# data[].attributes.body
Uses limited evidence from 1-2 sources. Sources may lack credibility or diversity. Citations are inconsistent or incomplete.

# data[].attributes.body
Incorporates evidence from 2-3 credible sources. Sources are somewhat diverse but may favor one perspective. Most citations are properly formatted and provided.

# data[].attributes.body
Expertly integrates evidence from 4+ credible sources. Sources are diverse (academic, government, industry) and well-balanced. Citations are properly formatted and consistently provided.

# data[].attributes.body
Argument about resource exploitation is unclear or inconsistent. Position lacks adequate support or logical flow. Examples may be vague or irrelevant.

# data[].attributes.body
Presents a generally clear argument about resource exploitation with adequate logical flow. Position is supported but may have some gaps in reasoning or examples.

# data[].attributes.body
Presents a clear, compelling argument about resource exploitation with strong logical flow. Position is consistently supported throughout the presentation with specific examples and data.

# data[].attributes.body
Information contains several inaccuracies or is outdated. Understanding of the resource and its exploitation status shows significant gaps.

# data[].attributes.body
Most information presented is accurate and relatively current. Some details about the resource may be general or slightly imprecise but core concepts are correct.

# data[].attributes.body
All information presented is accurate and current. Details about the resource, its use, and exploitation status are comprehensive and precisely explained.

# data[].attributes.body
Struggles to respond to questions effectively. Answers are vague, incomplete, or show limited understanding of the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Responds to most questions adequately with some supporting details. Shows general understanding of the topic but may occasionally lack depth in responses.

# data[].attributes.body
Responds to classmates' questions with confidence, depth, and specific details. Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of the topic through thoughtful, well-elaborated answers.

# data[].attributes.body
Poses few questions or questions that are superficial/basic. Shows minimal engagement with other presentations.

# data[].attributes.body
Poses adequate questions that show basic engagement with other presentations. Questions are relevant but may lack depth or complexity.

# data[].attributes.body
Poses thoughtful, relevant questions to other presenters that demonstrate critical thinking and deep engagement with their topics. Questions encourage meaningful discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Rarely participates in group discussions. Does not offer constructive feedback. Struggles to divide tasks fairly or accomplish assigned tasks on time. Does not participate in group presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Participates regularly in group discussions. Offers some constructive feedback. Contributes equally in task division and often completes tasks on time. Participates in group presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Actively participates in and facilitates group discussions. Offers valuable, constructive feedback. Excels in fair task division and consistently completes tasks ahead of time. Equitably participates in group presentation.