# data[].attributes.body
I do not think that the author took sides in this article. I think that he came into this with an open mind wanting to learn good information about both "sides". In the text it states, "And I wanted to find out the effect the wall was having on the people who lived close to it --- on both sides." It also says in the text, "...that it was the laughter that mattered. It was laughter that would one day resonate so loud that this wall would come tumbling down. No trumpets needed... only the laughter." This text helps to show that the author did not really have a chosen side. Although he did get close with a Palestinian boy, he did not think anything different of the Israeli people.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that "No Trumpets Needed" was a b=very impartial story. Not once did the narrator speak negatively about Israel or Palestine. In the text it stated," I was his guest, and I felt suddenly honored by that and moved by his affection." This shows that the narrator saw Said as a kind person and a normal person without malice. In the text it also states, "There was a girl who waved back....I saw her. It's the beginning." Despite hearing that tragic story about Said's brother, The narrator didn't write off Israeli people. The narrator thought that even then, the Israeli people were still able to achieve peace.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion and evidence from the story "No Trumpets Needed", the author is leading towards impartial because of various reasons. First, even though the author has been in the Palestinian side for the entire story and noticed the peacefulness the side has and the flowers and the children and Said and his kites, but in the story Said's mother told the author it isn't always that way such as the example his mother gave about Said's story; but if you walk up the hill where you can see Said working on his kites and the sheep, but If you look down the hill on the other side you can see the Israeli side where they have kids playing games and having fun. Secondly, as the author was setting up his camera for the last image of him leaving he got a glimpse of Said and his sheep getting startled from the the children and families from the bottom of the hill with Said's kites and they're all having fun and smiling. In conclusion, from the evidence in the story "No Trumpets Needed" the author is impartial and fair to both Palestines and Israelis.

# data[].attributes.headline
(1) The Way He Shows It Is By Him Writing about how bad the life has got since the Israelis made them move into a refugee camp And How There is just a bunch of attacks on the Palestinians (2) But its also showing that the Palestinians are tortured with the death of there loved ones just like the boy in the story when he saw his older brother get killed.

# data[].attributes.subject
(1) The Way He Shows It Is By Him Writing about how bad the life has got since the Israelis made them move into a refugee camp And How There is just a bunch of attacks on the Palestinians (2) But its also showing that the Palestinians are tortured with the death of there loved ones just like the boy in the story when he saw his older brother get killed.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the author wasn't biased toward either side, he went to another country with an open mind that people are not always the same. Said's uncle stated the reason why he flies his kites over to the east side was because "every kite is like a seed of friendship. He believes that one day, they will send the kites back and everything will be alright." "Maybe it helps him to forget, maybe if he forgets he will find his voice again, maybe he will grow again."

# data[].attributes.body
After a car was ambushed, Israels had sent soldiers they had and killed Mahmoud who was a elder brother for Sam who no longer talks because of the trauma from this incident.

# data[].attributes.headline
(1) But On This Side If These People Would Of Just Stayed On There Parts Of The Land They Could Of Worked Something out to just share the religious land between the two of them. (2) But The Israelis got greedy and left the Palestinians with almost nothing they took some of there childhood homes killed some of there family members and even destroyed and stole from there homes

# data[].attributes.subject
(1) But On This Side If These People Would Of Just Stayed On There Parts Of The Land They Could Of Worked Something out to just share the religious land between the two of them. (2) But The Israelis got greedy and left the Palestinians with almost nothing they took some of there childhood homes killed some of there family members and even destroyed and stole from there homes

# data[].attributes.headline
(1) Im Also Impartial because we took land from people during all the wars we had and we have had land taken from us so its like were a bit of both of them but its still wrong what there doing to each other theres still a lot of deaths. (2) But They Both Need to just stop and come to a agreement and let the Palestinians have some of there land back so they can raise a family of there own in a bigger area so the family is not suffocating in one little area so the children have space to play.

# data[].attributes.subject
(1) Im Also Impartial because we took land from people during all the wars we had and we have had land taken from us so its like were a bit of both of them but its still wrong what there doing to each other theres still a lot of deaths. (2) But They Both Need to just stop and come to a agreement and let the Palestinians have some of there land back so they can raise a family of there own in a bigger area so the family is not suffocating in one little area so the children have space to play.

# data[].attributes.body
From article no trumpets needed, the Israelis fought back after the Palestinians had killed three of their men so they did a revenge killing or maybe it was just a stray bullet but that didn't matter because Saids brother Mahmoud who was Palestinian was dead and killed by Israelis

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion from reading the article and finding a section that said 'That day, a settler's car had been ambushed down in the valley. Three of them were killed." which is talking about the Israels and saying how the Palestinians had killed three of their peoples it is safe to say this caused for more violence and killings

# data[].attributes.body
I think its negative bias

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that the author took any sides in the story but there where times that he was leading to one side but not completely. For example, with the kites it was a little confusing but the real meaning of them was about friendship. And they used the young boy to trying make some bias things .