# data[].attributes.headline
What happened to the group whose crops failed? Where could they go for food? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What happened to the group whose crops failed? Where could they go for food? 

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Why would you tolerate doing so much work as a peasant for so little? 

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
what did you end up with? what was your role?

# data[].attributes.body
The monarchy like the princesses and the king had the most money in the end and the Monks ended up witht he least amount of money.

# data[].attributes.body
A peasant pays a lot of taxes so if I was one I would feel terrible because often peasants had little money to live with.

# data[].attributes.body
We know that they have a lot of money because they own a lot of land to build on and also gain a lot of money as well. The structures and the buildings they make on the massive amount of land shows their wealth.

# data[].attributes.body
This is not so of a fair system because a lot of the peasants barely had any money just for their own needs while the higher ups get a lot of the money from the taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
The King and the princess, the royal family has the most coins at the end, and the monks and serves has the least coins at the end

# data[].attributes.body
The nobles and royal family (king and princesses) had the most coins at the end. The people who had the least money were the monks and serfs.

# data[].attributes.body
I wouldn't feel very happy as a peasant. This is because a peasant has to work very hard, but doesn't gain a lot of money. Instead, their lords would always make them pay taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
The people who possessed the most money included the King, princesses and pretty much all nobles and people from royalty. The people with the least amount were serfs/peasants and monks.

# data[].attributes.body
If I were a peasant, I wouldn't enjoy living because peasants had to work for nobles to farm crops and to make tools/materials. They also have to pay tax which can be very difficult when they don't have much money.

# data[].attributes.body
We can tell that nobles, churches and Kings had lots of money from the amount of land they had control of. They could give away this land to profit from it. You could also tell their wealth from the building and castles they live in. If someone was rich, they probably had a big and tall castle that was made from expensive materials such as stone and marble.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the feudal system is pretty unfair, definitely towards the serfs. But i think it's unfair to maintain order. Yes, it was unfair that serfs have to work so much, however serfs act as the base of the economy since they provide the nobles with crops and goods for the higher ups. Without them, everything would fall and the kingdom would be in a lack of resources. This would lead the kingdom in a vulnerable position from outside invaders such as the barbarians.

# data[].attributes.body
We know that the nobles, the King and the Church had a lot of money by the amount of churches, castles and manors from medieval times that still exist today. To build these places, a lot of land was needed, and more land meant higher status in the feudal system. We can also tell by looking at the churches, castles and manors. They were opulent and made with high quality, expensive materials (e.g. marble), which means that the royalty, nobility and church had to have a lot of money.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think the feudal system is fair. It is obvious that the nobles, King and Church are the ones who benefit from the system, as they gain a lot of money (through taxes) from the serfs. The serfs are the people who work the most and are the 'base' of the kingdom. Without them, the kingdom wouldn't function properly as basic services and food wouldn't be provided. However, they are the people who end up with the least amount of money.

# data[].attributes.body
The people with the most money were the nobility, or the ones at the top of the feudal system. The people with the last coins were the serfs and the monks.

# data[].attributes.body
I would not be satisfied with how the feudal system was run, since peasants did a lot of literally back-breaking labour but didn't get much coins out of it because of taxes. I would feel like I was getting exploited.

# data[].attributes.body
We know that the nobles and the church had a lot of money because of the amount of things they owned, as well as the quality. Since the buildings that they owned were often very big and boasting, it would have required lots of land and materials to actually make. Since more land meant a higher position in the feudal system, we can assume that the nobles were quite rich. Another factor was the quality of the items and clothes they wore. They were made from high quality materials, which were accordingly expensive. This meant that to afford such luxuries, the nobles, the royals and the church had to own a lot of money.

# data[].attributes.body
This is not at all a fair system. The nobles and the royals were the only ones who benefitted from this system, while the serfs did all of the work. Serfs made the entire feudal system, and the kingdom in general, work. They provided most things, from food to materials to services. Without them, the kingdom would fall into disarray because those basic services, materials and food suddenly had no source. Even though serfs did all the work, they ended up with the least amount of money, while the nobility gained the most.

# data[].attributes.body
In the end the people who ended up with the most money were the monarchy (king and princesses). The person who has left with the least amount of money were the serfs/peasants and the monks.

# data[].attributes.body
If I were one of the peasants I would find the feudal system very unfair since I would be working the hardest and get paid the least because of taxes. It just doesn't seem fair how somebody born into a certain family has their whole futures decided for them. Like the royals will be reach, popular and higher class. The peasants will never have a chance to be rich because they are born into a poor, lower class. It is amazing how far we have come.

# data[].attributes.body
We know that the nobles, king and the church have a lot of money because they own a large quantity of land (this is one of the ways people showed that they were rich). If you had a lot of land you would be able to sell it to the people of a lower class, gaining money for yourself. Or your could allow peasants to work the land for you. Their wealth was also proven by their living conditions and lifestyle. A large castle made from stone and servants that would abide to your every command. Another factor would be the clothing that they wore, long pieces of expensive fabric draping from their arms showing that they can afford what they don't even need.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally I do not think this was a fair system to live by. It was unfair how just because you were born in a certain family decided what you future would look like, living in a life or luxury or slaving away on fields for barely anything. I really don't understand how anybody thought it fair since the only class benefiting off it were the royals. The peasants were the ones who kept it standing, they were the ones doing all of the necessary work, all for what - the benefit of the royals. The royals, nobles and the church would also gain a lot of money through the taxes paid by the peasants. It really just isn't fair that the peasants would work really hard and then have to use that hard earnt money to pay off their taxes to the royals.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not too sure where they will go to eat but it says on google that they would often eat pork if they don't grow any crops. This is because these pigs were free from the forest and they often find their own food to eat which was also healthy.

# data[].attributes.body
If the peasants crop failed, I'm not sure where they would get the money to buy food or even seeds to plant a new crop. I'm sure back then they didn't have any 'Job Seeker Payment' available for people struggling with money issues. I would think they would just have to starve or steal from somebody else's crop in order to survive long term. But they could just go hunting for animals, it really would depend if they had the necessary materials and weapons.

# data[].attributes.body
The people at the top of the feudal system, which included the royal family and nobles, had the most coins at the end, while the serfs and monks, who were at the bottom of the feudal system, had the least.

# data[].attributes.body
I wouldn't have felt very pleased if I were a peasant. Despite working very hard each day, they only earned a little amount of money, and even had to pay taxes to their lords. I would've felt worthless compared to people higher up in the feudal system.

# data[].attributes.body
We know that the royalty and nobility had a lot of money because of the churches, castles and manors built back then that still exist today. These required a lot of land and money to build, having more land meant having a higher status in the feudal system, and the buildings were of high quality. This shows that the King, nobles and Church were able to afford to build these.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that this system is not fair. Even though the serfs worked the most and hardest, they earned little money, meaning that they were not able to afford the luxuries that the nobles and royalty had. The feudal system would've fallen apart if the serfs weren't there - they provided the entire kingdom with many things such as food, and yet they were still considered lowlifes and were treated badly.