# data[].attributes.body
1.data overview

Microsoft: 30% increase in greenhouse gas emissions due to AI replacement expansion by 2023 (Source: Microsoft Environmental Report 2024) Google data centers: On average, about 0.2 to 0.3 tons CO2 per MWh→ Large AI models use thousands of MWh → hundreds of tons of CO₂ are emitted into the air. CO₂ emissions during GPT-3 training are approximately 552 tons, equivalent to the annual emissions of 120 cars. Annual emissions from global data centers are approximately 200 million tons of CO₂. Approximately 2-3% of global carbon emissions. Major air pollutants: CO₂, NOₓ, SO₂, PM2.5. Global warming, fine dust, deteriorating health. Global data center carbon emissions: 🔸 Approximately 2%-3% of global carbon dioxide emissions. 🔸 Approximately more than 200 million tons of CO₂ (Source: International Energy Agency, 2022). The more AI-based the data center, the higher the carbon density. AI servers consume up to 5 times more power than general servers → consume more fossil fuels.

2.purpose

This is because the air pollution problem and resource waste caused by artificial intelligence have become serious recently.

3.explanation

This work(?) depicts air pollution and resource waste caused by artificial intelligence.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

The amount of ecologically farmed agricultural land in Germany from 1994 to 2023 in percent:

1994: 1.6%

1995: 1.8%

1996: 2.1%

1997: 2.3%

1998: 2.4%

1999: 2.6%

2000: 3.2%

2001: 3.7%

2002: 4.1%

2003: 4.3%

2004: 4.5%

2005: 4.7%

2006: 4.9%

2007: 5.1%

2008: 5.4%

2009: 5.4%

2010: 5.9%

2011: 6.1%

2012: 6.2%

2013: 6.3%

2014: 6.3%

2015: 6.5%

2016: 7.5%

2017: 8.2%

2018: 9%

2019: 9.7%

2020: 10.3%

2021: 10.9%

2022: 11.2%

2023: 11.4%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows that the amount of ecologically farmed land in Germany is almost always growing. In 2023 11.4% of agricultural land was ecologically farmed. This is an average amount when compared to other european countries, however the German government has the ambitious plan to increase that amount up to 30% by 2030. That would be

18.6% in just 7 years time but the data shows that the amount only grew by 9.8% in 29 years. With this information you can therefore conclude that there is still lots to do until this goal is achieved.

(3) Data Sources

The amount of ecologically farmed agricultural land in Germany from 1994 to 2023 in percent:

https://www.thuenen.de/de/themenfelder/oekologischer-landbau/aktuelle-trends-der-deutschen-oekobranche/oekolandbau-in-zahlen

The plan/goal by the German government:

https://www.bmel.de/DE/themen/landwirtschaft/oekologischer-landbau/bio-strategie-2030.html#:~:text=Die%20wissenschaftlich%20anerkannten%20Leistungen% 20helfen, Fläche%20ökologisch%20bewirtschaf tet% 20werden%20sollen.

The amount of ecologically farmed agricultural land of every

European Country in 2021 and 2022 in percent:

https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/5423/umfrage/anteil-der-oeko-flaeche-an-der-landwirtschaft-in-den-eu-27-laendern/

(4) Artwork Description

The increasing percentages of the chart are roughly visualized by a rising mountain range. However, the mountain range is not always rising which shows that not every year the percentages increased.

# data[].attributes.headline
10417 우민재 -Looking Up: The Human Cost of Ozone Layer Damage

# data[].attributes.subject
10417 우민재 -Looking Up: The Human Cost of Ozone Layer Damage

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data overview

Year – CFCs / Others = Total (million tonnes)

1986 – 0.0090 / 0.0025 = 0.0115 million tonnes
1987 – 0.0088 / 0.0024 = 0.0112 million tonnes
1988 – 0.0082 / 0.0028 = 0.0110 million tonnes
1989 – 0.0075 / 0.0040 = 0.0115 million tonnes (peak year)
1990 – 0.0058 / 0.0020 = 0.0078 million tonnes
1995 – 0.0032 / 0.0018 = 0.0050 million tonnes
2000 – 0.0014 / 0.0016 = 0.0030 million tonnes
2005 – 0.0006 / 0.0010 = 0.0016 million tonnes
2010 – 0.0003 / 0.0007 = 0.0010 million tonnes
2015 – 0.0001 / 0.0004 = 0.0005 million tonnes
2020 – 0.0000 / 0.0001 = 0.0001 million tonnes

(2)reason for data selection

This study examines the emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in order to understand their broader effects on human health—particularly the impact of increased ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation exposure. As the ozone layer thins, more UV-B reaches the Earth’s surface, elevating the risk of various health conditions. One of the most significant and well-documented consequences is the increased likelihood of developing cataracts, which can impair vision and quality of life.

Learning about the environmental origins of such conditions has deepened my interest in how global challenges intersect with personal health. This research has reinforced the importance of prevention, early detection, and raising public awareness about invisible yet harmful exposures. It also reflects how scientific understanding of environmental change can inform approaches to protecting human well-being—especially in areas as sensitive and essential as vision.

(3)Artwork Description

This image illustrates how chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), once used in products like refrigerants and aerosols, contribute to ozone layer depletion. In the stratosphere, CFCs release chlorine atoms when exposed to UV light. These atoms destroy ozone molecules, reducing the ozone layer’s ability to block harmful UV radiation.

As a result, more UV rays reach Earth’s surface, directly impacting human health. One serious effect is an increased risk of cataracts, an eye condition caused by prolonged UV exposure that can lead to blindness.

Although CFC emissions have decreased since the Montreal Protocol, their long atmospheric life means they continue to affect us today. The image shows this invisible chain—from industrial pollution to health risks—reminding us of the importance of protecting the ozone layer.

(4)Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/ozone-layer

# data[].attributes.body
(1)Data Overview

Environmental effect of construction material (GWP[kgCO2eq/m³])

Concrete C30/37 : 282.0

Glass pane, triple-glazed : 4761.7

Structural steel : 5403.2

(2)Reason for Data selection

I have a strong interest in architecture, particularly in how it shapes spaces and incorporates environmentally friendly design. In my first semester, I studied eco-friendly materials in English class and discovered carbon capture concrete. This sparked my curiosity about the environmental impact of different architectural materials. To explore further, I decided to analyze the Global Warming Potential (GWP) [kgCO2eq/m³] of key construction materials like concrete C30/37, glass pane, triple-glazed, and structural steel which are widely used in building projects.

(3)Artwork Description

To illustrate CO2 emissions for different construction materials, I scaled the size of each material's image according to its GWP value, focusing on key materials like concrete C30/37, triple-glazed glass, and structural steel. To emphasize their environmental impact, I displayed the GWP values in red directly on each image. I also aimed to raise awareness by using a dark-toned background that reflects the worsening effects of air pollution and global warming, highlighting the severity of greenhouse gas emissions.

(4)Data source

건축 자재 피라미드 : 건축 자재들의 환경 영향 비교하기

https://greenacademy.re.kr/archives/14669

https://www.materialepyramiden.dk/

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

DR (per 100,000) from outdoor air pollution in the US

1995: 39

2000: 34

2005: 26

2010: 16

2015: 12

2020: 10

(2) Reason for Data Selection

The data shows the death rate in the United States due to outdoor pollution from 1995 to 2020. It was chosen because it highlights the significant progress that has been made over time to reduce the health impacts of pollution. It also highlights the effectiveness of environmental policies, technological advances and public health efforts in mitigating air pollution-related deaths. Understanding this trend is critical to maintaining and further improving air quality while identifying areas for continued action to protect public health.

(3) Artwork Description

The smokestack represents industrial pollution, a key contributor to poor air quality. The red circles symbolize death rates due to pollution, with their size reflecting the severity of the issue. As the circles shrink, they represent the decline in pollution-related deaths from 1995-2020. This emphasizes the progress made in reducing air pollution’s health impact.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/outdoor-air-pollution#all-charts

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Reduce vehicle emissions

Advocate for cleaner energy

Use masks in high pollution areas

Limit outdoor activities on high pollution days

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Share of land defined as natural habitat:

1880: 76%

1900: 63%

1920: 53%

1940: 51%

1960: 44%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We selected this data in order to convey a sense of environmental urgency that is increasingly faced by the United States. The substantial loss of natural habitat faced by wild animals has become a major issue, with species endangerment rising as one of the biggest issues worldwide. However, despite the entire world suffering due to diminishing natural habitats, the United States has proven one of the biggest culprits of the destruction of wildlife, and contributes most to the increasingly small amount of habitat available for animal life.

(3) Artwork Description

Each tree, along with the animals demonstrates the general amount of natural habitats throughout the United States for about every 20 years. As the trees and the animals decrease in size, the amount of natural habitats also decreases. Leaving little to no space for the bigger animals, hence why the animal for each tree shrink in size.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/land-natural-share?country=~USA

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

First, industrial expansion must slow in order to stop the process of habitat loss. Second, in order to restore currently affected landscapes, the United States as a society must call for US law to include sentiments that emphasize the lives of animals and their ecosystems. Third, We can make a difference by cleaning junk, by reusing, reducing and recycling pollution from the habitats making them cleaner and livable. Last but not least, being a part in habitat rehabilitation such as planting trees helps rebuild the habitats, bringing back the homes of many animals living in them.

# data[].attributes.body
(1)Data Overview

the annual distribution rate of renewable energy in Korea(%)
2018: 4.99
2020: 7.44
2022: 9.22

(2) Reason For Data Selection

Energy is an essential part of our daily lives, and its importance cannot be overstated. However, many methods of energy production significantly harm the environment, making the transition to environmentally friendly alternatives crucial from an ecological perspective. Additionally, I am interested in energy generation technologies. Therefore, I wanted to research the annual distribution rate of renewable energy in South Korea to understand how much renewable energy has been utilized in the country.

(3) Artwork Description

From left to right, this represents the annual distribution rate of renewable energy in South Korea for the years 2018, 2020, and 2022. The sizes of the wind turbines, a representative example of renewable energy, illustrate these rates. The background features a forest to evoke an eco-friendly atmosphere. The annual distribution rate of renewable energy in South Korea is depicted through the varying sizes of the wind turbines for each year.

(4) Data Source

https://www.knrec.or.kr/biz/statistics/supply/supply02_01_list.do

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1970-1979 avg:1,642,000 tons of fish caught

1980-1989 avg:2,582,000 tons of fish caught

1990-1999 avg:2,624,000 tons of fish caught

2000-2009 avg:2,202,000 tons of fish caught

2010-2019 avg:2,260,000 tons of fish caught

The amount of fish being caught over the time over fishing grows at a surprising rate. From only 700 thousand tons of fish to over 3 million tons of fish being caught in one year.

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We chose this data because of the interesting laws in Korea restricting people from fishing different types of fish during a certain period.

(3) Artwork Description

Our art work shows the growing amount of fish being caught each year with each piece of the fish growing bigger.

(4) Data Source

Our data comes from Our World In Data. It shows a clear graph that shows how much fish was caught and when.

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

To avoid over fishing we can create anti-fishing zones to promote the growth of the fish population. Another thing we can do is to enforce the fishing laws even more and to keep fishers in check. Another way to lower over fishing we can lower the usage of large fishing nets, as Korea is famously known for using big trawling nets to do most fishing. Lastly we can make rules to protect endangered species making them unable to keep them.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Annual album sales in the K-pop industry over the past 5 years, based on Circle Chart, combined with annual album sales rankings (top 100)

- (2019) 23,858,390 - (2020) 32,782,134 - (2021) 45,468,887 - (2022) 60,476,914 - (2023) 94,167,827

(2) Reason for Data Selection

As the K-pop industry has grown, issues have arisen regarding the disparity between album sales and the actual number of people consuming the music, as well as the increasing number of albums being indiscriminately discarded. Recently, there has been criticism that entertainment companies are solely focused on their performance metrics, fueling an environmentally harmful competition for higher sales. To measure the scale of this issue, I selected the annual album sales (top 100) as the primary data.

(3) Artwork Description

Using striking metallic objects against a vibrant background, the artwork aims to starkly reveal what aspects of our cultural life we should be concerned about and what discomforts we should be aware of.

(4) Data Source

[Circle Chart](https://circlechart.kr/page_chart/album.circle?nationGbn=T&targetTime=2019&hitYear=2019&termGbn=year&yearTime=3)

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/taegong89/1

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Global hydrogen production per year (in tons)

2018: 69 million tons

2020: 90 million tons

2023: 97 million tons

(2) Reason for Data Selection

In my freshman year, I wrote an in-depth research report on hydrogen-electric hybrid technology, which sparked my interest in the hydrogen economy, recognized as a key player in the eco-friendly industry. To explore one of the biggest solutions for sustainable development in the future, I decided to investigate the annual hydrogen energy production, which forms the foundation of this system.

(3) Artwork Description

As the years progress, I depicted the gradual increase in the total production of hydrogen energy. To emphasize the growth, I adjusted the size of water droplets with the H₂ symbol and arranged them diagonally. Since water is usually produced as a byproduct when hydrogen energy is used, I incorporated ice and snowflakes into the background, considering the current winter season. Additionally, to illustrate the chemical properties of hydrogen, I added several chemical structure patterns.

(4) Data Source

‘여기는 팔고, 저기는 사고’ 드러나는 수소무역 윤곽. 주도권은? | SK에코플랜트 뉴스룸

글로벌 수소 보고서 2023mofa.go.krhttps://overseas.mofa.go.kr › brd › down

https://www.keei.re.kr/keei/download/KEIB_210802.pdf?utm

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Year

1973

1983

1993

2003

2013

2023

American fossil fuel consumption (TWh)

19204.70

17279

20504.29

23043.09

21720.93

21102.20

Rate of consumption

15.63%

14.06%

16.69%

18.76%

17.68%

17.18%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

The problem of increasing fossil fuel usage and burning persists in the U.S. to this day, as it is utilized in various production and manufacturing facilities, such as generating electricity to power everyday products (e.g., refrigerators, stovetops, ovens). This remains one of the main contributors to pollution today.

(3) Artwork Description

The smoke represents the amount of fossil fuel consumption in the US. The clouds of grim and ashy smog and smoke rise up from the surface, initially starting as a concentrated, dark cloud of smog before dissipating into the sky. This depicts the source, fossil fuels, which produce smoke and smog that pollute and spread in the air.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Turning off appliances in your home that aren’t currently being used can help save energy and reduce pollution. Additionally, reusing products and recycling are effective ways to minimize waste and conserve resources.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Renewable freshwater resources

1961: 4,259.84m

1970: 3,437.43m

1980: 2,477.92m

2000: 2,227.78m

2010: 2,102.78m

2020: 1,998.41m

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows the availability of freshwater. It shows how the availability is decreasing and how it’s becoming worse, from 1961 to 2020. The purpose of this is to raise awareness about the usage of freshwater and how we need to help and protect it. Water is essential to life, and we need to conserve it.

(3) Artwork Description

Our artwork shows how the freshwater we have is getting dirtier and more unhealthy. The big bubbles show how we had more freshwater in the earlier years, and as the bubbles get smaller it shows how our access and availability to freshwater is getting limited.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/water-use-stress

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result? (Over 3 things)

Properly disposing of hazardous products, volunteering in a beach cleanup, and protecting rivers flow naturally are all ways we can help protect freshwater.

# data[].attributes.headline
김찬솔, 마영진, 에볼렛

# data[].attributes.subject
김찬솔, 마영진, 에볼렛

# data[].attributes.body
English Description:

Title : Municipal Waste Recycling Rate, 1990-2014

(1) Data Overview

Annual amount of recycling waste rate in South Korea

1990 - 3%

1997 - 20%

2005 - 38%

2014 - 39%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows the amount of municipal recycling in South Korea. This shows how well South Korea is recycling their waste products. Showing awareness and encouragement to other countries on recycling.

(3) Artwork Description

Each section of the tree demonstrates the percentage of municipal waste recycling during the years from 1990-2014 in korea.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/municipal-waste-recycling-rate?tab=chart&country=~Korea

(5) What steps can I take to encourage  this result?

(Over 3 things)

1. Make recycling bins mandatory in all facilities and social outings

2. Have signs of promoting to recycle

3. Make community trash recycling groups

Korean Description:

제목 : 1990년부터 2014년까지 생활폐기물 재활용률

(1) 데이터 개요

국내 연간 재활용 폐기물 발생량

1990 - 3%

1997 - 20%

2005 - 38%

2014 - 39%

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

이 데이터는 한국 국내 연간 재활용 폐기물 발생량 보여준다. 이는 한국이 폐기물을 얼마나 잘 재활용하고 있는지를 보여준다. 재활용에 대한 다른 나라의 인식과 격려를 보여줍니다.

(3) 작품 설명

트리의 각 섹션은 한국에서 1990년부터 2014년까지의 기간 동안 생활 폐기물 재활용 비율을 보여줍니다.

(4) 데이터 출처

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/municipal-waste-recycling-rate?tab=chart&country=~Korea

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일

1. 모든 시설 및 사교 활동에서 재활용 쓰레기통을 의무화하기

2. 재활용하는 것을 홍보하기

3. 지역사회 쓰레기 재활용 그룹 만들기

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Based on data from ITOPF, a non-profit organization based in London, England, the frequency of large and medium oil spills from tanker accidents over time has decreased significantly. Large oil spills are categorized if more than 700 tonnes of oil from tankers have been released, while medium oil spills are categorized if less than 700 tonnes of oil have been released. Based on the graph, large and medium oil spills reached its peak in the 1970s with over 100 spills; however, by 2023, large and medium oil spills are at an all time low with less than 10 spills. This positive trend depicts the intervention that has been enacted to decrease oil spills and prevent further water pollution. This has positive implications on the marine ecosystems and the living and nonliving organisms that live under water.

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We chose the oil spill data because we wanted to look into a further subsection of water pollution. We believe that accidental oil spills have a large impact on the aquatic life and ecosystem that makes up more than 70% of our globe.

(3) Artwork Description

Our artwork attempts to depict the sea in a depressing manner with black sludge, trashcans, and plastic pollution. The black sludge represents the oil spills that move as a unit, carrying different pieces of pollution with it. Across the art piece, we created a sudden slash of toxic skulls that decreases in size, correlating with the decreasing trend of oil spills that is shown in our data.

(4) Data Source

Our data is sourced from ourworldindata.org, a website that is designed to show research and data regarding global problems. Specifically, our graph is sourced from ITOPF, a non-profit organization based in England that provides recommendations to governments and industries for sustainable environmental practices.

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)  In order to help prevent oil spills, people can volunteer to clean shoreline oil spills, donate money to fund current oil spill clean-up technologies like oil booms, and ensure proper storage of oil tanks before departure through sea.

(1) 데이터 개요영국 런던에 본사를 둔 비영리 단체인 ITOPF의 데이터에 따르면 시간이 지남에 따라 유조선 사고로 인한 대형 및 중형 기름 유출 빈도가 크게 감소했습니다. 유조선에서 700톤 이상의 기름이 방출되면 대규모 기름 유출로 분류되고, 700톤 미만의 기름이 방출되면 중간 기름 유출로 분류됩니다. 그래프에 따르면, 대형 및 중형 기름 유출은 1970년대에 100건이 넘는 유출로 최고조에 달했습니다. 그러나 2023년까지 대규모 및 중간 규모의 기름 유출은 10건 미만으로 사상 최저 수준입니다. 이러한 긍정적인 추세는 기름 유출을 줄이고 추가 수질 오염을 방지하기 위해 제정된 개입을 나타냅니다. 이는 해양 생태계와 물속에 사는 생물 및 무생물에 긍정적인 영향을 미칩니다.

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

우리는 수질 오염에 대한 추가 하위 섹션을 조사하고 싶었기 때문에 기름 유출 데이터를 선택했습니다. 우리는 우발적인 기름 유출이 지구의 70% 이상을 차지하는 수중 생물과 생태계에 큰 영향을 미친다고 믿습니다.

(3) 작품 설명

우리 작품은 검은 슬러지, 쓰레기통, 플라스틱 오염 등으로 바다를 우울하게 묘사하려고 합니다. 검은색 슬러지는 여러 가지 오염 물질을 운반하면서 하나의 단위로 이동하는 기름 유출을 나타냅니다. 예술 작품 전반에 걸쳐 우리는 데이터에 표시된 기름 유출의 감소 추세와 상관관계가 있는 크기가 감소하는 독성 두개골의 갑작스러운 베임을 만들었습니다.

(4) 데이터 출처

우리의 데이터는 글로벌 문제에 관한 연구 및 데이터를 표시하도록 설계된 웹사이트인 ourworldindata.org에서 제공됩니다. 특히, 우리의 그래프는 지속 가능한 환경 관행에 대해 정부와 업계에 권장 사항을 제공하는 영국에 본사를 둔 비영리 조직인 ITOPF에서 가져온 것입니다.

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일

기름 유출을 방지하기 위해 사람들은 해안선 기름 유출 청소에 자원 봉사하고, 오일 붐과 같은 현재 기름 유출 청소 기술에 자금을 기부하고, 바다를 떠나기 전에 석유 탱크를 적절하게 보관할 수 있습니다.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1990: 79.3/100,000 people died of air pollution

2000: 61.7/100,000 people died of air pollution

2010: 33.6/100,000 people died of air pollution

2021: 28.1/100,000 people died of air pollution

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We found this topic interesting, and we were curious about what the data would look like.

(3) Artwork Description

The factory emitting gas represents the amount of deaths caused by air pollution, and the pictures of the factory getting smaller show that the death rates have gone down.

5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Avoid smoking

Drive car less/carpool

Don’t burn garbage waste

Plant trees

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1960 0.07%

1980 0.21%

2000 0.27%

2020 0.43%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

It shows a bar graph over the years, and showcases the effect storms have had on the economy.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork shows the gradual growth of the storms. Starting small, and over time it becomes bigger, causing more damage to the economy.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/natural-disasters?hideControls=false&Disaster+Type=All+disasters&Impact=Economic+damages+%28%25+GDP%29&Timespan=Decadal+average&Per+capita=false&country=~KOR

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Strengthen doors and windows to prevent damages for future storms

Trim dead branches from trees to prevent them from falling off and causing potential damage

Buy flood insurance

Fortify your garage doors to prevent damage to your whole house.

이름: 윤 민재

제목 : 경제적 피해

(1) 데이터 개요 1960년: 0.07%

1980년: 0.21%

2000 년: 0.27%

2020년: 0.43%

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

이 데이터는 년도를 기준으로 한 막대 그래프로, 폭풍이 경제에 미친 영향을 보여줍니다.

(3) 작품 설명

이 작품은 폭풍의 단계적인 성장을 표현합니다. 처음에는 작게 시작지만, 시간이 지날수록 더 커지며 경제에 더 큰 피해를 줍니다.

(4) 데이터 출처

https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/natural-disasters?hideControls=false&Disaster+Type=All+disasters&Impact=Economic+damages+%28%25+GDP%29&Timespan=Decadal+average&Per+capita=false&country=~KOR

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일?

미래에 다가올 폭풍으로 인한 피해를 막기 위해  문과 창문을 보수하세요.

나무에서 마른 가지를 잘라내어 떨어지거나 잠재적인 피해를 유발하지 않도록 하세요.

홍 수 보험에 가입하세요.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview: Tonnes of Co2 emissions per capita (1980-2020)

1980: 3.5T

1990: 5.7T

2000: 9.4T

2010: 12.2T

2020: 11.5T

(2) Reason for Data Selection: Shows the great increase of Co2 possibly causing harm in the future. This data shows the significant increase of Co2 emissions over the past 40 years

(3) Artwork Description: The artwork shown represents the graph of Co2 emissions in Korea over the past 40 years. It shows a great increase of Co2 emissions and concentration over time. The arrow represents the flow of time starting from the 1980’s. At the end of the arrow is the time period 2020 and shows a decrease of Co2 from 2010.

(4) Data Source Link

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Avoid driving when possible

Use less disposable products

Lower energy costs in home

Avoid using AI

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Deaths per 100,000 people in South Korea:

1990: 84.6

1995: 70.1

2000: 63.7

2005: 49.3

2010: 34.9

2015: 34.3

2020: 29.3

(2) Reason for Data Selection

Air pollution is a major issue in the world, but it is especially prevalent in South Korea. However, efforts made to reduce air pollution have been successful, with the data showing decreasing death rates. The purpose of this data selection is to show that fighting pollution has a large impact, and to inspire people to continue fighting it.

(3) Artwork Description

Our background consists of a dark condensed fog hovering over a heavily polluted city. We added 7 images of masked skulls of different size ratios to represent the data we gathered from our source. Years progress as you move down the image.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rate-from-air-pollution-per-100000?tab=chart&country=High-middle+SDI~KOR

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Reduce harmful emissions from vehicles and engines

Plant and conserve trees

Switch to eco-friendly products

Prevention of open fires

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Average Fish and Seafood Consumption per Person in South Korea

1993: 18.8%

2000: 17.7%

2007: 21.9%

2014: 20.8%

2021: 20.9%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

As overfishing becomes more prominent, the ocean loses its biodiversity. This can lead to environmental loss as many fish species are crucial to the wellbeing of their environment. Many fish species are crucial to the ocean’s food chain, in which other species survive off of those fish. With overfishing and those fish species disappearing, other animals lose their food source and can become susceptible to extinction.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork shows how as more fish is caught and later consumed, the less fish there is in the environment.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/fish-and-overfishing

https://earth.org/solutions-to-overfishing/

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

1) Apply Regulations on Fishing Nets

2) Regulations on Fishing Nets

3) Protect Essential Predator Species

4) Increase Marine Protected Areas and Enhance Controls

(1) 데이터 개요

한국 국민 1인당 평균 생선 및 해산물 소비량:

1993: 18.8%

2000: 17.7%

2007: 21.9%

2014: 20.8%

2021: 20.9%

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

과도한 어획이 더 두드러짐에 따라 바다는 생물다양성을 잃습니다. 이는 많은 어종이 환경의 안녕에 필수적이기 때문에 환경 손실로 이어질 수 있습니다. 많은 어종이 바다의 먹이 사슬에 필수적이며, 다른 어종은 그 물고기를 먹고 살아갑니다. 과도한 어획과 그 어종이 사라지면서 다른 동물은 먹이 공급원을 잃고 멸종에 취약해질 수 있습니다.

(3) 작품 설명

이 예술 작품은 더 많은 물고기를 잡아서 나중에 먹을수록 환경 내 물고기 수가 줄어든다는 것을 보여줍니다.

(4) 데이터 출처

https://ourworldindata.org/fish-and-overfishing

https://earth.org/solutions-to-overfishing/

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일

1) 어망에 대한 규정 적용

2) 어망에 대한 규정

3) 필수적인 포식자 종 보호

4) 해양 보호 구역 확대 및 통제 강화

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Greenhouse gas emissions measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalents over a 100-year timescale (in percentages). These include carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from all sources, including land-use change.

1940: 4.57%

1960: 2.01%

1980: 22.25%

2000: 71.17%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

South Korea's emissions have been rising steadily, contributing significantly to global climate change. This data is chosen to highlight the need for action to curb emissions for environmental sustainability. South Korea's emissions have been rising steadily, contributing significantly to global climate change. This data is chosen to highlight the need for action to curb emissions for environmental sustainability.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork uses a greenhouse background with arranged the clouds in proportion to show the increase in greenhouse emissions over the years. This illustrates the potential increase of these emissions in South Korea, even if there is  a slight decrease in the 2000s.

(4) Data Source https://ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-gas-emissions

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

To address South Korea's rising emissions and their impact on climate change, various steps can be taken: I’d encourage the adoption of renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydro, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels for power generation. Implement stricter policies to reduce emissions from the industrial sector, such as energy efficiency standards and regulations on pollutant waste. Promote public transportation and discourage vehicle dependence, particularly in urban areas, to cut down on transportation-related emissions.Finally, foster tree planting initiatives, reforestation, and sustainable forestry practices to improve carbon sequestration.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1940

802 thousand tons

1960

12.5 million tons

1980

134.5 million tons

2000

440 million tons

2020

598 million tons

Total

1.19 billion tons

reason for data selection

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We chose to go over carbon emissions in South Korea because it’s a good display of how environmentally healthy the country is.

(3) Artwork Description

Our artwork displays the proportion of Korea’s total carbon emissions every 20 years, and how South Korea continues to produce more and more tons of carbon each year.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country?country=~KOR

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Difference of yearly carbon dioxide emissions by Korean

1960 - 0.5t

1980 - 3.5t

2000 - 9.4t

2020 - 11.5t

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows how humans are impacting the air by polluting it more and more every year. This increase of carbon dioxide is becoming a big problem and shows the impact that human activities have on the planet.

(3) Artwork Description

The dark background represents the amount of pollutant in the air and the increasing size of the smoke represents that every year there is more and more pollution.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Bike to school instead of taking the bus.

Get electric cars.

Plant trees or other plants

(1) 데이터 개요

한국인의 연간 이산화탄소 배출량 차이

1960년 - 0.5톤

1980 - 3.5t

2000 - 9.4t

2020 - 11.5t

(2) 데이터 선정 이유

이 데이터는 인간이 매년 점점 더 많은 공기를 오염시켜 공기에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 보여줍니다. 이러한 이산화탄소의 증가는 큰 문제가 되고 있으며 인간 활동이 지구에 미치는 영향을 보여줍니다.

(3) 작품 설명

어두운 배경은 공기 중 오염 물질의 양을 나타내며 연기의 크기가 증가한다는 것은 매년 오염이 점점 더 많아지고 있음을 나타냅니다.

(5)이 결과를 방지하려면 어떤 조치를 취해야 합니까?

(3가지 이상)

버스를 타는 대신 자전거를 타고 학교에 가세요.

전기자동차를 구입하세요.

나무나 다른 식물을 심으세요

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Annual Change in Temperature During the Month of January

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Average temperature in January for each year in Korea

1994: 30.7°F

2004: 29.8°F

2014: 32.3°F

2024: 33°F

Average temperature in January for each year in USA

1994: 25°F

2004: 24.3°F

2014: 27.7°F

2024: 27.1°F

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We selected this data to highlight the clear trends in climate change and its impact on average temperatures over time. By focusing on the changes in the temperatures during the month of January in South Korea and the USA, the data provides clear evidence of how climate change is altering weather patterns worldwide. This topic was chosen to raise awareness about the urgent need to address global warming, as it directly affects ecosystems, agriculture, and human health. The data aims to encourage individuals and policymakers to take action to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the consequences of climate change.

(3) Artwork Description

The illustration highlights the impacts of global warming by showing a cracked and barren landscape on one side and a lush, green environment on the other. Overlaid with orange circles, the image symbolizes the rising temperatures over time, in decade increments. The circles’ warm tones represent the intensifying heat associated with climate change, while the contrasting environments emphasize the stark difference between a world affected by global warming and one where ecosystems are preserved. Each circle is sized according to the temperature it is representing, the opacity of the circles and the colors lighten and darken to display the differences in temperature.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/climate-change

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

We can reduce fossil usage and transition to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We can also promote energy efficiency by investing in energy-efficient appliances, vehicles, and infrastructure to minimize energy waste. We can adopt sustainable practices, such as encouraging the use of public transportation, biking, and walking instead of personal vehicles to cut down on carbon footprints. Another method of avoiding climate change is by supporting reforestation, like planting trees and protecting our forests to absorb carbon dioxide and mitigate the effects of rising temperatures. Lastly, raising awareness and educating individuals and communicating about climate change and advocating for policies that prioritize environmental sustainability.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
_Merica Hanpanitkitkan, Michael Koo - GCP Data Visualization (1)

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
공기오염으로 인한 사망자

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Absolute number of deaths from ambient particulate air pollution

United States

1990:   106,000

1995:   107,200

2000:   106,200

2005:   100,000

2010:   83,400

2015:   88,400

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We selected the data because of its reflection of the direct impacts of air pollution. It clearly states the amount of deaths from air pollution, and death is often times the most extreme and acute circumstance. Because of this explicitness and dramaticness, we chose this data.

(3) Artwork Description

Our outwork depicts a frightening reality against a decrepit backdrop. The people featured in our artwork vary in size and represent a trend in deaths due to pollution, with each man increasing in size to represent growing deaths. The persons flag represents the location from which the data was measured--the men with the Korean flag represents the trend in deaths in Korea due to pollution, and the man with the American flag does the same but for deaths in America.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/absolute-number-of-deaths-from-ambient-particulate-air-pollution

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Using more environmentally-friendly means of transportation like bike riding and walking as opposed to driving.

Avoid wasting paper, as trees are incredibly important for air quality.

When in the market for a new car, opt to get the most eco-friendly option available

Try to carpool when you can.

Condense your trips for errands so you don’t drive as much.

# data[].attributes.body
Yearly rate of water pollution within the U.S. and South Korea (미국하고 한국에 수질 오염)

(1) Data Overview

Cigarette waste, USA:

2018:      32,500

2019:      24,500

2020:      12,250

2021:      17,500

2022:      22,750

Plastic waste, South Korea:

2018:      7,750

2019:      9,500

2020:      10,100

2021:      11,250

2022:      12,350

(2) Reason for Data Selection

During the start of Covid-19, Cigarette butts, the most commonly littered waste that contributes to water pollution within the U.S., had dramatically decreased being littered into the ocean. However, ever since it wasn’t recognized as a global issue anymore, the rate of cigarette butt pollution has been slowly rising back to its peak. On the other hand, South Korea suffers from plastic, the most commonly littered waste that contributes to water pollution within South Korea, since their rate of plastic pollution has been increasing every year. Thus indicating that both situations have to be noticed and taken seriously. The purpose for this data is to inform people about the worsening rate of water pollution on the most commonly found wastes within both countries in order to raise awareness regarding the negative impacts of water pollution on marine life and the environment/ /ocean itself. The goal for this data is to persuade appropriate actions to be carried out in order to lower the constantly rising rates of pollution.

(3) Artwork Description

Our two posters represent the sum of waste found throughout the years 2018-2022 within the Pacific and Atlantic oceans for the U.S. (visualization refers to New York city), and within the Yellow ocean and the Sea of Japan for South Korea (visualization refers to the Haedong Yonggungsa Temple); the U.S. prioritizing on their most commonly littered waste, cigarette butts, and South Korea prioritizing on their most commonly littered waste, plastic.

(4) Data Source

ttps://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/south-koreas-mountain-plastic-waste-shows-limits-recycling-2024-11-22

https://saveourshores.org/tobacco-waste-campaign

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Always be sure to use a sturdy ashtray and put out any flames before disposing of cigarettes.

Make sure to pick up any litter/plastic or metal on the streets and dispose of them properly.

Learn which parts of bottles and other waste products go in what bins (Garbage/Recycling).

미국하고 한국에 수질 오염

(1) 데이터 개요

Cigarette waste, 미국:

2018:      32,500

2019:      24,500

2020:      12,250

2021:      17,500

2022:      22,750

Plastic waste, 한국:

2018:      7,750

2019:      9,500

2020:      10,100

2021:      11,250

2022:      12,350

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

코로나19가 시작되는 동안 미국 내 수질 오염에 기여하는 가장 흔한 쓰레기인 담배꽁초가 바다에 버려지는 비율이 급격히 감소했습니다. 하지만 더 이상 전 세계적인 이슈로 인식되지 않은 이후 담배꽁초 오염률은 서서히 정점으로 상승하고 있습니다. 반면 한국은 플라스틱 오염률이 매년 증가하고 있기 때문에 한국 내에서 가장 흔한 쓰레기인 플라스틱으로 고통받고 있습니다. 따라서 두 가지 상황을 모두 주목하고 진지하게 받아들여야 한다는 것을 알 수 있습니다. 이 데이터의 목적은 수질 오염이 해양 생물과 환경/해양 자체에 미치는 부정적인 영향에 대한 인식을 높이기 위해 양국에서 가장 흔하게 발견되는 폐기물의 수질 오염률이 악화되고 있음을 사람들에게 알리기 위한 것입니다. 이 데이터의 목표는 수질 오염이 해양 생물과 환경/해양 자체에 미치는 부정적인 영향에 대한 인식을 높이기 위해 적절한 조치를 취하도록 설득하는 것입니다.

(3) 작품 설명

우리의 두 포스터는 2018년부터 2022년까지 태평양과 대서양에서 발견된 폐기물의 총합을 나타냅니다 (시각화 자료는 뉴욕시를 의미함). 그리고 황해와 일본해에서는 한국에서 발견된 폐기물의 총합을 나타냅니다 (시각화 자료는 해동 용궁사를 의미함). 미국은 가장 많이 버려지는 폐기물, 담배꽁초, 그리고 한국은 가장 많이 버려지는 폐기물, 플라스틱을 우선시합니다.

(4) 데이터 출처

ttps://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/south-koreas-mountain-plastic-waste-shows-limits-recycling-2024-11-22

https://saveourshores.org/tobacco-waste-campaign

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일

담배를 버리기 전에 항상 재떨이를 사용하고 불을 끄세요.

거리에서 쓰레기나 플라스틱, 금속 등을 수거하여 적절히 주워서 버리세요.

병과 기타 폐기물의 어떤 부분이 어떤 쓰레기통에 들어가는지 알아보세요(쓰레기/재활용).

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
한국에 공기오염 사망률/Air pollution death rate in Korea

# data[].attributes.body
Data Overview

The number of deaths is decreasing from 1990 to 2021.

(2) Reason for Data Selection

People think that Korea's air pollution is so severe that the number of deaths is increasing or very high, but it was chosen to show that it is safe from such air pollution.

(3) Artwork Description

In the picture, the gray dark clouds represent air pollution, and the people represent people affected by air pollution from 1990 to 2021. The mask can be seen as a symbol of this influence.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/air-pollution

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

1. Drive cars less

2. Don’t burn garbage

3. Plant/care for trees

4. Use less energy

5. Buy energy -efficient appliances

(1) 데이터 개요

1990-2021까지 사망자수가 감소하고 있다.

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

사람들이 한국의 공기 오염이 심해서 사망자수가 증사하거나 많다고 생각하나 이러한 공기오염에 안전함을 보여주고 싶어 선정

(3) 작품 설명

그림에서 회색어두운 구름은 공기오염을 뜻하고 사람들은 1990년에서 2021년까지 공기오염으로 영향을 받은 사람을뜻한다. 마스크는 이러한 영향의 상징으로 볼 수 있다

(4) 데이터 출처

https://ourworldindata.org/air-pollution

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일

1. 차를 적게 탄다

2. 쓰레기를 태우지 말아라

3. 식물을 키워라

4. 에너지를 적게 써라

5. 에너지 효율적인 제품을 사용해라

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Year            Global Forest Area (Hectares)

1990           4.13 billion

1995           4.09 billion

2000           4.06 billion

2007           4.03 billion

2014           4.00 billion

(2) Reason for Data Selection

The data shows the steady decline in global forest area over time, highlighting the impact of deforestation. With this data, we can see from 1990 to 2014 the long term effects of human activity that contributed to forest loss. The primary driver of forest loss is agriculture, with the highest rates of deforestation occurring in forests that are rich in biodiversity. The purpose of this is to bring awareness to this growing environmental issue.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork shows the trees slowly fading to the left indicating the loss of our forests. There is also smoke coming from the left. Hinting that the cause of this environmental issue is from human activity.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

You can choose products that are certified as sustainable. This can ensure your purchases aren’t contributing to forest destruction.

Limiting use of single-use items. Recycling paper and reducing food waste.

Bringing awareness to the situation to other people can help even more.

Supporting organizations that are protecting forests.

# data[].attributes.body
Yearly rate of water pollution within the U.S. and South Korea (미국하고 한국에 수질 오염)

(1) Data Overview

Cigarette waste, USA:

2018:      32,500

2019:      24,500

2020:      12,250

2021:      17,500

2022:      22,750

Plastic waste, South Korea:

2018: 7,750

2019: 9,500

2020: 10,100

2021: 11,250

2022: 12,350

(2) Reason for Data Selection

During the start of Covid-19, Cigarette butts, the most commonly littered waste that contributes to water pollution within the U.S., had dramatically decreased being littered into the ocean. However, ever since it wasn’t recognized as a global issue anymore, the rate of cigarette butt pollution has been slowly rising back to its peak. On the other hand, South Korea suffers from plastic, the most commonly littered waste that contributes to water pollution within South Korea, since their rate of plastic pollution has been increasing every year. Thus indicating that both situations have to be noticed and taken seriously. The purpose for this data is to inform people about the worsening rate of water pollution on the most commonly found wastes within both countries in order to raise awareness regarding the negative impacts of water pollution on marine life and the environment/ /ocean itself. The goal for this data is to persuade appropriate actions to be carried out in order to lower the constantly rising rates of pollution.

(3) Artwork Description

Our two posters represent the sum of waste found throughout the years 2018-2022 within the Pacific and Atlantic oceans for the U.S. (visualization refers to New York city), and within the Yellow ocean and the Sea of Japan for South Korea (visualization refers to the Haedong Yonggungsa Temple); the U.S. prioritizing on their most commonly littered waste, cigarette butts, and South Korea prioritizing on their most commonly littered waste, plastic.

(4) Data Source

ttps://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/south-koreas-mountain-plastic-waste-shows-limits-recycling-2024-11-22

https://saveourshores.org/tobacco-waste-campaign

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Always be sure to use a sturdy ashtray and put out any flames before disposing of cigarettes.

Make sure to pick up any litter/plastic or metal on the streets and dispose of them properly.

Learn which parts of bottles and other waste products go in what bins (Garbage/Recycling).

미국하고 한국에 수질 오염

(1) 데이터 개요

Cigarette waste, 미국:

2018:      32,500

2019:      24,500

2020:      12,250

2021:      17,500

2022:      22,750

Plastic waste, 한국:

2018: 7,750

2019: 9,500

2020: 10,100

2021: 11,250

2022: 12,350

(2) 데이터 선택 이유

코로나19가 시작되는 동안 미국 내 수질 오염에 기여하는 가장 흔한 쓰레기인 담배꽁초가 바다에 버려지는 비율이 급격히 감소했습니다. 하지만 더 이상 전 세계적인 이슈로 인식되지 않은 이후 담배꽁초 오염률은 서서히 정점으로 상승하고 있습니다. 반면 한국은 플라스틱 오염률이 매년 증가하고 있기 때문에 한국 내에서 가장 흔한 쓰레기인 플라스틱으로 고통받고 있습니다. 따라서 두 가지 상황을 모두 주목하고 진지하게 받아들여야 한다는 것을 알 수 있습니다. 이 데이터의 목적은 수질 오염이 해양 생물과 환경/해양 자체에 미치는 부정적인 영향에 대한 인식을 높이기 위해 양국에서 가장 흔하게 발견되는 폐기물의 수질 오염률이 악화되고 있음을 사람들에게 알리기 위한 것입니다. 이 데이터의 목표는 수질 오염이 해양 생물과 환경/해양 자체에 미치는 부정적인 영향에 대한 인식을 높이기 위해 적절한 조치를 취하도록 설득하는 것입니다.

(3) 작품 설명

우리의 두 포스터는 2018년부터 2022년까지 태평양과 대서양에서 발견된 폐기물의 총합을 나타냅니다 (시각화 자료는 뉴욕시를 의미함). 그리고 황해와 일본해에서는 한국에서 발견된 폐기물의 총합을 나타냅니다 (시각화 자료는 해동 용궁사를 의미함). 미국은 가장 많이 버려지는 폐기물, 담배꽁초, 그리고 한국은 가장 많이 버려지는 폐기물, 플라스틱을 우선시합니다.

(4) 데이터 출처

ttps://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/south-koreas-mountain-plastic-waste-shows-limits-recycling-2024-11-22

https://saveourshores.org/tobacco-waste-campaign

(5) 환경을 위해 내가 할 수 있는 일

담배를 버리기 전에 항상 재떨이를 사용하고 불을 끄세요.

거리에서 쓰레기나 플라스틱, 금속 등을 수거하여 적절히 주워서 버리세요.

병과 기타 폐기물의 어떤 부분이 어떤 쓰레기통에 들어가는지 알아보세요(쓰레기/재활용).

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Per capita CO₂ emissions

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emitted from fossil fuels and industry without land-use change included.

1990 : 5.7t

1997 : 9.7t

2004 : 10.3t

2011 : 12.7t

2018 : 13.0t

2023 : 11.2t

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows the amount of CO2 emitted from the time periods from fossil fuels and industry from the years 1990 to 2023. In South Korea, it emits a dire amount of CO2 increased over the course of time; we chose data from 1990 to 2023. Although the CO2 emitted lessened between 2018 to 2023, Korea still produces a lot of CO2, which they are actively working to reduce. The data produced further portrays the unhealthy amounts of CO2 produced, which encourages mindfulness towards the use of, and spreads awareness of the effects of fossil fuels.

우리가 선택한 데이터는 1990년부터 2023년까지의 화석연료와 산업 분야에서 배출된 CO2의 양을 보여줍니다. 한국에서는 시간이 지남에 따라 엄청난 양의 CO2가 배출되었습니다. 2018년부터 2023년 사이에는 CO2 배출량이 줄어들었지만, 한국은 여전히 ​​많은 CO2를 배출하고 있어 이를 줄이기 위해 적극적으로 노력하고 있습니다. 생성된 데이터는 생성된 CO2가 건강에 미치는 해로운 양을 더욱 묘사하여 화석 연료 사용에 대한 주의를 장려하고 화석 연료의 영향에 대한 인식을 확산시킵니다.

(3) Artwork Description

The sun shows more with less CO2 emissions. The larger the sun, the lesser the amount of CO2 emissions. The smaller the sun, the larger the amount of CO2 emissions. The years are in the center of the sun, but they start to decrease in 2023. We start in the sunniest part of the photo, and the suns continue to grow smaller as the CO2 emissions grow, going into the darker parts of the photo.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?tab=chart&country=~KOR

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

1. Using renewable energy(like solar energy)

2. Monitoring climate and temperature rises so that the levels can adjust so the environment is safer

3. Monitoring CO2 levels as well

4. Monitoring air pollution

5. Coming up with better resources to suffice for carbon emissions

6. Do research on correlation between heat waves and carbon emissions

7. Use more eco-friendly products that are better for the environment(example: Tesla is an eco-friendly form of transportation)

이 결과를 방지하려면 어떤 조치를 취해야 합니까?

1. - 신재생에너지(태양에너지 등) 이용

2. -환경이 더 안전하도록 수준을 조정할 수 있도록 기후 및 온도 상승을 모니터링합니다.

3. -CO2 수준도 모니터링

4. -대기 오염 모니터링

5. -탄소 배출에 충분할 수 있는 더 나은 자원을 마련합니다.

6. - 폭염과 탄소배출량의 상관관계 연구

7. - 환경에 더 좋은 친환경 제품을 더 많이 사용하세요. (예: Tesla는 친환경 교통수단입니다.)

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

China releases gas that causes air pollution which is also the primary cause of death in South Korea.

1990 - 15,100

1995 - 13700

2000 - 13100

2005 - 13100

2010 - 13800

2015- 18200

(2) Reason for Data Selection

Although Korea has many different causes of death, our group is focused on one of the causes which is the air pollution caused by China's gas released from factories. We used this data to find the amount/type of the gas being released from china’s factories, and the number of deaths in Korea happening due to the gas.

(3) Artwork Description

Our group’s artwork shows the released gas size and numbers, and the sky/environment becoming darker due to the gas being released.

(4) Data Source

death from pollution in south korea

air pollutants emissions from china

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Reduce the amount of gas being released from factories

Wear masks

Migrate to a different country

(Over 3 things)

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Global Plastics Production

2000: 213.00 million t

2005: 263.00 million t

2010: 313.00 million t

2015: 381.00 million t

2019: 459.75 million t

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows the global plastic production. Each year, plastic production increases by millions of tons, affecting ecosystems and environments across the world. Plastic is the most used material in almost every industry, being cheap and easy to make. Over production of plastic has led it to become an environmental pollutant, especially for marine life. Much of plastic waste ends up in the ocean, and the amount of plastic in the ocean increases with the amount of plastic production.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork shows the amount of plastic pollution in the ocean, harming marine animals. The pollutants include plastic bags, plastic can holders, and plastic water bottles. The artwork shows that those items negatively affect the marine animals, as it shows that the plastic can holder got stuck onto the turtle’s neck in the picture.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Recycle

Not use plastic/use eco-friendly materials

Go out and help clean, collect trash

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Plastic Pollution  Jacob Jones, Pia Cho (1)

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1990 Deaths Per 100,000 84.6

2000 Deaths Per 100,000 63.7

2021 Deaths Per 100,000 29.8

It shows how less people have died from air pollution.

Reason for Data Selection

(2)  This data shows how well the air quality has gotten and how well we are improving and as the years have gone by less and less people die from air pollution every year.

Artwork Description

(3) The artwork describes how the air pollution deaths have gotten smaller. For example in the artwork the clouds have gotten smaller which represents how less people are killed by air pollution.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-from-air-pollution?country=~KOR

What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(5) Instead of driving you can bike or run to avoid polluting the air.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Emissions of Air Pollutants 2000-2020

2000 : 1.2 Million Tons

2005:  1.1 Million Tons

2010: 1.02 Million Tons

2015: 881k Tons

2020: 735k Tons

(2) Reason for Data Selection

The reason we chose this data is because we wanted to know how Korea’s Carbon Dioxide Emissions were affecting the country. To be more precise we chose this data specifically to know how much Korea's Carbon Dioxide Emissions were decreasing/increasing and how it was affecting the country as a whole and certain parts/cities of Korea and the people who live in Korea.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork arranges circles that are proportional to the different Carbon Dioxide emissions. The circles are light gray and translucent to illustrate the idea of different gases

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/long-run-air-pollution?time=2000..latest&country=~KOR

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

1 - Reduce commutes

2 - Using renewable energy

3 - Different means of transportation (Biking, Electric Cars, Walking)

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

2000: 19,676 deaths

2005: 19,161 deaths

2010: 17,588 deaths

2015: 22,303 deaths

2020: 23,953 deaths

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This info shows the amount of deaths caused by air pollution. It helps us show that despite the effort on reducing air pollution, the amount of deaths caused by air pollution has only gone up. We chose this piece of data because we’ve known for a while that Korea had bad air pollution, and we wanted to do a little bit more research on it to find ways people can help decrease the amount of air pollution.

(3) Artwork Description

The picture/artwork shows an imaginable view of Korea and its cities covered in a storm of air pollution. The clouds visualize a graph and change in deaths caused by air pollution in the past 20 years.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/absolute-number-of-deaths-from-outdoor-air-pollution?tab=chart&country=~KOR

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Eat less meat

Don’t use your car as often

Use less energy when not needed

Plant and care for the trees

Reduce, reuse, and recycle

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1950: 20,139 TWh

1960: 31,011 TWh

1970: 53,375 TWh

1980: 71,671 TWh

1990: 83,005 TWh

2000:94,419 TWh

2010: 121,640 TWh

2015: 129,410 TWh

2016:130,027 TWh

2017:132,690 TWh

2018:135,696 TWh

2019:136,301 TWh

2020:129,756 TWh

2021:136,369.59TWh

2022:138,182.38TWh

2023:140,230.67 TWh

(2) Reason for Data Selection

When fossil fuels burn, they emit a lot of carbon dioxide and other gases. Extreme weather occurrences increase as a result of these emissions trapping heat in the earth’s atmosphere.

(3) Artwork Description

Carbon dioxide and other gases generated from the combustion of fossil fuels are expressed using elements of dark clouds, and the size of the dark clouds is gradually increasing, expressing that the amount of carbon dioxide emitted every year is increasing and the environment is being destroyed.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Invest in renewable energy sources,improve energy efficiency and investing in carbon free transportation.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Energy use per person in Korea over the years.

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Energy use per person in Korea over the years.

2005: 54,823 kWh

2009: 57,845 kWh

2013: 64,391 kWh

2017: 66,894 kWh

2021: 67,654 kWh

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows the rising energy use per person in Korea. This can be due to how Korea has experienced a ton of economic growth leading to an increased energy consumption. For example, this could result in areas like transportation and in households. Another reason energy consumption could have grown is because the population has grown over the years leading to urbanization in places, especially in cities. Lastly, because we are becoming a technology advanced society this is an inevitable factor which can contribute to the higher amount of energy use. This data puts into perspective and will hopefully help people realize that as time goes on, the amount of energy used by each person is increasing and will encourage them to utilize renewable energy sources.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork depicts 5 symbols of energy, which is an energy bolt and each symbol represents a year from our data points of energy use per person in Korea. It illustrates how the amount of energy used per person is increasing as time goes on. The background depicts a modern day city where people live and is an area where energy is used to a great extent. Each symbol is increasing in size to represent the amount of energy usage per person increasing and is also going in a positive slope like the data graph.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/energy?tab=chart&region=Asia&facet=none&country=~KOR&hideControls=false&Total+or+Breakdown=Total&Energy+or+Electricity=Primary+energy&Metric=Per+capita+consumption

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

1. You can save energy by turning off the lights when nobody’s in the room.

2. If possible, you can commute to work or school by walking or biking.

3. If possible, you can install and utilize renewable energy sources on your property such as solar panels or a geothermal heat pump, although this is much harder to do in Korea.

4. You can turn off power switches for things like electric fans or heaters that are plugged into an outlet inside your home when you don’t need them or aren’t in the house.

# data[].attributes.headline
준서, 엠비아, 하이슨

# data[].attributes.subject
준서, 엠비아, 하이슨

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Landfilled 73%

Mismanaged 4%

Incinerated 19%

Recycled 4%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

We chose this data because 12 million tonnes of plastic finds its way into the ocean every single year. 9.5 million tonnes of this enters the ocean from the land with 1.75 tonnes being chucked into the sea directly from the fishing and shipping industry. There are approximately 51 trillion microscopic pieces of plastic, weighing 269,000 tons.

(3) Artwork Description

Our artwork shows the share of plastic waste that is recycled, land filled, incinerated and mismanaged in 2019.

(4) Data Source

Plastic Pollution

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Reduce the use of plastic items

Invest in reusable or refillable items

Invest in infinitely recyclable items (aluminum and glass)

Read the chasing arrow symbol to determine what to and to not recycle

Clean and dry recyclable items before recycling

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Annual Fish and Seafood Production:

1961: 9.21%

1970: 9.31%

1980: 12.16%

1990: 19.25%

2000: 16.95%

2010: 15.77%

2021: 17.34%

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This data shows the amounts of fish that was produced annually in the United States, highlighting the significant proportion of fishing that is done. This data aims to spread awareness about overfishing and how it is affecting our seas, causing significant damage. Through our data we gained a lot of information on the average numbers for fish caught each year and hope to use it effectively.

(3) Artwork Description

This artwork represents overfishing throughout the years and how it has affected ecosystems around the world. The size of the image of the fish grows bigger and also shrinks, showing how the amount of fishing has fluctuated as time passes.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fish-seafood-production?tab=chart&country=~USA

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

To avoid overfishing, we can take several steps. Firstly, we can reduce our consumption of fish and seafood to help decrease the demand for these resources. Additionally, supporting the creation and maintenance of marine protected areas can help to preserve and restore marine ecosystems. Educating others on the dangers of overfishing and the importance of sustainable fishing practices can also play a crucial role in reducing the impact on marine life. Finally, supporting organizations that work to protect marine life and promote sustainable fishing practices can help to make a positive impact on our oceans. By taking these steps, we can help to prevent overfishing and protect the health of our oceans for future generations.

# data[].attributes.body
Title :Over fishing over time.

(1) Data Overview

1950 33,930 tonnes

1960 122,145 tonnes

1970 330,687 tonnes

1980 1.22 million tonnes

1984 1.54 million tonnes

1990 1.27 million tonnes

2000 947,678 million tonnes

2010 832,123 tonnes

2018 659,111 tonnes

(2) Reason for Data Selection

Me and my partner were discussing topics and just ended up choosing this one randomly. We thought that the topic would be interesting so we picked it.

(3) Artwork Description

This artwork represents the data of the increasing amounts of overfishing. From left to right the number of fish in the net increases then decreases.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wild-fish-catch-gear-type

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

We can create anti fishing zones

We can make fishing rare fish illegal

Setting limits to the amount of fish caught in the ocean

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1960: 12,540,118.00 t

1997: 444,967,600.00 t    AMERICA

2018: 634,177,300.00 t

1960: 2,897,315,000.00 t

1997: 5,688,142,300.00 t KOREA

2018: 5,376,473,000.00 t

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This visualization measures the amount of CO2 present in portions of the atmosphere over countries. The two countries we chose were South Korea and the United States of America. These two countries with relatively equal stages in industrial development represent how the land size of a country directly ties in with the overall CO2 waste production of a country.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork represents the amount of pollution that the selected country produces within that year. Each smokestack produces a cloud of pollution that helps visualize the exponential rise in produced pollutants throughout the years.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country?country=KOR~USA

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

-Switch to renewable energy

-Limit high emission sources

-Change the way you travel

-Recycle

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
invideo-ai-720 Reduce Plastic, Save Our Planet! 2025-01-13

# data[].attributes.body
천구백년에는 폭풍으로 팔만구천 명이 사망했고, 지진으로 팔천 명이 사망했으며, 홍수로 사천 명이 사망했습니다. 총 십만이천 명이 사망했습니다.

천구백십년에는 폭풍으로 만구천 명이 사망했고, 산불로 만 명이 사망했으며, 지진으로 천 명이 사망했습니다. 총 삼만 명이 사망했습니다.

천구백오십년에는 폭풍으로 만육천 명이 사망했고, 지진으로 천 명이 사망했으며, 홍수로 천 명이 사망했습니다. 총 만팔천 명이 사망했습니다.

천구백육십년에는 폭풍으로 만오천 명이 사망했고, 지진으로 천 명이 사망했으며, 홍수로 천 명이 사망했고, 극한 온도로 이천 명이 사망했습니다. 총 만구천 명이 사망했습니다.

천구백팔십년에는 폭풍으로 팔천 명이 사망했고, 극한 온도로 칠천 명이 사망했으며, 홍수로 천 명이 사망했고, 화산으로 천 명이 사망했습니다. 총 만칠천 명이 사망했습니다.

(2) Reason for Data Selection

이것은 자연재해로 얼마나 많은 사람이 죽는지 보여줍니다. 우리는 환경을 보호해야 합니다. 자연재해 사망률은 공부하기에 흥미로운 주제였습니다. 더 많은 사람이 이것을 보면 자연재해가 정말 큰 영향을 미치고 많은 사람의 목숨을 앗아간다는 것을 알게 될 것입니다.

(3) Artwork Description

이 작품은 1900년대의 옛날 스타일 템플릿을 사용했으며, 그 시대에 일어난 자연재해의 사진들을 보여줍니다. 자연재해 사진 6장은 자연재해 사망자에 대한 6개의 데이터를 나타냅니다.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/decadal-average-death-rates-from-natural-disasters?country=~USA

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

Ways you can avoid causing natural disasters are,

1: 잠재적 위험과 그것을 해결하는 방법에 대한 인식을 높이는 것.

2 다양한 재난에 올바르게 대비하는 방법에 대해 대중을 교육하는 것.

3. 예측 및 경고 시스템을 설치하고 강화하는 것.

4. 우리 환경에 스레기를 버리지 말라

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1960: 12,540,118.00 t

1997: 444,967,600.00 t AMERICA

2018: 634,177,300.00 t

1960: 2,897,315,000.00 t

1997: 5,688,142,300.00 t KOREA

2018: 5,376,473,000.00 t

(2) Reason for Data Selection

This visualization measures the amount of CO2 present in portions of the atmosphere over countries. The two countries we chose were South Korea and the United States of America. These two countries with relatively equal stages in industrial development represent how the land size of a country directly ties in with the overall CO2 waste production of a country.

(3) Artwork Description

The artwork represents the amount of pollution that the selected country produces within that year. Each smokestack produces a cloud of pollution that helps visualize the exponential rise in produced pollutants throughout the years.

(4) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country?country=KOR~USA

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

-Switch to renewable energy

-Limit high emission sources

-Change the way you travel

-Recycle

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

1990: 84.6 1995: 70.1 2000: 63.7 2005: 49.3 2010: 34.9 2015: 34.3 2020: 29.3

(2) Reason for Data Selection

I chose this data because I noticed that while the data points for other countries went up, south Korea’s data points went down, which means that Koreans put in a lot of effort so that their air pollution death rate went down.

(3) Artwork Description

The clouds in the picture represent the death rates of people in South Korea. The size of the clouds decrease in size represents the number of deaths that are decreasing over time.

(4) Data Source

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12K6pZ3GcGs_hZ_3FdNSxeLvgSyQQkcnaZ4IdEXJCWMg/edit?gid=0#gid=0

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

Driving vehicles less

Dont burn garbage

Use less energy

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview:

1940: 0.1 t

1960: 0.5 t

1980: 3.5 t

2000: 9.4 t

2023: 11.2 t

(2) Reason for Data Selection- I chose to make people aware of how bad carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industrial plants are.

(3) Artwork Description- a lot of smoke in the air gray smoke co2

(4) Data Source-https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?tab=chart&country=~KOR

(5) What steps can I take to avoid this result?

(Over 3 things)

international cooperation

Industrial process improvement

Expanding Regenerative Energy

(1) 데이터 개요:

1940년: 0.1t

1960년: 0.5t

1980년: 3.5t

2000년: 9.4t

2023년: 11.2t

(2) 데이터 선정 이유 - 화석연료와 산업공장의 이산화탄소 배출이 얼마나 나쁜지 사람들에게 알리고자 선택했다.

(3) 작품 설명 - 공기 중의 많은 연기 회색 연기 co2

(4) 자료출처-https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?tab=chart&country=~KOR

(5) 이러한 결과를 방지하려면 어떤 조치를 취해야 합니까?

(3가지 이상)

국제협력

산업공정 개선

재생에너지 확대

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Copy of Narrative Writing Comic Strip in Colorful Bold Panel Style

# data[].attributes.headline
Sean Kim, Eric Kim, Daniel Lee PSA Video

# data[].attributes.subject
Sean Kim, Eric Kim, Daniel Lee PSA Video

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGc2HNM63E/m0EbQiXuXr67rkHKGKA-uA/edit?utm_content=DAGc2HNM63E&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton\

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Login to access and create your next design.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGc2Sn4EHE/ICphx1KB5sVZFCEPTQXgVA/edit?utm_content=DAGc2Sn4EHE&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Login to access and create your next design.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGc2nuzDHw/1S7WCxCTp7Yk38JRJrncWQ/edit?utm_content=DAGc2nuzDHw&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Login to access and create your next design.

# data[].attributes.body
hi

# data[].attributes.body
환경 공익 광고 만들기 (PSA)

https://www.canva.com/design/DAGZMFZco3Q/rAZFjy4c1RC0i8upWAorBA/edit

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Login to access and create your next design.

# data[].attributes.body
pollution psa

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGcYiQz7gM/s1TcyKadZGVDBxxbzB5ABg/edit?utm_content=DAGcYiQz7gM&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.body
Korean Project

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGc29RCQmM/h0fRgrawi2nq1zsNSP24WQ/edit?utm_content=DAGc29RCQmM&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.headline
Song by Daniel P Junhyeong Han and Valentin K

# data[].attributes.subject
Song by Daniel P Junhyeong Han and Valentin K

# data[].attributes.body
psa

# data[].attributes.headline
황혜린, 이지서, 에볼레트

# data[].attributes.subject
황혜린, 이지서, 에볼레트

# data[].attributes.body
공익광고 (PSA)

# data[].attributes.body
Squid game

# data[].attributes.body
we worked hard as heck

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGc2hTXYBA/3xdahu2iKty6mh6s02O6hg/edit?utm_content=DAGc2hTXYBA&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Login to access and create your next design.

# data[].attributes.headline
10417 우민재 -Looking Up: The Human Cost of Ozone Layer Damage

# data[].attributes.subject
10417 우민재 -Looking Up: The Human Cost of Ozone Layer Damage

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data overview

Year – CFCs / Others = Total (million tonnes)

1986 – 0.0090 / 0.0025 = 0.0115 million tonnes
1987 – 0.0088 / 0.0024 = 0.0112 million tonnes
1988 – 0.0082 / 0.0028 = 0.0110 million tonnes
1989 – 0.0075 / 0.0040 = 0.0115 million tonnes (peak year)
1990 – 0.0058 / 0.0020 = 0.0078 million tonnes
1995 – 0.0032 / 0.0018 = 0.0050 million tonnes
2000 – 0.0014 / 0.0016 = 0.0030 million tonnes
2005 – 0.0006 / 0.0010 = 0.0016 million tonnes
2010 – 0.0003 / 0.0007 = 0.0010 million tonnes
2015 – 0.0001 / 0.0004 = 0.0005 million tonnes
2020 – 0.0000 / 0.0001 = 0.0001 million tonnes

(2)reason for data selection

This study examines the emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in order to understand their broader effects on human health—particularly the impact of increased ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation exposure. As the ozone layer thins, more UV-B reaches the Earth’s surface, elevating the risk of various health conditions. One of the most significant and well-documented consequences is the increased likelihood of developing cataracts, which can impair vision and quality of life.

Learning about the environmental origins of such conditions has deepened my interest in how global challenges intersect with personal health. This research has reinforced the importance of prevention, early detection, and raising public awareness about invisible yet harmful exposures. It also reflects how scientific understanding of environmental change can inform approaches to protecting human well-being—especially in areas as sensitive and essential as vision.

(3)Artwork Description

This image illustrates how chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), once used in products like refrigerants and aerosols, contribute to ozone layer depletion. In the stratosphere, CFCs release chlorine atoms when exposed to UV light. These atoms destroy ozone molecules, reducing the ozone layer’s ability to block harmful UV radiation.

As a result, more UV rays reach Earth’s surface, directly impacting human health. One serious effect is an increased risk of cataracts, an eye condition caused by prolonged UV exposure that can lead to blindness.

Although CFC emissions have decreased since the Montreal Protocol, their long atmospheric life means they continue to affect us today. The image shows this invisible chain—from industrial pollution to health risks—reminding us of the importance of protecting the ozone layer.

(4)Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/ozone-layer

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data overview

Total fertility rate in Korea

(2019) 0.918, (2020) 0.837, (2021) 0.808, (2022) 0.778, (2023) 0.721

(2) Reason for data selection

I choose this data because several studies have assessed the impact of air pollutants on the general population, and have found reduced fertility rates and increased risk associated with air pollution exposure. Research found that in the IVF population, nitrogen dioxide and ozone were associated with a reduced live birth rate while particulate matter of 10 mm was associated with increased miscarriage.

(3) Data source

KOSIS

(4) Artwork description

I expressed Low birth rate by the image babiesn getting smaller.

# data[].attributes.headline
10732_황승재_Problems Caused by the Shortage of Technical Talent

# data[].attributes.subject
10732_황승재_Problems Caused by the Shortage of Technical Talent

# data[].attributes.body
1. Data Overview

Current Situation
South Korea is facing a serious shortage of technical talent, especially in industries like IT, semiconductors, and advanced manufacturing.

Projected Increase
The shortage is expected to rise sharply—from about 800 people (2019-2023) to nearly 47,000 people (2024-2028), according to the Korea International Trade Association.

Impact on Competitiveness
This shortage threatens industrial competitiveness by slowing down innovation and advanced technology development.

Economic Consequences
It also slows economic growth by delaying new technology adoption and reducing productivity.

Social Challenges
The lack of skilled professionals hinders solutions for important social issues like environmental sustainability and healthcare.

Wider Technology Gap
The gap between South Korea and advanced countries may widen, risking national security and economic stability.

2. Reason for Choosing This Data

I chose this data because it clearly highlights the urgent and growing issue of technical talent shortage in South Korea, which directly impacts the nation’s future economic growth and global competitiveness. The dramatic increase in the projected shortage—from hundreds to tens of thousands within a few years—shows that this is not a temporary problem but a long-term challenge that requires immediate attention.

This data also reflects broader social and industrial implications, such as slowed innovation, delayed technological progress, and difficulties in solving critical social problems like healthcare and environmental sustainability. By understanding these numbers, I aim to emphasize the importance of pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to help fill this gap and contribute to national development.

3. Reference

한국무역협회 국제무역통상연구원 보고서

4. Artwork Description

This poster visually represents the critical problems and consequences arising from the growing shortage of technical talent. The fragile, incomplete wooden structure over the water symbolizes the weakening foundation and instability in industries and society caused by the continuously decreasing number of skilled professionals. The silhouettes of individuals emphasize the human aspect of this issue, highlighting both the scarcity of qualified talent and the overwhelming pressure on the few experts available. Together, these elements convey a powerful message: as technical talent gradually diminishes, the progress and stability of technological development and social infrastructure face increasing risks.

# data[].attributes.headline
10529 차상원 Global Trends in Renewable Energy: Share, Growth, and Future Potential

# data[].attributes.subject
10529 차상원 Global Trends in Renewable Energy: Share, Growth, and Future Potential

# data[].attributes.body
1) Data Overview

This dataset shows the share of primary energy consumption that comes from renewable energy sources worldwide and how that share has changed over time. It includes modern renewable technologies such as hydropower, solar, wind, geothermal, wave, tidal energy, and modern biofuels, but excludes traditional biomass. The data is calculated using the "substitution method," which corrects for inefficiencies in fossil fuel production by converting non-fossil energy sources into their fossil fuel input equivalents. This allows for a more accurate comparison of energy sources. As of the latest data, approximately one-seventh of the world’s primary energy comes from renewable technologies.

2) Reason for Selecting This Data and Purpose

This data was selected because it provides a clear, quantitative picture of the current status and growth of renewable energy technologies globally. As reducing the use of fossil fuels is essential to combat climate change and air pollution, understanding how quickly we are transitioning to renewables is crucial. The purpose of using this data is to analyze which technologies—such as hydropower, solar, or wind—are expanding most rapidly and how they are influencing the global energy mix. It helps us assess the effectiveness of efforts to decarbonize energy systems and identify key areas for policy and technological development.

3) Data Source

https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy

# data[].attributes.headline
10915 류준성 - The future carbon emissions problem

# data[].attributes.subject
10915 류준성 - The future carbon emissions problem

# data[].attributes.body
(1) Data Overview

Greenhouse gas, and CO2 emission around the world, 1850 to 2023

2020: 48.6

2021: 49.8

2022: 51.1

2023: 51.8

(2) Purpose of Data Selection

I wanted to emphasize that the advancement of technology has led to an increase in carbon emissions, which has become a major cause of global warming.

and highlight that the carbon issue also appears in connection with the film industry, too.

(3) 출처

https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions#all-charts

(4)Art Work Description

I used intense red colors to express the danger of carbon emissions and shades of gray to convey their negative impact. I also included a camera to relate the concept to the film industry.

# data[].attributes.body
(1)데이터 개요

Global Plastic Waste Generation : Approximately 350 million tonnes/year

Mismanaged Plastic Waste : Around 82 million tonnes/year (approximately 25% of total generation)

Plastic Leaked to the Environment : Approximately 19 million tonnes/year (around 25% of mismanaged waste)

Terrestrial Leakage: 13 million tonnes/year

River/Coastline Leakage: 6 million tonnes/year

Plastic Entering Oceans : Approximately 1.7 million tonnes/year (about 0.5% of total generation)

Earlier Estimates: Around 8 million tonnes/year

Latest Estimates: 1 million to 1.7 million tonnes/year

Final Destination of Ocean Plastic (based on 1.7 million tonnes entry) :

Near Shorelines: 1.5 million tonnes/year

Sinking to Seabed: 0.2 million tonnes/year

Transported Offshore (surface): Less than 0.1 million tonnes/year

(2)데이터 선택 이유 및 목적

This data was chosen for analysis because it shifts focus from mere plastic production to how it's managed and where it ends up, offering a deeper understanding of environmental pollution crucial for effective policy. It provides a clear, step-by-step numerical breakdown of plastic's journey from land to ocean, invaluable for pinpointing intervention points. The inclusion of the "missing plastic problem" offers an intriguing analytical opportunity to explore data uncertainties and foster critical thinking. Furthermore, the conclusion that most ocean plastic stays near coastlines highlights the importance of shoreline management and leakage prevention, enabling practical, data-driven policy recommendations, all supported by a reliable source like the OECD.

(3)데이터 출처

https://ourworldindata.org/how-much-plastic-waste-ends-up-in-the-ocean

# data[].attributes.body
1. Data Overview

Data on CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions play a crucial role in understanding and addressing global warming and climate change. This data primarily includes information on emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and other greenhouse gases, collected by country, region, and industry. Emission levels vary depending on sources such as fossil fuel combustion, industrial activities, agriculture, and waste management, and tracking changes over time is also important. These data are provided by international organizations like the UNFCCC, IPCC, and IEA, as well as national governments and research institutions. They serve as essential foundational information for policymaking, implementation of climate agreements, environmental impact assessments, and economic and social analyses.

2. Reason for Data Selection

There are several key reasons for selecting CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions data. First, this data allows for accurate identification of the causes and current status of climate change and serves as a key indicator for evaluating the implementation of international agreements such as the Paris Agreement. Second, emission data helps predict the extent of environmental changes like global warming and provides the basis for developing response strategies. Third, analyzing the impact of economic growth and industrial structural changes on emissions supports setting directions for sustainable development. Therefore, CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions data play a vital role in climate change mitigation and environmental conservation efforts, making it important to select reliable and accessible data sources for effective use.

3. Data Description

This image symbolically represents the issues of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. The purple-hued canyon landscape shows the delicate and changing state of the natural environment. The mirror placed in the center carries the meaning that the greenhouse gases we emit eventually come back to affect us. In other words, it reminds us that nature and human actions are closely connected.

The colorful star-shaped graphics scattered around represent greenhouse gas emission data and various factors related to climate change. The different colors and sizes symbolize the diversity of emission sources and the range of their impacts. Overall, this image conveys a message urging us to become more aware of climate change and to actively respond based on emission data.

4. Data Source

CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Our World in Data

# data[].attributes.headline
10206_김기태_Economy development and co2 emissions.

# data[].attributes.subject
10206_김기태_Economy development and co2 emissions.

# data[].attributes.body
1.데이터 개요.

Qatar has a GDP of $149,171, ranking first in the world, but it also has the highest per capita carbon emissions.
The United Arab Emirates, with the second-highest GDP, has the third-highest per capita carbon emissions.
This shows that the level of economic development is closely related to environmental issues.

2.데이터 선택이유 및 목적

The data on the relationship between economic development and environmental pollution is selected to highlight the close connection between a country’s economic growth and its environmental impact. Understanding this relationship is crucial because while economic advancement improves living standards and national prosperity, it often leads to increased environmental challenges such as higher carbon emissions and resource consumption.

The purpose of analyzing this data is to provide insights into how economic activities contribute to environmental degradation and to emphasize the need for sustainable development strategies. By examining these patterns, policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders can make informed decisions to balance economic growth with environmental protection, ultimately aiming for a sustainable future.

3.데이터 출처

CO₂ emissions per capita vs. GDP per capita, 2022

OUR WORLD IN DATA

4.작품설명

This piece visually represents the close relationship between economic growth and increasing carbon emissions through a gradient circle set against the backdrop of a carbon footprint.
The carbon footprint symbolizes the environmental impact of human activities, while the gradually expanding gradient circle illustrates the rise in carbon emissions as economic capacity grows.

The circle’s color intensity and size increase from the center outward, conveying the message that as economic development progresses, the environmental burden also intensifies.
Through this intuitive and evocative design, the artwork highlights the trade-off between economic growth and environmental challenges, encouraging reflection on the pursuit of sustainable development.

# data[].attributes.body
(1)데이터 개요

Annual CO₂ emissions from deforestation by product, Southkorea

2010-2014(per ton)

Oilseed products-7.18million/ other crops-3.67million/ beef-2.04million/ vegetable,fruits,nuts-1.92million/ rice-1.08million/ sugar-502,804/ other cereals-315,507/ plant fibers-192,291/ wheat-73,672

(2)데이터 선택 이유 및 목적

From an ecological perspective, the fact that carbon emissions from food production have not significantly decreased over time is deeply concerning. This stagnation reveals how current agricultural and food systems continue to prioritize industrial efficiency and profit over ecological health and regeneration. Despite growing awareness of climate change, many farming practices remain harmful to soil quality, biodiversity, and water systems. The failure to reduce emissions reflects a lack of true commitment to transforming food systems in a way that respects natural cycles and supports ecosystem resilience. Ecologists argue that without a fundamental shift towards regenerative agriculture, local food networks, and deep ecological values, the carbon footprint of food will continue to harm the planet and undermine long-term sustainability.

(3)데이터 출처

Annual CO₂ emissions from deforestation by product, South Korea-our world in data

(4)그림

This picture depicts the link between food-related CO₂ emissions and deforestation. It highlights how the production of certain foods—such as beef, soy, palm oil, and other agricultural commodities—contributes significantly to forest loss. I used black boxes to show the deforestation. The smoke from the behind shows the co2 coming out of factories.

# data[].attributes.body
(1)Data Overview

Vaccines are technologies that help protect people against developing diseases. Since the invention of the first vaccine, vaccination coverage has been increased.

(2)Reason for Choosing Data

Vaccination is important for several key reasons. First, it protects individuals from contracting and suffering severe symptoms of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. By stimulating the immune system, vaccines help the body recognize and fight the virus effectively. Second, widespread vaccination reduces the overall spread of the virus in the community, helping to protect those who cannot be vaccinated due to medical conditions or age. Third, vaccines contribute to building herd immunity, which slows down or stops outbreaks by reducing the number of people who can transmit the disease. Lastly, vaccination helps prevent the emergence of new virus variants by limiting viral spread, which is critical for controlling the pandemic in the long term. For these reasons, getting vaccinated is a vital step in protecting public health and returning to normal life.

(3)Data Source

Vaccination - Our World in Data

(4)Artwork Description

The circles represent people's health status, and as the circles’ colors fade along the boundary between the clouds and the ground, it shows that people become healthier after vaccination.

# data[].attributes.headline
10206_김기태_Economy development and co2 emissions.

# data[].attributes.subject
10206_김기태_Economy development and co2 emissions.

# data[].attributes.body
1.데이터 개요.

Qatar has a GDP of $149,171, ranking first in the world, but it also has the highest per capita carbon emissions.
The United Arab Emirates, with the second-highest GDP, has the third-highest per capita carbon emissions.
This shows that the level of economic development is closely related to environmental issues.

2.데이터 선택이유 및 목적

The data on the relationship between economic development and environmental pollution is selected to highlight the close connection between a country’s economic growth and its environmental impact. Understanding this relationship is crucial because while economic advancement improves living standards and national prosperity, it often leads to increased environmental challenges such as higher carbon emissions and resource consumption.

The purpose of analyzing this data is to provide insights into how economic activities contribute to environmental degradation and to emphasize the need for sustainable development strategies. By examining these patterns, policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders can make informed decisions to balance economic growth with environmental protection, ultimately aiming for a sustainable future.

3.데이터 출처

CO₂ emissions per capita vs. GDP per capita, 2022

OUR WORLD IN DATA

4.작품설명

This piece visually represents the close relationship between economic growth and increasing carbon emissions through a gradient circle set against the backdrop of a carbon footprint.
The carbon footprint symbolizes the environmental impact of human activities, while the gradually expanding gradient circle illustrates the rise in carbon emissions as economic capacity grows.

The circle’s color intensity and size increase from the center outward, conveying the message that as economic development progresses, the environmental burden also intensifies.
Through this intuitive and evocative design, the artwork highlights the trade-off between economic growth and environmental challenges, encouraging reflection on the pursuit of sustainable development.

# data[].attributes.body
(1)데이터 개요

Annual CO₂ emissions from deforestation by product, Southkorea

2010-2014(per ton)

Oilseed products-7.18million/ other crops-3.67million/ beef-2.04million/ vegetable,fruits,nuts-1.92million/ rice-1.08million/ sugar-502,804/ other cereals-315,507/ plant fibers-192,291/ wheat-73,672

(2)데이터 선택 이유 및 목적

From an ecological perspective, the fact that carbon emissions from food production have not significantly decreased over time is deeply concerning. This stagnation reveals how current agricultural and food systems continue to prioritize industrial efficiency and profit over ecological health and regeneration. Despite growing awareness of climate change, many farming practices remain harmful to soil quality, biodiversity, and water systems. The failure to reduce emissions reflects a lack of true commitment to transforming food systems in a way that respects natural cycles and supports ecosystem resilience. Ecologists argue that without a fundamental shift towards regenerative agriculture, local food networks, and deep ecological values, the carbon footprint of food will continue to harm the planet and undermine long-term sustainability.

(3)데이터 출처

Annual CO₂ emissions from deforestation by product, South Korea-our world in data

(4)그림

This picture depicts the link between food-related CO₂ emissions and deforestation. It highlights how the production of certain foods—such as beef, soy, palm oil, and other agricultural commodities—contributes significantly to forest loss. I used black boxes to show the deforestation. The smoke from the behind shows the co2 coming out of factories.