights and allocation within their borders. They manage water resources through state agencies and water boards, issuing permits for water use, setting water quality standards, and developing water management plans. State laws govern issues such as groundwater pumping, water transfers, and water conservation measures.

3. Local Governance: Local governments often have a role in water management, particularly in areas where water resources are locally controlled. They may operate water utilities, implement water conservation programs, and regulate land use practices that affect water availability and quality.

4. Interstate Water Conflicts: Water storage and allocation can lead to conflicts between states, especially in regions where water resources are shared across state boundaries. These disputes may involve disagreements over water rights, competing demands for water use, and the impacts of upstream water storage projects on downstream users. Resolving interstate water conflicts often requires federal intervention, such as through interstate compacts or Supreme Court rulings.

In summary, water storage and water wars involve a complex web of federal, state, and local regulations, policies, and governance structures. Balancing competing interests and managing water resources effectively requires collaboration and coordination among all levels of government.

# data[].attributes.body
In the heart of California's enduring drought, the Resnicks, billionaires behind Wonderful Company, own a lush oasis of 70,000 acres of water-intensive pistachio and almond trees. They've capitalized on opportunistic deals, securing ample water resources, including a majority stake in Kern Water Bank, and investing $35 million in additional water acquisitions. This access has fueled their agricultural empire, which includes POM Wonderful, Fiji Water, and Teleflora, generating $3.8 billion in sales annually. However, their water usage, enough for two-thirds of San Francisco's population, has drawn scrutiny and legal challenges. Critics accuse them of exploiting public resources for private gain, particularly in light of California's severe drought. Nevertheless, the Resnicks remain defiant, citing legal victories and emphasizing their investments in water-saving technologies and infrastructure. Their story is one of astute business acumen, relentless legal battles, and unyielding ambition, underscoring the complexities of water management in a parched region

# data[].attributes.body
The Wonderful Company, owned by Stewart and Lynda Resnick, has faced backlash for clear-cutting an oak forest in Paso Robles to expand vineyards for its Justin Wines brand. The action, which started in June and was halted by the county, has left hillsides vulnerable to erosion and raised concerns about groundwater depletion. Local residents and businesses are boycotting Justin wines, and officials are considering a deforestation ordinance. The company claims to comply with local laws and promises to plant 5,000 oak trees, but locals remain skeptical.