# data[].attributes.body
Intro:

Body 1

Topic sentence: on the other hand, There is also a strong consensus that it would be better to help everyone, not just within the country

Explain: Demonstrate global responsibility, promote international cooperation, and build a good image of a country

-However,often have difficulties with language, culture, transportation, and sometimes politics

Body2

Topic sentence: on the one hand,the charity's focus on domestic people means targeting a smaller group of people

Explain: invest more, effective, promote social welfare

Example:....

Moreover: increase national solidarity and connect people to people

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction

Paraphrase:

- Some people think charities should only support people in their own country, while others believe they should help anyone in need anywhere.

Thesis statement:

- This essay discusses both views and presents a neutral opinion.

Body 1 – Focus on people in their country

Topic sentence:

- Many people think charities should help their own citizens first.

Explanation:

- Charities start with the aim of helping those in hardship. Support should depend on need, not nationality.

Example:

- For example, a small charity in Vietnam may first help poor children in remote areas before looking abroad.

Body 2 – Help people everywhere

Topic sentence:

- However, not every charity can support everyone around the world.

Explanation:

- Some are created by students or ordinary people. They lack enough resources to help everywhere.

Example:

- Many projects and charities are started by students to help people in need; they are young, lack experience and funds, so they cannot support on a larger scale.

Conclusion:

Paraphrase answer:

- Both opinions have valid points but are limited. Charities should decide based on their size and resources to help those truly in need within their ability.

# data[].attributes.body
40-60

# data[].attributes.body
Body1: Some people agrue that only cintizen of the country in which charity organizations are in opperation offer help from those organizations.

idea: people who expect their donations to be used for the better life of their own nations. Deal with some country' issues => the country will become stronger and become more developed.

Body2: There are some people who consider that charity funds must give aid to poor people worldwide.

idea1: strengthen the relationship among many countries over the world by helping each other.

idea2: save many lives and show kindness: every person as a small part of our planet should be supported in order to confront the deep trouble at the moment

# data[].attributes.body
* Body 1 :

+ TS: On the one hand, it is understandable that why charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country

+ Idea 1: Priovity responsibility for domestic citizens

- Reason: Local people contribute and want to see the benefits return to their society.

- Exam: British people who donate to the British Red Cross often hope that their mory money will be used to support pour families or patients in the UK, in stead of transferring it all abroad.

* Body2: From my perspective, I belive that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live

- Idea 1 : strengthen international ecoperation and solidarity

+ Reason1: When one country supports another country during a crisis, this aveates cohesion and good velationships .

+ Reason 2: In the long deer run, this copperation

a so brings benefits to both parties

- Idea 2: Promote national image and prestige

+Exam: The US, Japan or many European countries are offen seen better sending aid abroad.

# data[].attributes.body
Intro:

Body 1:

-Topic sentence:some people argue that charitable organizations should prioritize domestic needs because their resources are limited and their first responsibility is to their own citizens

- limited resources: rely on donations, so focusing on their own country ensures that funds are not spread too thin

-> example: in a developing country may struggle to support both local homeless people and those abroad

- national responsibility: should prioritize local problems like poverty,unemployment, or natural disasters

Body 2: i believe it is more important for charities to provide aid wherever people are suffering, as humanitarian needs transcend national boundaries

- global solidarity: helping others abroad can foster international goodwill and cooperation

-> example: Red Cross provide aid worldwide, saving millions of lives during earthquakes, floods…

- humanitarian values: humanity has no borders-> people in crisis( war refugees or disaster victims) deserve support regardless of nationaltity.

Conclusion:

# data[].attributes.body
Body 1:

Topic sentence: it is understandable that charity groups should people in their nation first.

Supporting idea 1: This is because there is still many poor people, homeless people or sick people in their own country.

Detail: The charity helps local people, the country can become stronger and more united.

Supporting idea 2: local charities may understand the problems of their people better than problems in another countries

Body 2:

Topic sentence : the reason why charity organization should help anyone who need even if they live in another country.

Supporting idea: Nowadays, having problems in one country can affect others.

Example : if there is war, natural disaster or disease, people from different countries can suffer together.

Result : helping others in need, no matter where they are, which can make the world a better place. It also shows kindness and humanity.

# data[].attributes.body
BODY 1:

Address national issues: such as poverty, education, healthcare within the country.

Cultural and legal familiarity: easier to manage and monitor aid.

BODY 2:

However, human suffering has no borders → people in crisis need urgent help regardless of nationality.(Example: natural disasters or wars in poor countries require international charities to step in.)

strengthen the bonds of friendship between nations -> be supported by other nations when facing hardships

Promotes equality → by offering help abroad, charities send the message that all lives are equally valuable.

Conclusion

Restate disagreement: Charities should not restrict aid to domestic citizens.

Final thought: True compassion and humanitarian responsibility go beyond borders.

# data[].attributes.body
40/60

body 1:

topic sentences: on the one hand, there are convincing reasons why many people believe that charities should restrict their support to their own citizens.

supporting idea 1: local aid is easier to manage → no language/cultural barriers

details: reduced logistical costs, and faster delivery of assistance

supporting idea 2: by reducing domestic poverty and inequality

details: charities help maintain social stability, which in turn strengthens the whole nation

body 2:

topic sentences: on the other hand, it is widely argued that these organizations should extend their help to people in need all over the world.

supporting idea : offering aid internationally also promotes cooperation and mutual understanding

details: improve the image of their country, and encourage cultural exchange, the Red Cross’s humanitarian missions strengthen trust and collaboration between nations in times of crisis, reflects compassion, strengthens the special bond between the two nations, ex: Vietnam's recent. humanitarian support for Cuba

# data[].attributes.body
topic : I think both of the above opinion are right

Body 1

_ First , charity groups should help people in their own country

_ because there are still many poor people, homeless people, or sick people in their own nation( reason)

_Also helping our country will also better understand the issues to help other countries.

Body 2 (Still helping people everywhere, every case)

_ The era is developing, so if one country is regression or adversely affected, it will affect adjacent countries.

_ Also possible to increase the spirit of connection between countries

Conclusion :

In my opinion, charity organizations should try to help people in both their own country and other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
Body 1:

Topic sentence: On the one hand is that charitable support should be limited to the national level to prioritize domestic interests.

Supporting idea 1: Governments and charities have a primary duty to their own citizens.

Supporting details 1: Citizens pay taxes and expect social welfare in return; focusing on domestic aid helps improve living standards within the community.

Supporting idea 2: Local aid can be more efficient and practical.

Supporting details 2: Organizations understand the culture, living conditions, and specific needs; this avoids wasted resources on transportation or legal differences abroad.

Body 2:

Topic sentence: On the other hand, many people argue that humanitarian efforts should not be restricted by borders.

Supporting idea 1: Needs in other countries can sometimes be more urgent and life-threatening.

Supporting details 1: For example, famine, natural disasters, or epidemics in developing nations; ignoring them could leave people in desperate situations.

Supporting idea 2: International aid fosters global unity and mutual support.

Supporting details 2: Cross-border assistance strengthens international relationships and promotes the universal value of humanity.

# data[].attributes.body
Body 1:

Topic sentence: Of course, there have some reasons why there have people thinking that volunteering organizations should only give aid to their compatriots.

Supporting idea 1: the concern on the develoment/benefits of each country

Supporting details: more people overcome their difficulty =>create more strong community=>more competitive

Supporting idea 2: the anxiety about the damage from internal of each country

Supporting details: The charity organization can be taken advantage to bad purposes

Body 2:

Topic sen: There also have understandable reasons which make some individuals claim that charity organizations should spread their compassion to international friends.

Supporting idea 1: consolidate the relationship between countries

Supporting details: (results) maintain the peace in an area because many countries believe in each other.

Supporting idea 2: create impression with international friends

Supporting details: (result) create the belief =>easy to cooperate => 2 countries get benefits

Conclusion: Despite the risk, I still prioritize supporting giving aid to people over the world.

# data[].attributes.body
T S:

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that Charity organizations should offer help people from their country

Sp idea: optimizing charity budgets

Details:

Reason:

-Many handicapped disadvantage people in the country can receive aid

-Easily locate the problem area

Result:

-The country’s poverty situation improved

-charitable budgets are better managed and controlled

Body2:

On the other hands,On the one hand, there are several explanations for the fact that should help outsiders

Sp idea: Global hunger situation improves

Details:

Reason,result:

-improve world huger

-Children around the world can develop equally

-The world can be more connected

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction: In recent years, there has been a growing debate about the problems surrounding charity. It is argued that charity organizations should only help to the people of their own country, while others think that charity should be given to the people in great need wherever they live

Body 1: Charity organizations should only offer help to their own country’s people

+ every countries still have many issues that need to ve tackled -> focus on addressing problems of their countries in a thorough way, instead of helping others

Body 2: Other think that charity should be given to other people…

+ war and natural diseases are always global issues -> people are worthy of receiving help

+ developing countries constantly face greater difficulties -> some developed countries that have enough resources can offer helps to developing countries

In conclusion, while there are convincing arguments for both views, I believe that charity organizations should contribute to international aid when possible, creating a fair

# data[].attributes.body
Body1

Main ideas: Some people emphasize that charity organizations should focus on the needs of people in their own country

-Helping those within one’s country seems more practica....

Why should a person provide help for someone living somewhere far away ...

Body2:these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live

-This is important because there are many people in need all over the world

-charitable organizations can only do so much if they only focus on their own country.

# data[].attributes.body
Body 1:

Topic sentence: Charity organizations are made for helping people in need but they mostly focus on helping only in their own country, not many can reach out to the internationals.

Reason 1: Charity organizations may focus domestically on their country due to limited resources.

Examples:

-Many charities rely on individual donors, local bussiness and community foundations so it can't generatr enough income and also the high cost of international aids.

Reason 2: It is the more practical and simple way to monitor campaign in the area

Examples:

-The staff can easily visit the place they are helping out and monitor the campaign

Body 2:

Topic sentence: Eventhough, charities that have the opprotunities to reach out is also needed because a lot of countries can't provide enough for themselves

Reason 1: By helping other countries, we can strengthen our people relationship with their people

Examples:

-International charities strengthen relationships between countries through humanitarians aid, collaborative projects and shared knowledge

Reason 2: It can also can increase the impact on many more countries and collaborating with global partners allows the organizatoom to make greater differences.

Examples:

-We can partner up with the local communities by helping moreplaces, adapting more strategies