# data[].attributes.headline
Claudia Trujillo ( hi again here is a link to curiosity landing !!)

# data[].attributes.subject
Claudia Trujillo ( hi again here is a link to curiosity landing !!)

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4YqNoLkmxE

# data[].attributes.body
The first one was very bouncy and was not looking very good , it had a higher chance of breaking. The second one was safer and looked like it had many improvements . It had a low percent chance of breaking. But who knows, maybe in a couple years from now its ruined.

# data[].attributes.body
i like rockets. they are WAY COOL, bro!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity used a mechanism to land it safely with a crane like thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity used a mechanism to land it safely with a crane so it did not damage the mechanism while the other one just dropped which could damage it.

# data[].attributes.body
The curiosity deployed a rover on the surface, while the second video showed a spacecraft dropping a bouncy thing onto the surface.

# data[].attributes.body
The first one was way to bouncy and the other one looked safer.

# data[].attributes.body
it bounced for a very long time so next time they wouldnt want that to happen

# data[].attributes.body
to bouncy and took forever to land and it was to complex.

# data[].attributes.body
It was too bouncy and took forever to slow down.

# data[].attributes.body
it bounced for a very long time so next time they wouldn't want that to happen

# data[].attributes.body
I think the idea is de goooodest idea in de world it was a smaaart ideeea it wass preeeety goooood.

# data[].attributes.body
It bounced a lot for a long time, so they didn't want that same thing to happen. They made a car like structure to make it land.

# data[].attributes.body
The first one bounce a lot and like something could have broke inside,but the second one had improved because it had stronger boosters and parashoot.

# data[].attributes.body
They had to change the design because the bouncy one took a long time and looked rough against the rover, yet the skycrane worked a lot better.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one is way too  bouncy and took a long time to slow down and I think the other one is safer and will be able to get  more information.

# data[].attributes.body
One thing that's different is there are balls all over the original design. I think they had to change the design because there was no interaction in bouncing across the mars surface.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one wasn't as efficient as the second one because it took a lot of time to land.I also think that the first one could have had a higher chance to break because of how many times it was hitting the ground.I think they had to change the design so that it would work more efficiently and it would land slowly and safely.The first one also had a high chance of landing somewhere unexpected and not work at all.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one is way too bouncy and took a long time to slow down.Also I think the other one is safer and will be able to get more info.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first design bounced too much and it doesn't look safe. It looks like it is going to break.
The second one looked safer and you can tell it was improved.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first design bounced too much and something inside broke. The second one was much more safer because they had stronger boosters and parachute to land. Another important thing was on the rover it may be better to land on your wheels instead of a bouncy substance.

# data[].attributes.body
The first one was more bouncing and it didn't look too safe. The second one was more improved and better designed. It was also safer and more strategic.(Although it could have failed)
The design had to be changed because I think the ball method didn't seem as safe as it could have been.

# data[].attributes.body
they used balls all over it to secure the pod so the rover did not break and a parachute  and another parachute with rockets below it.

the creators could of change it because it took to long to land with the balls and could land upside down or in a ditch and get stuck

# data[].attributes.body
They used some bouncy balls that bounced to keep the rover from having a harsh landing. They probably had to change the design because it took to long to stop bouncing and get out.

# data[].attributes.body
The old rover was wrapped in a substance ( balls, in this case,) that would bounce on Mars' surface because of the atmosphere and gravity. This one also opened the rockets after they had got the rover out. The other one used the rockets and then placed the rover down before flying to someplace safe.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they used the balls to see if they would help keep the thing dropping safer

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
  I would consider this a technology. The door openers solved a problem for the lazy people. Because lazy people could just lie on the bed and pull. 

# data[].attributes.body
The big with day piy see wut have to the day.

# data[].attributes.body
i think they used the balls so they can see if it will survive the fall from the space shuttle and after the demonstration
they know that the robot will be safe to land

# data[].attributes.body
I think the difference

# data[].attributes.body
i THINK THAT  WHENE IT BUNTS

# data[].attributes.body
i think it was cool when lit lit on fire x3

# data[].attributes.body
I think the reason that they changed the design was that it was a while before the first rover stopped, (2004 rover) and so now Curiosity's like the rovers you see in just about every space movie.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the idea will the bouncing balls would've been a fairly good idea and would make the mission NOT AS hard

# data[].attributes.headline
                        Kayla             They both had idea that are almost alike but they built different models

# data[].attributes.subject
                        Kayla             They both had idea that are almost alike but they built different models

# data[].attributes.body
I think the balls were a good idea because, the balls didn't let the rover hit the ground hard on the landing but, the only thing that wasn't good was it took a long time to make the ball stop bouncing

# data[].attributes.body
The  rover has 4 wheels that are like bike tires but a lot bigger the rover had balls that were used to keep the thing steady. the parachute helped them land the rover.

# data[].attributes.headline
They both had a different types of ideas so they both started to 

# data[].attributes.subject
They both had a different types of ideas so they both started to 

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Curious didn't have the balls and that the other design did have the balls. I think that the second design did this so it wasn't such a hard landing. The women who made the Curious was surprised that it hit so hard. So they changed it so it wasn't so hard. This design does take longer than the first one though.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the bouncing balls were good for iit because then it doesn't have a hard landing and brake the balls.I think they changed the design so that it didn't take so long to hit.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the balls that they used were good because it didn't let the rover have a hard landing, but what I thought was wrong with the balls is that they didn't come to a complete stop for a very long time. The people want the rover to do what it is supposed to do as soon as possible not wait 10 minutes for the balls to stop bouncing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it was a good idea to use the balls because, the balls will protect the rover inside. Although it does take a while for the balls to stop bouncing and come to a full stop, but at least it's not a horrible, brutal landing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they should not use the balls because they jump and then stop.

# data[].attributes.body
It had where balls came out where they can bounce.

# data[].attributes.body
they both have parachou

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they changed the disian because it landed to hard and it might break.

# data[].attributes.body
in 2004 they used little balls like cotton balls to protect the scanner. And in 2012 they used a rover that would collect data and land safely so it does not get destroyed.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think they need to make the parchout better so the rover safer.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think they need to make the parchout better so the rover safer.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was cool beacause it has balls that p

# data[].attributes.body
in 2004 the balls were to small 2012 they used a rover

# data[].attributes.body
In 2004 they used  balls to pertect the rover or not destroy it the rover in 2012 they used rockets or a powerful drone

# data[].attributes.body
they use a parshut to land it with rockets and use something called a skycrane

# data[].attributes.body
In 2004 the balls were to small so in 2012 they used a rover

# data[].attributes.body
The balls protected the rover 2004 in 2012