# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of 0.5306605117 and a dispersion measure of 20.283. Which is fairly low compared to others. I think there was a RFI just because of how low my DM was. Also if you look at the DM x^2 graph it peaks at zero which is a strong indicator of RFI.

# data[].attributes.body
I adopted Pulsar J0358+5413. It has a right ascension of three hours, fifty-eight minutes, and fifty four seconds with a declination of fifty-four degrees, thirteen minutes, and thirteen point seven hundred and twenty-seven seconds. It has a period of 0.1563824178 seconds, and is part of a binary star system with a mean flux density of 23. The epoch is 54096 MJD, the barycentric frequency is 6.3945110925 Hz, and the best estimate distance based on YMW16 DM is 1 kpc.
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/idlinks/27015.htm

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of 2.896 milliseconds.  The observed DM was 23.918 pc/cm^3.  I believe there may have been a significant amount of interference, because the pulses on the Integrated Pulse Profile are quite difficult to distinguish.  Perhaps more integration time would have resolved this problem.  I searched the 20 meter data, and I did not find anyone else who had observed J2017-0603. Here is the link to my data: http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/idlinks/27258.htm

# data[].attributes.body
I'm going to re-do my pulsar reading because it didn't recognize my pulsar name, interestingly enough

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of 358.72 milliseconds, and the dispersion measure was 157.615. My observation seemed to sustain a fair amount of radio frequency interference, as my pulses were distinguishable but not smooth. I looked through 25 of the archive pages and did not find my pulsar among them. As a comparison, I used the ATNF catalog to compare my results with the literature results, and found that my DM values were 1 DM less than the catalog’s. Because I only captured two main pulses, I think that more integration time would help me see the pulse pattern on a larger scale, thus making analysis easier.

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of

1.004 seconds, and the dispersion measure observed was 76.711. The integrated pulse profiles seem decent; since I followed the instructions for the integration time, I believe RFI had most to do with my pulses being hard to distinguish. I was unable to find any other searches of my pulsar - besides my first few failures.
Edit: It looks like there was a lot of RFI; the DM peaks at zero and the sub-band plot has a horizontal line.
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/peak/PSR_J1721-1936/Skynet_57837_psr_j1721-1936_27260_27618_psr.jpg

# data[].attributes.body
Period: 1.5252656 ms
Dispersion measure: 70.86
My pulse profiles are really good! There may be some interference due to RFI, but overall I thought the integration time was good. A lot of other people have observed my adopted pulsar. The data looks similar but only with different integration times and the observed pulses are still there.
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/idlinks/27266.htm

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar's period is .23099 seconds, and the dispersion measure is 97.6. I for some reason had a lot of trouble finding my pulsar as an object with the telescope, so I used its coordinates to make my graph. I did not find anyone else who observed my pulsar due to this. I think my graphs would have looked nicer and had less noise if I had been able to find my pulsar as an object.
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/idlinks/27000.htm

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of 654.45 milliseconds and a dispersion measure of 50.025 pc/cm³.  The integrated pulse profiles look decent, although there seems to have been some interference. The interference could be the result of RFI, and I think I had a satisfactory amount of integration time. I believe that I am the only one who has observed my pulsar with the 20m.
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/idlinks/27236.htm

# data[].attributes.body
Period: 269.61 ms
Dispersion measure: 46.3
I'm still not entirely clear on how to tell if there is RFI. I'm guessing there was some (the 'two pulses of best profile' seem to have a lot of interference, is that evidence of RFI?). The high DM value seems to suggest not too much RFI.
I think I probably needed more integration time. That possibly would have made the pulses more defined (instead of having so much noise?).
My pulsar has not been observed by anyone else by the 20m.
results:
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/peak/PSR_J0335+4555/Skynet_57835_psr_j0335+4555_27235_27595_psr.jpg

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of 7494.03 milliseconds, and a dispersion measure of zero. The dispersion measure seems really wrong, but I followed all the directions, so I'm unsure why it wold be zero. I guess there is just a ton of RFI in the way of getting great data. My pulse profiles are spectacular, and I am quite proud of them. I looked to see if anyone else had observed my pulsar before and it turns out I am the only one who has used the 20m telescope to observe it. Here is my data:
http://www.gb.nrao.edu/20m/idlinks/27171.htm

# data[].attributes.body
My pulsar has a period of 16.05 milliseconds, a dispersion measure of 8.997 cm⁻³pc, and a fine-looking integrated pulse profile. Looking through the archive, I see that a bunch of people have already observed my adopted pulsar, but their integrated profiles all look differently from mine (and from each other's), so I would probably ask, "Why?" tomorrow at the web session. Since the DM was not zero, I can tell that there was not a lot of RFI in my observation.

Here is the link to my observation.