# data[].attributes.body
In today’s society, youngsters are taught to be competitive towards their classmates is a matter of fact that is worth concerning. In my perspective, the drawbacks of this way overweight the benefits. First and foremost, students will be able to peer learning foster when they work with each other. Should they learn from their friends’ remarks and comments, schoolchildren will know where the weaknesses of the work are and correct them, thereby making headway and acquiring new knowledge. Secondly, students can learn teamwork skills by cooperate with their classmates. As they share and discuss to modify the ideas, they can have the opportunity to maximize their communication capacity and increases bonds for stronger relationships. Finally, youngsters can enhance the quality of their work by collaborate with each other. Since they can assess, contribute and debate for reformation, their work will be optimal. In short, I hold my belief that between students, cooperation is overshadowing competition in several ways.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays schoolchildren and students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates and are not encouraged to help the weaker students. In my opinion, I firmly believe that its drawbacks outweigh its positive impacts. Admittedly , it hold certain advantages. The first and foremost, the advantages of this competitive environment are helping students have the interest in studying and and creating patience and wise leader. Second, children would put all effort and time into the study with a purpose of catching up with their peers. For example, instead of spending time watching games or going out, they will sit at the table and try to complete all tasks that their teachers give. Besides enhancing the efforts in study, competition also aims to practice children’s self-confidence. They are less likely rely on the support of surrounding people and would find the way to overcome the challengings they have. There are also disadvantages. Should students not be encouraged to help the weaker students, it has two cases. Firstly, on the positive side the weaker students will feel that they need to try harder to keep up with their classmates so that their learning outcomes will be improved . Secondly ,they will feel inferior about their own learning capacity, feel depressed and don't want to study anymore. In conclusion, when studying in a class, theyshould help the weaker classmates to build solidarity among classmates.

# data[].attributes.body
Competition is something that can't be avoided in daily life. Everyone competes with each other to get whether a better job, better school, or simply a higher rank in a mobile game. Competition not just helps us get what we wanted, it is also a way for us to develop ourselves because we can know more through challenges. So we can't blame the teacher for teaching their students to compete with the others. But sometimes, in this full of win-or-lose world, we forgot that if we help each other, the world would become a much better place. First, if a teacher teaches the good students to help the weaker ones, that whole class marks do not only increase with an incredible speed because they feel more comfortable asking their peers than the teachers but also the students in that class will get along with each other well. Secondly, that teacher's students would begin to develop the habit of helping others, which is very important in the society and made them a considerable person in life. Competition may have its own advantage, but helping each other is a personality that should have in today's life.

# data[].attributes.body
In today's society, students' sense of competition has increased. This may appear to be a beneficial element, but it is not since they are discouraged from assisting pupils who are not performing well in their academics. In my opinion, the disadvantages of this tendency exceed the benefits. When children work together, they learn more because it allows them to acquire abilities that less brilliant pupils lack. To begin, if you form a study group with other students, you will learn a great deal from us. They learn good qualities from one other while studying together. In addition to aiding them in being the greatest that they can be. Second, working in a group will enhance their self-esteem. If they feel their closest friend requires aid, they will have others in the group who will help. Working in a group, on the other hand, will establish a good attitude toward learning and working. They will try to be like everyone else if they feel worse than everyone else. Pupils should assist weaker peers when studying in class so that both good and bad students can enhance their own skills.

# data[].attributes.body
The fact that students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates and are not encouraged to help the weaker students is a matter of concern. From my perspective, children are filled with the feeling of winning. Encouraging them to be more competitive could be good in some cases, on the others; however, isn’t. Children can feel envy with their peers when receiving lower marks, and can even try to get a higher score at any cost, for example, cheating. Were it not for competition, students would focus more on making their grades better than the previous, not better than their friends. In addition, cooperation is thought to be better for pupils than competition. By working together, students can understand their own weakness, and can make progress by helping each other out. Intelligent students can also benefit from teaching the weak ones, since they have opportunities to revise the knowledges that they have learned. To conclude, the advantages of this method cannot outweigh the drawbacks.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays children and students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates, while others are taught to be cooperative. I think it is better to teach children and students how to cooperate and help each other. Because when children learn to cooperate with others, they could create more relationships. Having a good relationship with people will help their career later. Should children only compete with others all day, they will become extremely aggressive. Children are so aggressive that when playing a game, they will only focus on being able to win and will get angry or sulky when they lose. This will create a lack of sympathy from others when they see their behavior. If children are taught how to help the weaker and cooperate with other, they may have a bright soul. In short, students should be taught and encouraged to cooperate and helps others.

# data[].attributes.body
Whether the past or the present, there will always have competition in every environment, especially in school. Nowadays schoolchildren and students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates and even not encouraged to help the weaker students, in my opinion, in this situation the disadvantages do outweigh the advantages. First of all, in my point of view, the main factor that made children and students be taught like that is parents’s expectation. Parents always want their children to be good at every aspects, as well as studying. From that reason, they force their children to study harder and even tell them not to help anyone in class because they think that will make others better. This will not only put pressure on those child but also make them thinking and be more competitive in a negative way. Especially should a child go through puberty, they will be much more competitive and they would do anything just to be top of the class. If this thing lasts long, sooner or later, students will be more selfish; they will have trust issue and unwilling to help other people. Because of being taught like that, soon, we will creat a fault generation. Moreover, this will affect both their health and mental health: they will always get tired of studying and be more sensitive, in bad mood and in bad case, some of them will even commit a suicide. For those weak students, when they do not accept any help, they will be depressed and do not want to study anymore, this will also affect the society in the future. In short, competition for school is just a place where students gain knowledge and have their own experience, people should not put this issue seriously; when studying in a class, schoolchildren should help the weaker, then both good and bad students could develop their own skill.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, new methods of education are being applied in which students are taught to be competitive but not to help weaker classmates. From my perspective, I hold my belief that the benefits of this way overshadow the drawbacks. First and foremost, competitiveness increases the motivation for students to study for the better. Should students are encouraged to be competitive between classmates, they will try their best in order to rank highly in class. Under peer pressure, they will feel the needs of increasing their productivity to pass their classmates. Moreover, this method will inspired children to create the diversity of ability and skills, since they always develop and hone their skills. For example, students will think of new ways of solving a math problems or research for another formula. When doing a presentation, they will come up will new script and ways of presenting as they are being competitive with others and to get high mark. In addition, competitiveness will also be a skills for children in the future when they are working. It helps students to work hard in order to be promoted or to climb the corporate ladder. However, beside being competive, I believe that students should also assist others students instead of abandoning them. In conclusion, I consider that this way of educating outshine the advantages of cooperation and will bring motivation, encourage the diversity of skills along with being a working skills for students.

# data[].attributes.body
In today's world, a heated debated was created concerning the competitiveness among students. Personally, I am completely agree this idea for some reasons
It is undeniable that competitiveness has its own benefits. Firstly, competition among students can be a motivation for them to study in order to have better learning achievements than others. For instance, when a student get a A mark in a revision test, others would encourage themselves to have higher mark such as an A+. Secondly, the competitiveness can help students to show their character, which is a crucial factor that leads to their success. This results from the fact that children with higher competitiveness might be more potential to be a leader.
All in all, despite several disagreements, I believe that competitiveness is very beneficial to students

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with students are taught to be competitive towards their class . Since It is a healthy competition can show their personal capacity so that when students graduated from university, they can get their job easily and independence

# data[].attributes.body
The feeling of competition among pupils has surged in this modern world. This can be a positive aspect but, it is not really as they are discouraged to help those students who are not as good in their studies. From my perspective, the drawbacks of this trend outweigh the benefits. Children learn more when they collab with one another as this can help them imbibe other qualities that the less capable students might have.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates and aren’t encouraged to help the weaker students. In my point of view, I think that the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages. To begin with this problem, i think the main factor that impact on the awareness of students about the competitive towards their classmates is parents' expectation . They want to do the best thing for their children and want them to become the most excellent student in class. It will cause the opposite effect, causing the children to have negative thoughts and lead to unwanted events. As for unfair competition, it could lead to the loss of humanity and create a fault generation in the near future. Besides, the weaker will feel inferior about their own learning capacity, feel depressed and don't want to study anymore. Children are prone to be easily envious when their counterparts obtain better results and lack of co-operation with others. Additionally, the competition in the academic environment also results in the strong emphasis on study, which interferes children with extra-curriculum activities. As a consequence, children are ill-equipped knowledge about society and building relationships, which plays an integral part in their career path later. In short, I think competition for academic achievement is just a knowledge playground among students so we should not put this issue seriously

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, here is a greater sense of competition among students. Children learn more when they collaborate with one another because it allows them to imbibe attributes that less proficient students lack. Youngsters are driven by the desire to win at any costs. This could detract from a student's motivation. This leads to unhealthy competition, which is harmful to children. As a result, if these students did not perform better than their classmates, it could cause anger and harm their self-esteem. Pupils used to study in groups in the past, and both average and clever students benefited from it. This method of studying created an environment of team spirit. This cooperative quality was instilled in the students' personalities, assisting them in becoming better individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
Today, children at school are often taught to compete with each other, they are not encouraged to cooperate with each other to make up for their shortcomings. In my opinion, the cons outweigh the advantages. Firtsly, in today's fiercely competitive world, children have a feeling of winning at any cost. This can weaken a child's motivation to learn. This leads to unhealthy competition, which is not good for the little ones. Therefore, if these students do not score higher than their classmates, it can lead to resentment and damage their own self-esteem. Secondly, because students are encourage to compete eachother, they would not learn the way to do teamworks or cooperate. Everyone has strongpoints and weakpoints. Working together helps people combine everyone's strengths and weaknesses together, this is an extremely important skill in society

# data[].attributes.body
In today's society, there is a greater sense of competitiveness among students. This may appear to be a beneficial element, but it is not since they are discouraged from assisting kids who are struggling academically. The disadvantages of this tendency, in my opinion, exceed the advantages. Children learn more when they collaborate with one another because it allows them to internalize traits. youngsters are driven by the desire to win at any costs. This might detract from a student's motivation. This leads to unhealthy competitiveness. Children in a school aspired to outperform their peers rather than improve their own grades. If these students did not do better than their classmates, it might make student hate each other. Furthermore, young people prefer to remain in their own shells and are unwilling to assist their weaker peers.  Pupils used to study in groups in the past, and both average and bright students benefited from it. This approach of learning fostered a sense of belonging. This cooperative attitude was instilled in the students' personalities, assisting them in becoming better persons . However, the current tendency may have a negative influence on society as a whole and on student families in particular. To summarize, being outwardly competitive has more disadvantages than advantages. It is expected that such bad sentiments toward one another would make people more insecure and less confident in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
In my point of view, the disadvantage of this issue outweighs the advantage. First of all, of course it is good to have competition in school. A competitive environment will promote students to try their best. When we see our friends studying better than us, then we think to ourselves, "why can't we be equal?". Then we will try our best ability in learning. Should there a prize for winner, everyone will have motivation to win. Once a person feel sense of accomplishment, they will always want to have that feeling again. On the contrary, schoolchildren should collaborate with others too. When doing group activities, students can get along with each others and enhance team spirit. Moreover, when working collaboratively, the results of everyone's work are dependent on each other. So if your results are not as expected or you miss deadline, the whole cooperation process will have to stop in order to find and solve the problems. In short, in an educational environment, there should be both cooperation and competition in order to achieve the best results in learning.

# data[].attributes.body
In a school environment whether present or past , there is always a competition between students. This way has several disadvantages but in the meantime there are also many advantages. The first disadvantage that can be said is that they will feel self-conscious when they can not do as well as others. For example that when they do not study as well as other students, they will feel depressed and lead to low self-esteem. From those low self-esteem will lead to lower academic achievement and students will feel no longer interested in learning. Besides, there are also advantages things for students when they work together. They can form ideas together and give each other suggestions.  For example, there are people who are good at ideas, they will come up with ideas and the rest will work together to create results. Although they have several advantage in cooperate, working alone is also considered a good solution to compete with each other.  When everyone works alone, there will be different ideas and diversity in the way of development. Without the diversity of ideas, the classroom would not be able to consult and learn from each other. In short, they can compete but also have to work together to learn together to become better and create an effective learning environment.

# data[].attributes.body
These days, students are taught to compete with each other, which contains in itself both merits and demerits. From my point of view ,the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages. Firstly, competitiveness can easily lead to tension and anxiety, particularly if it encourages academic competition among pupils. When studying in such conditions, students can not fulfill their potentials. Secondly, if a competition does not give children a goal that is attainable by all, the activity becomes uneven, with some children leaping forward and others falling behind. Instead of honing in on learning a new skill or working as a team, the unhealthy competition is the one that focused on winning. In conclusion, I strongly agree that competitiveness in school should not be taught to students.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays schoolchildren and students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates and are not encouraged to help the weaker students. In that case, I do think that the disadvantages of this will outweigh the advantages for several reasons.
First of all, students who are taught to be competitive towards others may benefit some advantages when they grow up such as knowing how to control and monitor others in their working life. However, if students get too competitive, they will hold a thought that everyone is their enemy and they have to beat them. Those bad behaviors could lead to depression on other students who are about to be beat and even putting pressure on the one who will beat others.
Secondly, students with too much competitive feelings can be insensitive sometimes especially when seeing others struggling with their own problems. This can be really dangerous if they are not provided with the careness of teachers and adults immediately. What will happen in the future if they do not care about how others feel and only focusing on their work?
In conclusion, it is better for students to be taught with both competitive and sympathetic feelings towards others so they can develop all their ability to make changes not only to their life but also for another.

# data[].attributes.body
In the recent day, Students are taught by school and parents that they should be competitives towards their classmates and friends. Some people things it brings a lot of disadvantages, some other do not, but in my opinion, being competitive in student life brings many advantages. Firstly, Competition promotes student progress, thereby being motivated to study. At work, competition among students will encourage each of them to always put in more effort into what they are doing as they will try to force themself to achieve the best result. Last but not least, Competition between student also help them find out what they are missing. In the study environment, Competion helps schoolstudent know what they need to do or bad of so that they could beat their opponent. Even if they can not defeat others, at least they have tried and know where they are in the race to success. Competition In school is very important because it brings students essential skills for their further future.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, since schoolchildren are taught to be combative towards their classmates, they are not frequently encouraged to help the weaker students and generally speaking, the disadvantages of this situation do outweigh the advantages. Firstly, in their lives, children are often taught to be competitive so that they can be a strong-minded person who can withstand these days society. Though that certainly a big advantage, this method of educating schoolchildren may cause them to be the ignorant people. Meanwhile, teaching children to be sympathetic towards the weaker man may be a way for the children to learn how to behave in life and also a better person. Should schoolchildren be empathetic and competitive at the same time, they will be appreciated and be capable of getting along with each others more. In conclusion, teaching schoolchildren to be combative is not wrong, nevertheless, teaching children to be caring, supportive towards weaker students will make them much more perfect in lives.

# data[].attributes.body
It is obvious that competition between students in the class is a very good thing. But in my personal opinion, it also has 2 very serious problem and needs more attention.
Firstly , if students are only interested in competing with other students, it will lead to negative determinations. For example, if a student always wants his or her grades to be higher than the rest of the class but doesn't like it, the "super high determination" will make that student become annoyed, angry with himself. In some certain situation , that student's self-esteem or determination will also go down.
In addition, there is a fact that a team is often more effective than an individual. For example, if each person do different things from each others , it will have no connection. As a result, the World won't be developed.

# data[].attributes.body
Today's schoolchildren and students are educated to compete with their peers and are discouraged from assisting the weaker students. Although there are some advantages to this trend, I believe the disadvantages outweigh the positives. First, there are some advantages of competition between students. The first one is that children would devote all of their effort and time studying in order to catch up with their peers. For instance, despite spending time playing games or surfing the Internet, they will do their homework and study for the next lesson. This will help students to have high scores at school and satisfy their parent's expectation. On the other hand, the disadvantages of this tendency, in my opinion, are more severe. To begin with, encouraging people to compete with another at a early stage can have profound consequences for children. Every student should assist one another, and cooperation across classes would be the primary educational outcome. Discouraged students from assisting the weaker students would increase their rude attitude and selfish mind. In conclusion, this tendency can benefit young pupils in a variety of ways, I continue to believe that the bad consequences outweigh the benefits.

# data[].attributes.body
The the disadvantages of this style of studying at school absoulutely outweigh the advantages. Though being competitive is important, the syncronous improvement of all student in a class is better than anything nowadays. The first reason is helping others in class not only help them learn and pratice skills such as communicating or listening but also make them excited whenever they study or discuss about something. An optimistic attitude will be maintained which is good for students mental health. The second reason is that the syncronous improvement of all student in a class will make students unite, weaker students can participate in a lot of activities with others. Students will also easily learn the benefits and how to maintain a good relationship thanks to the cooperation . Generally, the cooperation is still more important because of the usefulness and the supports of others. This is better than competition which requires to work by only one self and do not gain much help to have a better result, specially students at school nowadays.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays,children tend to competitive than encourage to help the weakers students. In my view, thedrawbacks of this trend outweigh the benefits.Firstly,should you form a study group with others,you will learn many things from us.Studying together helps them learn good qualities from each other. And thereby helping them to improve themselves to the best.Secondly,working with group will helps them feel more confident.If they feel that their best friend is weak, they will have people in the group to help them without fear of not doing a good job.If they are not good at one aspect of the job, everyone in the team will do it together.Thirdly,working with group will motivate spirit of learning and working.If they feel worst than other people,they will try to be like everyone.It will be a great motivation for them to develop themselves as well as learn.To summarize,helping each other creates better relationships than competition and helps them more confident.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays schoolchildren and students are taught to be competitive towards their classmates and are not encouraged to help the weaker students. Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages?

# data[].attributes.body
In these days, it is hard to overstate the role of schooling. While some assert that learners should be taught to be competitive towards their classmates and are not encouraged to help the weakers students, others do not. From my perspective, I personally subscribe this opinion for these compelling reasons.

Growing up in a world with ever – increasing population, variety of children are taught to be compete with other from their earliest memories so as to surpass others. Firstly, competition skills are believe to be the driving force behind all the progress. Understandably, people tend to perform better when they strive to beat their opponents. For example, the United States was successful in inventing the missile in the competition with Russia. Secondly, fierce competition is inclined to help students to get better grades in order to enter pretigious university later on. This is followed by constant pressure to outshine one’s co – workers if career advancement is to be achieved. Moreover, it can be denied that competition can brings  the diversity. Should more people try to compete with other, more opinions are likely to be supported to the work.

To sum up, despite the oppositive opinions, I strongly agree that students should be taught to be compete with others as competition is one of the key factor that contribute to their academic success.