# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Imre Kertész ( Hungarian: [ˈimrɛ ˈkɛrteːs]; 9 November 1929 - 31 March 2016) was a Hungarian author and recipient of the 2002 Nobel Prize in Literature, "for writing that upholds the fragile experience of the individual against the barbaric arbitrariness of history". He was the first Hungarian to win the Nobel in Literature.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Imre Kertész was born in Budapest on November 9, 1929. Of Jewish descent, in 1944 he was deported to Auschwitz and from there to Buchenwald, where he was liberated in 1945. On his return to Hungary he worked for a Budapest newspaper, Világosság, but was dismissed in 1951 when it adopted the Communist party line. After two years of military service he began supporting himself as an independent writer and translator of German-language authors such as Nietzsche, Hofmannsthal, Schnitzler, Freud, Roth, Wittgenstein, and Canetti, who have all had a significant influence on his own writing.

Kertész's first novel, Sorstalanság (Eng. Fateless, 1992; see WLT 67:4, p. 863), a work based on his experiences in Auschwitz and Buchenwald, was published in 1975. "When I am thinking about a new novel, I always think of Auschwitz," he has said. This does not mean, however, that Sorstalanság is autobiographical in any simple sense: Kertész says himself that he has used the form of the autobiographical novel but that it is not autobiography. Sorstalanság was initially rejected for publication. When published eventually in 1975, it was received with compact silence. Kertész has written about this experience in A kudarc (1988; Fiasco). This novel is normally regarded as the second volume in a trilogy that begins with Sorstalanság and concludes with Kaddis a meg nem született gyermekért (1990; Eng. Kaddish for a Child Not Born, 1997; see WLT 74:1, p. 205), in a title that refers to the Jewish prayer for the dead. In Kaddis a meg nem született gyermekért, the protagonist of Sorstalanság and A kudarc, György Köves, reappears. His Kaddish is said for the child he refuses to beget in a world that permitted the existence of Auschwitz. Other prose works are A nyomkereső (1977; The pathfinder) and Az angol lobogó (1991; The English flag; see WLT 67:2, p. 412).

Gályanapló ( Galley diary; see WLT 67:2, p. 412), a diary in fictional form that covers the years 1961-91, was published in 1992. Valaki más: A változás krónikája (1997; I - another: Chronicle of a metamorphosis), continues this inner monologue in the form of notes made during the years 1991-95. After the political upheavals of 1989, Kertész was able to make more public appearances. His lectures and essays have been collected in A holocaust mint kultúra (1993; The holocaust as culture), A gondolatnyi csend, amíg kivegzőoztag újratölt (1998; Moments of silence while the execution squad reloads), and A száműzött nyelv (2001; The exiled language).

Imre Kertész was awarded the Brandenburger Literaturpreis in 1995, the Leipziger Buchpreis zur Europäischen Verständigung in 1997, the Herder- Preis and the WELT-Literaturpreis in 2000, the Ehrenpreis der Robert-Bosch-Stiftung in 2001, and the Hans Sahl-Preis in 2002. His works have been translated into numerous languages, including German, Spanish, French, English, Czech, Russian, Swedish, and Hebrew.
Translated by Ivan Sanders
From Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 2002, Editor Tore Frängsmyr, [Nobel Foundation], Stockholm, 2003

This autobiography/biography was written at the time of the award and later published in the book series Les Prix Nobel/ Nobel Lectures/The Nobel Prizes. The information is sometimes updated with an addendum submitted by the Laureate.
Imre Kertész died on 31 March 2016. Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 2002

To cite this page MLA style: "Imre Kertész - Biographical".
Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 7 Jun 2018. <http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2002/kertesz-bio.html>

Recommended:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Imre Kertész was born in Budapest on November 9, 1929. Of Jewish descent, in 1944 he was deported to Auschwitz and from there to Buchenwald, where he was liberated in 1945. On his return to Hungary he worked for a Budapest newspaper, Világosság, but was dismissed in 1951 when it adopted the Communist party line.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
IMRE KERTÉSZ ON SELF-IMPOSED EXILE AND WRITING

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
On April Fool's Day 2011, I was unexpectedly diagnosed with early-stage invasive breast cancer. As a freelance writer with a career I love and a family that depends on my income, I spent most of the year juggling surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation with assignments, interviews, and youth soccer schedules. Throughout, friends and colleagues seemed surprised that I remained relatively active and pretty optimistic.

What else was there to do, I wondered. Taking to my bed for the better part of a year wasn't an option for my personality or my bank account. Why not look at the bright side of early diagnosis and great prognosis and keep going? During that time, I contributed to two books, wrote dozens of articles and ended the year with a clean bill of health.

Since then, I've been more curious than ever about why some people persevere through trying circumstances while others begin flailing at the first sign of crisis. I wondered if there were commonalities among resilient people and whether it's possible to develop those qualities and strong points. The answers, according to the experts, are yes and yes. Here's what those never-say-die folks have in common-and how you can develop them for yourself.

People who bounce back tend to have a network of supportive people around them, says Michael Ungar, Ph.D., co-director of the Resilience Research Centre at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. For some people, that's a close-knit family, but for others it's a carefully cultivated group of friends, colleagues, mentors and others who actually care and are willing to help. Ungar says he's seen the tendency to seek out support sources in children as young as five years old: When the family unit isn't functioning in that way, children tend to reach out to coaches, teachers or other adults as a support network. Similarly, resilient adults seek out others who care about them who can offer emotional, professional or other assistance when times get tough.

Lorenn Walker had just left a hotel bar one night in 1976 when an unknown assailant nearly murdered her. He fled, but she was left badly injured, needing surgery on her face. Her recovery took four months. Through therapy and willfully refusing to be mired in fear and resentment, she was able to "reframe," or think about the situation in a different way. Instead of resenting the scars and the fearful memories, the Waialua, Hawaii, lawyer and counselor sees the attack as the catalyst that led her to her work in what she calls restorative justice-counseling prisoners and victims of violent crime in how to make peace with the past and cultivate meaning in their lives.

"You have the power to determine how you're going to look at a situation, and you don't give that power to other people, particularly people who are bad or who hurt you," she says.

Paul LeBuffe lectures about resilience as part of his role as director of the Devereux Center for Resilient Children, a Villanova, Pennsylvania, facility that works with educators and mental health professionals to develop more resilient children. It's not uncommon for his audience to include young people who were highly successful students, but graduated during the recession and are devastated at their inability to find jobs.

"They don't know how to cope with the fact that they didn't get the first job they applied for. So we hear a lot about these young people sitting in their parents' basements playing video games," he says.

If you don't give yourself the opportunity to fail sometimes and accept it as a part of life, you're going to struggle with bouncing back, LeBuffe says. Successfully emerging from failure develops the ability to be optimistic that things can be bad now, but they'll be okay eventually, he says.

If you get most of your self-worth from your job and you get fired, you've suddenly lost both your source of income and a big part of your identity, says Ungar. Resilient people often have a number of areas from which they get their sense of self-worth, says Ungar. They may have deep friendships or family connections, strong faith, or a leadership role in the community. They're better able to bounce back, because even if one goes away, they still have a sense of connection and being valued from those other areas, he says.

Whether it's forgiving yourself for a failure or forgiving someone else for an injury or injustice, being able to let go of past hurts and move on is an essential component of resilience, Walker says. When you find yourself "ruminating about grievances and negative stories, you have to just stop yourself and remind yourself of what you have to be grateful for," she says. If you're not a naturally forgiving person, this takes practice, but it is a skill that can be mastered, she adds.

LeBuffe says resilient people have a sense of purpose that helps them analyze their situations and plot the next moves. This stems from a set of values that is unique to each individual. When you know what's important to you, whether it's family, faith, money, career, or something else, you can prioritize what needs your attention most immediately to help you get back to where you want to be. That goes for organizations, as well. When everyone knows the ultimate goal, they can make meaningful contributions. When they don't, they're mired in indecision.

"If the people who work in a company don't know the values, they're paralyzed. They have to keep coming back to senior management to say, 'What about going after this market?' or 'What do you think about extending credit another 30 days?' instead of being able to act adaptively," he says. "It's the same for people. You have to know what's important to you to be able to take action."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
On April Fool's Day 2011, I was unexpectedly diagnosed with early-stage invasive breast cancer. As a freelance writer with a career I love and a family that depends on my income, I spent most of the year juggling surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation with assignments, interviews, and youth soccer schedules.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
While people vary dramatically in the coping skills they use when confronting a crisis, researchers have identified some key characteristics of resilience. Many of these skills can be developed and strengthened, which can improve your ability to deal with life's setbacks.

Resilient people are aware of situations, their own emotional reactions and the behavior of those around them.

In order to manage feelings, it is essential to understand what is causing them and why. By remaining aware, resilient people can maintain control of a situation and think of new ways to tackle problems.

Another characteristic of resilience is the understanding that life is full of challenges. While we cannot avoid many of these problems, we can remain open, flexible, and willing to adapt to change.

Here are some other characteristics of people who have strong coping skills.

A Sense of Control

Do you perceive yourself as having control over your own life? Or do you blame outside sources for failures and problems? Generally, resilient people tend to have what psychologists call an internal locus of control. They believe that the actions they take will affect the outcome of an event. Of course, some factors are simply outside of our personal control, such as natural disasters. While we may be able to put some blame on external causes, it is important to feel as if we have the power to make choices that will affect our situation, our ability to cope, and our future.

Strong Problem-Solving Skills

Problem-solving skills are essential. When a crisis emerges, resilient people are able to spot the solution that will lead to a safe outcome. In danger situations, people sometimes develop tunnel vision. They fail to note important details or take advantages of opportunities.

Resilient individuals, on the other hand, are able to calmly and rationally look and the problem and envision a successful solution.

Strong Social Connections

Whenever you're dealing with a problem, it is important to have people who can offer support. Talking about the challenges you are facing can be an excellent way to gain perspective, look for new solutions, or simply express your emotions. Friends, family members, co-workers, and online support groups can all be potential sources of social connectivity.

Identifying as a Survivor, Not a Victim

When dealing with any potential crisis, it is essential to view yourself as a survivor. Avoid thinking like a victim of circumstance and instead look for ways to resolve the problem. While the situation may be unavoidable, you can still stay focused on a positive outcome.

Being Able to Ask for Help

While being resourceful is an important part of resilience, it is also essential to know when to ask for help. During a crisis, people can benefit from the help of psychologists and counselors specially trained to deal with crisis situations. Other potential sources of assistance include:

Books - Reading about people who have experienced and overcome a similar problem can be both motivating and good for ideas on how to cope.

Online Message Boards - Online communities can provide continual support and a place to talk about issues with people who have been in a similar situation.

Support Groups - Attending support group meetings is a great way to talk about the challenges you're facing and find a network of people who can provide compassion and support.

Psychotherapy - If you are having trouble coping with a crisis situation, consulting a qualified mental health professional can help you confront the problem, identify your strengths, and develop new coping skills.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
While people vary dramatically in the coping skills they use when confronting a crisis, researchers have identified some key characteristics of resilience. Many of these skills can be developed and strengthened, which can improve your ability to deal with life's setbacks. Resilient people are aware of situations, their own emotional reactions and the behavior of those around them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The following questions and answers do not provide an exhaustive history of the Holocaust in Hungary. Rather, they address several salient issues often presented as "controversial." In fact, the answers are fully supported by ample contemporary documentation from the period.

The Museum has also published two leading publications that speak to these and other issues: The Geographical Encyclopedia of the Holocaust in Hungary, edited by Randolph L. Braham, and The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
1. What were the major events and turning points of 19th and 20th century Hungarian history that provide the context for understanding what happened in Hungary during the Holocaust? 2. Was antisemitism present in Hungary before the German occupation of the country in March 1944? 3. Did Hungary implement any official antisemitic policies before German forces occupied the country in March 1944?
4. Were Hungarian authorities involved in the mass murder of Jews before the German occupation of Hungary in March 1944?

5. Did Nazi Germany play a role in Hungary's antisemitic policies before the German occupation?

6. What was the Hungarian labor service? What was the fate of Jewish labor servicemen?

7. What role did Hungarian authorities play in the ghettoization and deportation of the Jews?

8. How aware was Hungary's leadership of German extermination policies toward the Jews?

9. What responsibility did Miklós Horthy bear in the deportation of Hungarian Jews? What decisions did he make?
10. What degree of continuity of cadres existed between Hungary's pre- and post-German occupation governments and public administration? 1. What were the major events and turning points of 19th and 20th century Hungarian history that provide the context for understanding what happened in Hungary during the Holocaust?

1848-49 Anti-Habsburg Revolution: Hungary failed to gain its independence from the Habsburg Empire despite a year-and-a-half-long armed conflict against the empire's Austrian rulers and against Russian forces brought in to put down the rebellion.

1867 Creation of the Austro-Hungarian Dual Monarchy: The Habsburgs, weakened after the military was defeated by the Prussians in 1866, were forced to reach a compromise with the Hungarian political elite, providing broad autonomy, with the exception of foreign and military affairs, to the Hungarian half of the country.

1918-1920 Collapse of Austria-Hungary: Following defeat in World War I, Habsburg rule ended and the Austro-Hungarian monarchy disintegrated. Through the Trianon Peace Treaty, Hungary lost two-thirds of its prewar territory and more than half of its population to neighboring successor states, principally to Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. After a short-lived communist dictatorship in 1919, an autocratic, right-wing political regime was established by Miklós Horthy, who maintained the position of head of state (regent) until October 1944.

1938-1941 Territorial Expansion of Hungary: Aligning itself with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, Hungary regained portions of the territories lost after World War I, participating in the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia (1938 and 1939), Romania (1940), and Yugoslavia (1941).

1939-1945 World War II: Hungary joined the Nazi-led Anti-Comintern Pact (1939) and Tripartite Pact (alliance) of Germany, Italy, and Japan (1940). In June 1941, the Hungarian army participated in the Axis invasion of the USSR. With the assent of Hungarian chief of state Regent Miklós Horthy, German forces occupied Hungary unopposed in March 1944. Despite massive military losses, Hungary continued to fight as part of the Axis, leading to total military defeat and occupation of the country by the Red Army.

1945-49 Communist Takeover: The communist takeover of Hungary and suppression of all opposition forces was completed.

1956 Revolution: An anti-communist uprising and attempt to remove Hungary from the Warsaw Pact was crushed by Soviet troops.

1989-1990 End of Communist Dictatorship: After the fall of communism, a multiparty parliamentary democracy was established.

2. Was antisemitism present in Hungary before the German occupation of the country in March 1944? Yes. Like many of the countries in Eastern and Central Europe, Hungary had a long tradition of antisemitism, which was present not only in public discourse and political life but also among cultural elites and on the street. Hundreds of antisemitic pogroms, massacres, atrocities, and assaults occurred in Hungary during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Tens of thousands of civilians participated in antisemitic actions in at least 30 cities during the 1848-49 Hungarian revolution against the Habsburgs and Russia. Although the era of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (1867-1918) was a time of major change, as the country's post-feudal system was transformed-with significant involvement from the Jewish population-into a modern, capitalist economy, the process produced many beneficiaries and many losers, resulting in increased social tensions. Large groups directed their frustration and anxiety toward the Jews. Antisemitic violence erupted in the early 1880s and flooded the country in the wake of the 1882-83 Tiszaeszlár "blood libel" case, in which Jews were falsely accused of the ritual murder of a Christian girl. Jews and their property were attacked by mobs in over 200 cities and villages. The riots were beyond the capacity of some counties' police forces to control, and martial law had to be introduced, bringing in the army to stop the violence. The surge of anti-Jewish passion led to the establishment of the National Antisemitic Party in 1883, which succeeded in gaining 17 seats in Parliament during the 1884 elections. This party was soon marginalized, however, and lost its place in the legislature.

Political antisemitism increased further at the beginning of the 20th century, stimulated by the integrated impact of anti-capitalist frustration, xenophobic hatred, religious anti-Judaism, and superstition. By 1918, the "Jewish question" had become one of the most hotly debated issues in the country. Due to wartime shortages and famine, riots erupted and turned into antisemitic pogroms. Law and order evaporated with the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy in the fall of 1918, and locals again attacked their Jewish neighbors in the countryside. During the short-lived communist dictatorship in 1919, Hungary's new Bolshevik authorities-including many functionaries of Jewish origin-persecuted people they considered capitalists, Jews and non-Jews alike. The fall of the communist regime after a few months and the foundation of Miklós Horthy's right-wing autocratic regime resulted in a new wave of violence under the pretext of avenging the period of "Jewish" Bolshevik rule. Horthy's paramilitary units killed Jews by the hundreds. Murders, lynchings, pogroms, and torture occurred at dozens of locations and were in many cases initiated by the local population.

Many influential, far-right, antisemitic organizations and paramilitary formations were formed, with the elite of the new regime among their ranks. One of them, the Association of Awakening Hungarians, demanded the expulsion of all European Jews from the continent as early as November 1919, 13 years before the Nazi rise to power in Germany. Antisemitism became the ideological cornerstone of the Horthy system. At the same time, the consolidation of the regime's power required an end to the violence, and steps were taken to dissolve paramilitary units. Anti-Jewish aggression did not vanish completely, however. Beating up Jewish students remained a ritual of university fraternities throughout the 1920s and 1930s.

For more information, please see Document 2-1 (PDF) and Document 2-5 (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
3. Did Hungary implement any official antisemitic policies before German forces occupied the country in March 1944? Yes, Hungary passed one of the first antisemitic laws in Europe in 1920 and issued nearly 300 anti-Jewish laws and decrees before the March 1944 German occupation.
"Concerning the Jewish question, for all my life, I have been an antisemite, I have never made any contact with Jews. I have found it intolerable that here, in Hungary, every single factory, bank, asset, shop, theater, newspaper, trade, etc., is in Jewish hands." With these words, Regent Miklós Horthy described his own prejudice in 1940 in a letter to then-Prime Minister Pál Teleki. It is not surprising, therefore, that shortly after Horthy came to power, Hungary enacted the so-called Numerus Clausus Act of 1920, which restricted the number of Jews who could be admitted to higher education and effectively ended legal equality of Jews in Hungary. As a result of the act, the number of Jewish students in Hungarian institutions fell from over 30 percent to under 8 percent. This discriminatory measure was modified somewhat in 1928 due to international pressure, but it was never revoked.

The increasingly antisemitic international political environment and the gradual radicalization of Hungarian internal politics in the 1930s resulted in the enactment of a systematic series of anti-Jewish laws. The Hungarian Parliament passed 22 antisemitic laws between May 1938 and the German occupation in early 1944. Some of these laws were explicitly discriminatory against Jews, while others did not specifically mention Jews but had the greatest discriminatory impact on the Jewish community. An additional 267 anti-Jewish ministerial and governmental decrees were issued during the same period. These decrees severely restricted the number of Jews permitted to occupy intellectual posts, serve in various free professions, and hold state-sponsored jobs. Jews were excluded from municipal bodies, and many were deprived of the right to vote. Marriages and sexual relationships between Jews and Gentiles were banned. Jewish agricultural real estate was targeted for confiscation. Jews were excluded from service in the army but were forced to perform unarmed military labor service instead. The number of jobs lost by Jews by 1943 is estimated to have been between 40,000 and 90,000.

The so-called "Second Jewish Law," passed by Parliament in 1939, placed law-making power concerning Jewish emigration in the hands of the government instead of Parliament and declared an official policy of forced Jewish emigration. During a meeting between Hungarian Prime Minister Pál Teleki (1939-1941) and Adolf Hitler in November 1940, Teleki was the one who actually advocated for the necessity of expulsion of all Jews from Europe.

In implementing the anti-Jewish laws, there were many instances in which overzealous local authorities took measures that exceeded even the harsh provisions of the laws themselves, exceeding the government's expectations. Jews were banned from local spas, markets, or the centralized food distribution system in many localities. While some decrees were annulled by the government, the local authorities' enthusiasm and antisemitic activism foreshadowed the efficiency of the deportation campaign of 1944.

For more information, please see Document 1-2 (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
4. Were Hungarian authorities involved in the mass murder of Jews before the German occupation of Hungary in March 1944? Yes, Hungarian authorities murdered Jews on several occasions before the German occupation. More than 20,000 Jews were deported to German-occupied Ukraine by Hungarian authorities in the summer of 1941, with full knowledge of the fate that awaited them. In January 1942, nearly 1,000 Jews were murdered by the Hungarian military and gendarmerie in Újvidék (currently Novi Sad, Serbia) and its vicinity. Many Jews were also killed in the labor service by Hungarian army personnel.
In June 1941, Hungary joined Nazi Germany's military attack against the Soviet Union. Leaders of the army and public administration in Subcarpathia, which Hungary had annexed in 1939 when Germany dismantled Czechoslovakia, recommended that Jews of "unsettled citizenship" (mainly Jewish refugees from Poland and the Soviet Union) be pushed across the border into Ukraine. The Hungarian government approved the plan in early July. There is no documentary evidence of Regent Horthy's direct involvement in this decision, but it is highly unlikely that an action of this magnitude would have been launched without his approval. About 22,000 Jews were rounded up by Hungarian authorities and deported in July-August 1941. Most of the Jews were refugees, but many Hungarian citizens were also dragged from their homes and sent off. Approximately 100-120 Jewish communities were impacted by these draconian measures; in some villages on the eastern border, every single member of the local Jewish community was rounded up.

The deportees were transported across the border and simply abandoned there. Many were killed by local Ukrainians. Most of the deportees ended up in Kamenets-Podolski, where German and Ukrainian units massacred them, along with local Jews, on August 27-30. More than 23,000 people were murdered in total in this single action, making the Kamenets-Podolski execution the first mass killing operation of over 10,000 victims in the Holocaust. Jews who managed to avoid the Kamenets-Podolski massacre were herded into ghettos in Nadvorna, Kolomea, and Stanislavov, where they shared the fate of local Jews: mass execution or deportation by the Germans to the Belzec death camp. The Hungarian government halted these early mass transports in mid-August, due to objections by opposition voices in Parliament and in response to pressure by the Germans who saw the uncontrolled influx of Jews from Hungary into a recently occupied military zone as a security threat. Small-scale deportations actually continued until October 1942. Just 2,000-3,000 Jews managed to escape these early deportations and return to Hungary, many of them smuggled into the country by local non-Jews or individual members of the Hungarian army.

In the southern region of Hungary annexed after the Axis attack on and dismantlement of Yugoslavia, Hungarian military and gendarmerie units, under the pretext of anti-partisan warfare, massacred more than 3,000 men, women, and children on January 21-23, 1942, in the city of Újvidék (today: Novi Sad, Serbia). The victims were predominantly Serbs, but approximately 700 Jews were also murdered. The Hungarian government did not investigate the bloodbath until Horthy and his circle initiated preliminary peace feelers with the western Allies without the knowledge of Nazi Germany. Striving to improve Hungary's international reputation, Regent Horthy, after having stopped the investigation, allowed it to go forward in October 1943, following a series of decisive military losses by the Axis on the Eastern Front. Guilty verdicts were delivered in January 1944, but the four main perpetrators had fled to Germany to escape responsibility. They returned to Hungary as high-ranking SS officers following the German occupation. Defendants who remained in Hungary after the war were sentenced to 10-15 years of prison.

For more information, please see Document 2-5 (PDF) and Document 2-8 (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
5. Did Nazi Germany play a role in Hungary's antisemitic policies before the German occupation? The direct role of Germany in Hungarian antisemitic policy was insignificant. For a long time, Nazi Germany did not exert any sort of pressure on Hungary to enact anti-Jewish laws. Hungarian antisemitic legislation was an organic, essentially Hungarian development. Nazi officials even opposed Hungarian deportation plans until 1943. The situation changed in 1943, however. As Germany increased its pressure on Hungary to deport its Jewish population to Auschwitz, Horthy and his circle were seeking ways to enter into negotiations for a separate peace with the western Allies and leave their alliance with Germany. Horthy tried to avoid deporting Hungary's remaining Jewish population because he was well aware that doing so would hinder his chances of achieving a separate peace.
Hungary's anti-Jewish laws and decrees were deeply rooted in the antisemitic traditions of Hungary and the Christian nationalist, authoritarian ideology of the Horthy system. The Numerus Clausus Act of 1920 was introduced many years before the National Socialist rise to power in Germany. Hungary's antisemitic legislation was an expression of the political elite's own social and political agenda, albeit influenced by the rise of Hitler's Germany and, eventually, by rivalry among Hitler's allied states. German officials actually refused Hungarian deportation initiatives until 1943. High-ranking Hungarian military officials proposed deporting 100,000 Jews in 1942, but the Germans backed away from the plan for logistical reasons.

By 1943, however, Germany was applying increasing pressure on the Hungarian government to ghettoize and then deport its Jewish population. Prime Minister Miklós Kállay (1942-44), supported by the Regent, consistently resisted these German efforts. With Hitler's military defeat seeming ever more likely, and growing awareness that deportation was the equivalent of a death sentence, Horthy and his advisors realized that the deportation of Hungarian Jewry could stymie their effort to contact the Western powers. As a result, Hungary's Jews found themselves in a unique situation. While millions of Jews across Europe were being shot to death or gassed, most Hungarian Jews, though living under harsh daily conditions, did not feel that their lives were in danger. The situation of the labor servicemen, of course, was different, and the atrocities committed by Hungarian authorities in July-August 1941 and January 1942 had already claimed a significant number of Jewish victims.

Although Horthy and his government refused to deport the country's Jews in 1943, the Horthy regime's official propaganda assumed an even harsher antisemitic tone, and the Parliament enacted additional anti-Jewish laws. These developments were rooted in the political elite's own anti-Jewish sentiments and agenda but were also intended to demonstrate to Berlin that the Hungarian government's antisemitic fervor was not subsiding. While the government did not hand over the Hungarian Jews resident in Hungary before the German occupation, it did abandon Hungarian Jews living abroad, blocking their return to the safety of Hungary and leaving them at the mercy of German authorities in Nazi-occupied territories. Return from abroad was permitted only to a narrow group of artists, professionals, businessmen, and their relatives. The government did its best to keep Hungarian Jews living abroad out of the country, which in essence constituted a death sentence for a significant number of men, women and children, and it made every effort to confiscate their property.

For more information, please see Document 2-16 (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
6. What was the Hungarian labor service? What was the fate of Jewish labor servicemen? The labor service was a specific form of Hungarian military duty during World War II. The right-wing nationalist Hungarian state led by Miklós Horthy considered certain minority groups politically unreliable. As war grew more imminent, Hungary, which had already aligned itself with Hitler's Germany and participated in the dismantlement of the territorial settlements reached at the end of World War I, eliminated Jews and other "unreliable elements" from armed military units but forced them to perform unarmed service for the army. The majority of the labor servicemen were Jewish, with conscription for other targeted groups only selectively implemented. Before Germany's occupation of Hungary in March 1944, at least 25,000 Jewish labor servicemen had been killed on the Eastern Front, many by the Hungarian military. At the end of 1944 and early 1945, thousands of surviving Jewish labor servicemen were deported to Germany, where many met their deaths.
The labor service system was introduced in 1939. By law, all Hungarian citizens over the age of 21 deemed unfit for armed service were susceptible to recruitment for labor service. As a result of the political radicalization that took place following Hungary's re-annexations of territories lost in World War I and early Axis military victories, the labor service became an expressly antisemitic institution by 1941, based on collective stigmatization and racial discrimination.

Tens of thousands of labor servicemen were forced to accompany the Hungarian army to the front following the Axis attack on the Soviet Union, and approximately 100,000 men, mostly Jews, had been drafted into labor service units by 1942. Between 25,000 and 40,000 Jewish labor servicemen perished before the German occupation of Hungary-during military action at the front, in Soviet captivity, due to harsh living conditions, and as a result of the brutality with which they were treated by Hungarian guards and officers. Jewish labor servicemen in many units were deprived of food and proper clothing during extraordinarily harsh winters and were the targets of blackmail, robbery, torture, and murder. The Hungarian military occasionally cleared minefields by herding labor servicemen through the danger zones. In April 1943, near the Ukrainian village of Doroshich, Hungarian soldiers set fire to the barracks of labor servicemen ill with typhoid fever and machine-gunned anyone who tried to escape. Approximately 400 people were killed in this single incident.

Paradoxically, labor service offered an avenue for survival between July and October 1944. Despite the otherwise enthusiastic collaboration of the Hungarian state apparatus in the mass deportation of Hungarian Jewry in mid-1944, the Ministry of Defense protected the labor servicemen during this period mainly because of their need for manpower to perform war-related tasks. Following this relatively safe period, however, the lives of the labor servicemen were again at risk. After the German-supported coup of the Arrow Cross (Nyilas) movement that toppled Miklós Horthy from power on October 15, 1944, Ferenc Szálasi's government handed over 70 labor service companies to the German authorities, along with roughly 35,000 Jewish civilian forced laborers from Budapest, including 10,000 women. A total of 50,000 to 60,000 Jews were forcibly evacuated to Nazi Germany in November and December 1944, through forced marches and deportations by rail. The prisoners who survived the extreme circumstances of slave labor building fortifications along the Hungarian-German border were sent on further death marches in the early spring of 1945 to Mauthausen and other concentration camps, where they also died en masse.

For more information, please see Documents 2-9 and 2-10(A) (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
7. What role did Hungarian authorities play in the ghettoization and deportation of the Jews? Nazi Germany's chief deportation expert SS Lieutenant-Colonel Adolf Eichmann arrived in Budapest on March 19, 1944, together with the German troops who occupied Hungary unopposed. Although his mission was to deport nearly 800,000 Jews, from a territory of some 66,000 square miles, the staff that he brought with him consisted of only 20 officers and adjutants. The assistance of the Hungarian civil administration and law enforcement authorities was thus essential. Eichmann was surprised at how actively and enthusiastically Hungarian authorities collaborated to achieve what was clearly a common purpose, initiating many anti-Jewish measures on their own. As a result, Hungarian Jews were identified, plundered, ghettoized, deported, and murdered with a speed and efficiency virtually unparalleled in the history of the Holocaust.
Regent Miklós Horthy ordered the Hungarian army not to resist the German occupation and appointed a new government consisting of well-known pro-Nazi political figures. The overwhelming majority of Hungarian public servants and law enforcement personnel accepted the situation following the arrival of the Germans as normal and fully cooperated with the Nazis. For many of them, new antisemitic measures were merely a continuation of former anti-Jewish policies, albeit by different means. Only a few administrative officials resigned in protest against the occupation.

The disenfranchisement, plunder, and ghettoization of the Jewish community were carried out by the Hungarian public administration authorities. Law enforcement agencies, including the police and gendarmerie, rounded up the victims, guarded the ghettos and camps, and assisted in organizing and implementing the deportations. The gendarmes, in particular, were notorious for being merciless perpetrators, beating and torturing their victims. The assault on the Jews also required the active assistance of a wide range of ordinary citizens, from medical doctors and midwives, to railroad personnel, to teachers and many others.

State Secretary (the equivalent of a modern deputy minister) László Endre at the Hungarian Ministry of Interior was the key figure orchestrating the ghettoization and deportation process. Formerly a sub-prefect of Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun county and a renowned administrative expert, he had been an advocate of more radical anti-Jewish practices since the 1920s. Along with many other Hungarian perpetrators, Endre was not simply a collaborator but an active agent taking the initiative to eliminate the country's Jews.

Hungarian authorities acted with an efficiency that surprised even the Germans. Hungary implemented the wearing of the yellow star on April 5, 1944. The Hungarian government decided on the ghettoization on April 7 and began implementing the edict just nine days later, on April 16. By the end of May, ghettos and camps had been created in more than 200 localities. Deportations took place at a torrid pace. In a sordidly cynical rivalry, Eichmann wanted to beat the "record" set by SS-Sturmbannführer Hermann Höfle, who had deported the 275,000 residents of the Warsaw ghetto to Treblinka-a distance of the 100 kilometers-over a span of 53 days between July 22 and September 12, 1942. Despite the approaching front lines, the deteriorating infrastructure, and the fact that deportation trains from Hungary to Auschwitz had to travel an average of 400-500 kilometers, Eichmann was successful thanks to the work of his Hungarian accomplices. Hungarian authorities deported 437,402 Hungarian Jews on 147 trains in just 56 days between May 15 and July 9, 1944. Apart from 15,000, all of these deportees were sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau.

For more information, please see Documents 3-3 and 3-4 (PDF), and Document 4-1 (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
8. How aware was Hungary's leadership of German extermination policies toward the Jews? Hungarian leaders, including the Regent, had been aware of the Nazi "Final Solution" well before the March 1944 German occupation of the country. While the details became even clearer in the following months, the Hungarian elite knew that deported Jews were being murdered.
The first news about the mass murder of Jews was brought to the country by Hungarian soldiers and labor servicemen who witnessed executions of Jews on the Eastern Front. Reports on the massacre of the Jews deported from Hungary in July-August 1941 also reached government circles. Minister of the Interior Ferenc Keresztes-Fischer told one of his underlings in October 1942 that he had stopped the deportations to the east because the Jews were being murdered there.

The network of Hungarian diplomats stationed across Europe also reported back to Budapest on the anti-Jewish policies of the Nazis and their collaborators. Trying to trace the whereabouts of deported Hungarian Jews, they noted that none of them had ever been heard from again. The documents of the Foreign Ministry show that Auschwitz and its subcamps were known locations to the government. In August 1942, an influential Hungarian journalist reported to the Ministry about his confidential conversations with the Hungarian ambassador to Berlin, Döme Sztójay. Sztójay, who would become Prime Minister after the German occupation, had told the journalist that Hungary should follow the German example and "resettle" the Jews to the east, making "no secret of the fact that this move would not mean resettlement but murder."

Hitler's intentions were also communicated directly to Regent Horthy by the Führer himself. According to the minutes of their meeting on April 16-17, 1943, Hitler reprimanded his ally for being too lenient on the Jews. Horthy asked, "What shall he do with them after having almost completely deprived them of their livelihoods-we can't beat them to death, after all." German Minister of Foreign Affairs Joachim von Ribbentrop, who was also present, answered, "The Jews must be exterminated or taken to concentration camps." Hitler raised the situation in Poland as an example to follow: "If the Jews do not want to work there, they are shot to death. If they are incapable of working, they have to perish. They have to be treated like the bacillus of tuberculosis that can infect the healthy body." Horthy had the Foreign Ministry write up a draft letter to Hitler a few weeks later about the meeting. One sentence reads, "Your Excellency further reproached me because the [Hungarian] government did not implement the extermination of the Jews as thoroughly as it happened in Germany and as it is desirable in other countries as well." Horthy eventually deleted the sentence, but the original document clearly shows that he understood precisely what Hitler and Ribbentrop told him.

If anyone in the higher circles of Hungarian government had any doubt about the fate of Jews, eyewitness accounts of prisoners who escaped from Auschwitz (the so-called "Auschwitz Protocols") provided additional proof that the rumors of mass murder were true. The documents reached prominent Hungarian cultural figures and politicians in May-June 1944. Even though Horthy claimed in his postwar memoirs that it was not until early July that he was informed that the deported Jews were being murdered-which would mean that his order on July 6 to stop the deportations had been issued as soon as he learned the terrible reality-there can be no doubt that the Regent was well aware of Nazi extermination policies long before the German occupation of Hungary. Moreover, Horthy personally approved the re-initiation of deportations in August 1944. Horthy himself conceded that at this time he was aware of what was happening to the Jews at their destination.

For more information, please see Document 2-15 (PDF) from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
9. What responsibility did Miklós Horthy bear in the deportation of Hungarian Jews? What decisions did he make? By maintaining his position after the German occupation of Hungary in March 1944, Horthy legitimized the invasion and its consequences in the eyes of government officials and the public. He clearly knew the brutal details of the ghettoizations and deportations orchestrated by his own government, and he was well aware of the fate of the deportees. He did momentarily suspend the deportations in early July 1944-after the Jews from all regions except the capital city had all been deported, the overwhelming majority to Auschwitz-but he agreed to restart the deportations a few weeks later. The Jews of Budapest were given a temporary reprieve because of national and international political and military considerations, not because of any sense of compassion or responsibility toward the Jewish community.
Despite some hesitation, Regent Miklós Horthy accepted the German occupation of his country. Military resistance was not a realistic option, and the presence of German military forces was welcomed by many as the Red Army drew closer to Hungary's eastern borders. While Horthy could have resigned, he did not, and he ordered Hungary's military not to resist the occupation. He thus remained in his position and appointed the members of the new government, while convincing himself that Germany would remove their troops, restoring Hungary's full sovereignty and freedom of action, as soon as the Jewish community had been eradicated. This price was one he was willing to accept. Horthy withdrew from directly handling Jewish affairs, but he was well aware of what was happening and condoned it.

By early July 1944, Jews had been eliminated from the provinces. The final action would have been the deportation of the Jews of Budapest. However, deterioration of the military situation, increasing international protests, pressure from some individuals around Horthy, and the widely circulated documents describing the mass murder taking place at Auschwitz all combined to influence the Regent to call a halt to the deportations. But he acted half-heartedly and ineffectively. In an early June memorandum to Prime Minister Döme Sztójay, Horthy indicated his desire that certain groups of Jews be spared. Three weeks later, at a meeting of the government on June 26, he repeated this wish, but nothing happened. He finally ordered a halt to the deportations on July 6, and by July 9 they had stopped. His delay in taking firm action cost the lives of several tens of thousands of Hungarian Jewish citizens. He only acted firmly, in fact, when he felt that his authority was being threatened. Convinced that thousands of gendarmes had been concentrated in and around Budapest not to organize the deportation of Jews but to overthrow him, Horthy ordered military troops in from neighboring areas to force the gendarmes out of Budapest. Horthy's actions reveal two things clearly. First, the Nazis could not proceed with the deportations without Hungarian assistance. Second, Horthy retained significant power and authority even after the German occupation took place. Had he truly opposed the deportation and murder of Hungary's Jewish citizens and acted a few weeks earlier, he could have saved tens of thousands of lives.

The Germans pressured Horthy to restart the deportations. He yielded and promised to give permission for the continuation to begin in late August. On August 19, the Ministry of the Interior informed the Germans that deportations could start again on August 25. With Horthy's approval, the government even drafted a written agreement with the Germans regarding the resumption of deportations. Changes in the military situation redrew the picture, however. Romania withdrew from the Axis and switched over to the Allied side on August 23. With Germany's position in the region radically weakened, Horthy responded in an unusually swift and resolute manner: he informed the Germans that he would not resume the deportations.

After a failed attempt to break away from his alliance with Germany in October 1944, the Nazis forced Horthy to resign and turn power over to the far right Arrow Cross (Nyilas) Party and its leader, Ferenc Szálasi.

For more information, please see Document 4-2 (PDF), Document 4-15 (PDF), and Document 4-17 from The Holocaust in Hungary, by Zoltán Vági, László Csősz, and Gábor Kádár.
10. What degree of continuity of cadres existed between Hungary's pre- and post-German occupation governments and public administration? The continuity was significant. Although a number of key positions were filled by antisemitic extremists, the majority of the personnel involved in public administration-from the Regent down to village notaries-remained unchanged after the German occupation. The disenfranchisement, plunder, and ghettoization of the Jews and the deportation of close to 440,000 of them was orchestrated and implemented by the country's traditional elite and its rank and file bureaucrats.
The new government led by the former Hungarian ambassador to Berlin, Döme Sztójay, consisted mainly of well-known politicians who had significant experience in government. This enhanced the appearance of legal continuity between the pre- and post-occupation eras. In a cabinet that consisted of ten members, eight had held ministerial posts before. At the demand of the Germans, a "purging" of the upper echelons of the public administration was initiated, and by the time deportations began, 41 of the 61 government-appointed county and town prefects had been changed. Some of them resigned in protest against the policies of the new government. Many local officials were also discharged. By the end of July, 58 new chief constables had been appointed, and 25 cities and towns had installed new mayors. Nonetheless, the majority of high-ranking officials-60 percent of the mayors, 80 percent of the subprefects, and 75 percent of the chief constables at the district level-remained in place. In fact, the majority of "removals" were really transfers from one locality to another or one post to another, which meant that there were significantly fewer actual new appointees than the number of posts affected by new appointments. Furthermore, new appointees generally assumed their positions only during July-August, or even later-after the massive deportations of May through the first week of July had already been carried out. The ghettoization and deportation of Hungarian Jewry was thus not the work of the newcomers but of the rank and file bureaucrats, police, and gendarmerie of the Horthy regime.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Holocaust in Hungary: Frequently Asked Questions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The following questions and answers do not provide an exhaustive history of the Holocaust in Hungary. Rather, they address several salient issues often presented as "controversial." In fact, the answers are fully supported by ample contemporary documentation from the period.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.