# data[].attributes.body
Watts (2018), discusses that rising in  tempatures will couse climate related poverty,drought and various kind of natural disasters but affects of tempature rising will show itself  specifically on nature. The author's arguement appears to be quite convincing as he states that

# data[].attributes.body
In “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN” Watts(2018), mainly argues that climate change is real. The Author warns us about the problem of the world is raised 1C temperature increase and it is going to 1.5C degree. Even 0.5C temperature will cause of floods, droughts and extreme heat for millions of people. Watts thinks that if scientist cannot stop the rise ing, food scarcity would be less of a problem for poor countries (check grammar, it hinders meaning). To the IPCC its not a distant future to get 2C temperature. The Author highlights that scientists are trying to create make some solutions and some of the leaders make an agreement together (Paris Agreement Pledge). The author focusing on the reforestation and trying to shift carbon free transport system are some of them. Author thinks with these this ideas its possible to keep on 1.5C with the solutions.

Organization should be improved, use linkers to organize supporting ideas.

Watts (2018) is convincing about the climate change catastrophe. So far its not getting better. It’s worsens the humankind’s life. Watts has a reasonable argument because the temperature is rising and we can see the effects on us.

Good point but you need to elaborate your reason and refer to the article you have read.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article entitled as "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN", Watts. J(2018,October 8) draws readers' attention to what happens if we don't restrict temperature change to between 1.5C and 2C (you need to state the writer's suggestion / recommendation / solution). The author starts off by indicating the report which was released by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) .The report states that we need imminent changes that are going to address the issues that affect climate. IPCC points out that if we don't take the measures there will be drought,poverty,extreme heat and so on.Currently the world is already above 1C than its preindustrial levels and from now on if we don't restrict it to between 1.5C and 2C, (do not go into detail) the outcomes will be disastrous.even half calcius can make huge difference.As an example,according to the report, at 1.5C, the proportion of the global population exposed to water stress could be 50% lower than at 2C (do not go into detail).There are two propositions to combat those problems.First one is reforestation and the other is cutting carbon pollution by 45%.The author concludes by stressing that the outcomes will be devastating if we  (informal - passive voice can help to adopt a more formal tone - if measures are not taken) don't take the measures.B,but he's also positive that this report will make people take climate change more seriously.

You need to refer to the author, use reporting verbs to express the author's attitude and use linkers to guide the readers.
Complete the task and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
1. In ”We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe,warns UN” ,Watts (2018)explains to climate (grammar hinders meaning) change owing to consumption and globalization.The author emphasizes that climate change is happening and it is about to be a huge issue for humanity. That's why the author has a convincing  solution by reporting the UN's research, IPCC. He starts with the result of climate change One of them is global warming   which affects all the universe negatively.The other one is extreme weather .According to Paris agreement the pledge,temperature should be stabilized.Watts says that degree changes affect species and people should start acting now.According to author the world is more warmer than normal level Natural disasters proves that climate change is already happening.Furthermore,

The supporting ideas are missing.

Watts (2018) pays attention to global warming and degree changes which cannot be stabilized over years.The author states that even if 1 celsius changes, it is important for the world's resources such as water. Also,global warming increases the risk of natural disasters owing to unbalanced weather. The author is reporting the solution by UN, IPCC. Watts's suggestion is reasonable. Unfortunately, people do not pays attention to its importance and it expedites the process.Records demonstrated that climate change is already happening in US so that they are about to face the damages which climate change caused.The damages such as loosing our habitat and loosing our  water is irreversible for humanity. Also,Watts indicates that climate change will affect many number of persons life indeed. For instance,climate change has a huge affect on temperature and for this reason if it is changes, all the plants, maybe living beings can affected .B because of humanity takes advantage of these living beings and plants, people can affected by climate change.For this problem h s/he has a solution.One of his solutions is electronic transport system .Watts's solution is logical because transport system decrea ises the carbon level and less carbon level is directly affects climate in a good way.

To conclude,the author has a good point in the article and his/her concerns are important and necessary for our future.

Good job, Nehir:) please go over my comments and corrections.

Best,

# data[].attributes.body
In '' We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN", Watts (2018) draws readers' attention to climate change (you need to state the problem and state the writer's solution or suggestion). Firstly, the author warns that scientists worry about the fact that there is only a dozen years  to fight against global warming if the degree of water does not stay stable. In addition, the author stresses the risk of global warming can bring along a lot of (informal) natural disasters. Although there is not exaggerated gap (language hinders with meaning), Watts defends that it is the largest alarm and responsible persons should take action to fight against it. Furthermore, what happen on land is related to under  the sea. Unfortunately, oceans are already suffering because of climate change (briefly explain why?). Secondly, Watts suggests some pathways to achieve goals by mentioning different combinations of land use and technological change. Also, s/he proposes reforestation and  interruption of carbon pollution. Finally, what the author desires by highlighting solutions is that persons must realize that the hazard is already on the world and they must not ignore it.
Watts (2018) claims that climate change is a dangerous case which humanity face. I believe (informal) that it is which we must think on and try to do something about this dangerous case. What stands out to me about article is that climate change does not come on one's own, it is related to natural disasters. Watts mentions that current danger is enough for people (language hinders meaning) and s/he is completely right, persons are even late (you need to elaborate your reasons). What Watts is hopeful with are changes of technology and different usages of land but it's not enough, persons must be more aware than now (explain why? what are your reasons?).Also i can not say that Watts is wrong about the ocean, it is affected more than persons do (check grammar here). Therefore, the author fails at one point which mentions that  current situation is awful, not good but still can be saved (explain why? you need to elaborate your reasons).

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In "What Have 12 Years to Limit Climate Change Catastrophe, Warms UN" Watts (2018) points that the huge problem that we are facing these days which is climate change is resolvable by keeping the temperature among 1.5-2.0 celc sius and while doing that s/he he or she talks about the huge differences that may be caused by only 1 degree. Also s/he believes that mentions about the reasonable solutions are in for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's report . Unfortunately the society doesn't pay the attention that the problem needs which leads us to today where there is no stabilized pledges.

The main argument is too wordy and the supporting ideas and reflection are missing.
Complete the task and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In ''We hat have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN'' Watts (2018) discusses the risk of climate change and what may happen if the temperature rising won't stay between 1.5-2 C. Therefore, author explains that IPCC'S possible solutions. The author start with natural catastrophes which are created by climate change. Secondly

Watts (2018) has a reasonable argument because when the climate changes, this situation affects people and whole World negatively.

Complete the task and get feedback.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the text entitled“We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN” by Watts, the author talks about there is maximum 12 years for global warming to be kept to a maximum of 1.5C half a degree can affect the world badly with drought, floods, extreme heat and poverty for people.The author mentions an effective report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) stating that needing of (check grammar) critical and extraordinary changes are affordable and achievable and at the end of the Paris agreement, they pledged to keep temperatures between 1.5C and 2C. The author is worrying about the warming world, because it's get presently 1C warmer than pre-industrial times. Watts supports his ideas with report by mentioning about water stress, food scarcity, climate-related poverty and risk of nature. The author especially stands on the how nature is effecting by this problem more than anything. For The IPCC, to fight against climate change , they offer different combinations of land use, technological tools and reforestation (there are too many details, state the main argument briefly, there are too many details, use linkers so that the readers can follow the supporting ideas). For the author most important solution is reforestation,(the offers technology too) because it is more effective on carbon pollution. The author states that now the world is facing a bigger problem which is 3C warming. Watts is shocked by how climate change is occurring  and more expeditious. Watts can't think now it's very miserable at he current level of 1C warming what happens when it comes to 3C warming (there are too many details, summaries should be concise. Here have a final statement that wraps up the summary).

The author states that best solution for carbon pollution is reforestation. I agree (informal - the writer has a reasonable solution) with the author because forests are the biggest producers of oxygen and they are it is very helpful to annihilate the carbon pollution. The author suggests and highlights that "Reforestation is essential to all of them as are shifts to electric support system. In addition, carbon pollution would have to be cut by %45 by 2030".
Buying seeds and planting the seeds are is easy. Seeds are not that expensive, they are it's very cheap actually. Anyone can buy and plant the seeds to reduce carbon pollution.
Reforestation seems like a better solution for carbon pollution because it's affordable and feasible. (You need to refer to a second idea or example to have a more convincing summary response paper.)

In short, I strongly agree with the Watts's ideas. We don't need to look far to find a solution, we have a cheap and achievable solution in front of us, Reforestation. (good points, but you can work on having a more academic tone.)

In your summary, you should be less wordy and organize supporting better using linkers and reporting verbs.

Best,

# data[].attributes.body
In " We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN", Watts (2018) draws readers' attention to rising temperature's possible harms on both environment and people and also its solutions according to IPCC by combining e land usage with technological change. The author starts by stating the importance of keeping the temperature in balance. Otherwise, beyond these temperatures, inevitable catastrophes will show themselves. Second, the author claims that climate change is already happening because  in some countries, unprecedented natural disasters occure such as droughts, devastating hurricanes, acifidication, loss of fisheries. Third, he states that some living beings may survive if the temperature target is reached through reforestation and technological change. Finally, the author concludes that the importance of rising temperature must be understood via IPCC, otherwise, the bad scenarios on the nature will affect all of us.

Watts (2018), argues that beyond 1.5 C is going to worsen the process of the nature such as droughts, floods, extreme heat and because of this we, humans should take the IPCC report into consideration . The  author's ideas are quite reasonable  and convincing according to research (IPCC report 2018), the World has 12 years to keep temperature in balance; otherwise the World will go into the way which it will never turn back. Everyday pepple release CO2 to the air and this quantity in every year is 30 billions tons.  Normally in atmosphere we have approximately 700 billions tons CO2. However,  we release 30 billions CO2 extra.  When the warming rises, ice caps melt and there will not be enough mass to reflect the extra CO2, thereby the surplus gas increases the amount of CO2 in atmosphere which is the reason of rising temperature. Besides, the author mentions this extra CO2 affects acidification in the oceans. At this point due to absorption of CO2 by the air, it is true that the rate of acid in the oceans depends on the rate of CO2 in the air. The more acid in the air, the more acid will be in the oceans. This means that approximately fifty percent of corals will die out. However, there is one piece of missing information Watts did not consider is that algae will be gaining profit from this phenomenon (Fabricius, 2014) you need to explain this for the reader as it is not clear) . Nevertheless, this situation will not change the fact that all the creatures in the oceans will be affected negatively.
Watts also praises that thanks to IPCC' s environmental solution by using technological change with land usage (reforestation), the World will tackle that carbon pollution by %45 by 2030. However, according to experts and UN report, people have no ability to reduce this carbon pollution even if tens of thousands years pass (BBC, 2014). As believed by IPCC report, maybe there could be more convincing information about how they will do or how the process will be. In this picture, it is not possible to hope to reduce carbon's negative effects. Moreover, there is a difficulty to measure a universal carbon budget to reach the target of 1.5 C according to Harvey (2018). Unfortunately, considering all these realities as long as people do nothing for the sake of the nature, the World is obliged to suffer from these negative circumstances. People consume more and more and while producing something most of us do not think the harms that we create. People still do not perceive that this is not a joke that the World will collapse if we do nothing. Simply put, as Watts, warming must be taken serious, there is a 3C fact and if the solution of IPCC is searched properly, the world can apply its solutions at least no more warming will happen.

Good job. but try to use "we" statements less, using passive voice can help.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In ”What we have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe,warns UN” ,Watts (2018) pays attention to climate change owing to consumption and globalization.The author emphasizes that climate change is happening and it is about to be huge issue for humanity. That's why the author suggests reporting the solution by the UN,IPCC. He starts with the result of climate change. According to Paris agreement the pledge should be stabilized. Unfortunately, people do not pays attention to its importance and it expedites the process.The other problem which he is  concerned s about is the natural disasters. Records demonstrated that climate change is already happening in US so that they are about to face the damages which climate change caused.The damages such as loosing our habitat and loosing our  water is irreversible for humanity. Also,Watts indicates that climate change will affect many number of persons' life indeed.Therefore, he has a solution for drawing attention about this issue,electronic transport system and reforestation.This solution will decrease the carbon pollution and the harm is also be less than now.

# data[].attributes.body
Watts (2018) in his article "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN?" argues that the climate change is a serious issue that the world in facing. The author warns that that even every half degree matters and it would worsen the impacts. The author proves the point that the climate change has  already started to speed up by giving some examples such as the hurricanes and forest fires. Following this, the author suggests that There are some other ways in order to achieve 1.5 c° which are by using both combinations of land and technological change use that helps to increase 45% of carbon pollution due 2030. The author concludes by stating that the climate change is increasing rapidly way more than the expectations but still he has some hopes that the report will attrack some people's attention toward taking climate change more seriously.

Watts (2018) claims that the climate change is really a major issue that people are facing nowadays since  every half degree matters and it would make things worsen. the author seems to make strong points because the climate change has already started to happen. To illustrate, the hurricanes in the US and the forest fire in Arctic. According to the report states that the global population is exposed to water stress which would be 50% lower at 2 c° specially millions of  people who are living in poor countries would be facing the risk of climate change poverty. However, the author compared and realized that plants at 2 c are almost more likely to lose half of their habits and most of the coal will be lost rather than 1.5 c. One more point is that, the extra half degree affects the sea as well negatively. To exemplify, sea level rise threatens 10 million more people by 2100. However, the author mentioned that nowadays some oceans are facing acidity and low levels of oxygen due to the climate change. the IPCC proposed different land use and technological change in order to achieve 1.5 c and and the significant one which is reforestation since it shift electric transport system. The author states that by 2030 thanks to the offered pathways from IPCC the carbon pollution might decrease 45%. Following this, the author comments on how fast is the climate changes is occurring. People should take actions and take climate change more seriously. This is another summary, your ideas are missing. Are these ideas, suggestions realistic? Why? why not? You need to explain your ideas.

Best,

# data[].attributes.body
In ''What have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN'' Watts (2018) discusses the risk of climate change and what may happen if the temperature rise ing will not won't stay between 1.5-2 C. Therefore, the author explains that IPCC'S possible solutions (the sentence is incomplete). The author starts with natural  catastrophes which are created by climate change. Secondly, the author highlights about the bad effects of climate change on some countries . Then the author stresses that The third issue is the effect of temperature on some living things such as, insects, corals. In addition, the author mentions that sea level is another significant argument (briefly explain why this is the case?). Finally, the author emphasizes that this problem of temperature is a very important problem for the world and he says that we should prevent it (make clear what does the author suggest?).

Watts(2018) mentions (use stronger verbs) that if the temperature rises above 1.5 C, this will affect the entire world, but if we use IPCC reports and their solutions, we can minimize this bad situation. He has a quite reasonable argument because climate change is a significant issue for  the whole world and  the author supports this important issue with proportions and reports is convincing for readers (this sentence does not add up to meaning, make clear what is significant?) However , I believe that he author should give more striking examples to convince the reader (be specific which examples are not convincing and why?, although the subject is very important. For example, the seasons are not the same as before. Winters are not even snowing (check grammar here) or summers are very hot. If the author gave more examples of this those who read it would be more influenced by writing, so they could have a stronger reason to take action (be specific which ideas should be mentioned?). I believe (informal) the IPCC's research is very accurate, but I do not think that some solutions are feasible. Because according to the IPCC, the reforestation and electrical transport system will prevent us from reaching the dangerous temperature ratio.However, in Turkey, the country where I live, which is very difficult to  market hem. If we consider the issue of afforestation, construction in too much Turkey and while this construction is already being destroyed and many trees does not do anything to stop it (language hinders with meaning). Because, the only thing many of these construction companies are considering is '' money ''. On the other hand, if we evaluate the electrical transport system solution is another problematic solution for Turkey such as hybrid cars. Due to the fact that hybrid cars are very expensive because they produce new (language hinders meaning) and the number of people that can get this car in Turkey is very low because most people's income is not enough even to buy a normal car. However, as Watts points out, climate change is a very important problem for the world, and if people do not find effective solutions for it, the world will face serious challenges go to a bad situation .
You need to elaborate your reasons and refer to the article you read.

Best,

# data[].attributes.body
Watts (2018), the article entitled "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" draws the readers attention to global warming's dangerous sides and its threats to the world (state what does the author suggest?). The author starts by saying

The article entitled "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN",  Watts (2018) claims that global warming has serious threats to the world and in recently, it affects the world more worse and fast. Watts' arg qument appears to be quite convincing because nowadays even every day a catastrophe occurs at different areas of the world.To For illustrate, everybody knows that (informal and even if you take it out, the sentence is still meaningful) with global warming the world loses huge glacier masses in pole areas and it leads to rising the sea level and also it causes to the loss of vanish pole animal's natural habitats. According to the Watts, nowadays the earth is 1°C more warmer than nonindustrial times. In the US there is a destructive hurricane catastrophe, also Cape Town suffers from droughts and forest fires. In addition, everybody can understand that climate change is not in the future it is in the now (so do you agree or disagree? this is not clear. Make your stance clear and explain your reasons.
In conclusion,  the world's resources are being depleted by greedy companies in an ir unresponsible way which harms the environment significantly. In my opinion this article is not a must-read since it doesn't give any specific information (it gives specific information, you need to adopt formal language and make clear why is this article not convincing for you?).(repetition of the same idea) Therefore i would not recommend

Best,

# data[].attributes.body
In "What have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) states that the temperature is increasing rapidly and it has an unexpending speed (state the author's suggestion / solution / recommendation should be stated). First, the author highlights that the level of temperature has an important role on the world and if it even changes a little bit the nature (check grammar here) and hundresds of millions of people would be affected from this. Watts describes that the target should be setteled in order to protect the people from deadly situations such as floods and extreme heat. The writer also mentions that the temperature limit should be maximum   1.5 C, because if the temperature will overpasses the limit, that would cause food scarcity es xpecially for poor countries. Moreover, he also stresses that the most effected one by climate change is the nature because, the temperature affects water and land, so the coral reefs and plants can be influenced very easily.Hence, the writer  is worried about the loss of species of animals and their habitats. In addition, he describes that the cut of carbon pollution, change the land use and technological change, reforestation are some ways to achieve 1.5C. Finally, the writer concludes by stating that climate chancing is already hear and it is occurring rapidly than expected.To conclude, Watts believes that people should take this issue more seriously and they should be more aware about it.

Watts states that even half a degree will worsen the risks of droughts, floods and extreme weather conditions. At that point, it seems reasonable for me  because, in Mediterranean region,where my hometown is, I see aw some extreme rainy days and it turns into a flood in front of my eyes. That situation is not normal for Mediterranean region, I believe that climate change is responsible for that. Moreover, Watta (2018) (I have changed this into APA as you are expeced to borrow information from the article you read) he describes that poor countries are suffering from food scarcity and inadequacy of clean water at 1,5C and if the temperature rises to 2C, that would have deadly consequences . This arguement seems realistic since, in last decades scarcity has become a bigger problem to world, even though it always been there. Something (be specific with what you state and try to avoid "something" as it is vague in meaning)must have affected the temperature because the scarcity has triggered by something (be specific with what you state and try to avoid "something" as it is vague in meaning) suddenly. Besides, Watts (2018) he supports that "the greatest difference would be to nature" (p.?) (the quotation does not make any point clear - what is the greatest difference?), at that point he has not only a right İdea / point of view side but also wrong İdea / point of view side. For instance, he gave the examples about the corals which got damaged by acidity and lower levels of oxygen. He is quite convincing about the corals because we see lots of news or documentaries on TV's which are about the causes of climate change cing. On the other hand, he seems to have forgotten that climate chance has some good effects to environment. To illustrate, it helps the crops to grow faster. Moreover, what we all know from our high school biology lessons is that plants use CO2 to make photosynthsis in order to generate oxygen and nutrition. In short,like Watts, I believe that unless people do something, nothing will chang ce and more suffer will surround mankind.

In the final analysis, while Watts believes that climate change cing has only bad consequences, I take the view that it has both good and bad effects on the  to world and humanity. Even though there are the good examples and some convincing datas which are in the text, the article is not sufficient for people to be knowledgeable about climate chance's effects.  However, (,but ... / . However, ... Both linkers mean the same, but their punctuation use is different) But I recommend this article because there is some specific (information is an uncountable noun) informations about the temperature.

Good job, İrem:) please go over my comments and corrections.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In "What have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) states that science community have warned the relevant parties about rising extreme effects of climate change by presenting released report by the UN. The author suggests the report by UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in order to demonstrate the impact it has and will on the world to solve the climate change problem. According to the report, keeping warming between 1.5C and 2C is essential to reduce the impacts such as droughts, floods, extreme heat and poverty. Initially, the author illustrates some recorded impacts around the world which have occured so far. Following this, the writer uses some statistics from the report  in order to  show the facts that will happen in near future (this does not add up to meaning , be specific here). Furthermore, the author presents the IPCC'S solutions which are different combinations of land use and technological change. In addition to making connection between the  importance of deforestation and electric transport system, the writer points out the significance of restricting carbon usage. In conclusion, Watts highlights ing the prime effect of this report should have on people's opinions about climate change.

Watts (2018) presents the IPCC's report which states the necessity of keeping the global warming maximum 1.5C  and suggests it as a trigger for people to people so that they can acknowledge the circumstances which are may caused by climate change. The author's argument appears to be quite convincing because rising on the effects of climate change can be seen obviously. In this subject, the writer also uses example of oceans' elevated acidity and lower levels of oxygen. Moreover, there are commonly known impacts arising from every corner of the part of earth such as extreme and irrelevant changes on weather and then droughts or floods, devastating hurricanes, forest fires or even lack of habitats for animals. On the other hand, Watts rightly draws attention to the possible forecasts  if warming exceeds 1.5C which are quite reasonable. It can be easily implied that there would be hardships for people and animals owing to the harm on nature. However, when it comes to the conclusion, the author has a weak argument which is only presenting the UN report's importance and mentioning different land usages and technological change. Watts seems to have forgotten that s/he just shows the facts known by everyone and even does not offer unusual valid solutions (you need to make your reasons clear why are these solutions weak? why do you think so?). Because only stating deforestation or carbon pollution do not explain anything to readers (adopt careful language). Without acceptable suggestions such as inviting governments or big companies or organizations to take action against warming and cooperate on valid remedies, it is not convincing at all (explain why governments and companies should be involved?). Because most of the people already acknowledged the necessity of reducing usage of carbon or being friendly with forests so that they can breathe. However, the problem is that people need an authority to help them for protecting the environment.

Good ideas, go over my comments and make the necessary changes.

Best,

# data[].attributes.body
Dear all,

Read the article entitled “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN” on page 25 - 26 Writing Workbook.

Write a summary response essay.

Use the summary response checklist on page 34 Writing Workbook.

Good luck,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
Jonathan Watts, in his article "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" (2018) describes the facts that lead to climate change such as; rising temperature and he mentions the solution which inhibits level of warming by using reports from IPCC (use stronger reporting verbs and what does he suggest as a solution? Solution is missing). Firstly, he states that it's important to keeping temperature in balance. However, increasing temperature causes natural disasters. Secondly, he compares impacts of 1 degree and 2 degree heat on nature in terms of  rising sea levels , loss of plant's habitat and loss of fisheries. He states that the solution is which combining e with land use and technological change to manintain 1,5 degree target. To conclude, the author stresses that climate change emerges  rapidly and effectively and this report can make it easier to understand the importance and seriousness the seriousity of rising temperature.

Watts (2018) warns us about the consequences of rising temperature. The author claims that the reason of poor countries' poverty is not related to climate change rather than another reasons (did he really state that?) . However, his idea is not convincing and not sufficient at all. Because poverty mostly comes from drought and natural disasters for example ; countries which are dealing with poverty have not got fertile areas to grow plants because of global warming and this also leads to scarcity

You have a good point but you need to explain your reasons and refer to the article you have read.

Best,