# data[].attributes.body
Logic behind it

# data[].attributes.headline
group member engagement  (participation in meetings, feedback provided etc)

# data[].attributes.subject
group member engagement  (participation in meetings, feedback provided etc)

# data[].attributes.headline
Number of sectors engaged during the consultation

# data[].attributes.subject
Number of sectors engaged during the consultation

# data[].attributes.headline
Number of responses to surveys or feedback forms related to the report

# data[].attributes.subject
Number of responses to surveys or feedback forms related to the report

# data[].attributes.headline
Participation of global south representatives in meetings and consultations

# data[].attributes.subject
Participation of global south representatives in meetings and consultations

# data[].attributes.body
Number of feedbacks from GS

Level of comfort of GS members participating in the WG

Continuity of participation

# data[].attributes.headline
Number of initiatives that were part (not part) of the evidence synthesis ecosystem

# data[].attributes.subject
Number of initiatives that were part (not part) of the evidence synthesis ecosystem

# data[].attributes.headline
Number and diversity of external stakeholders engaged throughout the process

# data[].attributes.subject
Number and diversity of external stakeholders engaged throughout the process

# data[].attributes.headline
satisfaction with engagement by ESIC members

# data[].attributes.subject
satisfaction with engagement by ESIC members

# data[].attributes.body
(maybe one survey now to everyone involved and on how they feel about their engagement opportunities and their feedback being received and one in june)

# data[].attributes.headline
Number of citations or references to the report in other publications

# data[].attributes.subject
Number of citations or references to the report in other publications

# data[].attributes.body
Long term?

# data[].attributes.body
no. of consultations from each region and sector

# data[].attributes.body
Ensure that different sector voices and inputs have come into the process by looking at people contributing to the process

# data[].attributes.headline
Number of people providing comments to each report

# data[].attributes.subject
Number of people providing comments to each report

# data[].attributes.headline
Average number of problems identified by WG

# data[].attributes.subject
Average number of problems identified by WG

# data[].attributes.headline
Participation and Representativeness in WG meetings

# data[].attributes.subject
Participation and Representativeness in WG meetings

# data[].attributes.body
·      Number of participants in each session.

·      Diversity of profiles (gender, sector, region, experience level, etc.).

·      Percentage of invited participants who attended (expected vs. actual participation rate).

·      Level of engagement (Did they actively participate or just listen?).

·      Retention rate (people who attended multiple sessions).

# data[].attributes.headline
Average number of solutions identified in stage 3 for each WG

# data[].attributes.subject
Average number of solutions identified in stage 3 for each WG

# data[].attributes.body
Tracking Comments : How many comments are incorporated and rejected.

# data[].attributes.headline
Ratio of problems/solutions identified vs prioritized

# data[].attributes.subject
Ratio of problems/solutions identified vs prioritized

# data[].attributes.headline
Empowerment of early and mid-career members

# data[].attributes.subject
Empowerment of early and mid-career members

# data[].attributes.body
How much they feel engaged/excited/capable/empowered about the reports topics/process

# data[].attributes.headline
Satisfaction of participants with the process

# data[].attributes.subject
Satisfaction of participants with the process

# data[].attributes.body
different measures can be put

# data[].attributes.headline
Use of participatory methodologies (exercises, live polls, brainstorming).

# data[].attributes.subject
Use of participatory methodologies (exercises, live polls, brainstorming).

# data[].attributes.headline
Effectiveness of broader engagement strategy beyond the WG members.

# data[].attributes.subject
Effectiveness of broader engagement strategy beyond the WG members.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at the engagement with the reports posted online

# data[].attributes.headline
Incorporation of equity considerations into the reports

# data[].attributes.subject
Incorporation of equity considerations into the reports

# data[].attributes.headline
Maybe adding in the consultation surveys a question of relevancy and feasibility of some of the solutions that we suggest on reports 3 and 4?

# data[].attributes.subject
Maybe adding in the consultation surveys a question of relevancy and feasibility of some of the solutions that we suggest on reports 3 and 4?

# data[].attributes.headline
I am not sure how to potentially measure the dynamics of the WGs to ensure a fair discussion is happening. Something around these might help?

# data[].attributes.subject
I am not sure how to potentially measure the dynamics of the WGs to ensure a fair discussion is happening. Something around these might help?

# data[].attributes.body
Percentage of WG members agreeing with the co-chairs style of facilitation

Number of 'issues' that were needed to individually addressed by the faciltation group

CoI forms that were provided with some feedback by Laura