# data[].attributes.body
Positive - offer a variety of choices to families, in theory keep public schools from being "over crowded"

Negatives - money is routed away from districts, no way to control how much vouchers are used

# data[].attributes.body
Parents have more choice.

# data[].attributes.headline
public private partnerships already exist.   see:  school facility industry

# data[].attributes.subject
public private partnerships already exist.   see:  school facility industry

# data[].attributes.body
I'm able to send my child to a school of my choice.

# data[].attributes.body
We can't control how that money is used in private schools.

# data[].attributes.body
positive:...If the district can't meet the needs of a students IEP in traditional public school setting.

# data[].attributes.body
Do all students have access to attend the private and religious schools?

# data[].attributes.body
Public funding should not be used to support religious teachings.

# data[].attributes.body
more competition!

# data[].attributes.body
Positive: Choice for parents and families.

Negative: Inequity of programming.

# data[].attributes.headline
Inequitable - Especially when students cannot get into a charter or private school.

# data[].attributes.subject
Inequitable - Especially when students cannot get into a charter or private school.

# data[].attributes.body
It will work if the money can flow both ways. Some of the private and religious schools have lot of donations and are well funded

# data[].attributes.body
Positives: school choice, customizable innovation

Cons: Undermines public schools, accountability, exacerbates inequality

# data[].attributes.body
Negative:...violates the separation of church v. state, schools can discriminate against students (especially most vulnerable students)