# data[].attributes.body
rip

# data[].attributes.body
heh -lohit

# data[].attributes.body
mhm

# data[].attributes.body
ya lohit

# data[].attributes.body
-jennifer

# data[].attributes.body
any T.E Lohit

# data[].attributes.body
Any evidence, Lohit? -Abeer

# data[].attributes.body
Lohit do you have an opinion on the subject

# data[].attributes.body
How about you, Lohit?

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you. The discussion is now closed.

# data[].attributes.body
Lohit what do you think about this topic

# data[].attributes.body
But it also has to do with age, like what Veda said in the first round. -Ayushman

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Jessica because helping animal is helping ourselves as well. ~Iris

# data[].attributes.body
qhat do you think lohit

# data[].attributes.body
This is a summarizing part from the article whixh accurately show the importance of animals in everyday life

# data[].attributes.body
"Animals are used in almost every scientific field from medicine to the aerospace industry, and they play a crucial role in the advancement of human life."

# data[].attributes.body
-quynh

# data[].attributes.body
for example,

# data[].attributes.body
Lohit what do you think?

# data[].attributes.body
yes

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Quynh. In article 1 it says that ¨if the animals are gone, then we might be gone as well¨  So, our life might depend on the animals life. - Veda

# data[].attributes.body
-abeer

# data[].attributes.body
That is true-Ayushman

# data[].attributes.body
Veda i totaly agree because humans share a speacial bond with pets.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Veda because if you get to know an animal well enough, your instinct to protect your pet will overcome the decision of helping a stranger. ~Iris

# data[].attributes.body
Abeer do you have a direct quote from that article?

# data[].attributes.body
Iris

# data[].attributes.body
Your opinion is valued

# data[].attributes.body
Abeer I think you should give some input.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that we should protect animals because they benefit us. -Lohit

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Veda, because many people still don't care about other animals other than pets. In article 2, the shooting of the dog Arfee received more attention than than 42 cows killed each year.- Riya

# data[].attributes.body
Considering the caus

Patricia Harman Murray
09:37
 Considering the causes about which you care most, are you more dedicated to helping animals or humans? Why?
At this point, I thi

Anonymous
09:39
 At this point, I think that I am dedicated to helping certain types of animals. -Adarsh
Adarsh, what makes y

Patricia Harman Murray
09:39
 Adarsh, what makes you say this?
i am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:39
 i am more dedicated in helping the animals because there are a lot of chances of us humans becoming extinct if animals become extinct.-Ansitha 
iagree. I am more de

Anonymous
09:40
 iagree. I am more dedicated to animals because animals play a large role in the ecosystem and they balance the food chain which is very important to humans too. -Quynh
I think that this is

Anonymous
09:40
 I think that this is because, like mentioned before, certain animals are generalized as domestic and some are not, making them more or less worthy of saving. 
Considering the caus

Anonymous
09:40
 Considering the causes that I care about most, I feel that I am more dedicated to helping humans. First of all, I am not much of a pet person. Also, humans cause many types of problems such as pollution that we need to fix. - Riya
-Adarsh

Anonymous
09:40
 -Adarsh
I am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:40
 I am more dedicated to animals because animals are actually in trouble because of humans. Humans cut down forests and kill animals for their parts. Some animals have their defensive adaptions, but humans have technology that can harm those animals. 
  -Jennifer

Anonymous
09:40
   -Jennifer
I don't think we sho

Anonymous
09:40
 I don't think we should be more dedicated to either side, we can be helping both sides at the same time. If we are only dedicated to help one side, the other side might die out.  ~Iris
I think both species

Anonymous
09:41
 I think both species matter. Animals help us with many things, and in order to stay alive, then the human civilization can grow too. - Ayushman
I am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:41
 I am more dedicated to animals because animals are important to humans. Without animals we may also be gone. In article 1 page 3 a Pygmy said without animals humans would be gone too. -Lohit 
Pollution can also k

Anonymous
09:41
 Pollution can also kill animals, but animal's natural problems don't really affect humans other than that we don't get food, so what makes you say that, Riya? -Adarsh
also, without animal

Anonymous
09:41
 also, without animals, humans would not be able to exist since animals give us food and help us in a lot of ways too.
quynh

Anonymous
09:41
 quynh
I believe that helpi

Anonymous
09:41
 I believe that helping both humans as well as animals can be possible. 
 I agree with w

Anonymous
09:41
  I agree with what you are saying. As humans we are the ones that ruin animals' habitats. It is our duty to make up for that  and save them. - Veda
In my opinion i thin

Anonymous
09:41
 In my opinion i think i am more dedicated to helping animals because us humans are killing animals for a sport and if they go extinct with out them we wont be here 
-Faris

Anonymous
09:41
 -Faris
Quynh, I appreciate

Patricia Harman Murray
09:41
 Quynh, I appreciate what you said. They, especially pets, are even more useful than the fact that they offer unconditional love.
If humans die out, a

Anonymous
09:42
 If humans die out, animals will not be affected, but if animals die out, humans will too. -Adarsh
I agree humans are m

Anonymous
09:42
 I agree humans are making the lives of animals worse so we should atleast protect them.-Lohit
I agree with Lohit&n

Anonymous
09:42
 I agree with Lohit 
We need to protect t

Anonymous
09:42
 We need to protect the ecosystem
It will help us as w

Anonymous
09:42
 It will help us as well in the long term
i get understand you

Anonymous
09:42
 i get understand your point. but if animals become extinct we cannot bring them back, we might starve to death as there is no dairy products or it wont be easy to farm so i think animals are very important.
i agree with veda be

Anonymous
09:42
 i agree with veda because humans do a lot of bad things for the environment and helping animals would kind of be like fixing the problem that we created in the first place. Also, helping animals would be good for the environment
-Quynh

Anonymous
09:43
 -Quynh
responding to riya -

Anonymous
09:43
 responding to riya - Ansitha Nambi
On article 1, page 2

Anonymous
09:43
 On article 1, page 2, it says, " ...one of the most important resources some poor creatures have is wildlife." We are destroying the wild for human needs, so as an instinct, we try to protect the animals that.
-Jennifer

Anonymous
09:43
 -Jennifer
I disagree with you

Anonymous
09:43
 I disagree with you Adarsh because humans are the main people who are helping animals. If we help humans, more people will be aware of animal problems. - Riya
I agree with Lohit,

Anonymous
09:43
 I agree with Lohit, for the reason that we need to protect ourselves also. Adding onto this, humans could be considered an invasive species, so we need to watch what we are doing to the environment.
-Adarsh

Anonymous
09:43
 -Adarsh
Let's turn the conve

Patricia Harman Murray
09:43
 Let's turn the conversation a bit. I'd like to know what you think about guiding question #2: "Compassion for other species can also nurture compassion for fellow humans." Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
Quynh, I get what yo

Anonymous
09:43
 Quynh, I get what you're saying, but if you just help animals, the humans might die out. ~Iris 
Quynh, I also agree

Anonymous
09:43
 Quynh, I also agree with you. I read many stories of how pets changed people's lives. For example, a toddler got lost in a woods, and her pet helped her find her way back home. Pets are a big factor to our human population
Ayushman

Anonymous
09:44
 Ayushman
I do agree. Humans r

Anonymous
09:44
 I do agree. Humans rely on animals to survive, so if animals are cared for, humans will thrive. -Adarsh
For the second quest

Anonymous
09:44
 For the second question (Adarsh)
I don't really agree

Anonymous
09:44
 I don't really agree with that question because many people take in pets as replacements for the absence of humans. -Jennifer
That is true-Ayushma

Anonymous
09:44
 That is true-Ayushman
Cayden, i disagree w

Anonymous
09:45
 Cayden, i disagree what you're saying because these "stupid" chickens are helping us survive by providing food for us. ~Iris
I disagree with Jenn

Anonymous
09:45
 I disagree with Jennifer, because people take pets just as another way of being loved, not necessarily for the absence of people. -Adarsh
I agree with Adarsh

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with Adarsh we rely on animals like animals rely on us. -Lohit
I agree with the sta

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with the statement because humans depend on animals to survive in a lot of ways that are rather undernoticed
Referring to quynh w

Anonymous
09:45
 Referring to quynh was saing i think we should help both sides be cause we depend on humans like the blind they need guide dogs and we also should care about our own kind to build a society and if we take care odf humans we can help our selfes -faris
i agree that compass

Anonymous
09:45
 i agree that compassion for animals can nurture compassion for fellow humans. according to times.com, when you help endangered species or other animal saving acts, you help endagered insects, such as bees. And bees play a key role as pollinaters, so helping bees would help with our food supply helping us. so caring for animals would also help us.
I agree with what yo

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with what you are saying Riya. I get that if we save humans that there will be more people to save animals. But, have you considered the fact that there is no guarantee that all humans will save animals?-Veda
And many more reason

Anonymous
09:45
 And many more reasons as well
I agree with Faris -

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with Faris -Adarsh
I noticed that someo

Patricia Harman Murray
09:46
 I noticed that someone posted something in response to what Caden said in the inner circle. Great! If you hear something being said in the inner circle,  you can bring that thought, comment, question into this online discussion.
Does anybody else ha

Anonymous
09:46
 Does anybody else have an opinion on the second question?
i disagree with you.

Anonymous
09:46
 i disagree with you. yes, few people do help animals but many also torture animals like the incident that happened in the city zoo in Copenhagen, the people in the zoo have killed a 2 year old giraffe to stop inbreeding.-Ansitha ( responding to Riya)
For question #2, I d

Anonymous
09:46
 For question #2, I do not agree with this statement. In article 1, Dieudonne Ngombo mentions as a tracker that "we get salary and than we our kids live better and we live well." I contradict this because obtaining salary does not make you appreciate animals more. - Riya
Abeer what do you th

Anonymous
09:46
 Abeer what do you think-Lohit
They should do a stu

Anonymous
09:47
 They should do a study about which affects a human more. A death of a human friend or the death of a pet.  - Ayushman
On article 2, it say

Anonymous
09:47
 On article 2, it says, "American demographics have changed, and more people are living alone. People are getting married later, if they get married at all... People are more attached to their pets."
i agree with the sec

Anonymous
09:47
 i agree with the second question. according to a study by frank ascione, it showed that children who were cruel to animals are more likeley to be violent to humans later, therefore the lack of compassion for animals corresponds to the lack of compassion for humans. so people who are compassionate to animals would be more likeley to be nicer to humans.
-Jennifer

Anonymous
09:47
 -Jennifer
-quynh

Anonymous
09:47
 -quynh
Thank you lohit for

Anonymous
09:47
 Thank you lohit for bringing abeer into the conversation
Jayna, I see what yo

Anonymous
09:47
 Jayna, I see what you're saying but that's only very few. ~Iris
I disagree with Riya

Anonymous
09:47
 I disagree with Riya. People will appreciate animals more because they support humans' well-being.-Adarsh
I agree with the sta

Anonymous
09:47
 I agree with the statement because saving other species does help us in turn as well
I agree with riya be

Anonymous
09:48
 I agree with riya because we dont need animals to care about and take care of our fellow selves. -faris
That makes sense quy

Anonymous
09:48
 That makes sense quynh
-jennifer

Anonymous
09:48
 -jennifer
Do you have T.E. to

Patricia Harman Murray
09:48
 Do you have T.E. to back this point up (I'm referring to the post by Anonymous at 9:47.)
I disagree with what

Anonymous
09:49
 I disagree with what Kashvi said because animals that support humans, even in the way that we eat them, they still help us. -Adarsh
 
Anonymous
09:49
 
Considering the caus

Patricia Harman Murray
09:37
 Considering the causes about which you care most, are you more dedicated to helping animals or humans? Why?
At this point, I thi

Anonymous
09:39
 At this point, I think that I am dedicated to helping certain types of animals. -Adarsh
Adarsh, what makes y

Patricia Harman Murray
09:39
 Adarsh, what makes you say this?
i am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:39
 i am more dedicated in helping the animals because there are a lot of chances of us humans becoming extinct if animals become extinct.-Ansitha 
iagree. I am more de

Anonymous
09:40
 iagree. I am more dedicated to animals because animals play a large role in the ecosystem and they balance the food chain which is very important to humans too. -Quynh
I think that this is

Anonymous
09:40
 I think that this is because, like mentioned before, certain animals are generalized as domestic and some are not, making them more or less worthy of saving. 
Considering the caus

Anonymous
09:40
 Considering the causes that I care about most, I feel that I am more dedicated to helping humans. First of all, I am not much of a pet person. Also, humans cause many types of problems such as pollution that we need to fix. - Riya
-Adarsh

Anonymous
09:40
 -Adarsh
I am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:40
 I am more dedicated to animals because animals are actually in trouble because of humans. Humans cut down forests and kill animals for their parts. Some animals have their defensive adaptions, but humans have technology that can harm those animals. 
  -Jennifer

Anonymous
09:40
   -Jennifer
I don't think we sho

Anonymous
09:40
 I don't think we should be more dedicated to either side, we can be helping both sides at the same time. If we are only dedicated to help one side, the other side might die out.  ~Iris
I think both species

Anonymous
09:41
 I think both species matter. Animals help us with many things, and in order to stay alive, then the human civilization can grow too. - Ayushman
I am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:41
 I am more dedicated to animals because animals are important to humans. Without animals we may also be gone. In article 1 page 3 a Pygmy said without animals humans would be gone too. -Lohit 
Pollution can also k

Anonymous
09:41
 Pollution can also kill animals, but animal's natural problems don't really affect humans other than that we don't get food, so what makes you say that, Riya? -Adarsh
also, without animal

Anonymous
09:41
 also, without animals, humans would not be able to exist since animals give us food and help us in a lot of ways too.
quynh

Anonymous
09:41
 quynh
I believe that helpi

Anonymous
09:41
 I believe that helping both humans as well as animals can be possible. 
 I agree with w

Anonymous
09:41
  I agree with what you are saying. As humans we are the ones that ruin animals' habitats. It is our duty to make up for that  and save them. - Veda
In my opinion i thin

Anonymous
09:41
 In my opinion i think i am more dedicated to helping animals because us humans are killing animals for a sport and if they go extinct with out them we wont be here 
-Faris

Anonymous
09:41
 -Faris
Quynh, I appreciate

Patricia Harman Murray
09:41
 Quynh, I appreciate what you said. They, especially pets, are even more useful than the fact that they offer unconditional love.
If humans die out, a

Anonymous
09:42
 If humans die out, animals will not be affected, but if animals die out, humans will too. -Adarsh
I agree humans are m

Anonymous
09:42
 I agree humans are making the lives of animals worse so we should atleast protect them.-Lohit
I agree with Lohit&n

Anonymous
09:42
 I agree with Lohit 
We need to protect t

Anonymous
09:42
 We need to protect the ecosystem
It will help us as w

Anonymous
09:42
 It will help us as well in the long term
i get understand you

Anonymous
09:42
 i get understand your point. but if animals become extinct we cannot bring them back, we might starve to death as there is no dairy products or it wont be easy to farm so i think animals are very important.
i agree with veda be

Anonymous
09:42
 i agree with veda because humans do a lot of bad things for the environment and helping animals would kind of be like fixing the problem that we created in the first place. Also, helping animals would be good for the environment
-Quynh

Anonymous
09:43
 -Quynh
responding to riya -

Anonymous
09:43
 responding to riya - Ansitha Nambi
On article 1, page 2

Anonymous
09:43
 On article 1, page 2, it says, " ...one of the most important resources some poor creatures have is wildlife." We are destroying the wild for human needs, so as an instinct, we try to protect the animals that.
-Jennifer

Anonymous
09:43
 -Jennifer
I disagree with you

Anonymous
09:43
 I disagree with you Adarsh because humans are the main people who are helping animals. If we help humans, more people will be aware of animal problems. - Riya
I agree with Lohit,

Anonymous
09:43
 I agree with Lohit, for the reason that we need to protect ourselves also. Adding onto this, humans could be considered an invasive species, so we need to watch what we are doing to the environment.
-Adarsh

Anonymous
09:43
 -Adarsh
Let's turn the conve

Patricia Harman Murray
09:43
 Let's turn the conversation a bit. I'd like to know what you think about guiding question #2: "Compassion for other species can also nurture compassion for fellow humans." Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
Quynh, I get what yo

Anonymous
09:43
 Quynh, I get what you're saying, but if you just help animals, the humans might die out. ~Iris 
Quynh, I also agree

Anonymous
09:43
 Quynh, I also agree with you. I read many stories of how pets changed people's lives. For example, a toddler got lost in a woods, and her pet helped her find her way back home. Pets are a big factor to our human population
Ayushman

Anonymous
09:44
 Ayushman
I do agree. Humans r

Anonymous
09:44
 I do agree. Humans rely on animals to survive, so if animals are cared for, humans will thrive. -Adarsh
For the second quest

Anonymous
09:44
 For the second question (Adarsh)
I don't really agree

Anonymous
09:44
 I don't really agree with that question because many people take in pets as replacements for the absence of humans. -Jennifer
That is true-Ayushma

Anonymous
09:44
 That is true-Ayushman
Cayden, i disagree w

Anonymous
09:45
 Cayden, i disagree what you're saying because these "stupid" chickens are helping us survive by providing food for us. ~Iris
I disagree with Jenn

Anonymous
09:45
 I disagree with Jennifer, because people take pets just as another way of being loved, not necessarily for the absence of people. -Adarsh
I agree with Adarsh

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with Adarsh we rely on animals like animals rely on us. -Lohit
I agree with the sta

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with the statement because humans depend on animals to survive in a lot of ways that are rather undernoticed
Referring to quynh w

Anonymous
09:45
 Referring to quynh was saing i think we should help both sides be cause we depend on humans like the blind they need guide dogs and we also should care about our own kind to build a society and if we take care odf humans we can help our selfes -faris
i agree that compass

Anonymous
09:45
 i agree that compassion for animals can nurture compassion for fellow humans. according to times.com, when you help endangered species or other animal saving acts, you help endagered insects, such as bees. And bees play a key role as pollinaters, so helping bees would help with our food supply helping us. so caring for animals would also help us.
I agree with what yo

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with what you are saying Riya. I get that if we save humans that there will be more people to save animals. But, have you considered the fact that there is no guarantee that all humans will save animals?-Veda
And many more reason

Anonymous
09:45
 And many more reasons as well
I agree with Faris -

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with Faris -Adarsh
I noticed that someo

Patricia Harman Murray
09:46
 I noticed that someone posted something in response to what Caden said in the inner circle. Great! If you hear something being said in the inner circle,  you can bring that thought, comment, question into this online discussion.
Does anybody else ha

Anonymous
09:46
 Does anybody else have an opinion on the second question?
i disagree with you.

Anonymous
09:46
 i disagree with you. yes, few people do help animals but many also torture animals like the incident that happened in the city zoo in Copenhagen, the people in the zoo have killed a 2 year old giraffe to stop inbreeding.-Ansitha ( responding to Riya)
For question #2, I d

Anonymous
09:46
 For question #2, I do not agree with this statement. In article 1, Dieudonne Ngombo mentions as a tracker that "we get salary and than we our kids live better and we live well." I contradict this because obtaining salary does not make you appreciate animals more. - Riya
Abeer what do you th

Anonymous
09:46
 Abeer what do you think-Lohit
 
edit

delete

more_horiz
They should do a stu

Anonymous
09:47
 They should do a study about which affects a human more. A death of a human friend or the death of a pet.  - Ayushman
On article 2, it say

Anonymous
09:47
 On article 2, it says, "American demographics have changed, and more people are living alone. People are getting married later, if they get married at all... People are more attached to their pets."
i agree with the sec

Anonymous
09:47
 i agree with the second question. according to a study by frank ascione, it showed that children who were cruel to animals are more likeley to be violent to humans later, therefore the lack of compassion for animals corresponds to the lack of compassion for humans. so people who are compassionate to animals would be more likeley to be nicer to humans.
-Jennifer

Anonymous
09:47
 -Jennifer
-quynh

Anonymous
09:47
 -quynh
Thank you lohit for

Anonymous
09:47
 Thank you lohit for bringing abeer into the conversation
Jayna, I see what yo

Anonymous
09:47
 Jayna, I see what you're saying but that's only very few. ~Iris
I disagree with Riya

Anonymous
09:47
 I disagree with Riya. People will appreciate animals more because they support humans' well-being.-Adarsh
I agree with the sta

Anonymous
09:47
 I agree with the statement because saving other species does help us in turn as well
I agree with riya be

Anonymous
09:48
 I agree with riya because we dont need animals to care about and take care of our fellow selves. -faris
That makes sense quy

Anonymous
09:48
 That makes sense quynh
-jennifer

Anonymous
09:48
 -jennifer
Do you have T.E. to

Patricia Harman Murray
09:48
 Do you have T.E. to back this point up (I'm referring to the post by Anonymous at 9:47.)
I disagree with what

Anonymous
09:49
 I disagree with what Kashvi said because animals that support humans, even in the way that we eat them, they still help us. -Adarsh
 
edit

delete

more_horiz

# data[].attributes.body
Considering the caus

Patricia Harman Murray
09:37
 Considering the causes about which you care most, are you more dedicated to helping animals or humans? Why?
At this point, I thi

Anonymous
09:39
 At this point, I think that I am dedicated to helping certain types of animals. -Adarsh
Adarsh, what makes y

Patricia Harman Murray
09:39
 Adarsh, what makes you say this?
i am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:39
 i am more dedicated in helping the animals because there are a lot of chances of us humans becoming extinct if animals become extinct.-Ansitha 
iagree. I am more de

Anonymous
09:40
 iagree. I am more dedicated to animals because animals play a large role in the ecosystem and they balance the food chain which is very important to humans too. -Quynh
I think that this is

Anonymous
09:40
 I think that this is because, like mentioned before, certain animals are generalized as domestic and some are not, making them more or less worthy of saving. 
Considering the caus

Anonymous
09:40
 Considering the causes that I care about most, I feel that I am more dedicated to helping humans. First of all, I am not much of a pet person. Also, humans cause many types of problems such as pollution that we need to fix. - Riya
-Adarsh

Anonymous
09:40
 -Adarsh
I am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:40
 I am more dedicated to animals because animals are actually in trouble because of humans. Humans cut down forests and kill animals for their parts. Some animals have their defensive adaptions, but humans have technology that can harm those animals. 
  -Jennifer

Anonymous
09:40
   -Jennifer
I don't think we sho

Anonymous
09:40
 I don't think we should be more dedicated to either side, we can be helping both sides at the same time. If we are only dedicated to help one side, the other side might die out.  ~Iris
I think both species

Anonymous
09:41
 I think both species matter. Animals help us with many things, and in order to stay alive, then the human civilization can grow too. - Ayushman
I am more dedicated

Anonymous
09:41
 I am more dedicated to animals because animals are important to humans. Without animals we may also be gone. In article 1 page 3 a Pygmy said without animals humans would be gone too. -Lohit 
Pollution can also k

Anonymous
09:41
 Pollution can also kill animals, but animal's natural problems don't really affect humans other than that we don't get food, so what makes you say that, Riya? -Adarsh
also, without animal

Anonymous
09:41
 also, without animals, humans would not be able to exist since animals give us food and help us in a lot of ways too.
quynh

Anonymous
09:41
 quynh
I believe that helpi

Anonymous
09:41
 I believe that helping both humans as well as animals can be possible. 
 I agree with w

Anonymous
09:41
  I agree with what you are saying. As humans we are the ones that ruin animals' habitats. It is our duty to make up for that  and save them. - Veda
In my opinion i thin

Anonymous
09:41
 In my opinion i think i am more dedicated to helping animals because us humans are killing animals for a sport and if they go extinct with out them we wont be here 
-Faris

Anonymous
09:41
 -Faris
Quynh, I appreciate

Patricia Harman Murray
09:41
 Quynh, I appreciate what you said. They, especially pets, are even more useful than the fact that they offer unconditional love.
If humans die out, a

Anonymous
09:42
 If humans die out, animals will not be affected, but if animals die out, humans will too. -Adarsh
I agree humans are m

Anonymous
09:42
 I agree humans are making the lives of animals worse so we should atleast protect them.-Lohit
I agree with Lohit&n

Anonymous
09:42
 I agree with Lohit 
We need to protect t

Anonymous
09:42
 We need to protect the ecosystem
It will help us as w

Anonymous
09:42
 It will help us as well in the long term
i get understand you

Anonymous
09:42
 i get understand your point. but if animals become extinct we cannot bring them back, we might starve to death as there is no dairy products or it wont be easy to farm so i think animals are very important.
i agree with veda be

Anonymous
09:42
 i agree with veda because humans do a lot of bad things for the environment and helping animals would kind of be like fixing the problem that we created in the first place. Also, helping animals would be good for the environment
-Quynh

Anonymous
09:43
 -Quynh
responding to riya -

Anonymous
09:43
 responding to riya - Ansitha Nambi
On article 1, page 2

Anonymous
09:43
 On article 1, page 2, it says, " ...one of the most important resources some poor creatures have is wildlife." We are destroying the wild for human needs, so as an instinct, we try to protect the animals that.
-Jennifer

Anonymous
09:43
 -Jennifer
I disagree with you

Anonymous
09:43
 I disagree with you Adarsh because humans are the main people who are helping animals. If we help humans, more people will be aware of animal problems. - Riya
I agree with Lohit,

Anonymous
09:43
 I agree with Lohit, for the reason that we need to protect ourselves also. Adding onto this, humans could be considered an invasive species, so we need to watch what we are doing to the environment.
-Adarsh

Anonymous
09:43
 -Adarsh
Let's turn the conve

Patricia Harman Murray
09:43
 Let's turn the conversation a bit. I'd like to know what you think about guiding question #2: "Compassion for other species can also nurture compassion for fellow humans." Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
Quynh, I get what yo

Anonymous
09:43
 Quynh, I get what you're saying, but if you just help animals, the humans might die out. ~Iris 
Quynh, I also agree

Anonymous
09:43
 Quynh, I also agree with you. I read many stories of how pets changed people's lives. For example, a toddler got lost in a woods, and her pet helped her find her way back home. Pets are a big factor to our human population
Ayushman

Anonymous
09:44
 Ayushman
I do agree. Humans r

Anonymous
09:44
 I do agree. Humans rely on animals to survive, so if animals are cared for, humans will thrive. -Adarsh
For the second quest

Anonymous
09:44
 For the second question (Adarsh)
I don't really agree

Anonymous
09:44
 I don't really agree with that question because many people take in pets as replacements for the absence of humans. -Jennifer
That is true-Ayushma

Anonymous
09:44
 That is true-Ayushman
Cayden, i disagree w

Anonymous
09:45
 Cayden, i disagree what you're saying because these "stupid" chickens are helping us survive by providing food for us. ~Iris
I disagree with Jenn

Anonymous
09:45
 I disagree with Jennifer, because people take pets just as another way of being loved, not necessarily for the absence of people. -Adarsh
I agree with Adarsh

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with Adarsh we rely on animals like animals rely on us. -Lohit
I agree with the sta

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with the statement because humans depend on animals to survive in a lot of ways that are rather undernoticed
Referring to quynh w

Anonymous
09:45
 Referring to quynh was saing i think we should help both sides be cause we depend on humans like the blind they need guide dogs and we also should care about our own kind to build a society and if we take care odf humans we can help our selfes -faris
i agree that compass

Anonymous
09:45
 i agree that compassion for animals can nurture compassion for fellow humans. according to times.com, when you help endangered species or other animal saving acts, you help endagered insects, such as bees. And bees play a key role as pollinaters, so helping bees would help with our food supply helping us. so caring for animals would also help us.
I agree with what yo

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with what you are saying Riya. I get that if we save humans that there will be more people to save animals. But, have you considered the fact that there is no guarantee that all humans will save animals?-Veda
And many more reason

Anonymous
09:45
 And many more reasons as well
I agree with Faris -

Anonymous
09:45
 I agree with Faris -Adarsh
I noticed that someo

Patricia Harman Murray
09:46
 I noticed that someone posted something in response to what Caden said in the inner circle. Great! If you hear something being said in the inner circle,  you can bring that thought, comment, question into this online discussion.
Does anybody else ha

Anonymous
09:46
 Does anybody else have an opinion on the second question?
i disagree with you.

Anonymous
09:46
 i disagree with you. yes, few people do help animals but many also torture animals like the incident that happened in the city zoo in Copenhagen, the people in the zoo have killed a 2 year old giraffe to stop inbreeding.-Ansitha ( responding to Riya)
For question #2, I d

Anonymous
09:46
 For question #2, I do not agree with this statement. In article 1, Dieudonne Ngombo mentions as a tracker that "we get salary and than we our kids live better and we live well." I contradict this because obtaining salary does not make you appreciate animals more. - Riya
Abeer what do you th

Anonymous
09:46
 Abeer what do you think-Lohit
 
edit

delete

more_horiz
They should do a stu

Anonymous
09:47
 They should do a study about which affects a human more. A death of a human friend or the death of a pet.  - Ayushman
On article 2, it say

Anonymous
09:47
 On article 2, it says, "American demographics have changed, and more people are living alone. People are getting married later, if they get married at all... People are more attached to their pets."
i agree with the sec

Anonymous
09:47
 i agree with the second question. according to a study by frank ascione, it showed that children who were cruel to animals are more likeley to be violent to humans later, therefore the lack of compassion for animals corresponds to the lack of compassion for humans. so people who are compassionate to animals would be more likeley to be nicer to humans.
-Jennifer

Anonymous
09:47
 -Jennifer
-quynh

Anonymous
09:47
 -quynh
Thank you lohit for

Anonymous
09:47
 Thank you lohit for bringing abeer into the conversation
Jayna, I see what yo

Anonymous
09:47
 Jayna, I see what you're saying but that's only very few. ~Iris
I disagree with Riya

Anonymous
09:47
 I disagree with Riya. People will appreciate animals more because they support humans' well-being.-Adarsh
I agree with the sta

Anonymous
09:47
 I agree with the statement because saving other species does help us in turn as well
I agree with riya be

Anonymous
09:48
 I agree with riya because we dont need animals to care about and take care of our fellow selves. -faris
That makes sense quy

Anonymous
09:48
 That makes sense quynh
-jennifer

Anonymous
09:48
 -jennifer
Do you have T.E. to

Patricia Harman Murray
09:48
 Do you have T.E. to back this point up (I'm referring to the post by Anonymous at 9:47.)
I disagree with what

Anonymous
09:49
 I disagree with what Kashvi said because animals that support humans, even in the way that we eat them, they still help us. -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
I think the hypothetical situation set by Joy was a good example of how much people care for animals or humans. -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer, you posted something about research showing that when some children don't care about animals, specifically when they mistreat them, they are likely to harm people too. How can we use T.E. from the articles to expound on this?

# data[].attributes.body
Oh I wasn't the one who said that post. I's sorry, I posted my name too late.

# data[].attributes.body
-jennifer

# data[].attributes.body
Adarsh as you were saying that animals help us i agree because without guide dogs the blind would have a hard time getting aroound areas -FAris

# data[].attributes.body
There are an endless amount of things that we don't notice everyday which are actually the result of help from animals. According to http://listverse.com/2017/05/22/top-10-secret-ways-animals-help-humans/, animals help us in many direct as well as indirect ways

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with what Kashvi said because animals that support humans, even in the way that we eat them, they still help us. -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Tutsam when we should save both when we have the chance

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with Tutsam because we can try to save both instead of just focusing on one. ~Iirs

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with faris because there are dogs in the fire station that help fight fire, and there are also animals that can sniff cancer or bombs

# data[].attributes.body
That makes sense quynh

# data[].attributes.body
-quynh

# data[].attributes.body
-Jennifer

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you lohit for bringing abeer into the conversation

# data[].attributes.body
abeer what do you think

# data[].attributes.body
Responding to Veda, it is true that not all humans will save animals, but when we recognize are human problems, other problems such as other animal problems. - Riya

# data[].attributes.body
according to a Utilitarian Philosopher named Peter Singer animals suffer like humans. Humans do torture animals even though we benefit from them. So i think humans should help animals.-Ansitha

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Riya. People will appreciate animals more because they support humans' well-being.-Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
Do you have T.E. to back this point up (I'm referring to the post by Anonymous at 9:47.)

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with riya because we dont need animals to care about and take care of our fellow selves. -faris

# data[].attributes.body
Does anybody else have an opinion on the second question?

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the statement because saving other species does help us in turn as well

# data[].attributes.body
Abeer what do you think-Lohit

# data[].attributes.body
To many people their pets are the only only loyal and loving companion that they have. So, it would be natural instinct that a human would save their own pet. We cannot say that this is wrong, as to some people no human can replace the bond they have with their pets. -Veda

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with the second question. according to a study by frank ascione, it showed that children who were cruel to animals are more likeley to be violent to humans later, therefore the lack of compassion for animals corresponds to the lack of compassion for humans. so people who are compassionate to animals would be more likeley to be nicer to humans.

# data[].attributes.body
And many more reasons as well

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Faris -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
Jayna, I see what you're saying but that's only very few. ~Iris

# data[].attributes.body
They should do a study about which affects a human more. A death of a human friend or the death of a pet.  - Ayushman

# data[].attributes.body
On article 2, it says, "American demographics have changed, and more people are living alone. People are getting married later, if they get married at all... People are more attached to their pets."

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Jennifer, because people take pets just as another way of being loved, not necessarily for the absence of people. -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
For the second question (Adarsh)

# data[].attributes.body
That is true-Ayushman

# data[].attributes.body
Ayushman

# data[].attributes.body
Cayden, i disagree what you're saying because these "stupid" chickens are helping us survive by providing food for us. ~Iris

# data[].attributes.body
I noticed that someone posted something in response to what Caden said in the inner circle. Great! If you hear something being said in the inner circle,  you can bring that thought, comment, question into this online discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree. Humans rely on animals to survive, so if animals are cared for, humans will thrive. -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
-Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
For question #2, I do not agree with this statement. In article 1, Dieudonne Ngombo mentions as a tracker that "we get salary and than we our kids live better and we live well." I contradict this because obtaining salary does not make you appreciate animals more. - Riya

# data[].attributes.body
I don't really agree with that question because many people take in pets as replacements for the absence of humans. -Jennifer

# data[].attributes.body
-Jennifer

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with you. yes, few people do help animals but many also torture animals like the incident that happened in the city zoo in Copenhagen, the people in the zoo have killed a 2 year old giraffe to stop inbreeding.-Ansitha ( responding to Riya)

# data[].attributes.body
i agree that compassion for animals can nurture compassion for fellow humans. according to times.com, when you help endangered species or other animal saving acts, you help endagered insects, such as bees. And bees play a key role as pollinaters, so helping bees would help with our food supply helping us. so caring for animals would also help us.

# data[].attributes.body
-Quynh

# data[].attributes.body
responding to riya - Ansitha Nambi

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the statement because humans depend on animals to survive in a lot of ways that are rather undernoticed

# data[].attributes.body
It will help us as well in the long term

# data[].attributes.body
We need to protect the ecosystem

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Adarsh we rely on animals like animals rely on us. -Lohit

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Lohit, for the reason that we need to protect ourselves also. Adding onto this, humans could be considered an invasive species, so we need to watch what we are doing to the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Lohit

# data[].attributes.body
Let's turn the conversation a bit. I'd like to know what you think about guiding question #2: "Compassion for other species can also nurture compassion for fellow humans." Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?

# data[].attributes.body
Referring to quynh was saing i think we should help both sides be cause we depend on humans like the blind they need guide dogs and we also should care about our own kind to build a society and if we take care odf humans we can help our selfes -faris

# data[].attributes.body
-Faris

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what you are saying Riya. I get that if we save humans that there will be more people to save animals. But, have you considered the fact that there is no guarantee that all humans will save animals?-Veda

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with veda because humans do a lot of bad things for the environment and helping animals would kind of be like fixing the problem that we created in the first place. Also, helping animals would be good for the environment

# data[].attributes.body
quynh

# data[].attributes.body
If humans die out, animals will not be affected, but if animals die out, humans will too. -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
I agree humans are making the lives of animals worse so we should atleast protect them.-Lohit

# data[].attributes.body
Quynh, I also agree with you. I read many stories of how pets changed people's lives. For example, a toddler got lost in a woods, and her pet helped her find her way back home. Pets are a big factor to our human population

# data[].attributes.body
Quynh, I get what you're saying, but if you just help animals, the humans might die out. ~Iris

# data[].attributes.body
On article 1, page 2, it says, " ...one of the most important resources some poor creatures have is wildlife." We are destroying the wild for human needs, so as an instinct, we try to protect the animals that.

# data[].attributes.body
-Jennifer

# data[].attributes.body
Pollution can also kill animals, but animal's natural problems don't really affect humans other than that we don't get food, so what makes you say that, Riya? -Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you Adarsh because humans are the main people who are helping animals. If we help humans, more people will be aware of animal problems. - Riya

# data[].attributes.body
-Adarsh

# data[].attributes.body
also, without animals, humans would not be able to exist since animals give us food and help us in a lot of ways too.