# data[].attributes.headline
2. Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to be? Discuss with reference to the arts and one other area of knowledge

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to be? Discuss with reference to the arts and one other area of knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
knowledge is always changing

factors that contribute to the fragility of revered knowledge include cultural context, historical events, technological advancements, and the subjectivity of interpretation.

Art - Artistic knowledge often relies on personal interpretation. A piece of art may hold different meanings for different audiences, and its significance can evolve over time.

Natural Sciences - Knowledge is often built on prevailing theories, which can be overturned by new evidence.

# data[].attributes.headline
To what extent do you agree with the claim “all models are wrong, but some are useful” (attributed to George Box)? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.subject
To what extent do you agree with the claim “all models are wrong, but some are useful” (attributed to George Box)? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Models, like those in math or science, are simplified representations of reality.

They help us understand complex things but leave out important details.

This raises the question of how do we know what we know

Our understanding of the world is often based on these imperfect models.

The statement highlights that what we "know" may not always be completely accurate.

# data[].attributes.headline
5. To what extent do you agree with the claim “all models are wrong, but some are useful” (attributed to George Box)? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. To what extent do you agree with the claim “all models are wrong, but some are useful” (attributed to George Box)? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Models, like those in math or science, are simplified representations of reality.

They help us understand complex things but leave out important details.

This raises the question of how reliable is our knowledge?

Our understanding of the world is often based on these imperfect models.

The statement highlights that what we "know" may not always be completely accurate.

# data[].attributes.headline
6. Does acquiring knowledge destroy our sense of wonder? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.subject
6. Does acquiring knowledge destroy our sense of wonder? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
natural sciences:

knowledge explains mysteries (e.g., gravity, evolution), reducing the sense of unknown.

but! deeper understanding can often raise new questions, preserving and/or enhancing wonder (e.g., quantum physics, hella complex)

arts:

understanding techniques/symbolism may possibly deflate and "unmystify" artistic works

however, knowledge can deepen appreciation and evoke new wonder at creativity and interpretation

conclusion: acquiring knowledge can both diminish and enhance wonder, depending on context and perspective.

# data[].attributes.headline
6. Does aquiring knowleadge destory our sense of wonder? Discuss with reference to twoareas of knowleadge.

# data[].attributes.subject
6. Does aquiring knowleadge destory our sense of wonder? Discuss with reference to twoareas of knowleadge.

# data[].attributes.body
Knowledge can kill wonder by explaining what was once imaginatively mysterious; deepened understanding inspires new intellectual awe.

Knowledge of historical events can diminish wonder by revealing the ordinary causes of extraordinary persons but may also encourage a heightened appreciation of the complexity of human societies.

In fact, knowledge often doesn't kill wonder but instead transforms it into a more informed appreciation of complexity and the unknown.

Depending on how it is approached, knowledge acquisition may either reduce or deepen wonder, often in ways leading to new forms of curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Do historians and human scientists have an ethical obligation to follow the directive: “do not ignore contradictory evidence”? Discuss with reference to history and the human sciences

There are two perspectives to interpret this question.

1)The first is that ethical obligation is fundamental for both sciences. Ignoring the truth to keep things the same can lead to irreversible consequences, but be certain that history and human scientists taught that there couldn't be other information that affects the perception of knowledge.

2)The second perspective is that disclosing this contradictory evidence can do more harm than good and change one's perception of certain things. Therefore, it leads to the question: Is it better to keep the truth a secret to not change anything? However, live with the understanding that we still do not know something.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Do historians and human scientists have an ethical obligation to follow the directive: “do not ignore contradictory evidence”? Discuss with reference to history and the human sciences

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Do historians and human scientists have an ethical obligation to follow the directive: “do not ignore contradictory evidence”? Discuss with reference to history and the human sciences

# data[].attributes.body
There are two perspectives to interpret this question.

1)The first is that ethical obligation is fundamental for both sciences. Ignoring the truth to keep things the same can lead to irreversible consequences, but be certain that history and human scientists taught that there couldn't be other information that affects the perception of knowledge.

2)The second perspective is that disclosing this contradictory evidence can do more harm than good and change one's perception of certain things. Therefore, it leads to the question: Is it better to keep the truth a secret to not change anything? However, to live with the understanding that we still do not know something.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. How can we reconcile the relentless drive to pursue knowledge with the finite resources we have available? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge. 

# data[].attributes.subject
3. How can we reconcile the relentless drive to pursue knowledge with the finite resources we have available? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge. 

# data[].attributes.body
Interpretation of the Title: This question highlights the tension between the desire to pursue knowledge and the limitations of finite resources (time, funding, materials). The phrase "relentless drive" suggests an ongoing pursuit, while "finite resources" refers to the constraints we face. The task is to explore how to balance this tension, using examples from the natural sciences and another area of knowledge (AOK).

# data[].attributes.headline
3. How can we reconcile the relentless drive to pursue knowledge with the finite resources we have available? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge. 

# data[].attributes.subject
3. How can we reconcile the relentless drive to pursue knowledge with the finite resources we have available? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge. 

# data[].attributes.body
Interpretation of the Title: This question highlights the tension between the desire to pursue knowledge and the limitations of finite resources (time, funding, materials). The phrase "relentless drive" suggests an ongoing pursuit, while "finite resources" refers to the constraints we face. The task is to explore how to balance this tension, using examples from the natural sciences and another area of knowledge (AOK).

# data[].attributes.headline
6. Does acquiring knowledge destroy our sense of wonder? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge. 

# data[].attributes.subject
6. Does acquiring knowledge destroy our sense of wonder? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge. 

# data[].attributes.body
Arts

Understanding technical aspects of artistic techniques—such as composition, color theory, or symbolism—can reduce the sense of enchantment and make a piece feel less spontaneous or emotionally impactful.

Learning about an artist’s background or the historical context of a piece can reveal deeper meanings and emotions, increasing appreciation and a sense of connection to the artwork.

Natural Sciences

Scientific explanations that break down phenomena into simpler terms (e.g., explaining rainbows through light refraction) can strip away the sense of magic and mystery associated with natural occurrences.

Discovering the complexities and unexpected findings of fields like quantum physics or astronomy can inspire even greater awe and curiosity by revealing how much more there is to explore and understand.

Conclusion

Acquiring knowledge does not necessarily destroy wonder; rather, it can transform it by replacing simple amazement with a deeper and more nuanced appreciation, depending on the perspective and context of the individual.