# data[].attributes.body
She wants the students to do well in exam.

# data[].attributes.headline
Concerned about the students' academic performance.

# data[].attributes.subject
Concerned about the students' academic performance.

# data[].attributes.body
She assume that with more practice, the students will be more confident. A

# data[].attributes.body
Ms A just wanted students to be more prepared since they are struggling and build their confidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher is concerned on her KPI and students.

# data[].attributes.body
Worried that the students will underperform during EYE

Students feeling stress & anxious about their exam

Afraid that her students’ performance will affect her grading

# data[].attributes.headline
Worried that her students cannot do well. She saw that they were struggling. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Worried that her students cannot do well. She saw that they were struggling. 

# data[].attributes.body
Reasonable

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: Does Ms A actually know the concepts or test item in the EYE paper? As it was not stated in the case study.

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: Does Ms A actually know the concepts or test item in the EYE paper? As it was not stated in the case study.

# data[].attributes.body
Wants to maintain good academic results

upkeep her ‘performance’ in school

Experienced teacher, can ‘spot’ questions

# data[].attributes.headline
- Reasonable if concern about students’ well-being but not reasonable if she cares only about her grading 

# data[].attributes.subject
- Reasonable if concern about students’ well-being but not reasonable if she cares only about her grading 

# data[].attributes.body
1) She wanted her students to do well

2) She wanted to know if the students understand the concepts that is to be about to be tested and use the info gathered from revision paper to remediate

3) To measure their level of readiness for EYE

# data[].attributes.body
Ms A wanted her students to perform well so she might have created a revision paper with parallel questions. However, she was not being fair and created a false sense of achievement instead.

# data[].attributes.body
Ms A could have printed and share the resources with the level teachers to maintain the fairness.

# data[].attributes.body
Depends, if she is the setter and has seen the exam paper.

# data[].attributes.body
Reasonable - she is genuinely concerned about her students and wants them to do well.

# data[].attributes.body
It is reasonable if she is genuinely concerned with her students understanding. It is not reasonable if she us concerned about her own KPI.

# data[].attributes.body
1. She wanted her students to be able to apply their knowledge in the real exam.

# data[].attributes.body
She had good intentions but she was being unfair

# data[].attributes.body
She wants the class to perform better.

If the class does well, it will look good on the class results.

Not sure if she is the setter or have vetted/seen the paper, but if she did/was, it is not a fair and valid assessment.

# data[].attributes.body
Check in with the setters / IP heads about it before printing to ensure that the integrity of the assessment was not compromised.

# data[].attributes.body
Considerations were reasonable

Maybe can share the practice paper with other classes?

# data[].attributes.body
It's reasonable because she had good intentions. It wouldn't be wrong since she did not know the real exam paper questions.

# data[].attributes.body
All classes should have the same revision worksheets.

# data[].attributes.body
To a large extent. The setter of the actual paper should not be the setter of the revision papers.

Get the level teachers to vet through the papers before releasing them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Give the whole level the same revision papers to make it fairer. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Give the whole level the same revision papers to make it fairer. 

# data[].attributes.body
The teachers setting the paper should not be from the level

# data[].attributes.body
Use past year papers for revision. Revision papers should be issued as a level.

Additional parallel revision questions could be based on students’ learning gaps (such as mistakes in classwork)

# data[].attributes.body
Suggestion for SEAB to set revision papers.

Level teachers should set papers together.

# data[].attributes.body
Another level teachers may set and vet the papers.