# data[].attributes.headline
Theme to add: democracy and political literacy

# data[].attributes.subject
Theme to add: democracy and political literacy

# data[].attributes.headline
Here is a list of "competency-like" outcomes developed in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences:

# data[].attributes.subject
Here is a list of "competency-like" outcomes developed in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences:

# data[].attributes.body
With a major in CLAS...
I can think critically and analyze complex situations.
I can solve problems efficiently and effectively.
I can speak persuasively to a variety of audiences.
I can translate data into useful knowledge.
I can write coherent explanations and arguments.
I can collaborate with teams and lead from within.
I can do research and analysis using state-of-the-art methods and technologies.
I can interact [sensitively] with people from diverse cultures and backgrounds. [w/thanks to JWarren-Findlow for that edit]

# data[].attributes.headline
Keep in mind that some external agencies and organizations (e.g. the Phi Beta Kappa Honor Society) have specific expectations for inputs, i.e. the institutional capacity to provide roughly intermediate-level preparation in mathematics and foreign languages. The new GenEd system will exert pressure on the kinds and number of basic courses being offered across the institution.

# data[].attributes.subject
Keep in mind that some external agencies and organizations (e.g. the Phi Beta Kappa Honor Society) have specific expectations for inputs, i.e. the institutional capacity to provide roughly intermediate-level preparation in mathematics and foreign languages. The new GenEd system will exert pressure on the kinds and number of basic courses being offered across the institution.

# data[].attributes.headline
I don't mind these competencies, but the current arrangement of the Critical Thinking part of GenEd, for example, is a disaster. Each discipline should have some course(s) that will satisfy the critical thinking competency WITHIN the major.

# data[].attributes.subject
I don't mind these competencies, but the current arrangement of the Critical Thinking part of GenEd, for example, is a disaster. Each discipline should have some course(s) that will satisfy the critical thinking competency WITHIN the major.

# data[].attributes.headline
These are good general themes. But it raises so many questions; e.g., if "Sustainability" is a theme, what precisely are we trying to "sustain"? Consumption? "Quality of life"? Why "Sustainability" rather than, for example, "Biodiversity" or "Climate Change"?

# data[].attributes.subject
These are good general themes. But it raises so many questions; e.g., if "Sustainability" is a theme, what precisely are we trying to "sustain"? Consumption? "Quality of life"? Why "Sustainability" rather than, for example, "Biodiversity" or "Climate Change"?

# data[].attributes.headline
Also makes it hard to find faculty across the university who can teach these multi-disciplinary perspectives

# data[].attributes.subject
Also makes it hard to find faculty across the university who can teach these multi-disciplinary perspectives

# data[].attributes.headline
It's a nice idea. But eliminating "distribution" may end up marginalizing some disciplines and depriving students of a chance to discover fields they don't immediately recognize.

# data[].attributes.subject
It's a nice idea. But eliminating "distribution" may end up marginalizing some disciplines and depriving students of a chance to discover fields they don't immediately recognize.

# data[].attributes.body
it's all in how the competency is written. Too many are double-barreled having a list of items that students should be competent in.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the idea of broad cross-cutting themes