# data[].attributes.body
No, they could have just told the truth and then have a less chance of having to buy
A real diamond necklace that wasn’t 40,000 francs,they could have just told her and since the two women are good friends and one has lots of francs,I’m sure she wouldn’t have a problem buying another one that was “real”.this is my responce, if this is being read thank you for reading my answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Madame Loisel and her husband did not take the right course of actions when they figured out the necklace was lost because if they just told the truth they would of had a life of less work therefore making it easier for them.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Madmoiselle and her husband did the wrong choice because they could’ve just told the truth and not have lived that nigtmareish life of hard labor for 10 years because of what they owed, also they could’ve found out the necklace was a merely copy.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Madame Loisel did the right thing when they found out that the necklace was missing because when you loose or brake something that isn’t yours you should give them the money to replace it or you replace it yourself. This is why I think that Mademe Loisel did the right thing by replacing the necklace.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes and no. Madame Loisel and her husband did the right thing, only because they did try to rush to find the necklace. They went to cab companies, they went to the Ministry, maybe... and they went to every cab to see if it was the same one. They DIDNT DO THE RIGHT RESPONSIBLE THING by wasting 10 horrible years of their life trying to pay for a new one instead of going up to her and telling the straight up truth. ;-;

# data[].attributes.body
Yes madame Loisel and her husband did the right thing because they had the right to return the necklace of her friend. In the text it claims that madame Loisel borrowed the necklace from her friend. This explains how it’s the property of her friend. Also the text states that madame Loisel was worried after they lost it. This shows how madame Loisel thought of the value of the necklace and may have overreacted. This proves why madame Loisel and her husband did the right thing because they had the right to return the necklace of her friend.

# data[].attributes.body
No Madame Loisel and her husband did not do the right thing because they could have just told the truth because you wouldn’t know what she could have said she could have told Madame Loisel that it wasn’t real and Madame Loisel and her husband probably wouldn’t have to get a real necklace that would take 10 years to pay up.

# data[].attributes.body
To be honest, in my opinion I don’t know if they made a good choice. If I was them, I would first tell them that it’s missing before I get a new necklace. After waiting all those years to save up enough money to buy a necklace, it was not worth it knowing that it was a fake necklace. So, I think that they made a bad choice. They even wrote a letter to Madame Forestier. In conclusion, I think that they made a bad choice and that they could’ve handled the situation better.

# data[].attributes.body
If I were Madame Loisel I would have just owned up to my mistake. I believe that to be the right thing to do, instead of going around and falling into huge debt. I feel that Madame Loisel’s friend would have been very understanding, especially considering it was only an imitation.

# data[].attributes.body
In opinion, I think they shoud’ve told Madame Foiester. It would’ve been easier, and they would be telling the truth. If they had gone to her and said, “Madame, I am so sorry. I have lost your necklace, will you please tell me how much francs the necklace was, so we could buy it back?” But instead, they decide to just ruin their lives for 10 years!

# data[].attributes.body
I think Madame Loisel and her husband chose the wrong course of action when they found out the necklace was missing. They should have told her friend that they lost the necklace and were going to pay for a new one. If they did that then they might find where she bought it from or they might learn from her that it was a fake.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like they did and did not at the same time because if they had just told her they would not have to pay 36000 frances in 10 years but they still paid it off instead of just saying we lost and we can’t pay it off.This is what I feel about there decision.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they did not do the right thing, because instead of buying a new necklace that cost them a lot of money and years to pay they should’ve told the truth. In the end it says that her friend told them necklace was an imitation and since they weren’t honest they ended up giving her something overpriced.

# data[].attributes.body
Well in my opinion I think that Madame Loisel and her husband they did not do the right actions. I think this because if they had told Madame Forestier maybe she would understand of Madame Loisel’s mistake. The text claims “ You must write to your friend, tell her you have broken the clasp of her necklace and that you are having it mended. It would give us some time to look some more”. This shows that they were lying and not saying the truth.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion not they did not do the right thing.Thougth others may disagree lying about loosing something owned by someone else is not good.To be honest I think it would have gone better if they did tell the true.One theme for the story "The Necklace" could posible be "Honest is the best thing to be".As show in the text do to them being un-honest caused them to loose thousands of fance .This is why I believe they did not do the action they should have