# data[].attributes.headline
although the student did cover structure. The text would have been a lot stronger if they dissected the structure of the text more😤😂😂😠😢🙈🙈🙈

# data[].attributes.subject
although the student did cover structure. The text would have been a lot stronger if they dissected the structure of the text more😤😂😂😠😢🙈🙈🙈

# data[].attributes.body
- the student could have identified the different types of text used.
- could have used more quotations

# data[].attributes.body
The student could have elaborated more towards how the letter was more personal and to explain further into the fact of the overall tone being authoritative.

# data[].attributes.body
The Author could have used direct quotes from the original stories to better show and makepoints about they arguments that they made and how it differs from the original letter

# data[].attributes.body
The student talked more about form and only barely covered structure. Also they did not point out the sentence structure

# data[].attributes.body
the student could have talked about the sentence length. also could have given examples on how the letter from the employer is more personal that factual and straightforward

# data[].attributes.body
They could have discussed the types of words that are used and how they affect the writing

# data[].attributes.body
The student doesn't really discuss the different lengths of sentences in the text. They should have put some more quotes in there to support their observations better.

# data[].attributes.body
-the original article used actual numbers when discussing the differences in prices and the letter just stated that there were higher wages in the city without giving a specific amount
-the letter was more direct and to the point than the original article

# data[].attributes.body
The student could have used quotes to demonstrate how the employer's letter is how they described, or how it differs from the original text.

# data[].attributes.body
- they most likely should have included more evidence in the fifth paragraph about how it is more "personal, expressed throughout"

# data[].attributes.body
- They could have focused more on the structure of the paragraphs

# data[].attributes.body
The student could have identified the difference in the length of the paragraphs and sentences as well as the types of sentences used. They could have also included more quotations when speaking about the different ideas about London that the text provides. The letter uses salutations and sign offs whereas the article does not.

# data[].attributes.body
-The student could have compared the different jobs of the two of them and why they have different view points because of the jobs

- The student also could have identified the different types of text/length of the text

# data[].attributes.body
-Could have pointed out things in the structure of the original article such as length, paragraph length and sentence structure
- Could have used any quotes from the original to help support their points more sufficiently

# data[].attributes.body
-they should have provided evidence on how the letter from the employer is more personal

# data[].attributes.body
- could have added more evidence/quotes when they talk about the article being a first-hand speech
-

# data[].attributes.body
- could have talked more about the structure of the paragraphs
- when explaining the differences between the original there could've been more quotations