# data[].attributes.headline
Describe the European attitudes towards Africa (make sure to include info from all 4 sources)

# data[].attributes.subject
Describe the European attitudes towards Africa (make sure to include info from all 4 sources)

# data[].attributes.body
The European thought of Africa similar to how a farmer would think of a duck that lays gold eggs. The Europeans thought of Africa as a way to get riches, fame (nationalism), and resources. Many countries partake in conquering as much of Africa as possible to bolster their political power and also to get resources. They hunted the animals in Africa to get precious materials such as ivory from elephant tusks. They set up markets to make more money. They thought of the people in Africa as savage and unchristian. They saw them as people that needed to civilized and controlled by rifles and most poetically the Maxim Gun.

# data[].attributes.body
I analyzed the first cartoon being the "spheres of influence in China." The First thing that I saw was that their were leaders of many European countries and also the leader of Japan siting around the circle with the words China.
Second I noticed that the Chinese guy behind them looks shocked and definitely not happy.
Third I noticed that Queen Victoria and the German leader look at each other angrily and seem to competing over China and more importantly colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Many European countries setup up spheres of influence in Foreign countries such as China through gathering power, influencing the Chinese dynasty, and winning key battles. They took control of territories inside of these Nations and used them to gather resources and gold. However, the main form of wealth came form controlling trading ports which they used to make a lot of money. Some people in China were angry at what was happening in China and decided to rebel against the Foreign conquerors These people were known as "The Boxers" and they brutally killed and slaughtered any foreigners and some Chinese people that supported these foreigners. They went from city to city ravaging them until a coalition was formed between many European countries including Britain, Germany, France, Russia, and the USA that stopped these boxers and punished/executed those that they captured. They then forced the Chinese Dynasty to pay 300 million dollars and took over more land.

# data[].attributes.headline
Does Germany Need Colonies? Explain how this author makes the case for German Nationalism.

# data[].attributes.subject
Does Germany Need Colonies? Explain how this author makes the case for German Nationalism.

# data[].attributes.body
The author makes the case for German nationalism by giving us many of the problems and issues of the German empire and telling us how getting colonies would fix many of the problems Germany faces. Getting these colonies would also increase the German morale and sprit. He talks about how these colonies would make Germany the greatest and superior which is a nationalistic belief. He gives us an expert opinion coming from a French economist on why colonies would make Germany the greatest and he also gives us an example of why colonies and nationalism is good through the form of Great Britain. He gives us the idea that German Nationalism would help Germany become a world power placing it in a "newly won position of power."

# data[].attributes.body
Political reason of imperialism mainly had to do with power. European nations wanted to get power from other places in the world so that they could develop empires. The used the lands they conquered for military purposes. Another reason was nationalism in which countries would want to take control of many foreign lands so that they could make their nation (empire) appear to superior and one of the great powers of Europe.

# data[].attributes.headline
Why is the name "The Scramble for Africa" fitting?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why is the name "The Scramble for Africa" fitting?

# data[].attributes.body
The name "The Scramble for Africa" is fitting because many European nations "scrambled" to exploit and take control of many parts of Africa. It was similar to a race as many of these powerful nations conquered as much land of Africa as possible. Notably, countries like Britain conquered huge amounts of Africa to use it as a political spirit booster, a source for resources, and a money maker.

# data[].attributes.body
Thing that stands out to me the most is the facial expressions between the German leader and Queen Victoria. I like how much details is in the cartoon as it allows us to infer about the rivalry between he two main powers of Europe at the time being Britain and Germany.

# data[].attributes.headline
Using the images explain what type of message European powers and the Chinese dynasty wished to send to dissenters?

# data[].attributes.subject
Using the images explain what type of message European powers and the Chinese dynasty wished to send to dissenters?

# data[].attributes.body
Using the images, the European power and the Chinese dynasty wished to send to the dissenters the message of stop rebelling and to submit to the European powers. This is clear as they executed the dissenters through beheading sending the strong sign of "stop rebelling we are in control."

# data[].attributes.headline
German Nationalism Primary Source Annotations: Give 3 examples from the text that support the author's claims 

# data[].attributes.subject
German Nationalism Primary Source Annotations: Give 3 examples from the text that support the author's claims 

# data[].attributes.body
The first example from the text that supports the author's claims is the opinion of a French economist, Leroy Beaulieu, who stated that "That nation is the greatest in the world which colonizes the most..."

The second example from the text that supports the author's claims is this statement about how Britain's colonies give her power: "But anyone who looks at the globe notes the steadily colonial possessions...dominant position in the overseas territory."

The third example from the text that supports the author's claims is the statement that further shows how much power colonies and nationalism/spirit gives England: "The fact is that England tenaciously holds...striking proof of the solid power and cultural fiber of England."

# data[].attributes.body
There were many economic reasons for taking these new lands. The most prominent reason is to get natural resources such as oil and gold. Some of these resources were used to power factories while others (gold) were important as a way to become wealthy. Nations developed markets in these new lands which allowed them to make even more money. In fewer words, Nations wanted to make money off these lands.

# data[].attributes.headline
Supporting Question: In what ways was Africa exploited?

# data[].attributes.subject
Supporting Question: In what ways was Africa exploited?

# data[].attributes.body
Africa was exploited in many ways. Africa was cut into boxes and shapes that European countries would take over. They took their land and conquered it by using their gun powers. They took resources from Africa and hunter their animals for resources such as Ivory. They set up markets to profit of the people in Africa. They grew cash crops in Africa to make more money and gain more resources. Also, before they setup up a slave trade in Africa that was extremely cruel. In all, Africa was exploited for resources, money, and pride.

# data[].attributes.headline
Does this cartoon promote social, political, or economic goals and how do you know?

# data[].attributes.subject
Does this cartoon promote social, political, or economic goals and how do you know?

# data[].attributes.body
This cartoon promotes political/economic goals as it clearly makes the Chinese nation look weak and savage as the Chinese person is depicted looking crazy with his long fingernails and his facial expression. It makes the European leaders look prominent and distinguished. However, there is also a underlying message that the artist might be trying to send. As we can see, the German and Britain leader seem to have a fierce rivalry based on their facial expressions. So the author may be trying to send a message that the European powers are "scrambling" for spheres of influence. So this cartoon could also be illustrated imperialism in a negative and greedy way.

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism is definitely dangerous. It can be helpful in many cases but only usually for the more powerful nation. Nationalism can lead to more conflicts and can also lead to colonization. It leads to weaker and smaller nations being conquered by stronger and nationalistic nations. These weaker nations suffer as their resources, land, and power will be drained slowly be more powerful countries. Also, nationalism can lead to wars as countries believe that they are superior to each other which will lead to conflict. An example of a famous war that had nationalism as one of its causes was the Great War.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the social reasons of imperialism was to spread Christianity throughout the lands that were conquered. Another of the social reasons of imperialism was to spread European civilization, ideas, and technology to the people whom they thought were uncivilized and brutes. From these reasons and more, two new ideas arrived being Social Darwinism and White Man's Burden.

# data[].attributes.body
Imperialism is where more powerful and technologically advance nations take over/spread their influence and power to weaker nations in foreign lands for multiple reasons ranging from politics, power, resources, nationalism, religion, and importantly wealth.

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism is an idea/concept that involves people of a certain country believing their country to be most superior and great nation. It is where you believe that your home country is the most powerful, the greatest, etc. This is one of the reasons why countries partaked in imperialism. They wanted their nations to become empires.

# data[].attributes.body
White Man's Burden is the belief that European civilized people being the more advance and civilized people had the "burden" to civilize/educate/spread Christianity to the "savages" that they conquered. This served as a justification to Imperialism.

# data[].attributes.body
Social Darwinism is the belief that stronger and powerful people/nations should rightly be able to take control of weaker people/nations. It gave of a "survival of the fittest" feeling which in turn gave off the belief that its only right that the strongest should rule. This also served as a justification to imperialism.

# data[].attributes.headline
Supporting Question: Are European goals harmless?

# data[].attributes.subject
Supporting Question: Are European goals harmless?

# data[].attributes.body
European goals are far from harmless. In the end of the day, the main goal of these European nations was to benefit themselves. They took natural resources away from the people that originally owned them. They forced ideals on people who may not have approved of them such as Christianity. Importantly, they basically took over the land of the Indigenous people. Many of these European goals also labeled these indigenous people as brutes and savages. These goals took resources, forced ideals, insulted them, took away much of their power, and conquered the indigenous people making these goals far from harmless.

# data[].attributes.headline
Supporting Question: Were the Boxers justified in their revolt?

# data[].attributes.subject
Supporting Question: Were the Boxers justified in their revolt?

# data[].attributes.body
The Boxers were slightly justified and unjustified in their revolt as their country was indeed being taken over by foreign powers. Their country's power was slowly diminishing and their revolt could have helped protect the country's power. However, they were indeed brutal with their methods and were not peaceful at all. Their revolt was not a good idea in which the countries that their were revolting against were much more powerful. Basically, their revolt really did not change much and actually caused more bloodshed and put their nation in more difficult situation than before. So that is why their revolt is slightly unjustified.

# data[].attributes.body
The Age of imperialism definitely deserves a bad rap. It was a time of exploitation of indigenous people and the mistreatment of their lands and resources. It should not have a good reputation as it would glorify the mistreatment of people and the conquering of land. The age of imperialism gave rise to competition and conflicts amongst powerful nations and suffering amongst weaker and exploited nations. Resources were taken from the people who rightly own them. Animals were hunted for greed and wealth. Land were taken from the inhabitants that lived on it. People were conquered using weapons such as the maxim gun. Opposition was brutally suppressed. Exploitation for greed was commonly practiced. As you can see, the things that are listed above are enough to prove why Age of Imperialism deserve a bad rap. Therefore, the age of imperialism should not be glorified and instead should have a bad rep.