# data[].attributes.body
T: 5
E: 4
A: 5
Con: 5
Total: 19

# data[].attributes.body
T=4
E=5
A=4
Con=5
Total=18

# data[].attributes.body
T=4
E=5
A=5
Con=5
Total=19
I gave the thesis a 4 because every Policeman doesn't all get away with their wrongs, they don't always get away with something horrible they have done with to an African American.

# data[].attributes.body
T= 3
E= 3
A= 5
CON= 4
TOTAL= 15

# data[].attributes.body
T=4
E=4
A=5
CON=5
O V E R A L L=18

# data[].attributes.body
T=5
E=4
A=5
Con=5
Total=19
I think for the evidence they were repeating there selves

# data[].attributes.body
T=5
E=4
A=5
C=5
Total= 19
I believe that they could have found stronger evidence for their second quote

# data[].attributes.body
T= 5
E=4
A=4
Con=5
Overall= 18/20

# data[].attributes.body
T= 4
E= 5
A= 5
Con=

# data[].attributes.body
T=
E=
A=
Con=

# data[].attributes.body
T=5
E=4
A=4
Con=5
Total= 18/20

# data[].attributes.body
T=4
E= 4
A=5
CON=5

Total= 18

# data[].attributes.body
T= 5
E=4
A=5
C=4
Total-19

# data[].attributes.body
T= 5
E= 5
A= 5
Con: 5
Total : 20

# data[].attributes.body
T = 5
E = 4
A = 5
Con = 4
Total = 18
I believe that the evidence could've provided a little more information, perhaps more on discrimination on people of color in general to support the starting thesis/claim. I gave the conclusion a 4 because it was a tad repetitive, but if it was shortened and a little more complex it would be a 5.

# data[].attributes.body
T:4
E: 5
A: 5
Con: 5
Total: 19/20
I think they got their point across perfectly. It was very well written.

# data[].attributes.body
T=5
E=4
A=5
Con=5
Total=19/20
I graded it this way because I truly understood where the read was getting at, they explained it thoroughly with a few bumps. Like with the evidence, the writer repeated evidences and that kinda showed me maybe he or she couldn't find different reasons to support their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
T= 5
E=5
A=5
Con=4
Total= 19/20
I think  the conclusion was  missing an rather  key evidence and only setting up the conclusion not pushing their thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
T=4
E=5
A=5
CON=4
Overall=18/20

# data[].attributes.body
T=5
E=5
A=5
Con=5
Total=20
I think that whoever wrote this did a good job. The introduction is a great attention grabber. I also like how strong they came in with their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
T= 5
E=5
A=5
Con=5
Total=20 The paper was well written, there was a clear claim and multiple evidence  pieces that was pulled from the video. I also saw plenty citing of the work used in the paper.

# data[].attributes.body
T=5
E=5
A=5
Con=5
Total=20
I think she or he did a great job on getting there point across.They caught my attention and made me want to know more.They dont need to fix or add anything it was a good TeaCon.

# data[].attributes.body
T= ?
E=?
A=?
Con=?
Total= ?

Give feedback to the writer.What you liked, disliked, what should be added or taken away.