# data[].attributes.headline
I think Ethan Hawke did, he showed  that he was really depressed. His facial expressions were really good and he convinced me that he actually wants to commit suicide.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Ethan Hawke did, he showed  that he was really depressed. His facial expressions were really good and he convinced me that he actually wants to commit suicide.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I think that Ethan Hawke did a far better job than Mel Gibson. I think this because Ethan Hawkes facial expressions, body language, word choice and tone were far better at portraying the tone of the scene rather than Mel Gibsons.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Ethan did it better. He has no will to live but, at the same time he's trying to wait it out. The whole blockbuster is the equivalent of the positive side of living. It's like an internal battle.

# data[].attributes.body
Mel Gibson was more effective, the setting was nicely selected. and the way he talks to the audience he was surrounded by death.

# data[].attributes.body
he did it best he made the auidenece feel sadness without having anger he felt lost not knowing if he should live or die this really shows the meaning of the expression to be or not to be

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Ethan Hawke did it better because he always kept a straight face and had most of the characteristics of a person who would want to kill themselves. The music also played a big part because it makes the scene more tense. He was also walking down the action aisle which makes it so like he has to make a decision.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mel Gibsons was the more effective because of the setting and the way he talked was so monotone he never raised his voice or never was super quiet. The setting had a big role in it too he was surrounded by dead people and he wanted to kill him self.   

# data[].attributes.subject
Mel Gibsons was the more effective because of the setting and the way he talked was so monotone he never raised his voice or never was super quiet. The setting had a big role in it too he was surrounded by dead people and he wanted to kill him self.   

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion Mel's was better because the setting he is in sets the tone alone with it being dark and silent. Then the way he would emphasize and keep an active tone throughout the whole thing.

# data[].attributes.headline
In my opinion I feel like Mel did it best there was more feelings put into the act and it made it more dramatic and depressing in the act it was more of an active tone.

# data[].attributes.subject
In my opinion I feel like Mel did it best there was more feelings put into the act and it made it more dramatic and depressing in the act it was more of an active tone.

# data[].attributes.body
Ethan did much better relating to true human emotion as he walks through a nicely lit Blockbuster while weary and pondering his own death. It makes an audience feel Gloomy, but more sympathetic to Hamlet´s current situation.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think ethan did it the best because he did a very good job expressing his mood . It made me feel like i was feeling what he was going through how he felt in the moment .  Gloomy  this made me feel this way because how the setting took place 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think ethan did it the best because he did a very good job expressing his mood . It made me feel like i was feeling what he was going through how he felt in the moment .  Gloomy  this made me feel this way because how the setting took place 