# data[].attributes.body
This video is showing that so countries penalizing you for having intentional or unintentional abortions and its not doing any good

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Criminalizing Abortion: Serving 30 Years For A Miscarriage | NowThis

# data[].attributes.body
The article tell how the "GOP's" attacking abortion and that it wrong"That’s the perverse logic behind the latest attempt to destroy abortion rights. Rep. Steve King’s (R-Ia.) proposal for an abortion ban at the sixth week of pregnancy would undercut reproductive rights by blocking people from getting an abortion before many are aware they are pregnant. The drastic cut-off date would lead countless people to realize that not only are they pregnant, but Washington had already decided they will carry the pregnancy to term.

“The GOP’s obsession with banning all abortions in this country knows no end, no boundary, and no common sense,” said Sasha Bruce, senior vice president in a statement following the announcement of a hearing in the House of Representatives on November 1"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Twisted Logic Behind the GOP’s Latest Assault on Abortion Rights

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
That's the perverse logic behind the latest attempt to destroy abortion rights. Rep. Steve King's (R-Ia.) proposal for an abortion ban at the sixth week of pregnancy would undercut reproductive rights by blocking people from getting an abortion before many are aware they are pregnant.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is pro life and is saying a women right does not out way a child's because they cannot make a decision. " Any two people are equal, and any two people have equal rights. Hence, a mother has every bit as much right to live as any child. But in nearly all abortions, the woman's right to live is not an issue, because her life is not in danger."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Rights of a Woman Do Not Outweigh the Rights of a Child

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Abortion, edited by Tamara Thompson, Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http%3A%2F%2Flink.galegroup.com%2Fapps%2Fdoc%2FEJ3010946216%2FOVIC%3Fu%3Dpl2683%26sid%3DOVIC%26xid%3Da9663abe. Accessed 8 Mar. 2019. Originally published as "Fact #5: The Right to Not Be Killed Supersedes the Right to Not Be Pregnant," abortionfacts.com, 2014.

# data[].attributes.body
This image is saying that politicians should not make abortion a legal debate because it is a personal choice.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a video about pro choice and and explains society's thoughts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Abortion isn't on any woman's bucket list | Amanda Bradley | TEDxSouthBank

# data[].attributes.body
The article explains how abortion goes under gender equality and pregnancy rights. The article also explain that if abortion becomes illegal or banned/denied the women will be expected to carry the baby and care for it.

¨The US Supreme Court decision in Roe v Wade, which gave women a right to abortion (under certain conditions) is seen by many as having transformed the status of women in the USA.¨

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This article sets out the women's rights arguments that, in certain circumstances, favour abortion.

# data[].attributes.body
This article explains women's right and how it is a form of gender discrimination to ban abortion. "Laws that restrict abortion have the effect and purpose of preventing a woman from exercising any of her human rights or fundamental freedoms on a basis of equality with men.

Restricting abortion has the effect of denying women access to a procedure that may be necessary for their equal enjoyment of the right to health. Only women must live with the physical consequences of unwanted pregnancy. Some women suffer maternity-related injuries, such as hemorrhage or obstructed labor. Women are consequently exposed to health risks not experienced by men."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Safe and Legal Abortion Is a Human Right

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol) explicitly recognizes that the right to health includes access to safe and legal abortion, at a minimum, in certain circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
The article explains how the ban of abortion  after 20 weeks is wrong. "Earlier this week, the House of Representatives passed an unconsitutional bill banning abortion after 20 weeks post-fertilization (22 weeks including pre-fertilization). The New York Times said "the bill is a violation of Supreme Court precedent. The court has ruled that women have a right to an abortion until the fetus could live outside the womb, generally starting around 24 weeks of pregnancy." But states have been violating this precedent for the past two years, evidence that our constitutional reproductive rights are under real threat. "

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Severe Fetal Defects Justify Late-Term Abortion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Abortion, edited by Tamara Thompson, Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http%3A%2F%2Flink.galegroup.com%2Fapps%2Fdoc%2FEJ3010946214%2FOVIC%3Fu%3Dpl2683%26sid%3DOVIC%26xid%3D2023576e. Accessed 6 Mar. 2019. Originally published as "The Consequences of Banning Abortions After 22 Weeks," jennifermassoni.com, 21 June 2013.

# data[].attributes.body
This image shows that it is a women's choice on what she does with her body

# data[].attributes.body
Its shows how if abortion was banned how it will negatively impact the poor

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Opposing Viewpoints in Context - Results -

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
My Library: Pleasant Valley Middle School Library

# data[].attributes.body
This article stress on how ohio's abortion bill is negatively affecting society "Now legislators in one state want Mr. Trump's cruel vision to become reality. Ohio lawmakers have proposed legislation to ban all abortions, period, with no exceptions for victims of rape or incest or to save a woman's life.

Carrying to term a pregnancy against one's will is punishment enough -- in fact, it can amount to torture, according to the United Nations Human Rights Council. But the Ohio bill would not only cut off access to the procedure, it would also open the door to criminal charges against both abortion providers and women seeking the procedure. One of the Republican co-sponsors of the legislation, State Representative Ron Hood, said it would be up to prosecutors to decide whether to charge a woman or a doctor, and what those charges would be. But they could be severe. Under the bill, an ''unborn human'' would be considered a person under state criminal homicide statutes. Thus, a prosecutor could decide to charge a woman who ended a pregnancy with murder. In Ohio, murder is punishable by life in prison or the death penalty."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Bills like the Ohio total abortion ban seem outrageous, because they are. But if there's any lesson to learn from them, it's that the Republican anti-abortion strategy doesn't stop with one extreme bill.

# data[].attributes.body
This shows people has different opinions about abortion

# data[].attributes.body
This shows that most people who are pro-life are men