# data[].attributes.body
This is a good explanation because they used good vocabulary words to describe the measures of center for Bill and Carl.

# data[].attributes.body
I like how you explained your thoughts and used data from each persons data.

# data[].attributes.headline
The person did repeat them self a couple of times

# data[].attributes.subject
The person did repeat them self a couple of times

# data[].attributes.body
They did good of explaining their opinion with facts from the models. They knew how to interpret the box plots.

# data[].attributes.body
The overall explanation is very well written and to the point.

# data[].attributes.body
I like how you explained your thoughts and used data form each person data

# data[].attributes.headline
The person used very descriptive and difficult vocab.  They showed their point very well, and they were backing up their claim.

# data[].attributes.subject
The person used very descriptive and difficult vocab.  They showed their point very well, and they were backing up their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
The response is good becasue it goes in depth and has good math vocabulary. Plus, this person explains why each math vocabulary word is important and use the word correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
I like how they said how bill has a wider distribution

# data[].attributes.body
This person compared the mad and than explained what it meant. They used terrific vocabulary and they did a nice job explaining.

# data[].attributes.body
On question 8 they did very well getting to the point and stating the reasoning to their evidence. For question 9 they did very well showing the differences between the data sets.

# data[].attributes.body
They had good organization in how they explained

# data[].attributes.body
I like how you talked about MAD and Mean on Q1 and also liked how you used good vocabulary

# data[].attributes.body
This person gave lots of details and it is very clear

# data[].attributes.body
They used very good vocabulary and used complete sentences

# data[].attributes.body
I would not say that this person’s work is concise, but it is clear. This one also mentions MAD and range.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked that on 9b they compared the test scores using median, and IQR

# data[].attributes.body
He could Improve by not saying I think

# data[].attributes.headline
We really like the orgazititation for answers it is very clear to read.

# data[].attributes.subject
We really like the orgazititation for answers it is very clear to read.

# data[].attributes.body
They explain the problem again and this person did not only tell us about the MAD they explained the distribution within this problem too.

# data[].attributes.body
The information is specific on number 8

# data[].attributes.body
Good use of words like consistent and deviation, also including explanations about range and Ma

# data[].attributes.body
I like how they used the measures of center and compared them so that anyone could understand what they are trying to say

# data[].attributes.body
has lot of detail, 2 conclusons is'nt nesesary But on other hands,the person uses vocabulare such like MAD, and uses it as part of its claim.

# data[].attributes.body
The person came up with any good points on number eight she or he had a good communication since she or he got every part correct bringing up means and mads and on number nine he brought up the mad, range, median and more this person looked and found what they should do and they did it I give them props.

# data[].attributes.body
It wasn’t straight to the point but it got the information

# data[].attributes.body
The description could have been more clear. I like the answers though.