# data[].attributes.body
Worldview: The spanning relations among certain countries shall be strengthened and reinforced through the cooperation of the UN and other global peace leaders. This, in term, will allow the world to provide a beneficial service to not only themselves, but as well as their neighboring countries and allies who demand support.
Beliefs: We must work together to address global issues / Wealthier countries will assist impoverished ones / 1 country does no have the right to own the rest of the world / We must share decision making and leadership with the community of nations.
Policies: Issue war and other military action through the UN / Increase support for international agreements / Pursue terrorists through the UN / Spearhead international efforts to establish regulations to protect developing economies / Work with others to achieve a globally sustainable balance of development and environmental preservation.
Arguments for:
-Gives more power and authority international organizations does not make countries powerless
Arguments against:
-handing power to individual organizations can lead to negative international influences, such as a world power becoming greedy with a lack of advantageous opportunities. Thus leading to a country that takes advantage of those who are smaller and less able to achieve economic greatness.

# data[].attributes.headline
Future 1: The Lead the World to Democracy 

# data[].attributes.subject
Future 1: The Lead the World to Democracy 

# data[].attributes.body
Worldview:  The way this lead America is by promoting special responsibility to protect the United States of America and the rest of the people on the world. The world is not happy with choice because they have there own freedom and they shouldn't be over watch unless necessary.
Beliefs: The way people had viewed the lead in to democracy is to promote and protect the U.S. We should not be afraid to use military to keep troublemakers in check
Policy: To use whatever means necessary to transform authoritarian ones. promote U.S culture and values abroad.. Eliminate obstructive government polices related to the environment.
Arguments for/Against: If we wait in the world to take action we will see a lot of bullies in this world and them it will be to late to take action. The U.S takes action before things happen because the U.S helps keep everyone inline and safe. But you cant enforce other country's to establish democracies. But you can keep people in line and safe.

# data[].attributes.body
Worldview:  The future of America rests in the protection of our global interests... Why we believe this is the path America should take... Peace is always first priority; however, if we are threatened we must be able to defend ourselves.
Beliefs:  The nation wants to protecting the economic and security interests worldwide is more important than promoting lofty ideals. The United States , like most other countries, benefits from stability.
Policies:  build the alliances with other countries to protect our interests and security abroad. Pursue "green" technologies and products, but also require other nations to protect the environment so that we do not lose our competitive edge.
Arguments for:
By keeping human right issue from interfering with our business interest, the United States will gain new markets for our products and inexpensive manufactured goods critical to our economic prosperity.
Argument Against
An interventionist U.S. foreign policy distracts politicians from the issue that they should focus on here at home.

# data[].attributes.body
Worldview: A nation should protect U.S. citizens and make our country the number one priority.
Beliefs: The nation should set their priorities straight and focus on our countries problems and threats. Protect U.S. citizens from harm.
Policies: Redesign our armed forces to focus on defending North America and build up our intelligence capacity. Stay out of conflicts that do not concern us directly. To protect U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition and U.S. jobs from cheap foreign labor. Also, reduce our dependence  on foreign oil by encouraging U.S. oil companies to invest at home and by promoting alternative sources of energy at home.
Arguments for:
-  Giving up top priority to our domestic problems, we will be in a much more better position to serve as a model for other countries.
-  By not interfering in other parts of the world where our presence may not be welcome.
- Mind own business
Arguments against:
-  We cannot afford to abandon our commitment