# data[].attributes.body
Students using evidence when explaining their position(s) to classmates

# data[].attributes.body
Students

are required to support claims with evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence that includes primary/secondary sources to include different forms of multimedia

# data[].attributes.body
Student collaboration and consensus building

# data[].attributes.headline
Students are making connections and developing their arguments. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Students are making connections and developing their arguments. 

# data[].attributes.body
Students actively listening to their classmates and using their classmates' ideas in their responses

# data[].attributes.body
Students are provided with context for primary sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Student to student discourse

# data[].attributes.body
Students are participating in productive discourse, agreeing and disagreeing. Students are grounding themselves in evidence. Students are able to transfer skills and apply to a current day issue or their immediate surroundings

# data[].attributes.body
sources and texts are at grade level and utilize multimedia

# data[].attributes.headline
students assessing issues in our communities with each other that may be different from their teachers

# data[].attributes.subject
students assessing issues in our communities with each other that may be different from their teachers

# data[].attributes.body
Materials represent multiple perspectives/sides to an argument, allowing for productive discussion. Texts are grade level.

# data[].attributes.headline
Activities that have students discuss issues.

# data[].attributes.subject
Activities that have students discuss issues.

# data[].attributes.headline
students developing and practicing skills to determine bias in media

# data[].attributes.subject
students developing and practicing skills to determine bias in media

# data[].attributes.body
Essential questions are open-ended enough to allow for multiple perspectives, but focused enough to be connected with the content / topic

# data[].attributes.body
Questions or connections to current or perennial civic challenges and/or opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
Students are having civil discourse about issues (past/present) that they may not agree on, but are able to discuss for inquiry and understanding, rather than persuasion.

# data[].attributes.body
Materials incorporate current-day social/political issues, allowing students to make connections and transfer skills.

# data[].attributes.body
students are collaborating as they work towards addressing issues in their communities, relying on properly cited evidence as they make their arguments, and are actively listening and engaging in productive discourse.

# data[].attributes.body
Inquiry questions are vague / generalized

# data[].attributes.body
Provides structures to support students analyzing sources and identifying bias

# data[].attributes.body
strategies where students contemplate issues

# data[].attributes.body
Materials include structures for student discourse and to invite diverse perspectives

# data[].attributes.headline
materials describing sims and diffs of local, state, and fed government 

# data[].attributes.subject
materials describing sims and diffs of local, state, and fed government 

# data[].attributes.body
Little (intentional/planned) opportunity for student collaboration or discourse.

# data[].attributes.body
Questions and structures create a binary structure for responses rather than a nuanced discussion or exploration.

# data[].attributes.body
Students discuss issues but does not ask students to develop a solution.

# data[].attributes.body
Students are using civic skills but within the materials there is not opportunities to practice civil disposition.

# data[].attributes.body
The topics chosen to promote inquiry (although I wonder about this, because if all of the inquiry topics are centered on a particular perspective, how good is the material in promoting civic engagement in a diverse community / country)

# data[].attributes.headline
diverse changemakers to support modeling for student changemakers

# data[].attributes.subject
diverse changemakers to support modeling for student changemakers

# data[].attributes.body
Narrow texts or limited perspectives - not enough evidence to engagement in discourse

# data[].attributes.body
Minimal scaffolding of civic skills (discourse, collaboration, student voice, diverse opinion sharing, etc). Little “/few real world connections.

# data[].attributes.headline
lack of engagement from students due to historical analysis not connecting to present analysis

# data[].attributes.subject
lack of engagement from students due to historical analysis not connecting to present analysis

# data[].attributes.body
materials provide for discuss but no exchange of ideas

# data[].attributes.headline
suggesting the material is or is not grade-appropriate for reading, writing, speaking, listening

# data[].attributes.subject
suggesting the material is or is not grade-appropriate for reading, writing, speaking, listening